Sharvesh Deviprasath: The FIDE Master of Many Moves
Meet Sharvesh Deviprasath, a chess virtuoso who proudly carries the prestigious title of FIDE Master. If chess were a rollercoaster, Sharvesh’s rating history would be the ultimate thrill ride—rising, dipping, then soaring to dizzying heights, especially in blitz where they flirted with a staggering 2640 peak in 2025.
Sharvesh has logged thousands of games across all time controls—blitz, rapid, bullet, and even daily—proving their dedication to the 64 squares knows no bounds. Their blitz record alone reads like a novel: 338 wins, 289 losses, and 70 draws. With a longest winning streak of 17 and a current streak of 8, Sharvesh doesn’t just play chess; they hunt streaks like legends hunt trophies.
Known for a tactical awareness that would make Houdini raise an eyebrow, Sharvesh boasts a 92.97% win rate after losing a piece—talk about turning lemons into checkmates! Their comeback rate? An impressive 72.41%, confirming that they never say "checkmate" until the final move.
Early resignations happen about 11% of the time (because, hey, even masters need to save time for snacks), but with an average of 64 moves per win, they clearly prefer the long, strategic battles over quick skirmishes. Whether playing White or Black, Sharvesh holds solid win rates (48.5% and 45.63% respectively), showing versatility and resilience no matter the color they're assigned.
Opponents beware: from "ryanreynolds2001" to "kingcrusher275," Sharvesh has trounced many with perfect 100% win rates. Their most frequent rivals, like "legoninja4" and "speed-o-sonic," fuel Sharvesh’s competitive fire—though those matches sometimes hover at a modest win rate, proving even FM Sharvesh faces worthy adversaries.
Beyond the board, Sharvesh's schedule seems fueled by caffeine and midnight inspiration, with peak win rates in the wee hours—79.55% at 5 AM, anyone? Evidently, genius strikes when most are still dreaming.
In summary, Sharvesh Deviprasath is more than a chess player—they're an endgame strategist, a comeback king/queen (or just "they"), and a streak chaser with a life devoted to the eternal quest of outsmarting opponents. Watch the board, because the next move could be legendary.
Hi Sharvesh Deviprasath!
Congratulations on climbing to 2640 (2025-03-04). Your recent games show creative opening choices and sharp tactical vision. Below is some personalized, constructive feedback to help you convert even more of your promising positions into wins.
1. What you’re doing well
- Dynamic openings. Your preference for the Sicilian (both colours) and Modern setups often leads to imbalanced middlegames where you thrive.
- Calculated aggression. When you sense the initiative you push hard, e.g. the Ne5! break in your last win against therouterunner (see mini-PGN below).
- End-game technique. In the longer games you generally convert extra material smoothly once major pieces are exchanged.
- Consistency of play times. Your results barely fluctuate across the week – see .
2. Key areas to tighten up
- Opening depth vs lower-rated gambits. Two of your recent losses came from early trouble against a Smith-Morra and a French KIA structure. A 15-minute review of main-line antidotes will pay off quickly.
- Respect every opponent. Resigning after 2–3 moves versus sub-700 players costs rating and practice. Stay objective until a concrete disadvantage appears.
- King safety when the queens stay on. Several defeats feature an uncastled king and loose dark squares (…g6 + …b5 positions). Re-evaluate pawn pushes that create permanent hooks (
h3/h4,…h6/…g5) without sufficient piece cover. - Clock management. You sometimes blitz early moves, then burn under 10 seconds in critical calculations. Aim for a steadier distribution – the confirms most of your blunders occur in the final 20 % of the time budget.
3. Illustrative moments
Turning point – converting the initiative
Early collapse – accepting a Smith-Morra pawn too casually
4. Opening homework (bite-sized)
- Versus the Smith-Morra: study
…d3 – …a6 – …e6setups; keep queenside solid, return the pawn if pressured. - French KIA lines: adopt the plan …
e5, …Nge7, …0-0, then break in the centre with …d5. Avoid premature …f6. - Add one low-theory reply as Black to
1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3(e.g. {{Link|term|Queen’s Indian}} or {{Link|term|Bogo-Indian}}) to reduce improvisation time.
5. Practical training plan
- Drills: 10 daily puzzles focused on double-attack motifs (forks, discovered checks). Use themes such as {{Link|term|Zwischenzug}} and {{Link|term|Overload}}.
- Sparring games: Play two 10 + 5 games each week with the explicit aim of reaching an endgame; no fast resignations allowed.
- Review routine: Immediately after each session add one diagram of a critical position into a personal notebook with “What I missed” and “How to avoid”.
6. Motivation snapshot
You are currently ~50 points shy of your peak – completely within reach once the opening patches are in place. Stay disciplined, trust your tactical instincts, and that next jump to 2600+ will follow naturally.
Good luck, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| speed-o-sonic | 17W / 12L / 22D | View Games |
| mjwigs | 38W / 8L / 3D | View Games |
| legoninja4 | 8W / 38L / 2D | View Games |
| cooterkiller69420 | 30W / 5L / 6D | View Games |
| Chessisgym | 23W / 14L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2402 | 2650 | 2026 | |
| 2024 | 2059 | 2469 | 2058 | |
| 2023 | 2190 | 2188 | 1283 | 1675 |
| 2022 | 2258 | 1516 | 2092 | |
| 2021 | 2227 | 2123 | 2092 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 110W / 50L / 8D | 95W / 61L / 12D | 68.4 |
| 2024 | 75W / 62L / 15D | 62W / 69L / 17D | 79.3 |
| 2023 | 68W / 43L / 41D | 68W / 41L / 51D | 49.4 |
| 2022 | 26W / 11L / 9D | 12W / 15L / 12D | 23.6 |
| 2021 | 66W / 84L / 12D | 84W / 72L / 9D | 65.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 36 | 13 | 7 | 16 | 36.1% |
| Unknown | 18 | 4 | 4 | 10 | 22.2% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 25.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 44.4% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 37 | 15 | 21 | 1 | 40.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 34 | 19 | 15 | 0 | 55.9% |
| Australian Defense | 25 | 16 | 6 | 3 | 64.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 63.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Modern | 16 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 56.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 15 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 73.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 12 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 10 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 10.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 43 | 26 | 10 | 54.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 25 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 24.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 24 | 8 | 11 | 5 | 33.3% |
| Australian Defense | 20 | 9 | 10 | 1 | 45.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | 26.3% |
| Modern | 19 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 47.4% |
| French Defense | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 15 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 60.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 25 | 2 |