Profile
Ray, also known as MountainWest, is a chess player who treats the clock as a friendly opponent and the board as a playground for curious ideas. A lifelong learner with a quick sense of humor, Ray thrives on rapid-fire battles and clever tactics.
Ray’s preferred time control is Rapid, where sharp instincts and resilient nerves often decide the day. Off the board, Ray is known for thoughtful commentary and a willingness to teach or laugh about a blunder in good spirits.
Playing Style
Ray embraces a flexible, practical approach that blends tactical flair with solid fundamentals. He enjoys testing new ideas, bouncing between aggressive gambits and solid positional play, and always keeps a light heart about the inevitable twists and turns of a long game.
Openings and Repertoire
- Sicilian Defense
- Scandinavian Defense
- Amazon Attack
- Australian Defense
- French Defense
- London System variants
Highlights
Peak rapid rating and a long timeline of improvement are part of Ray's chess story.
For a quick glance at Ray's profile, see Ray. 1328 (2017-04-03)
Personal Touch
Ray loves turning hard-fought games into mini lessons and jokes, proving that a great performance can go hand-in-hand with a good laugh. If you ever doubt the power of a well-timed pawn push, Ray will remind you that chess is both a science and a joy.
What went well in your recent rapid games
Ray, you showed a willingness to play dynamic, tactical lines when the position allowed it. In at least one recent win, you opened with an aggressive approach that led to clear initiative and material opportunities. That kind of willingness to complicate the position can create winning chances against opponents who are less comfortable with sharp play.
Your longer run in the rating history suggests you have improved over several months, indicating a solid foundation you can build on. You can carry that momentum by combining your sharp instincts with consistent practice and better clock management in rapid games.
- You handle open, tactical positions well when you find active piece play and direct tactics.
- You can switch between sharper lines and solid structures, which helps you adapt to different opponents and styles.
- You demonstrate resilience in complex middlegame transitions, which is valuable as games get longer or more complicated.
Key areas to improve
Rapid games reward smooth, precise decisions and good time management. A few recurring themes in your recent results are worth tightening up:
- Time management under pressure: a few late moves feel rushed. Develop a simple two-stage approach for most games: (1) get a sensible plan by move 15, (2) rotate to a concrete endgame plan if the position simplifies.
- Over-ambitious lines too early: sharp openings win when played well but can backfire if you’re not precise. Consider pairing your aggressive repertoire with a few solid, reliable options to reach playable middlegames more consistently.
- Endgame readiness: practice a small set of endgames (for example, rook endings and king-pawn endings) so you can convert small advantages and push hard when the opponent stumbles.
- Pattern recognition and calculation depth: in the first 12–15 moves, train to spot 2–3 tactical motifs (such as forks, pin-and-win ideas, and back-rank threats) and verify them quickly before committing to a line.
Openings to consider and plan
Your openings show a mix of aggressive and solid choices. For rapid games, having a dependable, somewhat quieter path can reduce mistakes and help you outplay opponents in the middlegame. Consider integrating these lines and reviewing their main ideas:
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation – a solid setup that often leads to clear, controllable middlegames. London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation
- Philidor Defense – a reliable structure that can help you neutralize early pressure and reach good endgames. Philidor Defense
- Scandinavian Defense – offers active piece play and straightforward plans, which can be easier to manage under time pressure. Scandinavian Defense
- Balance sharp lines with steady choices: rotate between a few aggressive options and safer, well-understood setups to keep your opponent guessing without risking too much on the clock.
Practice plan and next steps
To translate these insights into faster improvement, try the following focused plan. It’s designed to suit rapid games and build steady progress over the next couple of weeks:
- Daily tactical warm-up: 15–20 minutes focusing on 2–3 motifs (for example, forks and pins) with quick pattern recognition. Solve 15 puzzles per session and review missed ideas briefly.
- Two-week opening plan: pick 1 White system (for example, London System) and 1 Black system (for example, Philidor or Scandinavian) and practice them in short sessions, aiming to reach a solid middlegame by move 15 in most games.
- Time management routine: after the first 15 moves, compare your remaining time to a target (for example, keep at least 8–10 minutes left). Use a 5-second thinking aid to avoid rushing critical moves when the clock tightens.
- Endgame focus: dedicate 10 minutes after each session to rook endings or king-pawn endings so you can convert advantages or save drawn positions more reliably.
- Post-game reflection: review your last 5 rapid games within 24 hours. Write down one idea that worked and one mistake to avoid next time. Keep notes simple and free of engine lines to internalize learning.
- Track progress with intention: set a small weekly goal (e.g., +6 to +12 rating points over the next two weeks) and adjust your plan if you see recurring patterns in losses or time trouble.
Notes on your recent rating trends
Short-term changes show some fluctuation, with a recent month of lower performance. Over the past few months you have made solid gains, which suggests you have a strong foundation and the potential to push your rating higher with targeted practice. Use the upcoming weeks to lock in steady planning, reduce risky early moves, and convert more middlegame advantages into clean wins.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| al3n001 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| 99franke | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| djbashby | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nevinnnz | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| pasteldelimo | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| tawsiftas | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| stkshubham | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| beefoid | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| megaha0le | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| cuadradoguerrero | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mechantmonsieur | 65W / 41L / 0D | View Games |
| rightframer | 49W / 49L / 1D | View Games |
| johnmcveigh | 8W / 34L / 2D | View Games |
| webstar137 | 4W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| hermie42 | 1W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 100 | 253 | 724 | 1139 |
| 2024 | 100 | 126 | 712 | 1169 |
| 2023 | 100 | 244 | 717 | 1252 |
| 2022 | 287 | 261 | 890 | 1183 |
| 2021 | 225 | 886 | 1210 | |
| 2020 | 263 | 527 | 1135 | 1240 |
| 2019 | 178 | 718 | 1130 | 1325 |
| 2018 | 206 | 640 | 1100 | 1319 |
| 2017 | 129 | 733 | 1104 | 1437 |
| 2016 | 302 | 678 | 1172 | 1406 |
| 2015 | 620 | 736 | 1497 | |
| 2014 | 676 | 886 | 1399 | |
| 2010 | 1046 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 291W / 308L / 11D | 299W / 307L / 11D | 39.3 |
| 2024 | 597W / 605L / 20D | 521W / 680L / 17D | 38.7 |
| 2023 | 487W / 616L / 10D | 485W / 653L / 11D | 36.9 |
| 2022 | 163W / 149L / 3D | 138W / 164L / 3D | 47.1 |
| 2021 | 258W / 316L / 5D | 253W / 323L / 8D | 40.2 |
| 2020 | 368W / 438L / 8D | 361W / 442L / 13D | 42.1 |
| 2019 | 300W / 337L / 11D | 291W / 352L / 11D | 41.9 |
| 2018 | 394W / 421L / 15D | 331W / 494L / 15D | 43.2 |
| 2017 | 156W / 144L / 4D | 141W / 162L / 2D | 47.0 |
| 2016 | 88W / 81L / 1D | 72W / 101L / 1D | 47.6 |
| 2015 | 94W / 80L / 4D | 81W / 91L / 4D | 50.3 |
| 2014 | 2W / 4L / 0D | 0W / 6L / 0D | 56.2 |
| 2010 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 67.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 1145 | 515 | 622 | 8 | 45.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 729 | 324 | 396 | 9 | 44.4% |
| Australian Defense | 680 | 347 | 325 | 8 | 51.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 659 | 300 | 358 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Czech Defense | 647 | 298 | 342 | 7 | 46.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 634 | 274 | 349 | 11 | 43.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 632 | 330 | 299 | 3 | 52.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 591 | 299 | 285 | 7 | 50.6% |
| French Defense | 497 | 227 | 263 | 7 | 45.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 280 | 137 | 141 | 2 | 48.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 58 | 35 | 22 | 1 | 60.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 50 | 25 | 23 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 42 | 19 | 22 | 1 | 45.2% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 23 | 12 | 10 | 1 | 52.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 22 | 8 | 13 | 1 | 36.4% |
| Czech Defense | 20 | 9 | 11 | 0 | 45.0% |
| KGA: Fischer, 4.Bc4 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 0 | 36.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 14 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 65 | 27 | 36 | 2 | 41.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 53 | 27 | 26 | 0 | 50.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 46 | 22 | 19 | 5 | 47.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 33 | 11 | 20 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Czech Defense | 33 | 10 | 20 | 3 | 30.3% |
| Australian Defense | 28 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 26 | 11 | 12 | 3 | 42.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 23 | 10 | 13 | 0 | 43.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 52.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 18 | 4 | 12 | 2 | 22.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 64 | 18 | 46 | 0 | 28.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 56 | 15 | 41 | 0 | 26.8% |
| Czech Defense | 48 | 10 | 38 | 0 | 20.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 43 | 10 | 32 | 1 | 23.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 37 | 14 | 23 | 0 | 37.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 31 | 8 | 23 | 0 | 25.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 28 | 9 | 19 | 0 | 32.1% |
| French Defense | 25 | 6 | 19 | 0 | 24.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 23 | 9 | 14 | 0 | 39.1% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 18 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 5.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 2 |