Gabriel Lesueur - FIDE Master Extraordinaire
Meet Gabriel Lesueur, the chess player who has proudly earned the coveted title of FIDE Master. Whether you call them Gabriel or by their mysterious username acordeonist, one thing's clear: this is a player who doesn't just play chess, but *lives* it – sometimes at lightning-fast blitz speeds!
Blitz Battles and Rollercoaster Ratings
Gabriel’s blitz rating journey looks like a thrilling chess game itself, with a peak performance rating soaring up to 2453 in March 2025 – a number that hints at some seriously sharp moves and cunning tactics. Although their rating has danced between highs and lows (going from 2453 down to ~1600 over a surprising few months), it’s clear Gabriel doesn't shy away from the heat of the battle. Even when the chips are down, their comeback rate is an impressive 88% – because quitting early is not in their playbook (early resignation rate only around 3.45%).
Playing Style: The Long Games and the Brave Endgames
If you're into chess marathons, Gabriel is your person. With an average of 81 moves per win, this player shows true stamina and a deep love for the endgame, appearing in nearly 70% of their matches. Whether wearing the white or black pieces, their winning chances remain almost evenly matched (~44% wins each side), proving versatility and resilience.
Psychological Edge and Timing
Gabriel shines brightest at 6 PM, boasting a perfect 100% win rate at this magic hour – proof that some players really do have their "prime time." Weekdays like Tuesday and Friday bring out their best, with win rates nudging 50% or more. But beware opponents, especially handsoffhans – Gabriel holds a perfect winning record against them! Conversely, some rivals like cmunda and miaou33 have managed to spoil the party (0% win rate in those matchups).
Tournament Tales & Tactical Triumphs
With 56 recorded blitz games in the mysterious "Top Secret" opening series, Gabriel has carved out an identity that’s as enigmatic as their username. Their victory record is respectable, hovering at 44.64%, and one can't help but admire their knack for winning on time and by resignation – 11 wins by timeout and 7 by resignation show savvy time management and psychological pressure aplenty.
The Recent Chronicles
A recent triumph came in Chess960, where Gabriel outmaneuvered "handsoffhans" with a nifty endgame and won on time after a tense, calculated skirmish: a classic example of their endurance and sharp clock sense. Not every day is perfect, though — losses to players like cmunda and miaou33 remind us that even FIDE Masters have their human moments.
In Summary
In the unpredictable world of chess, Gabriel Lesueur is a fighter, a strategist, and a committed tactician who proves time and again that grit sometimes outweighs raw rating points. Whether clawing their way back after a tough loss or dazzling spectators with their endgame wizardry, Gabriel's chess journey remains a compelling story written one move at a time.
Keep an eye on "acordeonist": the accordion of the chessboard keeps playing!
Executive feedback for Gabriel Lesueur
You have shown clear courage in blitz, especially when your initiative lines up with active piece play. Your ability to spot tactical chances and convert them into decisive moments is a real strength. Going forward, you can translate that aggression into more consistent results by strengthening planning, calculation discipline, and endgame conversion.
What you do well
- You respond well to dynamic, forcing positions and look for concrete finishers when your pieces coordinate toward the opponent’s king.
- You are comfortable using aggressive openings (for example Amar Gambit and Nimzo-Larsen style lines) to seize the initiative and unbalance opponents in blitz.
- You manage complex middlegame tactics when your opponent makes inaccuracies, and you often press when you gain a real lead in activity.
Key improvement areas
- Balance aggression with solid development. In blitz, it’s easy to overcommit to attacking lines that leave your king exposed or your pieces uncoordinated. Before diving into sharp lines, confirm your king safety and ensure you have enough pieces in play to support the attack.
- Sharpen calculation in the middlegame. When you start a forcing sequence, quickly check for counterplay and potential resource losses for your own king. If there are multiple tactical branches, pick the most promising one and avoid chasing speculative lines.
- Endgame conversion. In blitz, many games swing on precise endings. Practice simplifying when you are clearly better and convert material advantages with clear plan steps (activate rooks, activate the king, and reduce opponents’ counterplay).
- Time management under pressure. Allocate time so you have at least a few seconds on critical moves in the final phase and avoid spending too long on any single idea that may not yield a clear advantage.
Opening performance snapshot (blitz context)
Your aggressive repertoires tend to produce advantages, but they can also invite sharp defenses. The Amar Gambit and Nimzo-Larsen lines give you chances to seize the initiative, while more straightforward setups like the English/other flexible defenses can reduce risk in tight time controls. Aim to maintain your practical edge by preparing a reliable, quieter alternative against the most common defenses you face, so you’re not left with only high-risk options when the position softens.
Drills and study plan
- Daily tactical puzzles (about 15 minutes) focusing on mating nets and quick decisive sequences, to reinforce your ability to finish when the opponent is under pressure.
- Two-repertoire opening work: pick one aggressive line (your preferred Amar Gambit or Nimzo-Larsen variant) and one solid, more positional response as a safety net. Review common replies and plan one or two follow-up ideas for each.
- Endgame practice: study rook endings and minor piece endings, with specific goals to activate the king and coordinate the rooks efficiently.
- Post-game review routine: after each blitz session, pick two moments from each game—one where you were strong, one where you could have improved—and write a short note on the alternative plan you could have followed.
Next steps
Focus on translating your sharp tactical sense into more consistent results by strengthening planning in the early middlegame, validating calculations with quick checks for counterplay, and routinely practicing endgames. A simple habit to adopt is to pause after a forcing sequence to ask: “What if my opponent finds the best defense?” If you answer that, you’ll reduce risky overextensions and improve overall blitz results.
Bonus: quick practice prompts
Try these brief drills between sessions:
- Spot a forcing sequence that leads to a tangible material edge within three moves in each position.
- Play two games where you deliberately avoid major pawn storms and instead prioritize king safety and solid development for a balanced middlegame.
Profile and study links (optional)
For quick access to your recent activity, you can view your profile here: gabriel_lesueur
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Andrei Shishkov | 1W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
| Jyotshnav Talukdar | 2W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| Alena Nikulina | 2W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| Carlos Roberto Ibarra | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
| Teimur Toktomushev | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2438 | 2474 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 42W / 40L / 2D | 37W / 50L / 3D | 78.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 69.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 3 | 7 | 1 | 27.3% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Döry Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| King's Indian Attack: French Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 5 | 0 |
| Losing | 5 | 5 |