Scott A. Roods - National Master Extraordinaire
Scott A. Roods has proudly earned the prestigious title of National Master, a testament to their deep passion and relentless dedication to the ancient art of chess. Known in the chess circles for their impressive tactical awareness and a comeback rate around 80%, Scott truly has the resilience of a grandmaster disguised as a mortal.
A Journey Through Ratings and Time
Starting modestly in 2009 with a Daily rating of 1804 and a Blitz rating of 1518, Scott’s chess prowess has soared over the years. Highlights include a peak Rapid rating of 2515 in 2020 and consistent performance hovering above 2000 across multiple formats into 2025.
Whether it’s the rapid blitz battles or the deep daily strategy sessions, Scott maintains a solid winning record, boasting a nearly 61% win rate with White and an equally fierce 56.8% with Black.
Playing Style & Psychological Mastery
Scott’s style is as sturdy as a castle: tough to break down with an endgame frequency of 71.5%, and long games averaging about 69 moves whether in victory or defeat. With a mere 1.7% early resignation rate, they believe every piece deserves a fighting chance—a philosophy not everyone shares but clearly, it works.
And speaking of fighting spirit, Scott’s win rate after losing a piece is a perfect 100%—the kind of comeback magic that makes chess enthusiasts cheer and opponents second-guess their every move.
Winning Streaks and Rivalries
Scott has dazzled with a longest winning streak of 48 games—an epic stretch where the phrase “momentum is king” truly applies. Though currently enjoying a well-earned pause from consecutive wins, their recent opponent record is a mixed bag featuring both clean sweeps and mysterious losses against some tricky foes like yasiny04 and imxxerror.
The Hours of Power
Want to catch Scott at their best? Look no further than the early morning hours or late evening chess battles. With peak win rates hitting 70% around 9 AM and strong performances even before sunrise, it’s clear Scott is either an early bird or a night owl—or maybe a vampire knight lurking on the chessboard.
Fun Facts
- Scott’s most played opponent is choose_your_weapon with 141 games and a near-perfect 100% win rate. Choose wisely when challenging Scott!
- Despite a competitive edge, Scott keeps a tilt factor of 13—meaning losing is upsetting, but not catastrophic. After all, even masters have human moments.
- One-sided losses? Practically non-existent at just 3.2%, proving Scott makes sure every defeat is a learning experience (or a revenge-worthy blunder by the opponent).
In short, Scott A. Roods is not just a chess player but a chess warrior with a sword forged in the fires of countless battles, wielding strategy, endurance, and wit to conquer the 64 squares. A player to watch, to learn from, and to miss at your own peril!
Overall Performance Summary
Scott, you have a current strength adjusted win rate of approximately 55%. Your rating has shown a very steady but modest increase of 1 point over the past 1, 3, and 6 months, with a positive rating trend slope across multiple time frames, indicating consistent improvement over time.
Strengths
- You maintain steady progress, reflected by your positive rating trend slopes at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
- You demonstrate a solid understanding of various openings and have secured some strong wins, including effective utilization of the Old Indian Defense and Caro-Kann Defense.
- Your ability to capitalize on opponent mistakes — such as seizing opportunities to capture material or create threats early in the game — has contributed significantly to your wins.
- In the bullet pace of these games, your moves display confident play and good board awareness under time pressure.
Areas to Improve
- Time management: Some of your recent losses ended with time pressure issues, as seen in games where opponents won on time. Improving time allocation per move could help avoid such losses.
- Handling complex middle games: In a few losses, your position became challenging after exchanges in the middle game. Working on calculation skills and evaluating positions in tactical or congested positions can help.
- Opening repertoire depth: While you use a range of openings like the Caro-Kann and Old Indian Defense, studying deeper lines and typical plans within your preferred openings could give you a sharper edge.
- Endgame technique: Some games suggest potential to strengthen endgame conversion skills, especially in close or balanced positions where small inaccuracies made a difference.
Recommended Focus Areas
- Practice slow games occasionally to deepen strategic understanding without the clock pressure.
- Analyze your losses in detail to identify recurring tactical oversights or strategic errors.
- Drill key endgame fundamentals (e.g., king and pawn endings, rook endings) to improve confidence in converting advantages.
- Explore time management techniques so you maintain enough time for critical moves in bullet games.
- Consider targeted study of the Old Indian Defense and Caro-Kann Defense structures you frequently play.
Sample Insight from Recent Games
In one recent winning game as Black against crane5907, you successfully used the Old Indian Defense to establish a strong position. Your timely aggression by advancing central pawns and activating pieces created opportunities to win material and eventually force a resignation.
In contrast, some losses show difficulty in managing pressure during the middlegame, especially when challenging pawn breaks occur. Focus on improving calculation and positional evaluation in these phases could enhance results.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pushpender12 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| fafo32 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| techniq | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| the_bomber_man | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| malfaid | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| star_wars39 | 102W / 3L / 0D | View |
| gemelos02 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| nilo75 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| vietnamgirl90 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| liyas_nd | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| choose_your_weapon | 141W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| dwchessmaster16 | 110W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| star_wars39 | 102W / 3L / 0D | View Games |
| whitieapple | 56W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| chessmasterchrisa | 38W / 13L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2013 | 1884 | ||
| 2024 | 2129 | 1899 | ||
| 2023 | 1951 | 2077 | 1926 | |
| 2022 | 2044 | 1904 | ||
| 2021 | 2061 | 2027 | 1847 | |
| 2020 | 2061 | 2089 | 2010 | |
| 2019 | 1698 | 1957 | 1995 | |
| 2018 | 1977 | |||
| 2017 | 2006 | |||
| 2016 | 1631 | |||
| 2015 | 2401 | 1927 | ||
| 2014 | 2196 | |||
| 2013 | 1697 | 2003 | 1901 | 2347 |
| 2012 | 1700 | 1436 | 2008 | |
| 2011 | 1864 | 1367 | 2049 | |
| 2010 | 1200 | 1815 | 2146 | |
| 2009 | 1518 | 1804 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 162W / 122L / 32D | 139W / 131L / 30D | 78.2 |
| 2024 | 193W / 120L / 36D | 183W / 132L / 31D | 72.8 |
| 2023 | 262W / 178L / 43D | 254W / 188L / 37D | 74.3 |
| 2022 | 208W / 112L / 22D | 185W / 129L / 28D | 73.6 |
| 2021 | 246W / 100L / 31D | 230W / 120L / 32D | 68.1 |
| 2020 | 227W / 117L / 27D | 216W / 116L / 35D | 68.1 |
| 2019 | 85W / 27L / 12D | 92W / 26L / 12D | 62.5 |
| 2018 | 61W / 11L / 7D | 55W / 15L / 8D | 65.2 |
| 2017 | 27W / 10L / 3D | 25W / 12L / 6D | 60.5 |
| 2016 | 43W / 13L / 5D | 34W / 13L / 7D | 62.3 |
| 2015 | 30W / 10L / 0D | 30W / 10L / 5D | 59.4 |
| 2014 | 50W / 8L / 17D | 58W / 14L / 12D | 57.3 |
| 2013 | 356W / 135L / 50D | 328W / 180L / 34D | 70.1 |
| 2012 | 268W / 147L / 26D | 259W / 172L / 20D | 72.6 |
| 2011 | 311W / 152L / 27D | 290W / 174L / 34D | 75.2 |
| 2010 | 205W / 149L / 22D | 169W / 182L / 19D | 72.1 |
| 2009 | 77W / 26L / 18D | 57W / 34L / 14D | 74.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 202 | 154 | 22 | 26 | 76.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 106 | 86 | 13 | 7 | 81.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 86 | 58 | 21 | 7 | 67.4% |
| French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation | 77 | 58 | 17 | 2 | 75.3% |
| Unknown | 75 | 72 | 3 | 0 | 96.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 56 | 37 | 15 | 4 | 66.1% |
| Unknown Opening* | 55 | 45 | 5 | 5 | 81.8% |
| Australian Defense | 55 | 50 | 2 | 3 | 90.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 54 | 31 | 15 | 8 | 57.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 50 | 29 | 11 | 10 | 58.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 206 | 113 | 85 | 8 | 54.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 204 | 113 | 82 | 9 | 55.4% |
| Australian Defense | 121 | 68 | 46 | 7 | 56.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 106 | 67 | 34 | 5 | 63.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 96 | 56 | 33 | 7 | 58.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 88 | 50 | 34 | 4 | 56.8% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 87 | 44 | 39 | 4 | 50.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 85 | 51 | 27 | 7 | 60.0% |
| Slav Defense | 82 | 43 | 35 | 4 | 52.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 79 | 47 | 30 | 2 | 59.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 419 | 207 | 176 | 36 | 49.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 176 | 78 | 88 | 10 | 44.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Karpov Variation | 154 | 76 | 54 | 24 | 49.4% |
| Australian Defense | 91 | 50 | 37 | 4 | 55.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Exchange Variation | 68 | 28 | 29 | 11 | 41.2% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 66 | 33 | 27 | 6 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 64 | 27 | 31 | 6 | 42.2% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 61 | 35 | 24 | 2 | 57.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 61 | 31 | 28 | 2 | 50.8% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 56 | 30 | 19 | 7 | 53.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Old Indian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern Defense: Averbakh System | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 48 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |