Adam Weissbarth: A Chess Biography
Adam Weissbarth embarked on his chess journey with a modest rating of 1051 in 2008, steadily evolving into a formidable competitor who eventually reached a peak rating of 2249. Over the course of numerous online matches, Adam has amassed an impressive win rate of over 68% in daily games, recording 56 victories, 13 defeats, and 13 draws.
An outstanding highlight of Adam’s career is his longest winning streak of 16 consecutive games—a testament to his tactical insight and resilience. He excels in endgame scenarios, which occur in over 70% of his matches, and typically requires around 58 moves to secure a win. Notably, he has nearly identical skill at both sides of the board: his win rate with White stands at 65.91%, while with Black it climbs to 71.05%.
Adam’s play style combines patience and gritty determination, illustrated by a high comeback rate of 71.43% and a perfect record when recovering from early material deficits. His flexibility allows him to adapt to both short, swifter matches and drawn-out battles, as his average loss occurs after nearly 69 moves. His ability to maintain focus under pressure is further demonstrated by his relatively low tilt factor.
Time of day also impacts Adam’s performance. He excels most when playing in the early morning hours, capitalizing on a fresh mind and clear concentration. Yet no matter the schedule or the pressure, Adam’s games consistently display creative tactics and strong finishing power. With a remarkable winning percentage in rated games, Adam continues to challenge high-level rivals while refining his craft.
Constructive Feedback for Adam Weissbarth
Your long-term daily results (peaking at 2301 (2009-09-20)) and the quality of your wins against 2000+ opposition show a well-rounded, resilient player. Below you will find a concise review of your recent games, strengths to keep nurturing, and specific, actionable points that can help you move from “very strong” to “master-level” consistency.
Key Strengths
- Opening versatility: You comfortably switch between the Ruy Lopez Exchange (as in the win versus almolo) and sharper lines such as the Scandinavian & Alekhine. Your familiarity with multiple structures already gives you a practical edge.
- Endgame patience: In your latest victory over johntiessen you converted an extra pawn despite heavy-piece complications until move 68. That speaks to good technique and tenacity.
- Pressure management: Five of your last six wins came from positions where you kept the initiative until the opponent’s clock or position collapsed. You rarely panic when the evaluation swings slightly against you.
Areas for Improvement
- Pawn-structure awareness under tension
Both recent losses against Kostas K. and Brian M. feature early …c5/e5 breaks that left weak backward pawns you could not repair. Try adding a quick “pawn-structure scan” to your candidate-move routine: ask “If I push this pawn, will it become a target next turn?” - Defensive resource spotting
In the Sicilian Canal loss you underestimated Black’s …Nc2! fork idea. Regular calculation drills with forced move puzzles (especially forks and zwischenzug motifs) will harden your defensive radar. - King safety versus activity balance
You often castle late (e.g. Alekhine Four-Pawns loss). While modern chess allows flexible king placement, delaying castling without a concrete reason invites tactics. A simple rule: if the centre is locked you may postpone castling; if the centre is open or opening, evacuate your king within 10 moves. - Converting large advantages faster
Some won positions took 60+ moves although a cleaner technical path existed. Study converting techniques such as “two weaknesses”, opposition & triangulation, and liquidation into winning pawn endings.
Opening Snapshot
| As White | 1.e4 remains your mainstay. Consider deepening your Ruy Lopez lines beyond the Exchange to avoid predictable preparation. |
|---|---|
| As Black | You answer 1.e4 with the Sicilian and Alekhine, both sound choices. Against 1.d4 the English/Alekhine setups you employ look solid, but you could add a classical Queen’s Gambit or Nimzo to diversify. |
Critical Moment Example
From the loss vs Kostas K. – a single missed tactic turned an equal game into material deficit. Replay the short fragment and visualise the resources for both sides:
Personalised Training Plan (Next 4–6 weeks)
- 20-minute daily tactics sprint
Focus on intermediate moves, defensive ideas, and “refutation calculation” (proving an opponent’s threat is harmless). - Weekly model-game study
• Ruy Lopez: Karpov–Unzicker 1974
• Alekhine: Vachier-Lagrave–Anand 2019
Play through them, guess moves, and annotate your thoughts. - Endgame workout
Solve 10 rook-and-pawn endgames from Averbakh’s manual or a modern equivalent each week. Aim to “win vs. tablebase” within ±0.20 accuracy. - Self-review discipline
After every game, spend 15 minutes marking three good decisions and three avoidable mistakes. Store them in a private journal—patterns will emerge quickly.
Final Thoughts
You already possess master-candidate strengths in opening understanding and endgame resilience. By tightening defensive calculation and structural awareness you can realistically push another 100–150 Elo. Keep the curiosity alive, review your games honestly, and feel free to reach out for deeper opening files or sparring positions tailored to your repertoire.
Good luck, and enjoy the journey!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| brianmathes | 0W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| Giorgos Kanellopoulos | 2W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| Jorge Zanelli | 1W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| kostaskoutsogiannopo | 0W / 1L / 1D | View Games |
| yurynunez | 1W / 1L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 2282 | |||
| 2008 | 1051 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 29W / 9L / 6D | 26W / 4L / 7D | 66.2 |
| 2008 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 70.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation, Alapin Gambit | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Alekhine Defense: Modern Variation, Alekhine Variation | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 20.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| French Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 3 | 0 |