Chuong Pham (afterbite) - International Master
Meet Chuong Pham, a chess warrior known on the digital battlefields as afterbite. An International Master recognized by FIDE, Chuong has been making tactical waves in the chess community with a blend of strategic prowess and an uncanny knack for comebacks. His chess journey is nothing short of enthralling, peppered with impressive streaks, thrilling victories, and the occasional humbling defeat—because even the sharpest kings stumble now and then!
Career Highlights & Style
Chuong’s chess rating might look like a rollercoaster on paper, but don’t let that fool you. With a peak blitz rating soaring up to 2632 and a bullet peak of 2323, he’s a force to be reckoned with, especially in faster time controls. Known for an aggressive approach, Chuong’s longest winning streak of 25 games leaves opponents wondering if they've just walked into a chess hurricane.
His average game length suggests he’s not one to rush pawns prematurely; instead, he crafts his victories thoughtfully with solid endgames in nearly 70% of his winning battles. Quick to resign sometimes (14.2% early resignations), he’s pragmatic—no sense throwing away time when the position screams defeat! But when the chips are down, expect a spectacle: with a comeback rate close to 70%, Chuong thrives under pressure, snatching wins even after losing important pieces.
Opening Secrets
Of course, every master has a bag of tricks, and Chuong is no exception. He’s fond of his "Top Secret" openings—cloak and dagger moves that have netted him nearly 60% wins in over 700 blitz games alone! Opponents beware: his knowledge isn’t just book-smart, it’s battle-tested with an ironclad 67% win rate in bullet chess when deploying those surprise weapons.
Psychology & Quirks
Time of day matters for this maestro: Chuong’s best performances light up after midnight, boasting a perfect 100% win rate at 11 PM hours (a chess vampire?). But heads-up, noon and afternoon games see him flex his chess muscles too, with over 65% success rates at prime hours like 2 PM and 3 PM.
He does have a tilt factor of 6, which means he might toss a small fit (internally) after a rough move or two, but it’s all part of the charm. Plus, Chuong wins more often when playing with the white pieces, outpacing his black games with a solid 60% win rate versus 56% —so always respect the first move advantage here.
Recent Memorable Battles
In a recent spectacle on November 19, 2023, Chuong, playing as Black, checked mate his opponent BaoMinh2401 in a masterful endgame following a Mieses Opening. Another clash against TinTin317 showcased his resilience, where he secured a win by resignation after a Sicilian Defense dance. But remember, even the best stumble—his recent loss also came against the nimble BaoMinh2401, proving that in the kingdom of chess, every encounter is a battle of wits and nerves.
Opponent Relations and Stats
Who does Chuong face most? Frequent foes include edmond_is_me, vadimz, and saphuongbang. Against many, he boasts near-perfect win rates, but as with any hero’s journey, there are opponents who occasionally slip by unscathed. He’s got the heart of a champion and the humility of a true competitor, always eager to learn from each game.
Summary
Chuong Pham is not just a name or a username; he’s a saga of determination, skill, and a dash of midnight magic on the chessboard. If you ever face afterbite in a blitz or rapid match, prepare for a journey through brilliant tactics, endgame mastery, and a subtle psychological battle that turns pawns into legends.
Fun fact: With a tilt factor of 6 and a comeback rate of nearly 70%, Chuong proves it’s never over until the chess clock runs out. So keep calm and play on — or else you might just get afterbitten!
Feedback on your recent bullet play
You’re playing at a fast pace where quick decisions matter as much as accuracy. From the data you shared, you’re comfortable with several solid openings and you’ve shown moments of sharp tactical intent. The next step is to sharpen decision quality in the critical minutes of a bullet game and to convert advantages into clean wins more reliably.
What you did well
- Opening familiarity: You perform well with Colle System structures (Rhamphorhynchus Variation) and show solid results in other steady setups. This indicates you have a reliable framework to fall back on when time is short.
- Consistency under pressure: Your opening choices tend to lead to solid middlegame positions, which helps you keep the game manageable even as the clock runs down.
- Resourcefulness in complex positions: When the position gets tactical, you’re capable of finding concrete plans and active moves that keep initiative on your side.
Areas to improve
- Time management and pacing: In bullet, every second counts. Build a simple pre-move plan for the first 6–8 moves and practice sticking to it, so you have more time to evaluate critical moments later in the game.
- Decision hygiene in the middlegame: Aim to slow down just enough to check for forcing moves, captures, and threats before committing. A quick 10–15 second scan after completing a tactical sequence can prevent oversights.
- Endgame readiness: Many bullets head into simplified endings quickly. Strengthen rook endings and basic king–pawn endgames so you can convert small advantages into wins or hold tough positions when material is equal.
- Broadened opening repertoire: Your Colle System performance is strong, but opponents will test you with sidelines. Prepare 1–2 generic responses to common deviations so you don’t get caught in an unfamiliar structure with little time to react.
Opening performance snapshot and practical plan
Your openings data show strong results in the Colle System line and solid results with several other solid defenses. Practical plan for the next weeks:
- Deepen Colle System knowledge: memorize 2–3 clear middlegame plans from the Rhamphorhynchus variation, including typical pawn breaks and where to place the light-squared bishop.
- Study a couple of flexible responses: pick 1–2 standard deviations from your main openings and learn the typical middlegame ideas so you’re not surprised by common refusals or transpositions.
- Pattern practice: do short tactical drills focused on common bullet motifs (checks, forcing moves, and simple rook/queen activity) to improve accuracy under time pressure.
How the stats context helps your improvement
The strength-adjusted win rate sits around the middle of the pack, which means there’s upside with targeted practice. Your rating trend shows positive momentum over recent periods, which is a good sign. Focus on boosting the quality of decisions in the critical moments (the late middlegame and endgame) while keeping your speed in check.
Two-week actionable plan
- Days 1–3: Master Colle System lines you already use. Review 3 recent wins or near-wins to extract the key middlegame plans and common tactical ideas you relied on.
- Days 4–6: Tactics focus. Solve 15–20 short tactical puzzles daily that emphasize checks, captures, and forcing moves in the Colle/Czech-leaning structures.
- Days 7–9: Time-management drills. Play 10-minute rapid games focusing on finishing the first 15 moves with a clear plan; then take 2 minutes to review the critical decision points.
- Days 10–12: Endgame basics. Practice rook endings and king activity patterns so you can convert small advantages or salvage draws when needed.
- Days 13–14: Personal game review. Annotate two of your games, identify the top 2 missed opportunities and the top 2 best decisions, and write down concrete improvements for next time.
Optional notes
If you’d like, I can turn a few of your recent games into annotated mini-Pgns with brief notes highlighting the key turning points and the moments that could be improved. This can help you internalize the plan for your next sessions.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| advancedrook | 2W / 9L / 0D | |
| Marat Denishev | 11W / 22L / 0D | |
| Rui Gen Teh | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| LordofSanDiego | 1W / 4L / 0D | |
| Nicolas De La Colina | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| SoupSailor | 1W / 19L / 1D | |
| huapun | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| silent_attack1 | 47W / 2L / 0D | |
| flamefire2013 | 72W / 3L / 0D | |
| sadness_of_chess | 33W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| volcano_angry | 161W / 3L / 0D | |
| Pham Nam Quan | 74W / 43L / 6D | |
| threatingofchess | 108W / 4L / 3D | |
| darkness_of_chesss | 111W / 3L / 0D | |
| cockroachgirly | 43W / 55L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2843 | 2565 | 2334 | |
| 2023 | 2607 | |||
| 2022 | 2607 | 2342 | ||
| 2021 | 2323 | 2607 | 2340 | |
| 2020 | 2450 | 2070 | ||
| 2019 | 2110 | 2427 | ||
| 2018 | 2099 | |||
| 2017 | 1795 | 1940 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1027W / 841L / 74D | 973W / 886L / 75D | 69.1 |
| 2023 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 38.0 |
| 2022 | 3W / 4L / 7D | 8W / 10L / 10D | 73.1 |
| 2021 | 110W / 79L / 15D | 112W / 66L / 29D | 80.9 |
| 2020 | 35W / 23L / 2D | 32W / 22L / 6D | 79.5 |
| 2019 | 58W / 15L / 7D | 53W / 26L / 3D | 79.3 |
| 2018 | 50W / 21L / 0D | 48W / 22L / 0D | 0.0 |
| 2017 | 25W / 14L / 0D | 17W / 21L / 0D | 59.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 381 | 212 | 158 | 11 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 237 | 132 | 101 | 4 | 55.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 199 | 112 | 84 | 3 | 56.3% |
| King's Indian Attack | 155 | 92 | 59 | 4 | 59.4% |
| Australian Defense | 133 | 64 | 65 | 4 | 48.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 109 | 38 | 66 | 5 | 34.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 107 | 45 | 58 | 4 | 42.1% |
| Czech Defense | 104 | 52 | 47 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 103 | 73 | 26 | 4 | 70.9% |
| French Defense | 100 | 55 | 44 | 1 | 55.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 142 | 99 | 43 | 0 | 69.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 28 | 12 | 15 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 21 | 10 | 9 | 2 | 47.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 20 | 12 | 7 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 12 | 4 | 1 | 70.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 15 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 46.7% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Modern | 14 | 7 | 6 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 25.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 11 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 63.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 25.0% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 14.3% |
| Döry Defense | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 28.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 25.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 73 | 0 |
| Losing | 29 | 5 |