Ahlam Makhlouf (aka Ahlamee) - Woman FIDE Master
Meet Ahlam Makhlouf, a chess player whose journey through the 64 squares is as colorful as her varied rating history! Awarded the prestigious title of Woman FIDE Master by the international chess federation, Ahlamee is a force to be reckoned with, whether playing blitz, rapid, or bullet.
Rising Through the Ranks
Starting from modest blitz ratings around 1270 in 2017, Ahlam steadily improved year over year to peak at an impressive 1617 in blitz by 2022. Her rapid play shows even more dominance, hitting a top rating of 1713 in 2023 — quite a sprint for those longer time controls! Bullet chess? She’s had fun there too, scoring respectable peaks around 1390 before choosing to focus more on the other formats.
Style & Strategy
Ahlam favors a strategic approach, averaging about 55 moves per winning game, demonstrating patience and skill in the endgame, which makes up over half of her matches. With an early resignation rate of just 18%, she’s tough to shake off—even when down a piece, her 100% win rate after losing material is nothing short of magical.
Winning Streaks & Rivalries
This player’s longest winning streak clocks in at a jaw-dropping 12 games. Opponents beware: Ahlam’s known to push back fiercely when challenged. While her win rate against some top rivals varies wildly (from crushing certain foes 100% of the time to struggling against others), she never shies away from a complex battle.
Fun Facts & Quirks
- Her highest rapid rating came after an electrifying six wins in six games in 2023 – talk about on fire!
- Her psychological tilt factor is low, so don’t expect her to crumble under pressure (though she's human, after all!).
- She seems to enjoy playing late at night and early morning hours, boasting nearly perfect win rates during the weird hours of 3 AM and 4 AM.
Whether it’s blitz chaos or the calm of rapid battles, Ahlame’s mix of resilience, tactical genius, and playful spirit make her a delightful and formidable player on the chessboard — someone who's always plotting her next winning move with a twinkle in her eye!
Hi Ahlam!
You are hovering around the 1550-blitz level (1617 (2022-08-04)), and the games in your recent streak show real progress. Let’s review where you shine and what to polish next.
What you already do well
- Initiative & tactics: Your most-recent win (see viewer below) shows a keen eye for dynamic play – e4–e5, Rxe5, and the mating net starting with 24.Rxf8+ were calculated confidently.
- Piece activity: You rarely leave pieces undeveloped. In many King’s Indian and Philidor structures you place knights on active squares and fianchetto the dark-squared bishop smoothly.
- Time usage: With 3 + 2 you seldom fall below 30 s until the late middlegame – that means you have spare clock to think in critical moments.
Opportunities for improvement
- Opening choice as Black vs 1.e4: In the loss to a_lejandr0_o you entered a risky sideline (…Bxb4) without clear compensation. Have a solid main line ready – for example the Two Knights with 4…Nf6 or the Giuoco Piano with early …Be7–d6.
- Pawn grabs vs development: Both in the loss and in earlier defeats you took loose pawns (Qxb4, Qxb7) and got caught in the crossfire. Before grabbing, run the “three-question drill”: 1) Are my pieces developed? 2) Is my king safe? 3) Can I retreat the queen?
- Endgame conversion: Some wins came from opponent disconnection/time. Let’s make technical endgames a strength so you can convert without relying on flags. Start with basic king-and-pawn vs king and the Lucena/Philidor rook endings.
- Tactical hygiene on the back rank: Several losses featured pins on the e-file or loose back-rank squares. Simple habit: when you move the f-pawn as Black, ask “Do I still cover f7, e6, and the back rank?”
Action plan for the next two weeks
- 10 minutes of puzzles/day. Focus on tactics involving pins & double attacks (your most common miss).
- Drill one solid Black line vs 1.e4. Example repertoire:
- 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Be7 4.d3 Nf6 5.O-O d6.
- Endgame study. Finish the Beginner-to-Master Rook Endgames chapter (≈30 examples). Re-create critical positions against the computer.
- Review every loss. Spend 5 min with the analysis board and write one sentence: “I lost because…”. This reflection will cut down repeat errors.
Illustrative games
Recent Win (White) – tactical domination
Recent Loss (Black) – pawn-grab backfires
Progress trackers
Keep an eye on when you win most often and schedule your sessions accordingly:
Final encouragement
You have the tactical flair to push toward 1700+. Combine that flair with a stable opening backbone and stronger endgame technique, and the rating gains will follow naturally. I look forward to your next set of games!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| eliass_od | 17W / 0L / 1D | |
| youssefmaroc1 | 7W / 11L / 0D | |
| teckmak | 4W / 8L / 0D | |
| achraf_ch | 4W / 0L / 0D | |
| aybsic | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1545 | 1713 | ||
| 2022 | 1489 | 1712 | ||
| 2021 | 1470 | 1548 | ||
| 2020 | 1202 | 1499 | 1489 | |
| 2019 | 1144 | 1274 | ||
| 2018 | 1183 | 1217 | ||
| 2017 | 1129 | 1269 | 1581 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 7W / 4L / 1D | 11W / 4L / 0D | 61.9 |
| 2022 | 16W / 4L / 0D | 16W / 3L / 1D | 53.7 |
| 2021 | 4W / 5L / 0D | 0W / 5L / 1D | 70.7 |
| 2020 | 10W / 6L / 0D | 4W / 12L / 2D | 72.5 |
| 2019 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 54.0 |
| 2018 | 4W / 4L / 0D | 2W / 3L / 0D | 54.8 |
| 2017 | 6W / 14L / 0D | 7W / 10L / 0D | 27.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Scotch Game | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Four Knights Game | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Evans Gambit: 5...Ba5 6.d4 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Drill Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scotch Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 12 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 1 |