David Akhmedov - FIDE Master and Chess Enthusiast
David Akhmedov, known on the chessboards as Akhmedov_David, is a titled FIDE Master who has been steadily climbing the ranks since 2017. With a brain primed for strategy and a passion for the game, David has turned countless opening moves into thrilling victories — and a few humble defeats sprinkled in to keep things interesting.
Starting with modest blitz ratings around 1055 in 2017, David’s tenacity has skyrocketed his peak blitz rating past the 2700 mark, flirting with grandmaster territory — a feat many aspire to but few achieve. His bullet chess skills aren't too shabby either, boasting a max rating of 2519 and an impressive 62.4% win rate in the fastest format possible. You might say he plays faster than his coffee cools.
A tactician with an 85% comeback rate and 100% win rate after losing a piece (yes, you read that right — 100%! David could probably turn the tables on a chicken when it crosses the road), he relishes endgames and grinds out wins with patience and precision. His games often stretch beyond 70 moves, showing that when it comes to endurance, he’s in a marathon, not a sprint.
David’s psychological resilience is notable — while sometimes hit by a “tilt factor” of 44%, he almost always regroups and returns with renewed vigor. Opponents beware: his longest winning streak of 17 games proves he can be downright relentless.
Outside the board, David's preferred opening secrets remain a mystery (classified, one might say), but across all game types, he has maintained consistent success. His playstyle shows a slight preference for playing with the white pieces, edging a 50.65% win rate there, while still remaining formidable when playing black.
Whether it’s blitz, bullet, rapid, or daily chess (although we suspect he doesn’t have much time for the slow stuff), David Akhmedov brings a mix of grit, speed, and strategic depth that chess aficionados admire and opponents dread.
What stands out in your bullet play
You show a confident, dynamic style in fast games. You tend to seek active play early, taking the initiative with aggressive openings and trying to dictate the pace of the game. Your willingness to enter sharp, tactical positions can lead to quick wins when your calculation stays precise.
- You often create pressure by opening lines for your heavier pieces to coordinate on the opponent’s king.
- You’re comfortable navigating complex, double-edged positions where a single tactical idea can decide the outcome.
- Your openings indicate readiness to fight for the initiative rather than settle into quiet, positional standoffs.
Tip: in fast games, clarity of plan matters as much as calculation depth. When you spike into sharp lines, try to identify a couple of concrete forcing ideas that you can rely on quickly.
Key areas to sharpen for stronger bullet play
- Time management: practice pacing to avoid time pressure that blunts your calculation. Consider a simple time budget (for example, quick checks in the early middlegame, and reserve a few minutes for the critical late middlegame).
- Endgame technique: aim to convert even slight material or positional advantages cleanly. In some games you reached tactical endings where precise technique would seal the win.
- Defensive discipline: when the opponent pressures your king, prioritize prophylaxis and safe king placement before seeking extravagant counterplay.
- Pattern recognition: strengthen quick recognition of common tactical motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas) so you can spot winning ideas faster in bullet time.
Opening performance insights
Your results suggest you are strongest in sharp, tactical openings that lead to dynamic middlegames. You perform particularly well with lines akin to Amar Gambit and French Defense, showing comfort with active piece play and imbalances. You also have some success with various Sicilian setups, indicating a taste for lively, double-edged positions.
- Amar Gambit: high activity and early piece pressure are good fits for your style. Continue refining calculation and look for clear forcing ideas to maximize the pressure.
- French Defense: strong results point to solid understanding of typical pawn structures and counterplay themes. Maintain the balance between space for your pieces and defensive solidity.
- Sicilian family: keep expanding your repertoire to handle both open and closed structures, paying attention to typical plans for both sides.
Next steps: deepen your familiarity with typical middlegame plans for your top openings. A one-page reference for the key plans in Amar Gambit and French Defense could help you decide quickly in bullet time. Amar Gambit and French Defense are good anchors to start with.
Practical practice plan to sustain and grow
- Time management drills: play 15–20 minute sessions focusing on keeping a steady pace and marking critical decision points.
- Endgame practice: weekly 15-minute endgame puzzles or simplified rook endings to improve conversion.
- Tactics routine: daily 10–15 minutes of focused tactic training to reinforce motif recognition.
- Opening study: build a compact reference for your top openings, including typical middle-game plans and common traps to watch for.
A balanced approach across these areas will help you convert the momentum from strong openings into consistent results in longer games as well as bullets.
Quick take on your recent games (high-level lessons)
- Your win shows you can press hard in dynamic positions and finish with tactical conviction when you find the right forcing line.
- Your losses often come from over-ambitious sequences under time pressure. This highlights the value of choosing safer, more forcing lines when the clock is ticking.
- Draws suggest solid defensive resilience but room to improve in converting momentum into a win, especially in late middlegame transitions.
Additional resources and placeholders
If you want to explore specific opening ideas further, you can reference key openings like Amar Gambit and French Defense for quick study notes, or broaden to related Sicilian lines as you grow more comfortable with dynamic positions.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| lochmatic | 9W / 2L / 6D | |
| Maksim Ivannikov | 9W / 5L / 3D | |
| tda18 | 1W / 12L / 1D | |
| Dmitrij Kollars | 3W / 9L / 0D | |
| Isaak Parpiev | 4W / 4L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2777 | |||
| 2024 | 2519 | 2690 | ||
| 2023 | 2643 | |||
| 2022 | 2601 | |||
| 2021 | 1771 | 2588 | 2046 | |
| 2020 | 1840 | 2388 | 2056 | |
| 2019 | 1755 | 1918 | 1830 | |
| 2018 | 1100 | 1761 | 1217 | |
| 2017 | 633 | 1055 | 1747 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 43W / 26L / 4D | 35W / 29L / 4D | 82.7 |
| 2024 | 68W / 50L / 11D | 65W / 57L / 5D | 80.8 |
| 2023 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 1D | 84.2 |
| 2022 | 32W / 56L / 9D | 41W / 49L / 4D | 85.6 |
| 2021 | 221W / 233L / 39D | 191W / 259L / 38D | 79.7 |
| 2020 | 331W / 207L / 53D | 286W / 235L / 51D | 82.9 |
| 2019 | 97W / 47L / 6D | 87W / 53L / 7D | 66.7 |
| 2018 | 86W / 58L / 10D | 73W / 80L / 8D | 65.5 |
| 2017 | 148W / 121L / 17D | 133W / 135L / 15D | 54.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 260 | 133 | 109 | 18 | 51.1% |
| Four Knights Game | 160 | 66 | 73 | 21 | 41.2% |
| French Defense | 135 | 67 | 59 | 9 | 49.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 103 | 55 | 43 | 5 | 53.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 97 | 56 | 36 | 5 | 57.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 94 | 57 | 32 | 5 | 60.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 88 | 36 | 45 | 7 | 40.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 82 | 55 | 23 | 4 | 67.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 77 | 23 | 47 | 7 | 29.9% |
| Czech Defense | 75 | 37 | 33 | 5 | 49.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| French Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Czech Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 67 | 37 | 21 | 9 | 55.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 61 | 32 | 24 | 5 | 52.5% |
| Four Knights Game | 39 | 27 | 6 | 6 | 69.2% |
| French Defense | 30 | 15 | 12 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 27 | 17 | 9 | 1 | 63.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 26 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 30.8% |
| Scotch Game | 25 | 14 | 8 | 3 | 56.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 22 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 21 | 7 | 10 | 4 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation | 20 | 7 | 13 | 0 | 35.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 2 |