Yash Bharadia: The FIDE Master Maestro
Meet Yash Bharadia, a FIDE Master who dances with pieces on the chessboard like a grandmaster at a masquerade ball—sometimes glamorous, often relentless, and always entertaining. With a blitz rating that has soared as high as 2670 and a bullet peak at a blazing 2789, Yash proves speed can be both an art and a science. Whether it’s bullet or blitz, this player’s win rates hover around the thrilling 50% mark, showing mastery tempered with a dash of humility (or maybe just a love of drama).
Yash doesn’t just rush to victory but loves the marathon too, averaging an impressive 76 moves to win and demonstrating tenacity in the endgame in over 80% of their games. Early resignations? A mere 5.25%, because why give up when the comeback rate after losing a piece is a staggering 98.29%? The chessboard isn’t just a battlefield, it’s Yash’s playground—a place where resilience rules and every lost piece is just a plot twist in the story.
When it comes to opponents, Yash is a colorful character. Some rivals leave with a perfect 0% win rate, others suffer a clean 100% sweep. But the real quirks emerge in daily rhythms: battles fought best between 6 PM and 7 PM—when the brain apparently hits peak tactical awareness. And beware Friday and Tuesday afternoons, prime time for pulling off those sneaky, hard-fought wins!
Psychologically, Yash’s tilt factor is respectfully low at 9, even when the winning gap between casual and rated games tilts slightly negative, those nerves can’t hold a candle to pure grit and craft. With a longest winning streak of 22 – yes, 22! – it’s clear this player doesn’t just chase wins; they chase legends.
In a nutshell, Yash Bharadia is not only a titled fighter but a strategist who loves a good challenge and can handle pressure like a grandmaster at a coffee shop blitz tournament. Watch this space—more checkmates and charming upsets are surely on the horizon.
Recent Blitz Performance
Your most recent game in the blitz pool concluded with a back‑rank mating attack by Black, ending the game in a decisive win for your opponent. That outcome highlights two key learning points: (1) maintaining king safety and back‑rank awareness in the late middlegame, and (2) managing sharp tactical pressure when the position opens up. Use this as a focused review opportunity to identify the moment when defenses or prophylaxis could have stayed tighter and to rehearse a simple plan for neutralizing similar attacking ideas in future games.
What you’re doing well
- Strong results with specific openings you’re comfortable with. The Colle System variation you’ve used shows a high win rate (about 78% across nine games), indicating you’re able to execute a solid, coherent plan from the opening and transition into favorable middlegames.
- Solid performance in several resilient defenses. You’ve achieved good results with the Sicilian Defense (60% win rate across 15 games) and the Caro-Kann Defense (about 58%). This suggests you can handle both tactical and positional lines and stay competitive when the game transitions to complex structures.
- Willingness to explore a variety of positions and keep the initiative when you’re ahead. Your openings data shows you can capitalize on activity and create practical chances in diverse structures.
Areas to improve
- Back‑rank and king safety awareness in blitz. The ending of your latest game shows how a back‑rank mating net can emerge quickly. Practice prophylaxis in the early middlegame and include a simple check for back‑rank weaknesses before heavy piece trades.
- Endgame conversion and simplification decisions. With near equal material in blitz, it’s common to drift into unclear endgames. Focus on practical rook endings and pawn endgames, where accurate simplification and opposition technique can convert close games into draws or wins.
- Consistency across a wider opening spectrum. Your “Unknown” openings have a relatively low win rate, which can destabilize your results when you run into unfamiliar lines. Consolidate a compact, reliable repertoire and reserve a couple of well-prepared surprise options for blitz.
- Pattern recognition and tactical readiness in quick time controls. The overall strength-adjusted win rate is around 0.53, suggesting you benefit from sharpening tactical patterns and quick calculation checks to avoid blunders in sharp moments.
- Time management and pacing. Blizt often hinges on efficient use of the clock. Build a routine of quick candidate-move checks and a brief post‑move reflection to minimize time pressure on critical positions.
Opening performance snapshot and recommendations
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — strong results; consider making this your primary opening for white in blitz. It offers a solid structure and clear plans that reduce the chance of early tactical chaos.
- Sicilian Defense — Najdorf and other Sicilian lines show solid results; use as a secondary weapon to keep opponents guessing and to practice sharp, tactical play.
- Other lines like the Unknown group and Dory/Barnes defenses show weaker results. It’s wise to limit these in blitz until you’re more confident, or replace them with more tried-and-true alternatives in your repertoire.
- Action step: pick 2–3 openings to own in blitz (one to play as White, one or two as Black). Create a small model game library with 5–7 representative lines you know well. Review a few sample games per week to reinforce plans and common responses.
Rating trends and what they mean
Short-term indicators show fluctuations: a sharp drop over 1–3 months, a modest rebound over 6 months, and a milder change over the 12‑month horizon. The 6‑month trend is positive, suggesting some recovery in recent play, while the 12‑month trend remains negative. In practical terms, stay focused on steady, mistake‑free play in the near term, and build routines that reduce big swings in either direction.
Actionable plan for the next 4 weeks
- Openings: lock in a compact blitz repertoire. Use Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus as your White core and Sicilian defenses as Black alternatives. Prepare 2–3 model games for each line and review them weekly.
- Tactics: dedicate 15 minutes daily to tactical puzzles to improve pattern recognition and quick calculation under time pressure. Aim to reduce calculation errors in the critical last 5–10 moves of a blitz game.
- Endgames: practice rook endings and king‑and‑pawn endings. Learn a few practical patterns (e.g., rook behind passed pawns, opposition tricks) to convert or hold positions with slight material imbalance.
- Post‑game review: after each blitz game, write down 3 takeaways: one good decision, one mistake, and one alternative move you could have played at that moment. Use this to guide the next session’s practice.
- Time management: set a rough pace; avoid overthinking critical moments. If you’re unsure in the first 15 seconds, mark a candidate move and move on to conserve clock.
- Mindset: stay calm after a mistake; avoid tilt by taking a few slow breaths and re-centering on the plan for the current position.
Notes and placeholders
Upcoming sessions can reference your opponent and game page to personalize feedback. For example, you can review the game against AlbusSevresPotter and pull key moments to annotate what could be improved in each phase. If you want, I can embed a light PGN recap for your next review:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| mounhaslosthermindforyash | 18W / 2L / 0D | |
| slowpippo | 6W / 11L / 1D | |
| Matein36 | 4W / 7L / 0D | |
| Dmitri Shevelev | 1W / 8L / 0D | |
| Karina Ambartsumova | 2W / 5L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2743 | 2634 | 2203 | |
| 2024 | 2752 | 2607 | 2203 | |
| 2023 | 2581 | 2203 | ||
| 2022 | 1753 | |||
| 2021 | 2336 | 2266 | 2149 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 37W / 25L / 2D | 38W / 22L / 4D | 75.4 |
| 2024 | 129W / 101L / 7D | 117W / 106L / 12D | 85.7 |
| 2023 | 36W / 6L / 0D | 41W / 3L / 0D | 66.0 |
| 2022 | 8W / 7L / 0D | 1W / 3L / 0D | 10.3 |
| 2021 | 131W / 169L / 14D | 133W / 160L / 19D | 83.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 205 | 92 | 102 | 11 | 44.9% |
| Modern | 74 | 41 | 31 | 2 | 55.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 64 | 29 | 29 | 6 | 45.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation | 42 | 22 | 17 | 3 | 52.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 36 | 16 | 18 | 2 | 44.4% |
| Bird Opening | 33 | 5 | 26 | 2 | 15.2% |
| Australian Defense | 28 | 15 | 10 | 3 | 53.6% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 28 | 20 | 8 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 27 | 20 | 6 | 1 | 74.1% |
| King's Indian Attack | 25 | 17 | 8 | 0 | 68.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 13 | 22 | 0 | 37.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 24 | 12 | 11 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Modern | 22 | 9 | 10 | 3 | 40.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 19 | 9 | 10 | 0 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 15 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 11 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Döry Defense | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 7 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |