Biography of AlexCn1
Meet AlexCn1, the National Master who probably thinks in chess moves before morning coffee. Emerging in the online chess world in 2011 with a modest daily rating of 1200, Alex quickly leveled up their blitz game from 1398 to an eye-watering peak above 2300 by 2021—basically, a speed chess sorcerer.
Over more than a decade, Alex has played thousands of blitz games, boasting a cool 50% win rate across 3,000+ battles. If blitz chess were a marathon, Alex would be comfortably in the lead — with a playful streak that includes a longest winning spree of 11 games straight and a comeback rate of nearly 79%. Clearly, giving up early isn’t in their vocabulary, even if the pressure mounts (tilt factor sits at a humble 9 out of 100 — simply human, after all).
Alex’s style favors enduring strategic endgames (67% of all matches), with average wins and losses clocking in around 62 moves each. That’s some serious stamina for both mind and mouse speed! Even when pieces are lost early, Alex demonstrates razor-sharp resilience, winning over 91% of the games after such setbacks. Clearly, this is no ordinary player; they dance beautifully with adversity.
Fun fact: Alex’s peak rapid rating (for those who like to take their time) hits 2158 — not too shabby for someone who thrives in the adrenaline rush of blitz and bullet chess.
Off the board, Alex is known for respecting opponents — except maybe those with usernames like kinghaziz or kingsloth08, who apparently got no mercy. On the flip side, some opponents have an almost perfect record against Alex, meaning the drama in chess rivalries never ends.
When it comes to timing, Alex performs best on Sundays and Saturdays with win rates nudging above 50%, especially around mid-morning hours, suggesting mornings clearly fuel those sharp tactical decisions. Also, if you ever find yourself in a timed battle with Alex around 6 AM, beware: a 100% win rate at that hour sounds like wizardry.
All in all, AlexCn1 is a blend of tactical genius, psychological resilience, and delightful unpredictability—possibly the kind of player who can simultaneously lose a rook and checkmate you before you realize it.
Keep an eye on this National Master — the board is their playground, and every move a potential masterpiece.
Game Review and Feedback for AlexCn1
Hi AlexCn1, great work on your recent games! You've demonstrated solid opening knowledge and tactical awareness, especially in your wins. Here’s some constructive feedback to help you improve further:
Strengths
- Opening Preparation: You are playing well-established openings like the Pirc Defense and Bogo-Indian, showing a good grasp of key theoretical ideas and plans.
- Active Play and Tactical Awareness: Your games display good tactical alertness, such as tactical exchanges to gain material and pressure the opponent effectively. For example, in your recent win versus “Lpsi,” you kept up consistent attack pressure which eventually led to a checkmate.
- Endgame Technique: You convert favorable endgames decisively, as in your QGD-based win where you used precise maneuvering to force resignation.
Areas to Focus On
- Time Management: A few games were lost on time despite technically balanced positions. Try to allocate your time more evenly across phases of the game, especially in complex middlegames where critical decisions arise.
- Handling Pressure in Defense: In some losses, opponents have successfully taken initiative after your inaccuracies in the middlegame—particularly when facing pawn breaks like ...b5 or central tension. Focus on improving your defensive skills and counterplay, which will help you reduce losing chances.
- Positional Understanding: Occasionally you exchanged pieces too early or allowed key squares to be contested (for example, control of dark squares in your Queen’s Indian or Grünfeld games). Work on identifying small strategic improvements like improving piece coordination and pawn structure stability.
Practical Tips
- Review key moments in your losses via AlexCn1’s analysis to understand why the position became difficult and what alternative moves could improve your position.
- Practice tactics regularly focusing on middlegame motifs such as pins, forks, and discovered attacks – these often appear in your games and sharpening them can increase your conversion rate.
- Study endgames fundamentals and basic defensive setups so you keep resilience when behind and maximize your chances to hold or create counter threats.
- Continue exploring your favorite openings deeper and experiment with move-order nuances to make your opening repertoire more robust and less predictable.
Highlights from Your Most Recent Win
Your win with the Black pieces against a 1956-rated opponent involved a sharp fight in the Pirc Defense. You successfully challenged the center and initiated active play on the kingside, culminating in a strong passed pawn and decisive rook activity. Well done on converting the advantage efficiently!
Keep up the good work! Consistent practice, reflection on your games, and targeted study will lead to notable improvement and higher 2158 (2019-03-27).
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Pagan | 39W / 54L / 17D | View Games |
| Joe Szczerba | 35W / 2L / 3D | View Games |
| Eduardo Ortiz | 4W / 7L / 0D | View Games |
| esr44 | 5W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| Glenn Bidari | 2W / 8L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1992 | 2054 | ||
| 2024 | 2122 | |||
| 2023 | 2084 | 1199 | ||
| 2022 | 1975 | 2170 | 1277 | |
| 2021 | 2099 | 2220 | 946 | |
| 2020 | 1897 | |||
| 2019 | 1744 | 1982 | 2158 | 946 |
| 2018 | 1814 | 2116 | 946 | |
| 2017 | 1999 | 2005 | ||
| 2016 | 1988 | 2083 | ||
| 2015 | 2020 | 2011 | ||
| 2014 | 1842 | 2086 | ||
| 2012 | 1229 | 1765 | ||
| 2011 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3W / 7L / 0D | 5W / 6L / 0D | 63.5 |
| 2024 | 35W / 18L / 2D | 24W / 28L / 3D | 68.6 |
| 2023 | 12W / 14L / 3D | 13W / 15L / 2D | 74.5 |
| 2022 | 93W / 77L / 5D | 87W / 82L / 6D | 40.2 |
| 2021 | 136W / 84L / 15D | 119W / 95L / 19D | 75.1 |
| 2020 | 23W / 21L / 3D | 12W / 34L / 4D | 70.0 |
| 2019 | 67W / 68L / 3D | 65W / 66L / 5D | 63.0 |
| 2018 | 78W / 78L / 5D | 73W / 85L / 7D | 67.4 |
| 2017 | 59W / 30L / 3D | 48W / 43L / 4D | 28.0 |
| 2016 | 207W / 164L / 14D | 191W / 184L / 13D | 63.4 |
| 2015 | 213W / 187L / 22D | 202W / 208L / 28D | 70.8 |
| 2014 | 42W / 30L / 4D | 41W / 34L / 3D | 72.4 |
| 2012 | 13W / 3L / 1D | 10W / 6L / 1D | 59.9 |
| 2011 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 5.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 28 | 12 | 14 | 2 | 42.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 26 | 14 | 11 | 1 | 53.9% |
| Alekhine Defense | 25 | 12 | 13 | 0 | 48.0% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 60.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 21 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 47.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 20 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 55.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 17 | 5 | 11 | 1 | 29.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 17 | 7 | 10 | 0 | 41.2% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Czech Defense | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 279 | 159 | 119 | 1 | 57.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 180 | 101 | 70 | 9 | 56.1% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 79 | 34 | 39 | 6 | 43.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 71 | 28 | 39 | 4 | 39.4% |
| Australian Defense | 55 | 32 | 20 | 3 | 58.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 55 | 28 | 24 | 3 | 50.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 54 | 28 | 22 | 4 | 51.9% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 53 | 32 | 19 | 2 | 60.4% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 41 | 19 | 20 | 2 | 46.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 41 | 20 | 17 | 4 | 48.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evans Gambit Accepted, 5.c3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 0 |
| Losing | 9 | 3 |