Alex Truskavetsky
International Master - the master of timely checkmates and tactical surprises
Alex Truskavetsky is an International Master, a title earned through a combination of sharp intuition, relentless study, and apparently the uncanny ability to win games just as the clock ticks down — because, honestly, some of those victories come down to time scrambles more often than not. Known for a playing style that mixes patience and precision, Alex can patiently maneuver through complex endgames (with an endgame frequency near 80%) and deliver the knockout punch when least expected.
Starting with a modest daily rating touching around 1300 in early 2019, Alex's climb has been nothing short of inspiring: peaking at 2393 in daily chess by mid-2022. But blitz and bullet formats? Oh, that's where Alex truly lights up the board, soaring past 2700 and even flirting with nearly 3000 in bullet rating—a speed demon with a mind as sharp as a knight’s fork.
Stats-wise, Alex boasts an impressive 81.6% win rate using their "Top Secret" opening in daily chess — the mystery continues. Blitz shows a respectable 54.67% win rate with the same secret weapon, proving that the legend is consistent across formats. Opponents beware: Alex’s longest winning streak reached a fierce 22 games, demonstrating ability to keep the heat on. Meanwhile, even when the tide turns (tilt factor at a manageable 13), comebacks happen almost 80% of the time!
Whether wielding the Modern Defense or the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack, Alex’s recent games showcase a knack for creative midgame maneuvers and precise endgame technique. The latest triumphs include swift victories by checkmate and patient wins on time, always with a dash of tactical flair.
Psychological quirk? Alex thrives best around 8 AM — a morning warrior who prefers to sip coffee over the board rather than on social media. The average game length hovers around 67 moves for wins, proving that Alex’s battles might be long but are always worth it.
In summary, Alex Truskavetsky is the chess competitor you don’t just want to watch — you want to study, challenge, and (if feeling brave) try to outwit. Just don’t blink; they might checkmate you while you're admiring their flair.
“Patience, precision, and plenty of pre-move surprises!”
Hi Alex!
Your recent games show why you sit near the 2900 mark: you play fearless, initiative-driven chess, you gladly take on sharp pawn structures, and your tactical radar is usually on point. Below is some targeted feedback drawn from your last batch of wins and losses.
What you already do well
- Initiative first. In both the Nimzo-Larsen win and the Elephant-Gambit game you sacrificed material (or structure) to seize tempi, then kept the attack rolling until the clock or the position collapsed for your opponent.
- Piece activity. You rarely leave pieces undeveloped. Even in the Modern Defense, your knights and bishops get out quickly so you can hit the centre from multiple angles.
- Bullet instincts. Moves like 32…Rbf7+ and 36…Ng3+ in the Modern win show that you spot forcing continuations under 1-second pressure.
Growth opportunities
1. Time-management in technically winning endings
Two recent losses (Airquake and Oleksandr_Bortnyk) came when you were at least equal but flagged in rook-plus-pawn endings. Your conversion speed lags behind your middlegame pace.
- Practise “count-to-three” pre-move sequences (e.g. Kg7–Kf6–Kg5) in winning K+R+P vs K endings until they are muscle memory.
- Add five minutes of tablebase drills to each session – choose a random 5-piece position and convert vs engine.
2. Modern / Pirc centre handling
In the loss to Antoni Kozak (A40), …d5 …c6 allowed e5 and you slid into a passive formation. Versus d4 Nf3 c3 setups:
- Consider delaying …c6 and playing a Gurgenidze scheme (…d6 …e5 …Nc6) so your light-squared bishop stays alive.
- Revisit key break timings: when can you strike with …c5 vs e4-d4-c3? A 10-game engine sparring set with forced …c5 on move 4 or 5 will clarify evaluations.
3. King-safety awareness when you’re White
The Pirc (B07) game showed that after 13.f5 you left g3/h3 holes. Your attacking instincts are excellent, but keep a 10-second “reverse-scan” before each pawn thrust: “If the files open, whose king is actually weaker?”
Mini action-plan for the next two weeks
- Daily – 15 bullet endgame drills vs bot, start from K+R+P vs K, 10 sec increment.
- Alternate days – play rapid (10|0) Modern Defense exclusively; annotate where you voluntarily closed your own bishop.
- Friday review – pick one loss where you were better but lost; write one-sentence “conversion rule” you ignored.
Useful stats & tracking
Monitor your own progress here:
- Peak bullet rating: 2982 (2025-03-08)
- Win rate by hour:
- Daily trends:
Keep the confidence!
You’re already converting tactics → initiative → scoreboard points. Tighten conversion technique and refine centre plans in the Modern, and 2950+ will follow. Good luck, and enjoy the grind!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| old_acc_mm | 10W / 8L / 6D | |
| atastypawn | 8W / 3L / 3D | |
| edborr | 11W / 1L / 1D | |
| Karina Ambartsumova | 10W / 2L / 1D | |
| Oleksandr Bortnyk | 4W / 7L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2879 | 1509 | 2349 | |
| 2024 | 2736 | 2715 | 2345 | |
| 2023 | 2672 | 2688 | 2340 | |
| 2022 | 2460 | 2358 | ||
| 2021 | 2524 | 2305 | ||
| 2020 | 2187 | 2457 | 2456 | 2250 |
| 2019 | 2384 | 1786 | ||
| 2018 | 2259 | 2292 | ||
| 2017 | 2163 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 159W / 77L / 13D | 142W / 79L / 23D | 86.6 |
| 2024 | 172W / 119L / 23D | 155W / 124L / 21D | 89.9 |
| 2023 | 26W / 16L / 9D | 36W / 13L / 7D | 82.6 |
| 2022 | 95W / 69L / 10D | 80W / 71L / 12D | 75.1 |
| 2021 | 105W / 70L / 10D | 105W / 67L / 14D | 75.4 |
| 2020 | 195W / 32L / 36D | 201W / 49L / 24D | 59.3 |
| 2019 | 49W / 20L / 8D | 52W / 33L / 3D | 68.2 |
| 2018 | 175W / 112L / 22D | 157W / 136L / 14D | 73.3 |
| 2017 | 53W / 21L / 3D | 46W / 29L / 2D | 71.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 70 | 44 | 19 | 7 | 62.9% |
| Modern | 48 | 26 | 19 | 3 | 54.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 40 | 21 | 17 | 2 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 33 | 17 | 13 | 3 | 51.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 32 | 25 | 5 | 2 | 78.1% |
| Czech Defense | 28 | 14 | 13 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 27 | 19 | 7 | 1 | 70.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 25 | 11 | 12 | 2 | 44.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 25 | 13 | 10 | 2 | 52.0% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 12 | 7 | 4 | 52.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 51 | 45 | 2 | 4 | 88.2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 27 | 24 | 2 | 1 | 88.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 25 | 24 | 0 | 1 | 96.0% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 18 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 94.4% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 68.8% |
| Slav Defense | 14 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 90.9% |
| Döry Defense | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 80.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 87 | 48 | 37 | 2 | 55.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 66 | 41 | 23 | 2 | 62.1% |
| Dutch Defense | 46 | 23 | 22 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Czech Defense | 44 | 25 | 17 | 2 | 56.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 42 | 23 | 15 | 4 | 54.8% |
| Australian Defense | 41 | 21 | 18 | 2 | 51.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 36 | 14 | 18 | 4 | 38.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 36 | 19 | 15 | 2 | 52.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 35 | 19 | 14 | 2 | 54.3% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 30 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Benoni Defense: Four Pawns Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Belyavsky Gambit | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 6 |