Avatar of MF Álvaro Aranha

MF Álvaro Aranha FM

Username: Alvarov79

Playing Since: 2012-03-31 (Active)

Wow Factor: ♟♟♟♟♟

Chess.com

Rapid: 2548
71W / 19L / 8D
Blitz: 2604
2191W / 2237L / 445D
Bullet: 2150
4W / 0L / 0D

FIDE Master Álvaro Aranha (Alvarov79)

Meet MF Álvaro Aranha, a chess warrior whose barrels of blitz games pack more punches than a grandmaster’s opening repertoire. Known online as Alvarov79, Álvaro has steadily climbed the ranks to earn the title of FIDE Master, proving that consistency and hard work definitely beat sheer luck—even if the latter sometimes feels tempting during those nail-biting endgames.

Blitz Battles and Lightning Wars

Álvaro’s forte lies in blitz chess, where rapid-fire decisions and lightning reflexes reign supreme. With a peak blitz rating soaring up to 2619 in 2024, he’s clearly a force to be reckoned with on the fast circuit. Playing nearly 5,000 blitz games reveals not just stamina but a blend of finesse and tactics. His longest winning streak? An impressive 14 consecutive victories—a sure sign that when the stars align, Álvaro is simply unbeatable.

Rapid and Bullet: Quick on the Draw

While blitz is Álvaro’s playground, his rapid and bullet skills are nothing to scoff at. With rapid games boasting a solid 53% win rate, and a flawless 100% win record in bullet games (albeit a modest sample), he maintains versatility across faster time controls. His bullet chess might be brief but it is spotless—no losses, just swift tactical strikes.

Playing Style: Patience Meets Precision

Álvaro is no quitter—his early resignation rate is a mere 0.27%. Endgames are his turf; he arrives here often (over 85% of the time), wielding an average of 77 moves in wins and 84 moves in losses. Hard-fought and usually well thought out, his games are long enough to test any opponent’s patience and mental endurance. Also, he has a psychological superpower: if he loses a piece, don’t count him out—Álvaro’s win rate after losing material is a perfect 100%, highlighting his remarkable tactical resilience and comeback prowess.

Quirks and Fun Facts

  • Comback king: Boasting a 91% comeback rate, Álvaro is the Houdini of chessboard disasters.
  • Chess psychology: His tilt factor is modest at 11, meaning he stays cool under pressure... most of the time.
  • Preferred hours: Battles fought around 3 AM and noon reportedly bring out his sharpest play—clearly, night owls and lunch breaks are prime chess zones.
  • Tricky opponent: He’s undefeated against several regular rivals like purehorses and xat1986x, with a win rate of 100%.

Álvaro Aranha’s chess journey is one of grit, speed, and a sprinkle of wizardry. Whether rushing through blitz or navigating complicated endgames, this FIDE Master embodies the spirit of fierce competition and tactical creativity—and perhaps, a little secret sauce known only to masters like him.


Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Overview of your recent rapid games

You’ve shown a strong ability to navigate complex positions and convert middlegame chances into wins. Your opening choices align with your aggressive style, and you’re actively pressing in long middlegame battles. Maintain this momentum by tightening decision points in critical moments and focusing on solid endgame technique to close each game cleanly.

What you’re doing well

  • Sharp tactical vision in the middlegame—you often find active plans that create practical winning chances.
  • Solid results with several aggressive openings, especially in Sicilian Defense variants and London System lines. This shows you’re comfortable in unbalanced positions and know how to press for the initiative.
  • Good clock management in many games, allowing you to keep pressure while making precise moves in critical moments.

Focus areas for improvement

  • Endgame conversion: after a concrete advantage, aim to simplify into rook or minor-piece endgames where you are confident you can convert. Practice common rook endings and technique for converting extra pawns.
  • Strategic patience in some openings: a few games feature aggressive pawn pushes or tactical skirmishes that leave behind structural weaknesses. Balance activity with solid king safety and gradual space gains.
  • Time-pressure checks: when the clock tightens, identify a few universal plans for each top opening so you don’t get stuck deciding between multiple branches at once.
  • Pattern recognition in openings: while your repertoire is strong, reinforce typical middlegame plans from each opening so you can transition smoothly and avoid missteps in unfamiliar lines.

Opening performance snapshot

You have a robust and diverse opening toolkit, with standout results in several lines. Notably, your success with Sicilian Defense variants and London System variations indicates comfort in dynamic, unbalanced games. Build on this by refining typical middlegame plans and common tactical motifs for these openings. Consider maintaining a focused study on your top performers to deepen confidence in the most critical positions.

  • Sicilian Defense variants: strong results—continue polishing standard responses and plan ideas for the common middlegame transitions. Sicilian Defense
  • London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation: your results show clear understanding of pawn structures and piece activity. Review safe continuation paths to preserve advantages. London System
  • Other strong lines (e.g., Scandinavian Defense, Alapin/Scherzer variations, Barnes Defense): keep practicing these to ensure you have reliable, repeatable plans in you toolkit. Opening repertoire

Strength Adjusted Win Rate

Your strength-adjusted win rate is high, reflecting strong results against a mix of opponents. Use this as motivation to keep refining your patterns and to target areas where you can push your edge even further in rapid time controls.

Momentum and rating trends

You’re riding positive momentum with noticeable rating gains in recent periods. To sustain this, pair quick, frequent practice with deeper, slower studies. A balanced approach—daily tactical drills plus a couple of focused openings and endgames sessions each week—will help you convert momentum into consistent results.

Practical next steps

  • Post-game reviews: allocate 10–15 minutes after each rapid game to identify the turning points where a different plan could have preserved or increased your edge.
  • Endgame drills: practice rook endings and minor-piece endings weekly to improve conversion of advantages.
  • Opening study focus: select your top two or three openings and build a concise reference of typical plans, key pawn breaks, and common tactical ideas.
  • Safety nets in defense: reinforce king safety in the middlegame and avoid overextension unless you have a clear, practical winning path.

Suggested practice plan (next 2 weeks)

  • Week 1: Endgames focus — rook endings and minor piece endings; review 2 illustrative endgames per session.
  • Week 1–2: Opening reinforcement — deepen knowledge of your top openings; prepare 2-3 go-to middlegame plans for each opening.
  • Weekly tactic sprint — 15–20 minutes of mixed tactical problems to sharpen pattern recognition under time pressure.

Optional study aids

If you want, you can link to specific games or openings for targeted review. For example, you might review the recent Sicilian and London System games to extract recurring strategic ideas. MF Álvaro Aranha



🆚 Opponent Insights

Recent Opponents
kapacaida 0W / 0L / 1D View
mridvikar 1W / 0L / 0D View
liindseeyy 1W / 0L / 0D View
veryezchess 1W / 0L / 0D View
eduard999_82 1W / 0L / 0D View
Pyrics 1W / 0L / 0D View
garudapura 1W / 2L / 0D View
mylovechess30122010 1W / 0L / 0D View
mobaier 1W / 0L / 0D View
schepetnov_egor 1W / 0L / 0D View
Most Played Opponents
777perfect 31W / 15L / 1D View Games
Daniel Rangel 16W / 23L / 1D View Games
palombie 16W / 20L / 1D View Games
Fedor_Afanasiev 19W / 11L / 6D View Games
Daniel Lowinger 9W / 15L / 6D View Games

Rating

Year Bullet Blitz Rapid Daily
2025 2421
2024 2604
2022 2506
2021 2525
2020 2509 1961
2019 2249
2018 2302 1917
2017 2310
2016 2267
2015 2310
2014 2261
2012 1677 2123
Rating by Year20122014201520162017201820192020202120222024202526041917YearRatingBlitzRapid

Stats by Year

Year White Black Moves
2025 19W / 3L / 2D 23W / 1L / 1D 77.3
2024 428W / 467L / 82D 370W / 507L / 96D 81.6
2022 4W / 5L / 1D 3W / 6L / 0D 83.1
2021 83W / 81L / 12D 63W / 85L / 25D 84.3
2020 554W / 452L / 103D 509W / 485L / 106D 84.2
2019 48W / 39L / 5D 39W / 46L / 6D 87.4
2018 37W / 22L / 2D 29W / 25L / 2D 82.8
2017 4W / 4L / 1D 3W / 5L / 2D 85.3
2016 3W / 2L / 1D 1W / 4L / 0D 87.3
2015 1W / 0L / 0D 2W / 0L / 0D 109.7
2014 7W / 2L / 0D 6W / 1L / 0D 86.9
2012 14W / 1L / 1D 9W / 3L / 2D 79.7

Openings: Most Played

Rapid Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Scandinavian Defense 3 2 1 0 66.7%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 3 3 0 0 100.0%
Center Game: Berger Variation 2 1 1 0 50.0%
Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation, Haag Gambit 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Sicilian Defense 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Elephant Gambit 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Barnes Defense 2 2 0 0 100.0%
Italian Game: Two Knights Defense 2 1 1 0 50.0%
QGD: Ragozin 2 1 0 1 50.0%
Blitz Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation 353 159 170 24 45.0%
Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit 195 87 86 22 44.6%
Sicilian Defense: Closed 150 56 75 19 37.3%
Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation 132 57 59 16 43.2%
Benko Gambit 125 50 61 14 40.0%
Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line 125 50 60 15 40.0%
Scandinavian Defense 106 44 53 9 41.5%
Slav Defense 98 47 41 10 48.0%
Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation 95 40 46 9 42.1%
London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation 86 44 32 10 51.2%
Bullet Opening Games Wins Losses Draws Win Rate
Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation 1 1 0 0 100.0%
Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation 1 1 0 0 100.0%
Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation 1 1 0 0 100.0%
Scandinavian Defense 1 1 0 0 100.0%

🔥 Streaks

Streak Longest Current
Winning 14 0
Losing 11 0
🐞 Report a Problem