Profile of amarhadzic1980
From the very first move to the final checkmate, amarhadzic1980’s chess story is one marked by consistent growth, tactical brilliance and resilient determination. With years of competitive play behind the board, this player has steadily refined his skills in various time formats—especially in the blitz arena—with ratings that have progressively improved from 2184 in 2023 to an impressive 2342 in 2025.
His game is characterized by deep endgame mastery and tactical awareness. With an endgame frequency soaring at 82.7% and an average win emerging after approximately 75 moves, amarhadzic1980 shows how patience and persistence pay off on the board. His almost flawless ability to bounce back—even after a disadvantage such as losing a piece—is underlined by a comeback rate of 89.43%, a testament to his mental fortitude.
In rapid and bullet formats, his performance further emphasizes versatility. Rapid scores consistently hover around the mid-2200 mark, while his bullet competitions, despite some fluctuations, offer insight into his capacity to adapt under time pressure. Moreover, his equally balanced success with both White and Black demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of the game.
Time-performance trends illustrate his adaptability; he performs well across different days of the week and even during less traditional hours. Whether it’s a late-night battle or a brisk morning session, his win rates reflect a player who can pivot and adjust to the clock’s demands without losing focus.
Psychological resilience is another cornerstone of his profile. A low tilt factor and a significant win rate margin in rated versus casual play hint at a calm, composed approach even during challenging positions. Coupled with an early resignation rate that speaks to efficiency, his style is both pragmatic and incisive.
As a competitor, amarhadzic1980 has carved out a niche by blending a broad opening repertoire with steadfast endgame techniques. His use of sharp, dynamic openings—ranging from the Sicilian and Vienna to other creative lines—underscores his willingness to explore different strategic avenues in pursuit of victory.
In summary, amarhadzic1980 is not just a player who improves his ratings year by year; he is an artist of the board—a tactician who faces adversity head on and emerges stronger from each encounter. His journey is a rich tapestry of calculated risk, ongoing evolution and an unwavering passion for the game of chess.
Recent game overview and what it suggests
You’ve been playing blitz with a clear willingness to fight for initiative in the opening and to keep pieces active in the middlegame. In the wins, you demonstrated resilience under pressure and found concrete ways to convert middlegame activity into practical chances. In the losses, there were moments where your attack or king safety became the main battleground, and a few tight tactical sequences ended unfavorably. The takeaway is to balance calm, precise calculation with your natural willingness to complicate—especially in blitz where time pressure makes over-ambitious lines costly.
Key improvement areas
- Time management under blitz pressure: aim to allocate your thinking more efficiently in the first 8–12 moves. If you’re unsure after a couple of forcing or semi-forcing lines, switch to safer, solid plans and “refuse” overly risky tangents that can blow up on you when the clock is tight.
- Endgame conversion and rook endings: your games often reach rook or minor-piece endgames. Sharpen technique here to maximize drawing chances when you’re behind and to convert when you’re ahead (practice practical rook endings with pawns on opposite sides).
- King safety and piece coordination: watch for lines that loosen your king's shelter or miscoordinate rooks and queens. Prioritize maintaining a coherent unit of rooks and minor pieces, especially when your opponent’s attack starts to build.
- Blitz-pattern recognition: build quick pattern recognition for common middlegame motifs (back-rank ideas, hanging pawns, and typical tactical motifs like forks, pins, and overextended defenses) so you can spot forcing sequences faster without deep calculation every time.
- Opening plan consistency: you’ve shown comfort in several openings. Consider narrowing to a small, solid core repertoire for blitz and learn the typical middlegame plans and pawn structures that arise from those lines so you can transition to a strong middlegame quickly.
Opening strategy and plan
Your current openings show a mix of aggressive and solid setups. That’s good for variety, but blitz thrives on familiarity. A focused plan could be to:
- Choose 2–3 openings you like and study their typical middlegame plans and common pawn structures inside and out (e.g., a solid option for Black and a dynamic option for White).
- For each chosen line, prepare a handful of “go-to” ideas in the middlegame so you can steer the game into familiar positions even when you’re under time pressure.
- Create quick-reference checklists for each opening: typical tactical motifs to watch for, common king-safety themes, and the most practical (safe) plan to transition to the middlegame.
Suggested starting points based on your openings history: you’ve used and mixed Philidor, Alapin/Scandinavian-influenced lines, and others. Consider committing to a main Black reply (e.g., a solid defense such as the Philidor family lines or a simple, flexible Scandinavian setup) and a White system that leads to open, tactical play if you enjoy that style. Amar Hadzic
Practical training plan
- Daily tactics (15–20 minutes): focus on patterns like forks, discoveries, pins, and back-rank ideas. Blitz-friendly tactic sets help you spot forcing lines quickly.
- Endgame practice (2–3 sessions per week): rook endings, king and pawn vs king, and opposite-side pawn endings. Use short, practical endgames to build conversion skill.
- Opening repertoire study (2 sessions per week): lock in 2–3 openings for White and 2 for Black, with a one-page summary of common middlegame plans and typical pawn structures.
- Game review routine (after each blitz session): identify at least 1–2 critical moments where the result could have shifted with a safer plan or quicker tactical decision. Look for blunders, near-misses, and time-pressure moments.
- Simulate time pressure: practice 5+0 blitz with a 5-second increment to mirror real games, but during practice, set a personal “blunder check” rule—after 6–8 moves, force yourself to pick the best two candidate moves and decide quickly.
Next steps and quick checks
To keep progress tangible, try these next steps over the next couple of weeks:
- Pick two openings you’ll stick with for blitz and create a compact, 1-page plan for each (plans, typical targets, and pitfalls).
- Do daily quick tactical puzzles and one endgame drill. Track how often you win a minor material edge or convert it into a win.
- Review your recent games with a focus on the moment you switched from middlegame to endgame: could you have simplified earlier to reduce risk?
- Discuss ideas with a coach or training partner to validate critical decision points and improve your decision-making under time pressure.
Optional references and profiles
You can use these to review related games or discuss specific ideas with a coach or training partner: daniqq, thor33, Wiktoria Cieślak, fabritiusmacrinus
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| farko_np | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| manusch88 | 1W / 1L / 2D | |
| jony3099 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| temp1225 | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| acsqueen12345 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| drillthrall | 6W / 1L / 1D | |
| roll_king | 0W / 3L / 0D | |
| dancoki | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| pieppiepboy56 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| franquitosagredo | 1W / 2L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| marioti1993 | 13W / 14L / 3D | |
| Stefan Busch | 15W / 12L / 3D | |
| lucacanova | 11W / 16L / 2D | |
| T C | 11W / 15L / 1D | |
| apcom | 12W / 11L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1923 | 2248 | 2247 | |
| 2024 | 2061 | 2209 | 2257 | |
| 2023 | 1759 | 2184 | 2250 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2071W / 2158L / 261D | 2011W / 2175L / 308D | 79.7 |
| 2024 | 1430W / 1484L / 186D | 1389W / 1514L / 196D | 79.8 |
| 2023 | 1355W / 1126L / 145D | 1293W / 1156L / 161D | 80.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 3411 | 1697 | 1495 | 219 | 49.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1747 | 869 | 772 | 106 | 49.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1107 | 523 | 509 | 75 | 47.2% |
| Vienna Gambit, with Max Lange Defense | 1063 | 525 | 466 | 72 | 49.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 958 | 432 | 469 | 57 | 45.1% |
| French Defense | 774 | 381 | 355 | 38 | 49.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 740 | 337 | 363 | 40 | 45.5% |
| Czech Defense | 711 | 317 | 357 | 37 | 44.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 643 | 291 | 311 | 41 | 45.3% |
| Modern | 414 | 179 | 212 | 23 | 43.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 16 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 62.5% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 42.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Czech Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 68.8% |
| Czech Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 16.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 5 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 12 | 1 |