Overview
amr ahmed (amrspecialist) is a fast, fearless chess player best known for blistering Bullet games and a stubborn love for dynamic, unbalanced openings. A prolific online competitor since the mid‑2010s, amr blends tactical flair with impressive resilience: long comeback streaks and an uncanny ability to bounce back after material loss. Preferred time control: Bullet — this is where amr shines and often makes opponents regret blundering their clocks.
- Username: amrspecialist
- Preferred time control: Bullet (fast, furious, and frequently victorious)
- Aggregate Bullet experience: relentless practice and massive game volume
Playing Style
amr plays like someone who ordered "no draws" with extra pepper. Expect early complications, tactical scraps, and endgames that last far longer than an opponent anticipated. Key style markers:
- High Endgame Frequency — often grinds opponents down deep into the late game.
- Avg decisive games run long (avg moves per win ≈63), so patience often pays.
- Comeback specialist — a very strong Comeback Rate; don’t count out amr after a slip.
Career Highlights
amr climbed from casual weekend blitzes to top-tier Bullet play through sheer volume and study. Notable milestones:
- Reached career peak ratings in recent years across Bullet and Blitz — a hard-earned ascent. (2508 (2025-10-27))
- Extensive match experience against many regular opponents; long head‑to‑head histories reward pattern recognition and psychological edges.
- Huge experience: tens of thousands of rated Bullet games — practice makes precision (and occasional comedic blunders).
Top rivals include longtime online sparring partners — see one frequent opponent: momofischer.
Openings & Trends
amr favors sharp, offbeat systems and is comfortable defending as well as attacking. Openings are chosen to create imbalance and practical winning chances — especially in Bullet.
- Frequently plays: Czech Defense, Philidor Defense, and the cheeky Amar Gambit.
- Notable success with Philidor and several less mainstream setups — a specialist’s edge in rapid decision-making.
- Adapts openings by time control: more experimental in Bullet, more solid in Rapid/Blitz.
Fun Facts & Rituals
- Pre‑game ritual: a single deep breath and a curt "let's go" — succinct and effective.
- Surprising peak hours: a statistical edge appears in early morning play (05:00 shows improved results).
- Likes long, dramatic wins and a dry postgame joke when tactics land.
Sample Tactical Sketch
A compact attacking theme often seen in amr's games (mini‑sequence you can replay):
Open the mini‑game in a PGN viewer to replay move by move — a typical sharp burst of Bullet‑style tactics.
Follow & Challenge
For rivals, fans, and curious coaches: amr’s archive is an open workshop of tactics, risk, and entertaining practical chess. Search "amrspecialist" on your platform of choice and drop a challenge — but bring your A‑game and a fast mouse.
- Try these openings if you want to practice vs amr: Czech Defense, Amar Gambit, Philidor Defense.
- Track Bullet performance over time:
Quick summary for amr ahmed
Nice session — several clean wins, a couple of losses that look like time trouble or tactical oversights, and a decisive finish by passed pawns and queen invasion in one of your wins. Strengths: creating passed pawns, back‑rank/7th‑rank awareness and converting advantages. Areas to improve: time management in bullet, avoiding knight forks and loose pieces, and reducing unnecessary early pawn moves.
Concrete highlights (example game)
Finish vs butler1996 — you created a powerful passed c‑pawn and used queen infiltration to mate on the 7th rank. Great pattern recognition: open the file, push the passed pawn, and invade with the queen once the opponent's king safety collapses.
- Key plan: 29.c5 then 30.c6 — forcing the opponent to open lines and create entry squares for your queen.
- Finishing idea: Qa6 followed by Qb7 — classic invasion on the 7th leading to mate.
What you're doing well
- Creating and advancing passed pawns — you convert them efficiently in bullet.
- Spotting back‑rank and 7th‑rank invasion squares with queen/rooks.
- Practical play under pressure — you capitalize on opponents' time trouble (Flagging appears in results).
- Wide opening experience — keeps opponents guessing.
Main weaknesses to fix (bullet focus)
- Time management: several games end in time losses. Build simple habits to preserve seconds for the endgame.
- Tactical oversights: knight forks and checks (Nxc2/Nxa1 motifs) show up — double‑check tactics when knights are near your pieces.
- Early pawn moves that waste tempo (a3, extra pawn pushes) cost development and time.
- Loose pieces: quick moves sometimes leave pieces en‑prise — a one‑second scan for hanging pieces reduces blunders.
Daily 20–30 minute practice plan
- 5 min — Tactics (focus on forks, pins, mating nets) at bullet speed.
- 10 min — Opening drill: pick one White and one Black system; learn the first 6 moves and two typical plans.
- 10–15 min — Play 3–5 serious bullet games (3+1 or 5+1). Goal: finish with at least 8–10 seconds on the clock to practice time management.
Immediate practical tips
- When ahead: trade pieces (not pawns) to simplify and make the passed pawn easier to promote.
- When behind: trade queens to reduce tactical shots and buy time on the clock.
- Use pre‑moves only when safe (captures where there are no checks or refutations).
- Make a tiny waiting move if you're low on time and there is no forcing continuation — prevents last‑second blunders.
Opening & repertoire guidance
In bullet, favor practical, low‑theory systems. Pick a main setup for White and Black and learn typical pawn structures and tactical themes rather than deep move lists.
- If you often open with d3/e4, prioritize quick development (Nc3/Nf3, bishops out, castle) over extra flank pawn moves like a3 unless you know the theory.
- Study motifs that punish loose coordination versus active knights to avoid the N‑fork patterns you faced.
7‑day drill plan
- Days 1–2: 200 tactics concentrated on forks and knight motifs.
- Days 3–4: 30 minutes studying a single opening structure; then 5 practice games with increment.
- Days 5–7: 50 bullet games focusing on finishing with at least 8–10 seconds remaining.
Next steps
Keep a short post‑game note for each loss: "why did I lose?" (time, tactic, opening). That log will reveal patterns quickly.
- I can do a deep move‑by‑move analysis of any one game (e.g., the loss vs i137) — tell me which game to analyze.
- Or I can create a 3‑week targeted training plan to improve your bullet clock play and tactical vision.
- Use Loose piece and Flagging as quick tags in your notes to label recurring issues.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| stath1993 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sabeta82 | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| cuterandreidaniel | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| arcticchess | 1W / 3L / 0D | View |
| richardmaster | 1W / 4L / 0D | View |
| gonglekss | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| maxn0b | 4W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kingcaloog | 6W / 5L / 0D | View |
| thawcy | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| criscaiza25 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| momofischer | 169W / 63L / 3D | View Games |
| jk2390 | 68W / 84L / 8D | View Games |
| eng_mahmoud_badr | 44W / 61L / 2D | View Games |
| ludo_sta | 50W / 39L / 5D | View Games |
| standevin | 38W / 32L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2382 | 2166 | 2233 | 1504 |
| 2024 | 2266 | 2199 | 2232 | 1508 |
| 2023 | 2209 | 2210 | 2021 | 1567 |
| 2022 | 2128 | 2108 | 1997 | 1370 |
| 2021 | 1865 | 2167 | 1813 | |
| 2020 | 1878 | 2074 | 1837 | 1523 |
| 2019 | 2028 | 2141 | 1714 | 1550 |
| 2018 | 1951 | 1916 | 1651 | 1499 |
| 2017 | 1809 | 1916 | 1648 | 1514 |
| 2016 | 1989 | 1803 | 1681 | 1602 |
| 2015 | 1445 | 1681 | 1410 | 1538 |
| 2013 | 1045 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2003W / 1933L / 102D | 2106W / 1838L / 92D | 68.2 |
| 2024 | 2025W / 1881L / 108D | 2046W / 1851L / 122D | 69.5 |
| 2023 | 2609W / 1998L / 123D | 2571W / 2012L / 134D | 68.1 |
| 2022 | 1891W / 1699L / 66D | 1953W / 1619L / 92D | 66.5 |
| 2021 | 1850W / 1878L / 60D | 1957W / 1754L / 70D | 64.5 |
| 2020 | 2163W / 2177L / 102D | 2227W / 2083L / 110D | 66.4 |
| 2019 | 2898W / 3119L / 134D | 2992W / 3025L / 170D | 69.8 |
| 2018 | 1129W / 1135L / 49D | 1123W / 1075L / 64D | 68.0 |
| 2017 | 2240W / 2276L / 138D | 2376W / 2185L / 123D | 67.8 |
| 2016 | 3895W / 3673L / 198D | 3806W / 3752L / 210D | 69.5 |
| 2015 | 852W / 788L / 23D | 816W / 782L / 26D | 60.7 |
| 2013 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 66.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 8560 | 4425 | 3954 | 181 | 51.7% |
| Modern Defense | 7671 | 3729 | 3747 | 195 | 48.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 6585 | 3323 | 3119 | 143 | 50.5% |
| French Defense | 4664 | 2322 | 2238 | 104 | 49.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 4305 | 2152 | 2083 | 70 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 3988 | 2191 | 1698 | 99 | 54.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3053 | 1569 | 1414 | 70 | 51.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 2827 | 1485 | 1275 | 67 | 52.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2723 | 1266 | 1401 | 56 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2663 | 1186 | 1416 | 61 | 44.5% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 4464 | 2362 | 1947 | 155 | 52.9% |
| Modern Defense | 2965 | 1384 | 1490 | 91 | 46.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 2667 | 1452 | 1134 | 81 | 54.4% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 2615 | 1383 | 1172 | 60 | 52.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2021 | 910 | 1057 | 54 | 45.0% |
| French Defense | 1701 | 856 | 792 | 53 | 50.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1461 | 708 | 709 | 44 | 48.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1399 | 752 | 594 | 53 | 53.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 1209 | 631 | 540 | 38 | 52.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 967 | 529 | 405 | 33 | 54.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 184 | 134 | 44 | 6 | 72.8% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 154 | 120 | 30 | 4 | 77.9% |
| Czech Defense | 133 | 97 | 35 | 1 | 72.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 73 | 41 | 30 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Modern Defense | 66 | 41 | 23 | 2 | 62.1% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 61 | 52 | 7 | 2 | 85.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 57 | 37 | 18 | 2 | 64.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 55 | 35 | 18 | 2 | 63.6% |
| Australian Defense | 54 | 40 | 13 | 1 | 74.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 52 | 41 | 9 | 2 | 78.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 42 | 35 | 7 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 33 | 30 | 3 | 0 | 90.9% |
| Czech Defense | 19 | 11 | 6 | 2 | 57.9% |
| Modern Defense | 18 | 12 | 5 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 17 | 12 | 2 | 3 | 70.6% |
| French Defense | 16 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 75.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 16 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 2 |
| Losing | 21 | 0 |