Gregory Kilishek (amstar13)
Meet Gregory Kilishek, the chess enthusiast known in the virtual arenas as amstar13. With a blitz rating reaching an impressive peak of 2444 and a rapid rating climbing above 2100, Gregory dances across the chessboard with a mix of calculated strategy and surprising flair.
Career Highlights
- Blitz master with over 15,000 wins and a consistent performance averaging above 2300 for several years.
- Rapid player with a growth curve that saw his rating jump to 2123, displaying versatility beyond the lightning-fast blitz.
- Bullet competitor too (though with fewer games), proving Gregory is no stranger to time-based pressure.
Playing Style & Personality
Gregory's games are a rollercoaster of drama and tactical fireworks. An impressive 93.85% comeback rate and a flawless 100% win rate after losing a piece prove that he never gives up—he just makes the other player nervous with his relentless attacking spirit and psychological resilience.
His average moves per win (~91 moves) hint at marathon battles, while an early resignation rate of less than 0.4% shows he’s in it for the long haul. If a chess game were a suspense thriller, Gregory’s would be the director’s cut.
Signature Openings
While Gregory keeps some play styles shrouded under the mysterious label "Top Secret", he has shown strong performances with unconventional choices like Bird's Opening and the rarely tamed Scandinavian Defense Modern Variation. Beware if you face Gregory in the arena; you never know if the next move will be a clever trap or a secret surprise!
Humorous Stats
- Longest winning streak: 13 games — enough to make anyone believe he’s a chess robot!
- Average blitz win rate hovers around 47-48%, which sounds modest until you realize the sheer volume of games played — consistency is key!
- Games played like a whirlwind with tens of thousands logged, Gregory has probably analyzed more internet chessboards than there are pieces on Earth.
Final Thoughts
Gregory Kilishek combines dedication, resilience, and a sprinkle of secret sauce to make his mark in the chess world. Whether lightning-bolt blitz or carefully plotted rapid, opponents beware: this master of the squares is always plotting two moves ahead — maybe even three if you’re lucky.
What went well in your recent blitz games
You demonstrated positive qualities in dynamic, tactical settings. Key strengths include:
- Ability to keep the pressure on in sharp positions, creating practical problems for your opponent to solve under time pressure.
- Resilience in defense and willingness to enter complex endgames when the position required precise handling of material and activity.
- Good willingness to fight for activity and to convert small advantages into practical chances, especially when your pieces coordinate on open files and diagonals.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: try to establish a simple, clear plan for the first 15 moves and stick to it, so you don’t get into time trouble during complex middlegames.
- Opening choices and transitions: in blitz, a solid, predictable path often yields more reliable middlegames. Consider focusing on 1-2 openings you know well and that lead to safe development and king safety.
- Decision quality in critical moments: when there are multiple tactical options, pause for a quick check of material balance, threats, and king safety before committing to a line.
- Endgame technique: practice common rook and king endings, especially those that arise after exchanges, so you can convert favorable endings more consistently.
- Pattern recognition under pressure: invest time in puzzles that emphasize forks, pins, skewers, and back-rank ideas to improve your instinct for these motifs in real games.
Openings and transition notes
Your games show a preference for sharp, unbalanced play that can yield practical chances in blitz. To minimize risky moments, consider reinforcing a couple of solid, straightforward lines in your main openings so you reach clean middlegames quickly. When you do commit to tactical展开, aim to simplify when ahead or reduce unnecessary complications if you’re running low on time.
Recommended practice plan
- Blitz-focused drills: 3–4 short sessions per week using a fixed opening system, followed by a quick post-game review to identify the moment you could have played more calmly.
- Endgame training: dedicate 15 minutes a couple of times per week to rook-and-king endings and basic two-rook endings to improve conversion.
- Time management practice: work on short, timed puzzles (5–10 minutes) to improve quick evaluation and reduce hesitation at critical moments.
- Post-game annotation: after each blitz session, annotate one key decision from each game and write down an alternative plan you could have attempted.
- Plan a steadier opening repertoire: choose 1–2 solid options and master their typical middlegame plans, then gradually add a secondary system for variety.
Next steps
If you’d like, I can tailor a 4-week, focused training outline around your most common opponents and time control, with targeted puzzles and specific openings to practice. Just share any details you want me to prioritize.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| drbayzz | 10W / 4L / 1D | View |
| cirillo5 | 13W / 3L / 4D | View |
| matt2master | 29W / 33L / 4D | View |
| skender388 | 48W / 33L / 7D | View |
| nikolapishtalov | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gm-gaza2025 | 5W / 1L / 0D | View |
| chimera-angel | 13W / 9L / 0D | View |
| nkechi | 37W / 18L / 3D | View |
| thldywns2026 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| sc2pro123 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| sapayin | 143W / 157L / 20D | View Games |
| kanielc | 85W / 103L / 27D | View Games |
| Jay Bonin | 51W / 96L / 14D | View Games |
| Nicholas Figorito | 49W / 83L / 26D | View Games |
| realkaspinha | 57W / 77L / 17D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2339 | 2073 | ||
| 2024 | 2356 | |||
| 2023 | 2313 | |||
| 2022 | 2231 | 2101 | ||
| 2021 | 2321 | 2094 | ||
| 2020 | 1489 | 2268 | 1930 | |
| 2019 | 2237 | 1634 | ||
| 2018 | 2093 | |||
| 2017 | 2053 | |||
| 2014 | 1530 | 1966 | ||
| 2012 | 1863 | |||
| 2011 | 1849 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 942W / 813L / 167D | 882W / 891L / 148D | 95.3 |
| 2024 | 1135W / 1034L / 207D | 1077W / 1125L / 174D | 95.4 |
| 2023 | 1311W / 1143L / 217D | 1176W / 1315L / 195D | 91.3 |
| 2022 | 1308W / 1167L / 228D | 1248W / 1287L / 193D | 92.3 |
| 2021 | 1408W / 1243L / 229D | 1346W / 1350L / 211D | 89.7 |
| 2020 | 1745W / 1443L / 318D | 1633W / 1608L / 259D | 91.1 |
| 2019 | 506W / 363L / 68D | 480W / 378L / 85D | 90.5 |
| 2018 | 52W / 28L / 9D | 38W / 38L / 12D | 90.9 |
| 2017 | 70W / 65L / 18D | 77W / 64L / 10D | 89.4 |
| 2014 | 10W / 7L / 0D | 8W / 7L / 1D | 92.0 |
| 2012 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 80.0 |
| 2011 | 45W / 21L / 5D | 37W / 24L / 7D | 80.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Modern | 3360 | 1553 | 1575 | 232 | 46.2% |
| Czech Defense | 2527 | 1191 | 1140 | 196 | 47.1% |
| Modern Defense | 1885 | 959 | 787 | 139 | 50.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1271 | 617 | 558 | 96 | 48.5% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1183 | 580 | 520 | 83 | 49.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1178 | 566 | 514 | 98 | 48.0% |
| Australian Defense | 886 | 437 | 381 | 68 | 49.3% |
| Döry Defense | 847 | 402 | 385 | 60 | 47.5% |
| French Defense | 797 | 396 | 345 | 56 | 49.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 744 | 358 | 324 | 62 | 48.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 33 | 16 | 13 | 4 | 48.5% |
| Modern | 31 | 10 | 16 | 5 | 32.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 22 | 9 | 11 | 2 | 40.9% |
| Döry Defense | 19 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 52.6% |
| Modern Defense | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 38.5% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| East Indian Defense | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 41.7% |
| Pirc Defense: Austrian Attack | 11 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 13 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |