Master Shifu: The Grandmaster of Quirks and Checks
Known online as anaguasoft, Master Shifu is a chess player whose strategic prowess is matched only by his penchant for drama on the board. From modest beginnings in 2012 with a blitz rating barely scraping 1200, Shifu quickly rose through the ranks, breaking the 2400 barrier in blitz by early 2024 – a milestone few achieve without a few spilled cups of coffee.
Rating Journey
Starting at humble daily ratings in the 1000s, Shifu's real magic showed up in the blitz and bullet arenas, where he transformed from a fledgling tactician into a force to be reckoned with. His bullet peak was 2306 (achieved back in 2016), but it’s in blitz where he truly shines, hitting a blazing peak of 2426 in 2024. Rapid games have also seen him crack the 2200 mark, proving he isn't just a speed demon but a well-rounded competitor.
Playing Style & Personality
Master Shifu embraces the unpredictable: a 16-game winning streak is balanced by a respectably humble 14-game losing streak. If that sounds like the emotional rollercoaster you’d expect from someone who rarely resigns early (only 0.77% early resignations), you'd be right. His games often go deep, with an average 78 moves to victory, showing endurance and a love for endgame puzzles (85.65% endgame frequency).
He has an astonishing 90.21% comeback rate - the true sign of a fighter, not a quitter. Even losing a piece doesn’t rattle his nerves too much (he wins nearly half the time after such a setback). Though his tilt factor is at a quaint 14, don’t let that fool you: Shifu’s best time to play and absolutely wreck opponents is 11 PM, proving he’s a night owl plotting grand checkmate schemes.
Opening Repertoire
Fancy a peek into his secret playbook? The mysterious “Top Secret” opening dominates his blitz repertoire with over 15,000 games! His secondary picks include the Sicilian Defense and Trompowsky Attack, showing he's comfortable stirring the pot and inviting complex tactical melee. Not all openings are loved equally, though; he has a cautious relationship with the Smith Morra Gambit Declined, sporting a humble 16.67% win rate there – perhaps an opening best taken with a grain of salt (and a backup plan).
Battle Scars and Glory
Across an epic career, Shifu has dispatched opponents 7,416 times in blitz alone, balanced by 7,002 bitter defeats, sprinkled with 1,060 draws – that’s some thick ice on which this warrior glides. Bullet battles add another 533 wins and 454 losses to the tally, cementing his reputation as a versatile duel artist.
Recent Adventures on the Board
Fresh off the digital battlefield, Master Shifu's latest victory came after a calculated resignation defeat by his opponent, showcasing his skill in applying pressure until the enemy folds. Of course, no hero’s journey is without setbacks; a tough checkmate loss to sicillianenthusiast2 reminds us even masters stumble – but they always return stronger.
Fan Favorite Facts
- Has a solid win rate on Fridays and Saturdays, making weekends his prime time to conquer chess clocks.
- Prefers playing White pieces slightly more successfully, with a 49.72% win rate compared to 46.77% for Black.
- Keeps opponents guessing with an Average of 78 moves per win, and an even longer patience on losses.
- Frequently engages in tactical endgames, proving not just brute force but deep strategic patience.
- Secret weapon: Unstoppable comebacks when the odds are stacked, with a striking over 90% comeback rate!
Whether you call him anaguasoft, Master Shifu, or just the guy who’s always plotting a comeback in the midnight hour, one thing’s clear: this player is a chessboard ninja, mixing art, science, and a dash of chaos to delight and confound.
Blitz performance: what you’re doing well
You showed sharp calculation and strong tactical awareness in your recent blitz win, finishing with a forcing sequence that led to checkmate. That game demonstrates you can transform pressure into a decisive finish when you spot active piece coordination and clean lines for your queen and rooks.
Across your recent games, you often keep the initiative when you have the move and you’re comfortable playing aggressive setups that aim for concrete, time-pressure traps. Your ability to find practical ideas under blitz constraints is a real strength.
What to focus on for improvement
- Confidence with plan and prophylaxis: In blitz, it’s easy to chase tactical shots without a clear long-term plan. After each forcing sequence, quickly ask yourself what your opponent’s best reply could be and how you’ll respond to it.
- Endgame + simplification drills: When the position stays tense, practice converting advantages in simplified endings. Knowing a few golden endgames (rook and pawn endings, opposite-side pawns) can improve conversion in time Scrambles.
- Time management under pressure: Some moves show hesitation or overthinking in critical moments. Aim to allocate a fixed short window for each critical decision, and reserve a tiny buffer for the final ten seconds of a blitz game.
- Blunt defenses against unexpected lines: In blitz, opponents may steer into surprising setups. Build a compact, reliable reaction plan for two common openings you face, so you can respond confidently even if the standard lines deviate.
Opening performance snapshot and practical plan
Your openings show solid results with a mix of styles. Notably, the London System style line (and related solid setups) shows a healthy win rate, suggesting you’re comfortable with solid development and a steady structure. Some Sicilian and other dynamic lines also perform respectably, which aligns with your ability to seize active play when the position allows.
- Lean into your best-performing solid lines (like the London System variants) for quick, predictable middlegames where you can outplay your opponent in the clock.
- Keep some sharpened, practice-ready responses to dynamic lines (for example, select a couple of Sicilian ideas and a couple of Caro-Kann ideas) so you can switch gears quickly in blitz.
- Review 1–2 recent blitz games per week focusing on the openings you use most. Note where you missed prophylaxis or where you could have simplified to a winning endgame sooner.
Targeted training plan for the next weeks
- Daily quick puzzles (5–10 minutes) focused on tactical motifs that appeared in your recent games, such as attacking nets, back-rank ideas, and forcing trades to open lines.
- Two 20-minute blitz sessions per week with deliberate opening review: pick your top two openings (for example, a solid system and a sharp dynamic line) and run through 6–8 typical middlegame structures you tend to reach.
- Endgame basics: practice rook endings and king-vs-queen endings with a timer to improve conversion in time trouble.
- Post-game routine: after each blitz session, write a brief 3-point takeaway for the next time you see each key position (what you did well, what you missed, and what you’ll try differently).
Quick takeaways from the three most recent results
- Recent win: you demonstrated a clean attack and finished with a mating net. Use that as a concrete reminder to seek lines that maximize your piece activity when opponents overextend.
- Recent loss: there were opportunities to simplify or steer into favorable endgames that you didn’t fully capitalize on. Work on a post-attack plan to tighten follow-through in such positions.
- Recent draw: you maintained pressure and created chances, but time pressure or a mis-timed exchange can swing these in blitz. Focus on sharp but reliable exchanges that keep the clock in your favor.
Contextual links (optional)
Review the most recent win against a strong opponent: leogrindsyou
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chessblaze123 | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| quasaric | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| basem2001 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Naruna Chan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| william christensen | 4W / 2L / 0D | View |
| hima-laya | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| ginseng0904 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| phantommenace64 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| archetype_64 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| matthf21 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jony Habla | 84W / 197L / 17D | View Games |
| Gerardo Cabellon | 69W / 181L / 34D | View Games |
| Marc Paraguya | 33W / 63L / 8D | View Games |
| batangpasig | 44W / 42L / 9D | View Games |
| cruz29 | 18W / 39L / 11D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2101 | 2350 | 2229 | |
| 2024 | 2224 | 2252 | 2209 | |
| 2023 | 2023 | 2285 | 2231 | |
| 2022 | 2160 | |||
| 2021 | 2206 | |||
| 2020 | 1989 | 2157 | ||
| 2019 | 2053 | 2175 | ||
| 2018 | 2105 | 2138 | ||
| 2017 | 2120 | 2240 | ||
| 2016 | 2184 | 2218 | 1342 | |
| 2015 | 2053 | 1971 | 1173 | |
| 2014 | 1862 | 2063 | 1063 | |
| 2013 | 1861 | 1063 | ||
| 2012 | 1859 | 1126 | 1073 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 300W / 324L / 48D | 279W / 341L / 55D | 80.6 |
| 2024 | 161W / 122L / 25D | 142W / 148L / 17D | 80.6 |
| 2023 | 216W / 179L / 33D | 207W / 187L / 41D | 80.6 |
| 2022 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 114.0 |
| 2021 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 2L / 0D | 105.4 |
| 2020 | 43W / 28L / 5D | 40W / 29L / 5D | 81.1 |
| 2019 | 150W / 98L / 14D | 110W / 125L / 14D | 77.0 |
| 2018 | 249W / 289L / 36D | 279W / 276L / 29D | 80.6 |
| 2017 | 837W / 674L / 111D | 767W / 758L / 92D | 84.9 |
| 2016 | 1182W / 1139L / 166D | 1104W / 1174L / 213D | 83.2 |
| 2015 | 919W / 783L / 112D | 871W / 826L / 123D | 83.0 |
| 2014 | 285W / 230L / 30D | 282W / 217L / 30D | 82.6 |
| 2013 | 6W / 10L / 0D | 6W / 8L / 1D | 64.5 |
| 2012 | 20W / 11L / 1D | 19W / 16L / 1D | 71.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 618 | 301 | 289 | 28 | 48.7% |
| Döry Defense | 531 | 257 | 243 | 31 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 437 | 199 | 201 | 37 | 45.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 413 | 218 | 162 | 33 | 52.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 409 | 203 | 160 | 46 | 49.6% |
| Czech Defense | 343 | 174 | 144 | 25 | 50.7% |
| Australian Defense | 312 | 150 | 142 | 20 | 48.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 283 | 143 | 121 | 19 | 50.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 279 | 123 | 141 | 15 | 44.1% |
| East Indian Defense | 252 | 128 | 108 | 16 | 50.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alekhine Defense | 74 | 40 | 32 | 2 | 54.0% |
| Döry Defense | 58 | 31 | 22 | 5 | 53.5% |
| Czech Defense | 53 | 27 | 25 | 1 | 50.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 51 | 21 | 25 | 5 | 41.2% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 46 | 21 | 23 | 2 | 45.6% |
| Australian Defense | 39 | 24 | 13 | 2 | 61.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 38 | 20 | 18 | 0 | 52.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 37 | 17 | 19 | 1 | 46.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 37 | 15 | 21 | 1 | 40.5% |
| French Defense | 29 | 15 | 14 | 0 | 51.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 12 | 8 | 3 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Czech Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Döry Defense | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 2 |