Woman FIDE Master Annapoorni Meiyappan
Known in the chess world as a strategic force to be reckoned with, Annapoorni Meiyappan holds the prestigious title of Woman FIDE Master. She's not just a player; she's a well-crafted blend of brains, boldness, and a dash of brilliance on the 64 squares.
A Journey Through the Ranks
Starting with a modest rapid rating back in 2011, Annapoorni quickly climbed the ladder, peaking at a very respectable 1949 in rapid chess — a rating that says, "I’ve seen your tricky opening and raised you multiple queens!" Her blitz and bullet ratings have enjoyed their own highs, proving that whether under slow analysis or lightning-fast pressure, she’s ready to outwit her opponents.
Playing Style & Humor
With an impressive tactical awareness, Annapoorni boasts a 74% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece. That’s right — she turns setbacks into setups like a true chess ninja! Average moves per win hover around 65, showcasing her patience, while an occasional early resignation rate of just 1.6% suggests even when the chips are down, she’s not one to quit without a fight.
Psychologically, she’s a delightful enigma: equipped with a tilt factor of 8 (somewhere between "calm grandmaster" and "slightly miffed squirrel"), she keeps her cool enough to consistently outperform casual players by nearly 15%.
Notable Streaks & Opponents
Her longest winning streak clocks in at a whopping 22 games. That's enough to give any opposing player nightmares about seeing her name pop up in their match queue!
Her record against recent opponents is a rollercoaster of 100% wins against some and 0% against others — because even chess legends have their Achilles’ heels.
Off the Board
Behind the scenes, Annapoorni is probably the kind of player who can analyze a game while brewing the perfect cup of tea — multitasking like a queen on and off the board. Whether you face her in a rapid game or a tense blitz battle, expect surprises, strategic twists, and maybe a joke or two hidden in the moves.
In short: Annapoorni Meiyappan doesn’t just play chess; she lives it. And if the pieces could talk, they'd probably say, “Watch out, she’s coming for your king!”
Hi Annapoorni Meiyappan!
Great work on your recent games – they reveal an adventurous style and growing tactical vision. Below is targeted, constructive feedback to help you convert more of those attacking ideas into consistent wins.
What you’re already doing well
- Active piece play out of the opening. In several French-/Scandinavian-type positions you quickly mobilise pieces and seize open files.
- Tactical alertness. Your win vs. 2324rp shows you spotting Bxf7+! and a series of zwischenzugs that forced resignation.
- Comfort in dynamic pawn structures. You willingly push pawns (g- and h-pawns in particular) to unbalance quiet positions – a valuable skill once paired with prudent king safety.
Key improvement themes
-
King safety & prophylaxis.
• Your losses often begin with an over-extended kingside (e.g. g-pawn pushes in the odds Caro-Kann and several Scandinavian defeats).
• Before launching pawns, ask “If my attack stalls, which squares around my king become weak?” Get in the habit of one prophylactic move (h3, Kh1, a3) before a full assault. -
Converting extra material.
When you are up a pawn or exchange, avoid “still looking for a knockout.” Simplify into won endings. Try the rule of thumb: When ahead, trade pieces (not pawns); when behind, trade pawns (not pieces). -
Endgame technique.
Several games reach rook-and-pawn endings where a technical slip costs you.
• Drill the "Lucena" and "Philidor" rook endings 10 times each this week.
• Practise king activity – in rapid time-controls queens often get traded suddenly; be ready! -
Opening depth vs. width.
You play many systems: French, Scandinavian, Caro-Kann, Sicilian, Pirc… That’s excellent exploration, but pick one main repertoire for each colour and study typical middlegameThe stage after development where plans and pawn structure matter. plans. Knowing plans beats knowing moves. -
Time management.
Blitz clocks show you dipping below 1 min while still in a sharp middlegame. Try a “1-2-3” rhythm:
• <1 s: obvious recaptures/checks
• <2 s: quiet developing moves
• 3-5 s: every non-forcing move (blunder-check)
This alone will save 10-20 s per critical moment.
Illustrative examples
Your attacking strength
Notice how every piece joined the party before you opened lines with g4. Recreate that model when attacking.
A cautionary loss
Here, after winning a pawn (26…Rxc2+), black’s connected rooks & passer decided the game. The takeaway: once the queens are off, centralise the king; don’t allow the opponent to coordinate heavy pieces on the 2nd/7th ranks.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Every day: 20 tactical puzzles filtered for “intermediate difficulty forks & discovered attacks.”
- Alternate days: play one 15 + 10 rapid game solely focusing on time-management rhythm. Review without engine for 5 min, then with engine.
- Openings: choose either the [French Tarrasch] or [Caro-Kann Classical] as main defence to 1.e4 this fortnight and study two model games per day.
- Endgame: finish the “100 Endgames You Must Know” chapters on rook vs. rook + pawn endings (chapters 53-60).
Motivation corner
Your current peak ratings: Blitz 1780 (2019-09-18), Rapid 2008 (2022-06-16). Set a micro-goal of +50 elo in either time-class by focusing on the single weakness you deem most urgent from the list above. Improvement compounds quickly once effort is focused!
Keep up the energetic, creative chess, Annapoorni. Refine the defensive foundations and the results – and rating – will follow.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| seesaw2434 | 3W / 74L / 10D | |
| aravinth2014 | 9W / 17L / 4D | |
| Kendrick Knowles | 16W / 11L / 3D | |
| globeplay | 3W / 10L / 6D | |
| shoaib2022 | 18W / 0L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1745 | 1949 | ||
| 2024 | 1949 | |||
| 2023 | 1745 | 1949 | ||
| 2022 | 1949 | |||
| 2021 | 1743 | 1906 | ||
| 2020 | 1058 | 1743 | 1795 | |
| 2019 | 902 | 1780 | 1872 | 1176 |
| 2018 | 1067 | 1703 | 1810 | |
| 2017 | 1354 | 1755 | 1176 | |
| 2016 | 910 | 1801 | 1075 | |
| 2015 | 1749 | |||
| 2014 | 1726 | 1075 | ||
| 2013 | 928 | 1234 | 1553 | 1086 |
| 2012 | 1347 | 1201 | ||
| 2011 | 963 | 1044 | 845 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 78.0 |
| 2024 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 52.0 |
| 2023 | 8W / 0L / 0D | 13W / 0L / 0D | 47.4 |
| 2022 | 10W / 5L / 8D | 7W / 11L / 3D | 63.8 |
| 2021 | 24W / 29L / 7D | 16W / 28L / 12D | 71.9 |
| 2020 | 24W / 44L / 18D | 16W / 55L / 8D | 69.1 |
| 2019 | 59W / 64L / 30D | 54W / 70L / 19D | 72.6 |
| 2018 | 61W / 42L / 18D | 47W / 55L / 21D | 65.7 |
| 2017 | 80W / 102L / 40D | 80W / 86L / 35D | 72.4 |
| 2016 | 102W / 52L / 53D | 79W / 86L / 40D | 66.9 |
| 2015 | 90W / 74L / 33D | 86W / 87L / 23D | 74.0 |
| 2014 | 55W / 46L / 14D | 50W / 56L / 11D | 70.7 |
| 2013 | 71W / 46L / 9D | 60W / 64L / 2D | 67.0 |
| 2012 | 114W / 69L / 11D | 104W / 80L / 8D | 73.8 |
| 2011 | 3W / 4L / 0D | 2W / 5L / 1D | 70.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 26 | 9 | 14 | 3 | 34.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| French Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 343 | 158 | 143 | 42 | 46.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 211 | 104 | 89 | 18 | 49.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 196 | 73 | 88 | 35 | 37.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 190 | 80 | 81 | 29 | 42.1% |
| French Defense | 125 | 61 | 43 | 21 | 48.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 112 | 55 | 35 | 22 | 49.1% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 103 | 46 | 36 | 21 | 44.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 80 | 46 | 28 | 6 | 57.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 68 | 23 | 33 | 12 | 33.8% |
| Slav Defense | 68 | 25 | 31 | 12 | 36.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Modern Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scotch Game | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 2 |
| Losing | 8 | 0 |