Chess Player Profile: ano89273
Meet ano89273, a formidable National Master whose chess prowess has been honed over thousands of intense games. Known for a sharp mind and a relentless tactical eye, this player has journeyed through the ranks with grit, wit, and the occasional flair of genius.
With a peak Blitz rating surpassing 2500 and a bullet zenith close behind, ano89273 commands the clock as well as the board. Their blitz career alone boasts over 11,500 games, winning more than half—a testament to both stamina and sharp instincts. Notably, their comeback rate after facing setbacks is an impressive 82.6%, proving stubbornness is a secret weapon in their arsenal.
As a virtuoso of rapid calculation, ano89273 embraces the chaos of fast time controls but also masters the slow burn of daily chess, where the win rate soars to a staggering 86%! When on the board, expect games averaging over 70 moves in wins and losses alike—clearly, they don’t quit early and like to savor every tension-filled moment.
Psychologically, ano89273 might tilt a bit more than the average player (tilt factor of 12), but who wouldn’t when faced with 12 consecutive losses at some point? Luckily, character shines brightest under pressure: with a longest winning streak of 16 games, they turn the tide like a true warrior.
Playing Style
- Adept at endgames, featuring in over 76% of matches
- Prefers to fight till the end, rarely resigning prematurely (early resignation rate < 0.4%)
- Solid performance playing with White (54.3% win rate) and no slouch with Black (48.8%)
When asked about their openings, ano89273 guards their secrets closely, vectoring through countless variations with an almost “Top Secret” classification. And yet, the legend grows — against frequent opponents like jt2000 and pharmadude, wins and losses dance in thrilling harmony.
Memorable Matches
The latest battles demonstrate not only technical skill but creative flair: from swashbuckling sieges in the French Defense Normal Variation to nimble traps in the Nimzowitsch-Larsen Attack, ano89273’s games are a kaleidoscope of bold decisions and deep calculations. When victory calls, resignation from their opponents is a common chorus.
Even in defeat, the lessons shape stronger comebacks. Losses have come by checkmate and resignation, but never from lack of passion or resilience.
In a Nutshell
National Master, tactician, and stubborn fighter. ano89273’s chess story is one of steady rise and relentless pursuit of mastery. Whether blitzing through rapid bullets or patiently plotting in daily games, this player combines skill and spirit, proving it’s not just the pieces but the player behind them that wins the game.
Fun fact: If there was a chess award for “Best Comebacks” or “Most Dramatic Game Endings,” ano89273 would probably have a shelf full of trophies by now.
Hi ano89273!
Great work keeping your blitz rating around the 2400 mark (2512 (2021-08-15)). Your games are fun to watch—full of energy and tactical imagination. Below is some focused feedback you can put to work right away.
What’s already excellent
- Flank pawn storms: In the win against MichailovM you combined
h4–h5with queenside pressure and converted cleanly. You clearly know how to open lines when the position calls for it. - Piece activity: Your pieces rarely sit idle. In the Nimzo-Larsen game vs tgpgoat both rooks and queen invaded the seventh rank before move 30.
- End-game technique: Against Capa98 you converted a K+P ending with no fuss—good sign that you don’t relax too early.
Main improvement themes
- King safety when pushing wing pawns
Two recent losses began with the same script: …h6/…g5 (or h4–h5) opened decisive diagonals against your own king. A quick example:
Keep a “safety checklist” before advancing the rook pawns:
‒ Are queens still on?
‒ Can the e- or d- files open?
‒ What is the quickest route to tuck the king to h7/g7?
- Opposite-side castling races
In the Hyper-Accelerated Dragon loss you allowed h-pawn levers while your counterplay (…b5…c4) never started. Review typical defensive resources: …h5, …Rh7 doubling on the h-file, and exchange sacs onc3. - Central counter-punch vs “quiet” Queen’s-Pawn systems
Versus the Zukertort/Colle you drifted into a passive setup. A quick …c5 or the flexible …b6/…Bb7/…e5 plan would seize space and reduce White’s kingside initiative. - Time management
Several blunders arrived under 15 s. Try the “30-second rule”: aim to have ≥1:30 on the clock by move 15, leaning on preparation for the opening moves.
Opening laboratory
| With | Current choice | Homework |
|---|---|---|
| White | Alapin 1.e4 c5 2.c3 | Add the sharp 6.f4 plan vs …d6 lines. |
| White | Nimzo-Larsen 1.b3 | Prepare the pawn sac cxd5 Nc3 against the …d5/…e5 clamp. |
| Black vs 1.e4 | Hyper-Accelerated Dragon | Memorise critical 6.Bc4 lines; drill “Dragon tactics” in Puzzle Rush. |
| Black vs 1.d4 | Black Knights’ Tango mix | Decide on a single structure—either pure Tango (…e6 before …d5) or the solid Tarrasch Defence. |
Four-week training micro-cycle
- Day 1–2: Annotate one recent win and one loss before consulting the engine.
- Day 3–4: 30 tactical puzzles daily, emphasising double attacks & deflections.
- Day 5: Play a 15 + 10 game, then spend 20 min analysing critical moments.
- Day 6: Opening drill—flash-card your main lines for both colours.
- Day 7: Rest / watch GM blitz; study their clock handling habits.
Progress tracker
Re-check in a month and compare:
Keep the tactical fire, add a dash of king safety, and the 2500 barrier will fall soon. Good luck and enjoy the grind!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jt2000 | 28W / 8L / 4D | View Games |
| Pharmadude | 22W / 8L / 1D | View Games |
| alexander_requelme | 14W / 8L / 2D | View Games |
| 2011KING | 7W / 14L / 1D | View Games |
| mkapho73 | 10W / 10L / 1D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 2450 | 2410 | 2529 | 2529 |
| 2021 | 2424 | 2444 | 2305 | 2529 |
| 2020 | 2214 | 2395 | 2336 | |
| 2019 | 2095 | 2356 | ||
| 2018 | 2038 | 2286 | 2334 | |
| 2017 | 2006 | 2127 | ||
| 2016 | 2167 | 2007 | 1977 | 2334 |
| 2015 | 2025 | 2068 | 2018 | 2351 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 75W / 43L / 5D | 60W / 46L / 17D | 83.3 |
| 2021 | 556W / 389L / 86D | 492W / 444L / 112D | 85.9 |
| 2020 | 538W / 398L / 101D | 492W / 456L / 97D | 81.6 |
| 2019 | 313W / 250L / 42D | 256W / 276L / 47D | 77.0 |
| 2018 | 388W / 344L / 45D | 356W / 370L / 57D | 74.3 |
| 2017 | 518W / 378L / 30D | 445W / 429L / 44D | 69.8 |
| 2016 | 369W / 291L / 23D | 327W / 297L / 34D | 69.1 |
| 2015 | 589W / 344L / 57D | 557W / 368L / 57D | 72.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 289 | 158 | 111 | 20 | 54.7% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 288 | 145 | 131 | 12 | 50.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 281 | 151 | 111 | 19 | 53.7% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 249 | 132 | 102 | 15 | 53.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 214 | 112 | 83 | 19 | 52.3% |
| Australian Defense | 209 | 122 | 82 | 5 | 58.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 205 | 98 | 89 | 18 | 47.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 204 | 95 | 86 | 23 | 46.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 197 | 100 | 77 | 20 | 50.8% |
| Döry Defense | 185 | 92 | 87 | 6 | 49.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 75 | 46 | 26 | 3 | 61.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 51 | 28 | 20 | 3 | 54.9% |
| Australian Defense | 49 | 32 | 14 | 3 | 65.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 41 | 22 | 18 | 1 | 53.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 38 | 23 | 13 | 2 | 60.5% |
| Czech Defense | 29 | 18 | 11 | 0 | 62.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 22 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 21 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 52.4% |
| Sicilian Defense | 19 | 11 | 8 | 0 | 57.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 19 | 12 | 7 | 0 | 63.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: Exchange, 5.Bg5 c6 6.Qc2 g6 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Three Knights Opening | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Exchange Variation, Alapin Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 4 |
| Losing | 12 | 0 |