Anwesh Upadhyaya: The International Master with a Bullet Blaze
Meet Anwesh Upadhyaya, or as his online comrades dub him, Anwesh9792 — a formidable International Master certified by FIDE, and a chess player whose speed on the board is as impressive as a caffeinated knight galloping across the ranks.
Since 2017, Anwesh has been setting the digital chess world on fire, especially in bullet chess, where his ratings have soared above 2800 at peak, peaking at an awe-inspiring 2840 in June 2022. That means he doesn't just play fast; he annihilates opposition before they have time to blink.
But beware: while his bullet rating screams lightning speed, his style is far from reckless. Averaging over 74 moves per win, Anwesh prefers to savor the full flavor of endgames (endorsed by a 76% endgame frequency) — kind of like a grandmaster chef simmering a classic recipe to perfection rather than microwaving a quick snack.
Playing Style & Tactics
With a comeback rate of 79%, Anwesh rarely lets the opponent’s piece snatch moment get him down; instead, he turns adversity into opportunity with tactical brilliance and psychological resilience (though with a tilt factor of 13, even the best have their “oh no” moments). He wins over half of his games even after losing a piece — proof that he's no stranger to fighting back from a pinch.
Favorite Battles and Daily Grind
His record in bullet games is nothing short of epic: over 3,700 wins among nearly 6,600 battles, with a winning rate near 57% using his secret weapon opening (curiously labeled "Top Secret"). In daily games, where patience is king, his win rate blazes at an Incredible 96.7%, making “daily grind” sound rather glamorous.
Peak Moments & Memorable Games
Anwesh's blitz peak rating touched a spicy 2837 in early 2020, and his rapid games have dazzled at a solid 2468 peak. More recently, in April 2025, Anwesh delivered checkmate in a Sicilian Dragon battle, showcasing not only precise calculation but nerves of steel — finishing strong with a rook and queen dance that left his opponent speechless.
Off the Board
Though specific hobbies remain a mystery, Anwesh’s game analysis suggests a mind that enjoys complex puzzles and outmaneuvering opponents of all calibers — from casual to titled grandmasters. Behind every brilliant move lies a player who’s as committed to learning and adapting as he is to winning.
So if you ever find yourself facing Anwesh9792 online, prepare to be outfoxed with a smile — and maybe a good dose of humility.
Hi Anwesh, here is your personalised post-match review
What you are already doing very well
- Opening awareness and flexibility. Your recent wins show confident handling of both 1.e4 and 1.d4 structures. In the Accelerated Dragon game you steered the position to a favourable IQP + king-side attack with the creative manoeuvre Nc7–e8–d6–c8-a7.
- Tactical vision. Combined motifs such as forks, double attacks and mating nets are clearly a strength: 27.Re8+!!–34.Rf1+–38.Qh4# was a precise finishing sequence (see embedded PGN).
- Endgame technique when ahead. In several games against swathirai you converted extra material without allowing counter-play. Your rook endings in particular are convincing once you reach a technical phase.
Main growth opportunities
- Time management. Three of your last five losses (e.g. vs ChessLearner_200 and Niji183) happened with a winning or equal position on the board. You often spend ~40 seconds in the opening but have <10 seconds for complex endings. Consider switching a portion of your training to 3 + 2 or 5 + 3 to internalise a steadier move rhythm.
- Prophylaxis against counter-play. In the D30 loss you attacked on the kingside but allowed …Qf3/…Qg4 ideas that exploited dark-square weaknesses. Before launching pawn storms, add the question “What is my opponent’s next active move?”—often a single preventive move (e.g. h3–g4 only after Kh2) keeps the initiative.
- Transition choices. The English Defence loss shows a recurring theme: exchanging into queen endgames without calculating the opponent’s passed pawns. Practise pawn-up but opposite-colour bishop endings to sharpen your assessment of when simplification is genuinely favourable.
Three concrete action items for the coming week
- Play 15 games of 3 + 2 and aim to keep >45 seconds after move 20 every time. Log how often you succeed.
- Run the critical positions marked “?” below through an engine and then explain in your own words why the computer’s prophylactic move works. This strengthens your inner “no-rush” alarm.
• D30: after 17…Be7
• A15: after 25…Rxd1+ - Do a daily mini-set of three pawn endgame studies. Focus on outside passed pawn and shoulder charging concepts; these exact themes flipped a won game into a draw vs Niji183.
Quick stats snapshot
Peak rating: 2837 (2020-02-04)
Hourly results pattern:
Glossary highlight
Remember to look out for the hidden tactical Zwischenzug before capturing—several of your successful combinations were possible only because you spotted this in time.
Your latest attacking masterpiece
Keep up the excellent work, Anwesh! Small refinements to your clock handling and prophylactic thinking will push you comfortably beyond 2750 blitz.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Abhijeet Gupta | 69W / 136L / 24D | |
| chessmaster11413 | 100W / 13L / 2D | |
| jovencitos33 | 37W / 39L / 7D | |
| Ustat | 47W / 30L / 4D | |
| Rakesh K Jena | 41W / 28L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2697 | 2686 | ||
| 2024 | 2693 | 2729 | 2040 | |
| 2023 | 2690 | 1757 | ||
| 2022 | 2762 | 2040 | ||
| 2021 | 2803 | 2729 | 2040 | 1738 |
| 2020 | 2644 | 2635 | 2040 | 1738 |
| 2019 | 2590 | 2759 | 2464 | |
| 2018 | 2544 | 2584 | 1770 | |
| 2017 | 2588 | 2512 | 2462 | 1436 |
| 2016 | 1450 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 6W / 4L / 0D | 7W / 2L / 2D | 86.7 |
| 2024 | 7W / 1L / 2D | 6W / 0L / 0D | 66.9 |
| 2023 | 6W / 4L / 3D | 5W / 6L / 1D | 83.5 |
| 2022 | 435W / 145L / 29D | 386W / 169L / 55D | 85.9 |
| 2021 | 137W / 57L / 16D | 121W / 70L / 25D | 86.1 |
| 2020 | 184W / 128L / 26D | 157W / 154L / 32D | 80.4 |
| 2019 | 58W / 17L / 9D | 59W / 23L / 14D | 74.3 |
| 2018 | 1145W / 759L / 158D | 1018W / 836L / 185D | 86.7 |
| 2017 | 783W / 458L / 54D | 751W / 490L / 54D | 60.1 |
| 2016 | 16W / 22L / 0D | 19W / 21L / 0D | 0.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 824 | 519 | 300 | 5 | 63.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 63 | 39 | 22 | 2 | 61.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 51 | 32 | 12 | 7 | 62.8% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 50 | 20 | 21 | 9 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 47 | 33 | 12 | 2 | 70.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 45 | 15 | 28 | 2 | 33.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 40 | 22 | 15 | 3 | 55.0% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 35 | 14 | 18 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Döry Defense | 32 | 19 | 10 | 3 | 59.4% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 32 | 16 | 12 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 291 | 161 | 109 | 21 | 55.3% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 227 | 124 | 78 | 25 | 54.6% |
| Modern | 225 | 129 | 80 | 16 | 57.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 211 | 122 | 76 | 13 | 57.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 171 | 91 | 61 | 19 | 53.2% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 168 | 92 | 63 | 13 | 54.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 163 | 90 | 60 | 13 | 55.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 151 | 81 | 59 | 11 | 53.6% |
| Czech Defense | 145 | 85 | 53 | 7 | 58.6% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 142 | 79 | 47 | 16 | 55.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack | 15 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 86.7% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, American Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening: Closed Variation, Rabinovich Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Semi-Slav Defense: Accelerated Meran Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Colle: 3...e6 4.Bd3 c5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGA: 4.e3 e6 5.Bxc4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |