Archaic Martin: The Rise of a Reluctant Chess Warrior
Meet Archaic Martin, a chess enthusiast who tiptoed onto the battlefield of kings and pawns with a modest rapid rating of 623 back in 2020. Since then, Martin has been climbing the ranks faster than you can say "checkmate," reaching a rapid peak of 1307 in 2025. Not bad for someone who sometimes feels like their pieces have a mind of their own!
Playing Style and Strengths
Martin favors a slow but steady grind, averaging about 62 moves per win—because why rush victory when you can enjoy the scenic route? With a low early resignation rate of just 2.35%, this player prefers to fight until the very end. And when it comes to endgames, Martin truly shines, with a hefty 63.7% frequency, proving patience is a virtue on the board.
Opening Arsenal
Known for their trusty Caro Kann Defense, Martin wields it like a seasoned swordsman, boasting a win rate north of 72% in rapid games. Other favorites include the Reti Opening and the Queen's Pawn Opening Zukertort Variation, both yielding impressive success. Guess Martin's motto is: "Why fix what's not broken?"
Battle Records
With over 179 wins in rapid chess and a respectable record in blitz and bullet formats, Martin demonstrates versatility and grit. Their resilience is legendary—bounce back from lost material 100% of the time and pull off comebacks nearly 74% of the time!
Psychological Quirks
Everyone tilts sometimes, right? Martin's tilt factor is about 11, meaning a couple of blunders might cause a small mental hiccup, but nothing catastrophic. They play seriously in rated games, even if casual games sometimes dim their usual spark, dropping their win difference by 20% between the two.
Fun Facts & Rivalries
- Martin's longest winning streak is a mighty 10 games—enough to send chills down the spines of opponents.
- Some rivals see Martin as unbeatable, with 100% win rates against players like martync1 and nr1asaf.
- Best hours to challenge Martin? Approximately 5-6 PM and after 9 PM, when they boast solid win rates over 60%, likely fueled by snacks and caffeine!
So whether you're a pawn pushing through or a queen darting across the board, beware the quiet storm of Archaic Martin. Proving every game that age-old chess wisdom still applies—sometimes, slow and steady really does win the match.
Feedback for Archaic Martin — recent blitz games
You've shown good energy and willingness to fight for initiative in your blitz games. You tend to seek active play and aren’t afraid to enter sharp, tactical positions. That fighting spirit is valuable, and with some targeted adjustments you can convert that activity into more consistent results.
What you’re doing well
- Ability to generate dynamic, tactical chances when the position opens up. You push for attacks and look for forcing moves that put pressure on your opponent.
- Old and new piece coordination is often active; you bring pieces toward the opponent’s king and keep your pieces in playable squares.
- Resilience in complex middlegames. Even when the position is chaotic, you continue to fight for tactics and complications instead of simplifying too early.
- Comfort with flexible openings and setups, which can lead to surprising middlegame chances and favorable imbalances.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz. A common pattern is spending too much time in the early middlegame, which leaves you short on time to finish accurately in the endgame. Try setting a rough per-move budget and stick to it, especially in the first 15 moves.
- Consolidation after gaining an edge. When you win material or open lines, solidify your advantage with a clear plan and avoid overextension that can invite counterplay or tactical traps.
- Endgame technique. Practice common rook and pawn endgames and other straightforward endings so you can convert advantages efficiently when the board simplifies.
- Avoid tactical overreach. In chaotic lines, double-check that a flashy tactic doesn’t walk into a counter tactic or a material trap. Quick checks for opponent threats and forcing replies help reduce surprises.
- Pattern recognition under time pressure. Regular, focused tactic practice can speed up your ability to spot forcing moves and common tactical motifs.
Practical plan for the next week
- Time management drills: play several 3+0 or 2+1 blitz games with the rule to spend no more than a fixed amount of time on the first 15 moves. Review where you saved or spent time and adjust.
- Endgame practice: study rook endgames and basic king-and-pawn endings. Focus on simple conversion techniques and avoiding last-moment blunders.
- Tactical training: complete a daily 15-minute puzzle session that emphasizes 2-3 forcing moves. This builds quick pattern recognition for blitz decisions.
- Opening planning: choose two reliable opening setups you’re comfortable with and write a short plan for the middlegame (typical pawn structures, piece ideas, and common breaks).
- Post-game review routine: after each blitz game, jot down three lessons — one mistake to avoid, one good idea to repeat, and one alternative move you considered.
Opening and middlegame notes
You appear to favor flexible, non-committal development in many blitz games, which can yield rich middlegame chances but also leaves room for missteps under time pressure. Build a compact opening plan for your go-to setups, so you reach a familiar middlegame structure quickly. Practice staying aware of your opponent’s immediate threats and have a couple of safe, steady responses ready to keep pressure manageable.
Recommended short-term study
Focus on practical blitz decision-making and endgames. Short, targeted lessons on endgame technique and time management will translate quickly into cleaner games under the clock.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| کیوان امیری | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| cottynho | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| safekiko | 17W / 28L / 6D | |
| redstormuno | 33W / 13L / 3D | |
| elpadrinomiguelangel | 20W / 11L / 3D | |
| ninuskacz | 17W / 1L / 2D | |
| picklestein_22 | 11W / 2L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1006 | 1166 | ||
| 2024 | 888 | 1041 | 1231 | |
| 2023 | 909 | 1000 | 987 | 994 |
| 2022 | 800 | 750 | 781 | 1031 |
| 2021 | 844 | 481 | 800 | |
| 2020 | 816 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 24W / 30L / 2D | 29W / 26L / 1D | 79.0 |
| 2024 | 63W / 54L / 4D | 61W / 53L / 6D | 80.4 |
| 2023 | 184W / 121L / 13D | 168W / 138L / 15D | 66.8 |
| 2022 | 190W / 116L / 17D | 140W / 176L / 10D | 60.8 |
| 2021 | 19W / 19L / 3D | 21W / 19L / 4D | 49.2 |
| 2020 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 1D | 54.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 80 | 47 | 32 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 27 | 14 | 12 | 1 | 51.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 26 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 65.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 10 | 7 | 0 | 58.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 56.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 1 | 63.6% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 153 | 81 | 67 | 5 | 52.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 152 | 88 | 61 | 3 | 57.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 80 | 44 | 32 | 4 | 55.0% |
| Australian Defense | 74 | 39 | 30 | 5 | 52.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 65 | 34 | 25 | 6 | 52.3% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 58 | 23 | 33 | 2 | 39.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 48 | 23 | 23 | 2 | 47.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 39 | 20 | 17 | 2 | 51.3% |
| Center Game | 36 | 18 | 18 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 32 | 14 | 12 | 6 | 43.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 25.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Australian Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 0 |
| Losing | 11 | 6 |