Vaidas Sakalauskas (asas71) - International Master Extraordinaire
Meet Vaidas Sakalauskas, the chess virtuoso known in online circles as asas71. An International Master titled by FIDE, Vaidas isn’t just your regular chess player; they are a blitz and bullet dynamo with a knack for combining style and strategy like a grandmaster chef mixing secret ingredients.
Vaidas started making waves as early as 2013 with bullet ratings soaring to over 2100, then steadily climbed the ranks to reach a peak blitz rating of 2565 as recent as January 2023 – which is impressive enough to make the chessboard sweat. Their bullet peak was equally fierce at 2559 in late 2020. Whether it’s lightning-fast bullet games or the tactical fireworks of blitz, Vaidas thrives under time pressure.
Known for a chess style that favors endurance and strategy (average wins last about 72 moves), Vaidas rarely resigns early and boasts an incredible 84.5% comeback rate after setbacks. Losing a piece? No problem – they still win nearly 62% of such battles, proving that the game isn’t over until it’s checkmate. Talk about resilience!
With a commanding win rate of 56.5% in blitz and a staggering 75.2% in bullet on their favorite "Top Secret" openings, Vaidas clearly keeps opponents guessing – probably why some call them "The Chess Whisperer." Their longest winning streak? A jaw-dropping 25 games, because why stop on a good thing?
Timing is everything in chess, and Vaidas performs best in the mysterious witching hour of 1 AM and on Thursdays, scoring wins nearly 74% of the time – maybe the moonlight fuels their gambits? When they play white pieces, opponents better watch out: Vaidas boasts a 67% win rate with the whites, and a solid 59% with the blacks.
Off the board, Vaidas’s games show a sweet tooth for complex endgames, often dragging matches to an average of over 70 moves before delivering the final blow. Their favorite openings remain a secret weapon, but they certainly enjoy catching opponents in Pirc and Queen’s Gambit variations, demonstrating versatility and deep preparation.
Recent games reflect their superior nerves and tactical vision: a latest blitz victory by resignation at a peak rating of 2565 against letsgoband, showcasing graceful poise and precision.
Though even legends stumble (who hasn’t lost to a sneaky checkmate?), Vaidas keeps the tilt factor impressively low at 6, which means they don’t rage quit – they analyze, improve, and come back stronger. A true chess gladiator!
In sum, whether you’re a casual player or a seasoned competitor, Vaidas Sakalauskas (asas71) is a player to watch – a creative tactician, relentless fighter, and an International Master who makes chess look effortless (though we know it’s anything but).
Keep an eye out: next time you face asas71, bring your best moves and maybe a little luck.
Constructive Feedback for Vaidas Sakalauskas (asas71)
At-a-Glance
- Peak blitz rating: 2565 (2023-01-17)
- Typical session performance:
- Weekly rhythm:
Your Strengths
- Dynamic opening choices. You comfortably handle both flank systems (Reti) and sharp counter-attacks (Alekhine, Pirc). This keeps opponents guessing and often leads to imbalanced middlegames that suit your style.
- Tactical alertness. In the 2023 win against letsgoband you spotted 22.Rd6! and 24.Bxh6!, seizing the initiative with precise calculation.
- Piece activity over material. You willingly part with pawns to keep pieces active—an excellent habit when supported by concrete calculation.
Key Improvement Areas
-
King safety after pawn grabs.
In your recent loss to NmJonathanTan you captured ona7andb7, but after 21…Nh4! the exposed king became the decisive factor.
Ask “what are my opponent’s attacking chances?” before taking side pawns. -
Time management.
Several losses (e.g. vs IGMI_NguyenKePhat) were flagged or decided in frantic scrambles. Avoid burning clock in the opening; aim to enter the final 30 seconds with a simpler position or a clear plan. -
Endgame conversion.
Games such as your 2020 QGA win show excellent middlegame play but slightly shaky technique once queens come off. A few missed technical wins cost valuable seconds. -
Consistent repertoire.
Against 1.e4 you alternate between Alekhine, Pirc and Philidor structures. Consider specialising in one line for a month so you can study typical plans, endings and “automatic” manoeuvres—freeing clock time for critical moments.
Action Plan
- Structured opening study. Pick one reply to 1.e4 and one to 1.d4 for the next 30 games. Build a mini-file with five model games each; focus on plans, not just moves.
- Tactical defence drills. 10 minutes/day of puzzles where your side is already worse. This balances your natural attacking flair with better defensive vision.
- “Three questions” routine. Before every move ask:
1) What does my opponent threaten?
2) What changed in the position?
3) Which of my pieces is worst placed?
This habit adds automatic Prophylaxis to your game. - Endgame technique. Weekly practice of rook-and-pawn endings on a board or trainer. Add thematic studies on rook on the sixth vs passed pawn and basic Zugzwang positions.
- Post-game routine. After each session:
- Mark one critical moment (win or loss) and replay it without an engine.
- Only then verify with the engine to see the objective evaluation.
Target Milestones (next 6 weeks)
- Maintain 55 %+ score in chosen openings (track with a simple spreadsheet).
- Reduce average “opening phase” time to <45 seconds in 3-minute games.
- Finish 10 annotated endgames from classic players (e.g., Capablanca, Karpov) to improve conversion skills.
Encouragement
Your creative style already scores aesthetic wins. By adding a layer of caution around your king and polishing your endgame technique, a 2500+ blitz rating is well within reach. Enjoy the journey and keep the pieces active!🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| pultineviciuspaulius | 4W / 10L / 5D | |
| antonio1813 | 9W / 2L / 0D | |
| lewiseisen | 8W / 0L / 3D | |
| ngoductrihn2004 | 7W / 3L / 0D | |
| Tomas Laurusas | 4W / 4L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 2565 | |||
| 2021 | 2497 | |||
| 2020 | 2522 | 2504 | ||
| 2019 | 2321 | 2440 | ||
| 2018 | 2267 | 2392 | ||
| 2017 | 2284 | |||
| 2015 | 2197 | 2348 | ||
| 2014 | 2244 | 2001 | ||
| 2013 | 2156 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 57.0 |
| 2021 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 53.0 |
| 2020 | 18W / 5L / 3D | 18W / 8L / 3D | 68.7 |
| 2019 | 11W / 4L / 1D | 8W / 6L / 0D | 71.7 |
| 2018 | 37W / 20L / 10D | 33W / 29L / 9D | 80.6 |
| 2017 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 1L / 0D | 89.0 |
| 2015 | 104W / 38L / 11D | 91W / 54L / 14D | 76.0 |
| 2014 | 6W / 2L / 1D | 6W / 0L / 0D | 60.9 |
| 2013 | 26W / 5L / 2D | 28W / 7L / 1D | 70.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 37 | 22 | 11 | 4 | 59.5% |
| Czech Defense | 35 | 17 | 15 | 3 | 48.6% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 18 | 8 | 6 | 4 | 44.4% |
| Slav Defense | 17 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 58.8% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Modern Defense | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 44.4% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 85.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 26 | 21 | 4 | 1 | 80.8% |
| Budapest: 3...Ng4 4.e3 | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 71.4% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 11 | 6 | 4 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Benko Gambit Accepted: Central Storming Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 1 |
| Losing | 6 | 0 |