Ashvin Sivakumar (ASHCHESS)
FIDE Master & Bullet Legend
Meet Ashvin Sivakumar, affectionately known across the internet as ASHCHESS, a FIDE Master recognized for their sharp mind and even sharper tactical prowess. Ashvin's chess journey began humbly in the early 2010s with bullet ratings hovering around 1300 — a mere warm-up for what was to come.
Fast forward through years of intense and frequent play, Ashvin has blitzed their way up to a remarkable bullet peak rating of 2708 projected for 2025 — rivaling some of the sharpest and fastest brains on the chessboard. This rise isn't just a story of skill, but also one of endurance: thousands of battles fought, with over 9,200 wins in bullet alone. Despite the speed, Ashvin keeps a cool head, boasting a comeback rate above 85% and an incredible 94.6% win rate even after losing a piece — talk about resilience!
Ashvin’s playing style is a marathon of high-quality moves, averaging around 70 moves per game whether winning or losing. Opponents beware: with such a high endgame frequency (over 76%), they should expect a tenacious and strategic finisher who rarely resigns early — only about 7.5% of the time.
Chess psychology? Our hero manages a respectable tilt factor of 17, proving that even the best have moments when the pawns just won't cooperate. But fear not: Ashvin shines brightest on Saturdays and early mornings, where win rates hit their highest across days and hours. White pieces? A steady 57% win rate. Black pieces? Still formidable at over 52%.
Notable Streaks & Opponents
With a longest winning streak of 22 games, Ashvin’s consistency is no joke. And while some recent adversaries have caused trouble (looking at you, esultanov and scott-fox21), some opponents like facilitosoy and jonas_karch have been swept off the board every time.
The Opening Strategy
Ashvin prefers keeping openings a "Top Secret" — quite literally, as the games played with this classified repertoire dominate their portfolio. With impressive win rates above 54% in bullet and even higher in blitz and rapid formats (nearing 70%), it’s clear this secret weapon packs a punch.
Fun Fact
While most grandmasters sip coffee calmly, Ashvin probably drinks something stronger — the barely contained energy evident in nearly 17,000 bullet games played! So if you ever see a lightning-fast move on your board, it’s probably Ashvin channeling their inner speed demon.
In short: fast, fearless, and a force in the wild world of online chess — Ashvin Sivakumar is a name to remember!
Hi Ashvin, here’s a performance review based on your latest Titled-Tuesday blitz games.
What you are doing well
- Dynamic opening play. Your wins against higher-rated players such as Mikhail Panin show confident handling of the Hyper-Accelerated Dragon and Queen’s Gambit structures. You steer positions toward imbalanced pawn structures where your tactical vision shines.
- Clock management. Even in very sharp positions you keep 40–60 seconds in reserve, forcing opponents to make the last mistakes. This is a big edge in 3 + 1 blitz.
- Tactical alertness. The exchange-sac 25…Qb6! followed by …Ba6 in your game with Panin, and the resource 32.Rxb7! in your win vs Aemulus20, both highlight an eye for concrete tactics under time pressure.
Targeted improvement areas
-
Pirc / Modern set-ups versus 1.e4 (your recent losses to nitpicker & arna-inactive).
Early g-pawn thrusts (g4/g5, h4/h5) scored heavily against you. The main issues:- Passive piece placement: …Re8 and …Nc6 were played but the c8-bishop stayed shut.
- Under-prepared queenside counterplay; you fought on the kingside where White already had space.
-
Conversion technique when you’re clearly better.
In several wins (e.g. Panin, OurDudeness) you needed 10–15 extra moves to convert a decisive advantage because you kept pieces on instead of simplifying.- Look for exchanges into clearly won endings rather than continuing the attack with equal material.
- Practical rule for blitz: once Stockfish would show > +5, spend one tempo to trade queens or reach a won rook ending.
-
Endgame resistance when worse.
Your resignations against Bauman_Guy and Makswolf came from positions that still had drawing chances (opposite-colored bishops, imbalanced material). Blitz opponents often stumble here.- Refresh core rook-pawn endings so you recognise drawing fortresses instantly.
- Adopt a “never resign with increment and pawns on the board” policy during online events.
Action plan for the next two weeks
- Play 20 training games using only classical Pirc lines with …c6 & …d5 to feel the structures.
- Daily 10-minute drill: convert +3 engine positions vs computer set to 15 seconds/move. Aim for “conversion in < 25 moves”.
- Endgame flash cards: KRP vs KR, opposite-colored bishop + passer, and queen vs pawn on 7th (Zugzwang themes).
Useful references from your games
See full PGN of your clean win vs Panin
Critical moment from the loss to nitpicker (move 22)
The immediate 22…Be6! instead of 22…Rxc2 would have equalised by eliminating White’s strong d5-knight.Your stats snapshot
Peak blitz rating: 2605 (2021-08-24)
When you win most often:
Day-by-day performance:
Keep up the momentum!
You’re already beating 2600-level opposition. Plugging the three points above should push you toward 2600+ blitz consistently. Looking forward to your next breakthroughs.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| bonblobliqr1 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Vedant P Kumbakonam | 2W / 2L / 0D | |
| Radin Yadegar | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Maka Purtseladze | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Isin Ijarin | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| michobr | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| portugalskaya-raketa | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Radoslav Genov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| vezradim | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| danzha | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Never_walk_alone | 50W / 57L / 18D | |
| gamayevoleg | 56W / 39L / 20D | |
| Leo Bispo | 51W / 49L / 11D | |
| Hoang Minh Tho Do | 45W / 44L / 5D | |
| hannibal4 | 45W / 29L / 4D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2708 | 2570 | 2200 | |
| 2024 | 2543 | 1667 | ||
| 2023 | 2489 | 1660 | 2200 | |
| 2022 | 2498 | 2484 | 2037 | |
| 2021 | 2427 | 2424 | 2008 | |
| 2020 | 2428 | 2481 | 2039 | |
| 2019 | 2436 | 2278 | 1949 | |
| 2018 | 2328 | 1690 | 1856 | 1429 |
| 2017 | 2316 | 2052 | 1856 | |
| 2016 | 2315 | 1740 | 1429 | |
| 2015 | 1878 | 1875 | ||
| 2014 | 1597 | 1815 | ||
| 2013 | 1397 | 1672 | ||
| 2012 | 1251 | 1693 | 1429 | |
| 2011 | 1025 | 1575 | ||
| 2010 | 1327 | 1537 | 1413 | |
| 2009 | 1234 | 1264 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 138W / 122L / 12D | 145W / 99L / 24D | 83.6 |
| 2024 | 16W / 2L / 0D | 13W / 6L / 0D | 28.1 |
| 2023 | 13W / 8L / 0D | 13W / 8L / 2D | 37.6 |
| 2022 | 188W / 105L / 18D | 170W / 134L / 17D | 76.1 |
| 2021 | 1789W / 1174L / 211D | 1611W / 1312L / 214D | 76.7 |
| 2020 | 1309W / 917L / 136D | 1222W / 1014L / 152D | 77.5 |
| 2019 | 956W / 613L / 89D | 847W / 696L / 106D | 77.4 |
| 2018 | 801W / 493L / 58D | 753W / 495L / 65D | 58.5 |
| 2017 | 188W / 99L / 15D | 164W / 137L / 12D | 73.6 |
| 2016 | 251W / 196L / 21D | 249W / 203L / 21D | 56.7 |
| 2015 | 8W / 2L / 0D | 10W / 2L / 0D | 69.9 |
| 2014 | 43W / 18L / 4D | 43W / 22L / 3D | 69.5 |
| 2013 | 6W / 3L / 0D | 7W / 0L / 0D | 57.2 |
| 2012 | 16W / 7L / 1D | 15W / 11L / 1D | 43.5 |
| 2011 | 4W / 5L / 1D | 8W / 7L / 0D | 50.2 |
| 2010 | 18W / 8L / 0D | 18W / 10L / 0D | 78.6 |
| 2009 | 4W / 1L / 0D | 7W / 3L / 0D | 58.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1002 | 585 | 414 | 3 | 58.4% |
| Czech Defense | 78 | 41 | 33 | 4 | 52.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 60 | 44 | 13 | 3 | 73.3% |
| Modern | 51 | 23 | 26 | 2 | 45.1% |
| Australian Defense | 50 | 31 | 17 | 2 | 62.0% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 49 | 27 | 17 | 5 | 55.1% |
| King's Indian Defense: Kazakh Variation | 38 | 26 | 10 | 2 | 68.4% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Aronin-Taimanov Defense | 34 | 20 | 13 | 1 | 58.8% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation | 34 | 21 | 10 | 3 | 61.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 31 | 19 | 9 | 3 | 61.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1090 | 628 | 396 | 66 | 57.6% |
| Modern | 721 | 386 | 282 | 53 | 53.5% |
| Czech Defense | 702 | 374 | 287 | 41 | 53.3% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 641 | 323 | 274 | 44 | 50.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 532 | 302 | 203 | 27 | 56.8% |
| Pirc Defense: Classical Variation | 404 | 223 | 160 | 21 | 55.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 379 | 204 | 146 | 29 | 53.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 364 | 183 | 161 | 20 | 50.3% |
| Modern Defense | 341 | 194 | 129 | 18 | 56.9% |
| Benoni Defense | 340 | 171 | 148 | 21 | 50.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Benoni Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| KGD: Classical, 3.Bc4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 22 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 1 |