About Andrew T Jones
Andrew T Jones, known on the chessboards as ATJ1968, is a dedicated chess enthusiast with a penchant for the fast-paced thrill of Blitz chess. Over the years, he has engaged in thousands of games, showing both resilience and fighting spirit whether playing white or black. His tactical awareness and psychological endurance often shine in the heat of rapid decision-making.
Playing Style & Strengths
Preferred mostly in Blitz games, Andrew combines strategic depth with tactical sharpness, averaging nearly 58 moves in his wins and around 63 in losses, indicating his endurance in long, competitive battles.
- Known for a moderate early resignation rate of under 1%, showing persistence in fights
- Frequently reaches endgames, appearing in about 63% of his matches
- Strong comebacks with a comeback rate above 77%
- Balanced performance playing as White and Black, with White win rate slightly higher
- Best playing hours include early mornings, showing an interesting tilt-resistant mindset
Memorable Achievements & Stats
Andrew’s peak ratings speak volumes about his capabilities:
- Blitz Peak: 1537 (September 2017)
- Daily Chess Peak: 1942 (January 2010)
- Rapid Peak: 1747 (August 2019)
- Bullet Peak: 1265 (May 2022)
- Longest winning streak: 20 games
- Current winning streak: 1 game, keeping the momentum alive
- Known for endurance with almost 7600 blitz games played and thousands of wins
Favorite Openings
Andrew favors well-established solid openings and often experiments with aggressive Sicilian lines, showing versatility and an offensive mindset:
- Sicilian Defense: Played in various varieties including the Alapin, Closed, and the Four Knights Cobra Variation
- Philidor Defense: Balanced defensive play with notable success
- Scandinavian Defense: Shows a strong win rate with this unconventional choice
- Bird Opening (Dutch Variation - Batavo Gambit): Adds spice and surprises to his games
- Amazon Attack & Barnes Defense: Adds flair and creativity in his repertoire
Notable Opponents
Andrew has a large and diverse set of opponents. Among his top frequent opponents, he has positive records against players like danny1812 and rocky0777. He’s no stranger to friendly rivalries and tough battles, always bringing his best game.
Behind the Scenes
When not busy trading queens and pawns, Andrew’s psychological trends reveal a calm competitor who manages tilt well, with a modest tilt factor of 13. He tends to perform best in the wee hours, so if you see his username lighting up the board at 1 AM, beware—you’re in for a fast and fierce fight!
Fun Fact
Despite his strong focus on Blitz, Andrew has also dabbled in Bullet and Rapid formats, proving that whether it’s lightning-fast or a paced contest, his chess heart is ready to face all challenges. His determined spirit would make Magnus Carlsen nod with approval — or at least scramble to sharpen his opening preparation!
Overall Performance and Progress
Andrew, you have shown a commendable improvement over the last six months, gaining 93 rating points, with an impressive 141 points increase over three months and a solid 39 points over the past month. Your strength adjusted win rate is just under 50%, which is a solid foundation to build on in blitz chess where games are fast-paced and mistakes are frequent.
While your short term 1-month trend shows a slight dip, your mid to long term rating trends (3, 6, and 12 months) illustrate healthy growth and consistency in your gameplay. This suggests some fluctuations but steady overall progress.
Game Highlights: Strengths
- Opening Preparation: Your repeated use and success in the Semi-Slav Defense and Sicilian Defense (noted in your games where you played 1.d4 and 1.e4 respectively) show you have a good knowledge of key theory lines such as the Queens Gambit Declined and the Najdorf Sicilian. Continuing to deepen your understanding in these lines will give you a strategic edge out of the opening.
- Positional Play and Endgame Technique: In your wins, you effectively utilize piece coordination — for example employing pins, forks, and controlling key squares mid-to-late game. Your ability to convert small advantages into winning endgame positions is noticeable.
- Calculative Ability: Several wins featured tactical shots like exploiting opponent piece placement with knights and queens, showing good tactical vision.
- Resilience and Adaptivity: Multiple predicted resignations show you build enough pressure to force mistakes or prevent counterplay.
Areas for Improvement
- Tactical Awareness: Some losses involved losing material early or mis-coordinating pieces, such as allowing exchanges that put you at a disadvantage. Focus on sharpening tactical pattern recognition with puzzles focused on combinations and forced moves.
- Time Management: Your clocks in several games show you spent critical moments with low time remaining, which can lead to rushed or imprecise decisions. Practice managing your time better, especially in complex middlegame positions, keeping some buffer for calculation in critical moves.
- Opening Repertoire Refinement: While your openings are solid, occasional early exchanges or losing important central squares suggest reviewing and reinforcing your opening principles—focus on avoiding premature pawn weaknesses and unnecessary trades.
- Endgame Technique in Complex Scenarios: Some games showed losses in technically complex or material-balance endgames. Studying fundamental endgames will boost your confidence in closing out games.
Next Steps and Recommendations
- Review Key Games: Analyze your wins and losses, particularly positions where you felt unsure, to reinforce good decisions and learn from errors.
- Tactical Training: Incorporate daily blitz puzzle training focusing on forks, skewers, pins, discovered attacks, and endgame tactics.
- Time Control Practice: Experiment with slightly longer time controls occasionally to improve deeper thinking under time pressure.
- Opening Study: Regularly revisit openings in your most played lines, focusing on critical variations to avoid surprises and optimize your early game plans.
- Endgame Fundamentals: Practice classic endgame positions, especially rook endgames, to convert advantageous positions more reliably.
Keep up your dedication, Andrew! Steady improvement comes with consistent training and game analysis. You're on a great path to continuing your rise in blitz chess ratings.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| den_str | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| vincewinnfield | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| guimai07 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| haakonrc | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| brody21 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lanzamelones | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| mahadevshiv | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| gothams_white_knight | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| dollie1993 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| arsul87 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| danny1812 | 51W / 19L / 4D | |
| rocky0777 | 41W / 3L / 1D | |
| alekpanker | 16W / 23L / 2D | |
| davut_san | 18W / 13L / 4D | |
| kender101 | 15W / 16L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 819 | 1223 | 1465 | 1456 |
| 2024 | 787 | 1086 | 1430 | 1386 |
| 2023 | 1016 | 1223 | 1540 | 1431 |
| 2022 | 1139 | 1211 | 1502 | 1492 |
| 2021 | 1112 | 1306 | 1469 | 1544 |
| 2020 | 1133 | 1358 | 1563 | 1539 |
| 2019 | 850 | 1361 | 1747 | 1571 |
| 2018 | 848 | 1361 | 1614 | 1526 |
| 2017 | 872 | 1377 | 1446 | 1602 |
| 2016 | 823 | 1349 | 1611 | |
| 2015 | 1276 | 1424 | 1652 | |
| 2014 | 716 | 1300 | 1391 | 1600 |
| 2013 | 1243 | 1328 | 1676 | |
| 2012 | 1227 | 1111 | 1680 | |
| 2011 | 1387 | 1081 | 1684 | |
| 2010 | 1768 | |||
| 2009 | 1831 | |||
| 2008 | 1469 | |||
| 2007 | 1812 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 171W / 129L / 11D | 165W / 140L / 10D | 65.1 |
| 2024 | 213W / 177L / 16D | 201W / 178L / 22D | 61.4 |
| 2023 | 278W / 272L / 37D | 300W / 265L / 20D | 64.9 |
| 2022 | 263W / 253L / 23D | 280W / 240L / 17D | 61.9 |
| 2021 | 252W / 223L / 19D | 235W / 236L / 21D | 64.4 |
| 2020 | 319W / 285L / 27D | 321W / 283L / 26D | 62.8 |
| 2019 | 207W / 136L / 19D | 160W / 183L / 11D | 61.8 |
| 2018 | 265W / 217L / 17D | 233W / 248L / 13D | 60.9 |
| 2017 | 236W / 187L / 27D | 224W / 216L / 19D | 63.2 |
| 2016 | 406W / 315L / 33D | 357W / 367L / 32D | 60.3 |
| 2015 | 191W / 171L / 26D | 179W / 199L / 21D | 64.1 |
| 2014 | 225W / 175L / 15D | 207W / 176L / 18D | 63.1 |
| 2013 | 241W / 147L / 18D | 244W / 145L / 13D | 59.5 |
| 2012 | 139W / 92L / 9D | 145W / 78L / 12D | 60.1 |
| 2011 | 83W / 45L / 7D | 74W / 38L / 14D | 62.0 |
| 2010 | 48W / 21L / 5D | 39W / 23L / 9D | 57.5 |
| 2009 | 68W / 20L / 4D | 58W / 24L / 8D | 54.2 |
| 2008 | 15W / 2L / 1D | 6W / 7L / 1D | 49.6 |
| 2007 | 19W / 2L / 0D | 21W / 6L / 1D | 50.1 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 671 | 336 | 305 | 30 | 50.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 454 | 240 | 207 | 7 | 52.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 310 | 144 | 154 | 12 | 46.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 285 | 141 | 140 | 4 | 49.5% |
| Philidor Defense | 261 | 131 | 117 | 13 | 50.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 260 | 147 | 105 | 8 | 56.5% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 255 | 138 | 111 | 6 | 54.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 201 | 99 | 97 | 5 | 49.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 200 | 100 | 96 | 4 | 50.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 145 | 86 | 56 | 3 | 59.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 246 | 154 | 76 | 16 | 62.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 242 | 167 | 64 | 11 | 69.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 157 | 97 | 55 | 5 | 61.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 150 | 66 | 76 | 8 | 44.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 145 | 82 | 53 | 10 | 56.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 122 | 58 | 59 | 5 | 47.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 119 | 76 | 37 | 6 | 63.9% |
| Barnes Defense | 107 | 78 | 27 | 2 | 72.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 104 | 51 | 44 | 9 | 49.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 91 | 62 | 23 | 6 | 68.1% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 61 | 26 | 33 | 2 | 42.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 48 | 33 | 12 | 3 | 68.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 43 | 20 | 22 | 1 | 46.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 30 | 17 | 11 | 2 | 56.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 30 | 18 | 12 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Philidor Defense | 28 | 14 | 12 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 22 | 12 | 10 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 22 | 12 | 9 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 18 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 44.4% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 17 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 47.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 14 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 35.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Australian Defense | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Ruy Lopez: Classical Defense, Benelux Variation | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Classical Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 1 |
| Losing | 13 | 0 |