Chess Profile: ayaend
Ayaend is a dynamic and continuously evolving chess player whose career spans over a decade of dedicated improvement and competitive play. From his early days in 2011, when his Blitz and Bullet ratings were in the mid‐1500s and low 1400s respectively, ayaend’s skills have steadily risen – a journey punctuated by impressive achievements and notable consistency.
Over the years, ayaend has developed a strong reputation in rapid and bullet formats, with his ratings in these categories steadily climbing into the low 2200s in recent years. His performance history shows remarkable progress in Blitz and Bullet, reflecting his swift calculation abilities and lightning–fast decision–making. His rapid play, while occasionally absent in earlier years, exploded into the 1600–2060 range during competitive play – a sign of his adaptability and deepening understanding of the game.
Beyond raw ratings, his style on the board is characterized by a high endgame frequency (over 85% of his win–scenarios involve intricate endgame maneuvering) and an average win length nearing 78 moves. His results with the white pieces slightly edge those with black, and his overall win rates across all time–controls hover right around the 50% mark. Yet, what truly sets ayaend apart is his tactical awareness: with a comeback rate surpassing 92% and an astonishing 100% win rate even after the loss of a piece in critical moments, he demonstrates a level of resilience rarely seen in competitive play.
Ayaend’s time–performance trends reveal a player who adapts well across different days and hours, with balanced win rates throughout the week and even achieving peak performance during late–night sessions. His openings are diverse – from deep theoretical lines in the Sicilian Defense and the Semi–Slav to inventive deviations in less–traveled roads – testament to a broad and well–practiced repertoire.
Psychological factors also play a significant role in his game. With a measured tilt factor and only a slight difference between his rated and casual performance, ayaend remains calm under pressure, using every setback as an opportunity to launch a counter–attack. His commitment to study, tactical sharpness, and psychological fortitude mark him as a dedicated competitor with a continuously improving game.
In summary, ayaend’s chess career is defined by persistence, tactical brilliance, and an unwavering desire to improve. From steady rating increases to a fearless attitude in challenging positions, his biography reflects the journey of a modern chess player who is as thoughtful as he is aggressive – always ready to seize the initiative and outthink his opponent.
Progress highlights from your recent games
You’ve shown willingness to take the initiative with active piece play and to seek tactical chances when the position allows. In your winning game, you pressed with a dynamic opening plan and converted the initiative into concrete material and activity on the board, finishing with precise rook activity and clean simplifications. In the recent losses and draws, there were moments where the opponent’s counterplay challenged your king safety and development, offering clear targets to study and improve upon. The overall pattern suggests you do well when you keep the game tactical and open, but you benefit from strengthening plan and defense when the position becomes more closed or under pressure.
What you did well in your recent win
- You started with an aggressive, center- and file-opening plan that created straightforward targets for your pieces.
- You pursued open files with rooks, trading into positions where active rooks could dominate the board (for example, exchanges that left you with strong rook activity on open files).
- You maintained pressure on your opponent’s king and coordinated your pieces to maximize tactical opportunities, finishing with a clean endgame conversion.
- You kept the tempo and used forcing moves to reduce your opponent’s counterplay, which helped you convert the advantage efficiently.
Key areas to work on
- Defense and king safety when opponents launch early central or flank breaks. Practice recognizing when you should consolidate rather than push further, especially if your pieces are not perfectly placed yet.
- Developing a clearer opening plan and sticking to it. When the opening yields dynamic play, keep your structure intact and avoid over-extending pawns or committing to aggressive pawn pushes before your minor pieces are developed.
- Endgame conversions, especially rook endings. In positions with rooks and open files, keep activity high and avoid passive maneuvers that let your opponent reclaim activity or create counterplay.
- Time management in complex middlegames. Build a simple framework for allocating thinking time to critical moments, so you don’t rush or get stuck on less important moves.
Concrete plan for the next 2–4 weeks
- Reinforce a compact, repeatable opening set. Choose two White openings you’re comfortable with (one aggressive, one solid) and two Black responses (against 1.e4 and 1.d4) to build a predictable, playable framework.
- Practice tactic-heavy puzzles daily (15–20 minutes) to sharpen calculation, focusing on common motifs you encountered in recent games (forks, pins, skewers, and rook activity along open files).
- Do targeted endgame work, especially rook endings with pawns on the board. Work through simple rook endings and common rook-and-pawn endings until you can convert a small advantage reliably.
- Review your recent games with an emphasis on critical moments. Identify at least one turning point in each game and write down an alternative plan or move that could have kept your edge or reduced risk.
Drills and practice recommendations
- Opening consolidation drill: pick two openings you like (for example, a Sicilian-based approach as Black and a practical setup against 1.d4 as White). Practice the first 8–12 moves against a computer or a partner to reach a stable middlegame structure.
- Tactical pattern practice: 15–20 minutes of puzzles daily, focusing on patterns that appeared in your recent games (open-file tactics and piece coordination near the king).
- Endgame practice: weekly rook-endgame sessions, starting from equal material and working toward creating and converting a simple passed pawn or activating the king and rooks on open files.
- Post-game notes: after each game, write a brief two-part summary: (a) the moment you felt advantage or equalization, and (b) one alternative plan you could have followed at that moment.
Practice quick-start placeholder
If you’d like, I can attach a short practice set or a sample Pgn of a typical practice puzzle sequence here for you to try. Just say the word and I’ll add it.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| koromarbel | 5W / 2L / 0D | View |
| saitago | 1W / 2L / 0D | View |
| godly-eren | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| mandarina_11 | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Mark Machin Rivera | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| christatix | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Ashritha Eswaran | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| richarzard69 | 9W / 12L / 0D | View |
| skrcheski | 13W / 14L / 2D | View |
| Edgarma_PCAP | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dux_bellorum_7th | 117W / 76L / 7D | View Games |
| Cam D. | 77W / 53L / 15D | View Games |
| capita66 | 48W / 47L / 9D | View Games |
| bedazzle99 | 51W / 41L / 6D | View Games |
| KF3WIN | 44W / 47L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2543 | 2275 | 1493 | |
| 2024 | 2330 | 2162 | 2063 | 1855 |
| 2023 | 2280 | 2136 | 2063 | 1909 |
| 2022 | 2227 | 2133 | 1929 | 1892 |
| 2021 | 2318 | 2172 | 1753 | 1900 |
| 2020 | 2271 | 2129 | 1871 | |
| 2019 | 1959 | 2096 | 1668 | |
| 2012 | 1627 | 1690 | ||
| 2011 | 1441 | 1576 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1336W / 1148L / 154D | 1226W / 1244L / 170D | 83.4 |
| 2024 | 2610W / 2316L / 303D | 2464W / 2458L / 306D | 82.4 |
| 2023 | 3286W / 2793L / 403D | 3047W / 3030L / 402D | 80.5 |
| 2022 | 1930W / 1616L / 231D | 1839W / 1741L / 238D | 80.5 |
| 2021 | 1834W / 1506L / 215D | 1742W / 1597L / 217D | 80.5 |
| 2020 | 1832W / 1618L / 237D | 1828W / 1682L / 221D | 81.4 |
| 2019 | 1679W / 1510L / 190D | 1593W / 1599L / 217D | 81.9 |
| 2012 | 56W / 23L / 1D | 51W / 30L / 0D | 69.9 |
| 2011 | 19W / 8L / 0D | 21W / 4L / 0D | 56.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 179 | 89 | 76 | 14 | 49.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 143 | 74 | 62 | 7 | 51.8% |
| French Defense | 124 | 69 | 47 | 8 | 55.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 118 | 62 | 45 | 11 | 52.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 105 | 49 | 44 | 12 | 46.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 100 | 59 | 35 | 6 | 59.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 98 | 51 | 39 | 8 | 52.0% |
| Australian Defense | 97 | 48 | 42 | 7 | 49.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 91 | 43 | 42 | 6 | 47.2% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 76 | 39 | 33 | 4 | 51.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 3251 | 1520 | 1504 | 227 | 46.8% |
| Amar Gambit | 3231 | 1589 | 1452 | 190 | 49.2% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 2801 | 1325 | 1329 | 147 | 47.3% |
| Modern | 2372 | 1167 | 1080 | 125 | 49.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 2318 | 1123 | 1065 | 130 | 48.5% |
| Bird Opening | 1931 | 958 | 861 | 112 | 49.6% |
| French Defense | 1832 | 927 | 807 | 98 | 50.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 1757 | 885 | 781 | 91 | 50.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1745 | 844 | 794 | 107 | 48.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1725 | 825 | 805 | 95 | 47.8% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 14 | 9 | 4 | 1 | 64.3% |
| Unknown | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 90.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Old Indian Defense | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Four Knights System, Nimzowitsch Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Grünfeld Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Catalan Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Old Indian Defense: Duz-Khotimirsky Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Benoni Defense: Old Benoni | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Exchange Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 16 | 2 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |