AZCACTUS: A Journey Through Chess
Since his first recorded games in 2011, AZCACTUS has evolved into a versatile and determined chess competitor. His early forays in blitz and rapid chess quickly revealed a passion for the game and a relentless commitment to improvement. Over the years, his rating progression—from humble beginnings to consistently strong performances across multiple formats—illustrates an unwavering work ethic and hunger for excellence.
In blitz chess, AZCACTUS has honed the art of fast, tactical play. His games are full of creative openings—from sharp Sicilian Defense variations to unexpected lines in the Bishop’s Opening—that often catch his opponents off guard. Meanwhile, in rapid chess, his strategic thinking and calm under pressure have earned him impressive ratings, reflecting an ability to balance speed with deep calculation.
Not one to be confined by any single format, AZCACTUS also delves into daily chess, where his analytical skills and stamina shine. His adaptability on the board—a near equal win rate when playing both White and Black—demonstrates a mature grasp of chess fundamentals and a willingness to tackle challenges head-on, even in prolonged contests.
Beyond the numbers, the statistics tell the story of a player with a keen tactical awareness and psychological resilience. With a remarkable comeback rate and an almost imperceptible tendency to tilt, AZCACTUS transforms setbacks into opportunities for brilliance. His opening repertoire is rich and varied, and his endgame accuracy further cements his reputation as a balanced and resourceful competitor.
Now, with more than a decade of experience reflected in his yearly rating milestones and a continuously evolving playing style, AZCACTUS remains both an inspiring figure for fellow enthusiasts and a formidable opponent on the board. His journey is a testament to the power of persistence, adaptability, and passion in the pursuit of chess mastery.
Overview of your recent blitz play
You recently finished a blitz game with a decisive mating attack, which shows you can fight for a win and coordinate your pieces when the position is sharp. In another recent game, you faced a tough tactical sequence that ended in a loss, highlighting the pressure blitz games place on quick decision making and king safety. A careful balance between sharp attacks and solid defense will help you convert more of these dynamics into wins.
What you are doing well
- You maintain dynamic pressure and look for forcing moves when the opponent’s king or key pieces are exposed.
- You convert complex middlegame tension into tangible results, often finishing with a clear tactical plan.
- You show willingness to seize initiative, even in less familiar or sharp structures, which is a strong trait in blitz.
Areas to improve
- Clock management: in blitz, try to identify critical moments quickly and avoid spending too long on non-critical moves. Develop a quick filtering method for candidate moves.
- King safety and structural awareness: some losses came from overextending or missing latent threats. Build a habit of checking for immediate tactical threats before committing to aggressive plans.
- Endgame technique: strengthen the ability to convert advantages in rook and minor piece endgames, especially when the opponent has counterplay or resourceful defense.
- Pattern recognition: broaden your quick recognition of common tactical motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank ideas) so you spot them faster under time pressure.
- Blitz opening clarity: pick a small set of reliable lines you know well and study typical middlegame plans from those lines, so you can reach comfortable positions faster.
Opening handling and study plan
Your recent openings show you enter several sharp, tactical battles. In blitz, consider narrowing your opening repertoire to two or three trusted setups you understand deeply. For example, if you often encounter the Sicilian, practice a specific, solid line and its main middlegame plans so you can reach practical positions quickly. Build a quick-reference checklist for each line with: main plan, typical pawn breaks, and common tactical ideas your opponent might pursue. Regular review of your opening choices against strong responses will help reduce early mistakes and keep you in the game longer.
Endgame and conversion plan
- After simplifying, aim to keep active king and rooks, especially when passed pawns exist.
- Practice a few common rook-and-pawn endings, focusing on creating passed pawns and using the king actively.
- When you have an initiative, convert with precise forcing moves rather than speculative pawn pushes.
Training plan and next steps
- Daily tactics: solve 15–20 puzzles focused on motifs like forks, pins, skewers, and back-rank ideas.
- Weekly game review: pick 2–3 recent blitz games, identify the top 2 mistakes, and outline exact alternative moves that would have been better.
- Openings: choose 2 lines to specialize in for the next two weeks and practice common middlegame plans from those lines.
- Endgames: spend 2 sessions weekly on simple rook endings and king activity practice with practical exercises.
Optional training prompts
If you’d like, I can generate a focused practice puzzle or a short drill tailored to a recent pattern you struggle with. For example, a quick drill could be:
.🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| brenio99 | 60W / 0L / 1D | View Games |
| caturgila26 | 6W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| mustafasamimi | 4W / 5L / 1D | View Games |
| alwialbaar | 5W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| tristal | 5W / 2L / 2D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2062 | 2370 | 1954 | |
| 2024 | 2217 | 1788 | ||
| 2023 | 1558 | 1703 | 2113 | 1668 |
| 2022 | 1829 | 2084 | ||
| 2021 | 1969 | 2142 | ||
| 2020 | 2080 | 1931 | ||
| 2018 | 1872 | |||
| 2015 | 1863 | |||
| 2012 | 1791 | |||
| 2011 | 1908 | 1548 | 1475 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 513W / 436L / 39D | 515W / 427L / 48D | 73.4 |
| 2024 | 638W / 507L / 72D | 587W / 578L / 57D | 73.2 |
| 2023 | 1014W / 919L / 71D | 981W / 970L / 70D | 68.4 |
| 2022 | 297W / 270L / 22D | 269W / 299L / 36D | 69.5 |
| 2021 | 34W / 42L / 9D | 39W / 42L / 8D | 72.1 |
| 2020 | 119W / 102L / 21D | 117W / 101L / 19D | 74.0 |
| 2018 | 7W / 11L / 0D | 8W / 7L / 0D | 66.6 |
| 2015 | 21W / 4L / 0D | 15W / 13L / 0D | 74.4 |
| 2012 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 2L / 0D | 48.8 |
| 2011 | 13W / 4L / 2D | 13W / 6L / 0D | 61.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 790 | 347 | 410 | 33 | 43.9% |
| King's Indian Attack | 551 | 270 | 255 | 26 | 49.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 549 | 294 | 233 | 22 | 53.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 483 | 255 | 204 | 24 | 52.8% |
| Réti Opening | 444 | 246 | 184 | 14 | 55.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 412 | 223 | 175 | 14 | 54.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 404 | 197 | 190 | 17 | 48.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 382 | 188 | 184 | 10 | 49.2% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 328 | 148 | 151 | 29 | 45.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 283 | 127 | 141 | 15 | 44.9% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Réti Opening | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Bishop's Opening | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense | 192 | 102 | 85 | 5 | 53.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 136 | 78 | 52 | 6 | 57.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 116 | 56 | 54 | 6 | 48.3% |
| Réti Opening | 104 | 57 | 47 | 0 | 54.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 95 | 41 | 47 | 7 | 43.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 93 | 45 | 45 | 3 | 48.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 72 | 34 | 34 | 4 | 47.2% |
| French Defense | 70 | 35 | 27 | 8 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 68 | 28 | 35 | 5 | 41.2% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 67 | 35 | 31 | 1 | 52.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 2 |