Ilkay Koc - The National Master of Chess
Ilkay Koc, also known by the much cooler handle azzbrn, has earned the prestigious title of National Master, proving that they're not just a casual checkmating enthusiast but a true chess warrior of notable skill.
Since 2018, Ilkay has blitzed their way through thousands of games, peaking with a blitz rating a hair short of 2530 in 2025 — that's faster than most people’s Wi-Fi and nearly as lethal as their queen sacrifices. Bullet battles are no less intense, with ratings soaring over 2200, while their rapid games clock in with a sharp 2307 peak rating. Clearly, speed and strategy are their kingdom!
With a longest winning streak of 28 games, Ilkay has demonstrated an uncanny ability to lock down victories, and with a comeback rate of 85%, they somehow always find a way to march back from the brink, making losing pieces look like just another puzzle to solve.
Analyzing their playstyle reveals a consistent average of around 70 moves per game won or lost — patience and persistence are their allies. Ilkay tends to win a bit more often with the white pieces (about 58%) but doesn’t shy away from black’s challenges either.
Despite a tilt factor of 9 (because hey, even masters get frustrated occasionally), Ilkay's ability to win after losing a piece sits at a perfect 100%. In other words: if you snatch a pawn, better watch your back, because Ilkay is ready to turn the tables with a sneaky tactical twist.
Their opening repertoire might be "Top Secret" (and trust us, no chess journalist has cracked that code yet), but it’s evidently very effective — boasting win rates above 70% in rapid games and respectable numbers across other formats.
Ilkay’s opponents beware: whether it's Sunday afternoon or a Friday night blitz session, their top win times align perfectly with peak chess hours, meaning they're always battle-ready when you least expect it.
In short, Ilkay Koc is a force to be reckoned with — a tactical ninja, a strategic master, and occasionally a humble human who willingly resigns early (only 0.58% of the time though!). Follow their games for lessons in resilience, speed, and a little bit of chess magic.
Overall Performance
Your recent blitz games show solid play with a strength adjusted win rate just above 51%, which is a good baseline at your level. Over the last 6 months, your rating has improved slightly by 5 points, and your recent 1- and 3-month trends suggest positive momentum. Keep focusing on maintaining and building this growth.
Strengths
- You demonstrate good tactical awareness and capitalize on opponents' inaccuracies, often finishing games decisively as seen in several checkmate wins.
- You manage your time reasonably well, avoiding severe time pressure in most games.
- Your use of openings like the Nimzo-Indian Defense and English Opening indicates a good variety and comfort with different strategic concepts.
Areas for Improvement
- In some games, opponents gained early initiative through aggressive pawn breaks or piece activity in the center—consider reinforcing your opening knowledge especially in the Queen's Gambit Declined and French Defense lines to better counter these plans.
- A few losses were by resignation due to gradual position deterioration or material loss. Working on your defensive technique and simplification strategies could help save difficult positions.
- Focus on improving middle-game planning to create consistent pressure rather than relying mainly on tactical opportunities.
Opening Suggestions
You frequently face and play openings such as the Queen's Gambit Declined (with the Queen's Knight Variation), Nimzo-Indian Defense, and various Sicilian Defense lines. Consider studying and reinforcing your understanding in these areas:
- Study the key ideas and typical pawn breaks in the Queen's Gambit Declined to handle dynamic changes in the center confidently.
- Practice tactical motifs and typical piece maneuvers in the Nimzo-Indian Defense, focusing on timely exchanges and control of key squares.
- Review common Sicilian Defense sidelines to be prepared for unexpected variations in blitz time controls.
Next Steps
- Analyze your losses deeply, especially games with quick tactical blows, to identify patterns or recurring weak spots.
- Regularly review your opening repertoire with emphasis on common opponent responses and prepare plans accordingly.
- Incorporate endgame training to ensure you convert your advantages efficiently in blitz games.
- Keep practicing with a focus on consistent time management to avoid time trouble in critical moments.
Resources
Review your games periodically and consider consulting chess databases for the openings you play. It would also be beneficial to practice tactics daily and explore thematic lessons on the Queen's Gambit Declined and Nimzo-Indian Defense to sharpen your strategic understanding.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| krslazz | 49W / 15L / 1D | View Games |
| queenygn | 16W / 6L / 2D | View Games |
| fetenn | 12W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
| roryud | 4W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
| lukino77 | 9W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2219 | 2521 | 2367 | |
| 2024 | 2164 | 2516 | 1800 | |
| 2023 | 2148 | 2486 | 1800 | |
| 2022 | 2435 | |||
| 2021 | 2429 | 1879 | ||
| 2020 | 2232 | 2379 | 1799 | |
| 2019 | 2181 | |||
| 2018 | 2016 | 2180 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 147W / 64L / 5D | 115W / 88L / 11D | 73.2 |
| 2024 | 165W / 109L / 15D | 161W / 111L / 19D | 67.7 |
| 2023 | 13W / 6L / 1D | 15W / 2L / 1D | 62.8 |
| 2022 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 1W / 0L / 0D | 70.5 |
| 2021 | 5W / 0L / 0D | 5W / 0L / 0D | 85.7 |
| 2020 | 264W / 183L / 31D | 216W / 225L / 26D | 74.8 |
| 2019 | 65W / 52L / 3D | 54W / 55L / 8D | 73.3 |
| 2018 | 65W / 39L / 5D | 62W / 42L / 8D | 70.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 33 | 25 | 4 | 4 | 75.8% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 14 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Czech Defense | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 70.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Averbakh Variation | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Modern | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Gruenfeld: 5.Bg5 c6 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 116 | 65 | 45 | 6 | 56.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 36 | 14 | 21 | 1 | 38.9% |
| Australian Defense | 23 | 19 | 3 | 1 | 82.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 72.2% |
| Czech Defense | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 13 | 5 | 6 | 2 | 38.5% |
| Slav Defense: Exchange Variation | 13 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 30.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 75 | 37 | 35 | 3 | 49.3% |
| King's Indian Defense | 72 | 40 | 28 | 4 | 55.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 57 | 40 | 14 | 3 | 70.2% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 52 | 31 | 17 | 4 | 59.6% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 40 | 20 | 18 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 38 | 17 | 21 | 0 | 44.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 34 | 18 | 13 | 3 | 52.9% |
| Catalan Opening | 34 | 21 | 9 | 4 | 61.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 32 | 18 | 12 | 2 | 56.2% |
| Australian Defense | 30 | 20 | 9 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 28 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |