Artem Bardyk: The FIDE Master with a Checkered Past and a Bright Future
Meet Artem Bardyk, a chess player whose moves are as precise as the perfectly aligned microtubules in a cell! Awarded the distinguished title of FIDE Master by the international chess community, Artem’s journey on the 64-square petri dish is nothing short of evolutionary brilliance.
Starting with modest ratings around 1900 in both Blitz and Bullet formats back in 2020, Artem has since undergone an impressive metamorphosis. By 2024 and 2025, their Blitz peak soared near 2959 and Bullet rating nudged past 2900 — clearly Darwinian selection favored Artem’s tactical genes!
Known for a diverse opening repertoire, Artem frequently incubates strategies such as the Four Knights Game, Ruy Lopez Cozio Defense, and Scandinavian Defense Mieses Kotrc Variation in Blitz play, boasting winning percentages around or above 50%, especially shining in the Center Game Accepted where success rates spike to nearly 58%.
In Bullet, Artem’s acid test comes with the Scandinavian Defense Mieses Kotrc Variation with a spectacular win rate over 71%, proving their quick reflexes and rapid-fire calculation cells fire in perfect sync.
One can't help but admire Artem’s stamina on the board; with an average of 86 moves per victory and a comeback rate of nearly 90%, they exhibit the resilience of a hardy mitochondrion powering through tough endgames (fittingly, Artem’s Endgame frequency is a robust 82.5%). Their ability to win after losing a piece—an astonishing 99.95% of the time—means they truly embody the spirit of cellular regeneration and tenacity.
While Artem sometimes experiences a “tilt” factor causing minor system glitches (measured at a calm 13), their overall performance displays a strong biological imperative: adaptation and survival. Their white pieces tend to be a little more fertile territory with a 53.7% win rate, while black pieces hold steady at a respectable 48.95%.
Off the board, Artem’s battling opponents include some in the chess ecosystem as fearsome as the Snowlord and the elusive Aleksandr Bortnyk. Their experience with a wide array of opponents reveals a well-evolved predator-prey dynamic in the chess biosphere.
Whether it’s outwitting faster opponents in Bullet or carefully nurturing endgame strategies in Blitz, Artem Bardyk, aka BardArtem, continues to grow and adapt, proving that in chess, as in biology, it’s not the strongest who survive—but those who can combine strategy, rapid response, and resilience. With moves this genetically superior, Artem’s future in the chess world looks like a thriving ecosystem full of fascinating biological and tactical insights.
Summary of Recent Performance
Artem, your recent games show a solid performance in blitz chess, evidenced by a strength adjusted win rate just above 50%. Your rating has improved significantly over the past six months with a notable increase of 1263 points and continues to trend upward across 1-month, 3-month, and 6-month periods, indicating consistent growth.
What You Did Well
- You played aggressively and seized tactical chances effectively as seen in your wins where strong tactical shots led to decisive material gains or mating nets.
- Your endgame technique is commendable, with good use of active king maneuvers and pawn breaks to convert advantages, shown in several wins by resignation or checkmate.
- Castling was timely and helped secure king safety in multiple games, contributing to your middle and endgame strategy.
- You managed time well in most games, maintaining good clock control especially during critical moments.
Areas to Improve
- Handling Pressure Against Tactical Attacks: In some losses such as the game against Kevin Joel Cori Quispe, improved caution around your king when facing strong attacking players could help. Look out for checks and pins, especially near your king.
- Opening Choices and Preparation: Consider deepening your understanding of popular Sicilian Defense variations since many games began this way. Strengthening your opening repertoire based on your opponents’ choices could give you better early-game stability.
- Positional Judgment: There were instances where simplifying or exchanging pieces earlier would have been beneficial to ease defensive challenges. Practicing strategic plans in positions can improve your long-term decision making.
- Resilience to Opponent’s Counterplay: Notice areas where your opponents broke through your setup. Building awareness of potential counter-attacks and preparing prophylactic moves will reduce surprise attacks.
Recommendations Moving Forward
- Analyze your losses in detail, especially focusing on the moments when the position became difficult. Identifying recurring tactical or positional weaknesses will focus your training.
- Develop a more diverse opening repertoire with a few main lines plus surprise weapons to avoid becoming too predictable.
- Incorporate endgame studies to continue polishing your technique, which is already a strong point in your play.
- Practice blitz games specifically under time pressure to enhance intuition and speed in complex positions.
- Use the Catalan Opening and other openings you performed well with as a base to deepen strategic knowledge.
Your rating trend and large rating gains over six months are excellent indicators of your dedication and talent. Keep up the structured study and gameplay, and you will see even further improvements!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Emin Ohanyan | 13W / 39L / 5D | |
| Padmini Rout | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Setu Madhav Yellumahanthi | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Gennady Kozlov | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Tomasz Jaskolka | 4W / 0L / 2D | |
| pizzalover2502 | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| Rose Atwell | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Vitaly Teterev | 4W / 1L / 0D | |
| Caleb Levi | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| vasilisfragkos | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Oleksandr Bortnyk | 16W / 73L / 7D | |
| ros1999 | 33W / 42L / 5D | |
| Emin Ohanyan | 13W / 39L / 5D | |
| Manu David | 19W / 32L / 2D | |
| Rudik Makarian | 9W / 39L / 5D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3002 | 2902 | ||
| 2024 | 2873 | 2893 | ||
| 2023 | 2884 | 2719 | ||
| 2021 | 1963 | |||
| 2020 | 1937 | 1958 | 1791 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1143W / 717L / 171D | 1006W / 850L / 176D | 87.5 |
| 2024 | 1306W / 920L / 211D | 1183W / 1032L / 218D | 90.1 |
| 2023 | 537W / 367L / 101D | 479W / 416L / 84D | 90.6 |
| 2021 | 3W / 1L / 1D | 4W / 1L / 0D | 96.8 |
| 2020 | 21W / 10L / 2D | 19W / 9L / 3D | 68.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 543 | 281 | 209 | 53 | 51.8% |
| Four Knights Game | 501 | 259 | 179 | 63 | 51.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 408 | 223 | 138 | 47 | 54.7% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 292 | 166 | 101 | 25 | 56.9% |
| Ruy Lopez | 271 | 143 | 95 | 33 | 52.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 257 | 125 | 103 | 29 | 48.6% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 217 | 127 | 72 | 18 | 58.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 206 | 102 | 79 | 25 | 49.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 196 | 102 | 75 | 19 | 52.0% |
| QGD: Semi-Tarrasch, 5.e3 | 158 | 70 | 69 | 19 | 44.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 199 | 104 | 85 | 10 | 52.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 175 | 113 | 56 | 6 | 64.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 168 | 100 | 58 | 10 | 59.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 165 | 102 | 54 | 9 | 61.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 158 | 87 | 57 | 14 | 55.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 136 | 69 | 52 | 15 | 50.7% |
| Modern | 127 | 90 | 33 | 4 | 70.9% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 105 | 47 | 51 | 7 | 44.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 92 | 43 | 46 | 3 | 46.7% |
| Australian Defense | 90 | 58 | 31 | 1 | 64.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 20 | 0 |
| Losing | 13 | 1 |