Overview
Basem Shaban (username: Basem1985) is a tenacious online blitz specialist and a prolific player whose career stretches from the early 2010s through 2025. A grinder at heart, Basem has played tens of thousands of blitz games — a true marathoner of the two‑minute battlefield. Fans know him for late comebacks, patient endgames and an affection for d4 openings. His peak blitz rating is proudly recorded as 2337 (2024-08-09) and his rating trend is worth a look:
.Style & Strengths
Basem’s play reads like a slow‑burn thriller: he wears opponents down, loves long endgames and rarely gives up early. He combines tactical grit with stubborn defense.
- Preferred time control: Blitz — fast decisions, slow resilience.
- Endgame frequency: very high (Basem converts long games into wins or dramatic reversals).
- Comeback specialist: an impressive comeback rate that makes trailing opponents uneasy.
- Psychology: prefers midday play — "best time of day" around 12:00 — and has a modest tilt factor (keeps humor intact after bad streaks).
Openings & Repertoire
Basem’s repertoire tilts toward flexible, unorthodox and sometimes hypermodern setups. He opens with d4 far more often than e4, and his choices reflect both surprise value and practical chances.
- Signature approaches: Amazon Attack (a favorite), Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack, Nimzo‑Larsen tendencies and a respectable Caro‑Kann response when on the black side.
- Notable stats: high volume with the Amazon Attack in blitz, solid win rates with Nimzo‑Larsen and some favorite sharp sidelines in bullet.
- First‑move preference: d4 (dominant across recent years).
Memorable Moments
Basem’s career highlights are less about trophies and more about marathon sessions: crushing win streaks, improbable comebacks, and the occasional spectacular tactical finish. His longest recorded streaks include a 19‑game winning run and, yes, a humbling 22‑game losing slide that taught him more than any lecture.
- Longest winning streak: 19 games.
- Longest losing streak: 22 games (the stuff of character development).
- Current streak (latest snapshot): a short 2‑game losing run — perfect fuel for a comeback.
Quick Facts & Figures
- Career blitz activity: a staggering volume of games (tens of thousands), making Basem one of the most active blitz competitors online.
- Play rhythm: busiest and most successful around midday, but a decent night owl too (some of the best wins come at 00:00).
- Durability: low early‑resignation rate and long average game lengths — Basem fights until the end.
Notable Opponents
Basem has logged many duels with recurring rivals. A few frequent names:
- David Levine — most played opponent.
- juan saenz — long rivalry with swings either way.
- Meshter — countless tactical skirmishes.
Sample Tactical Win (Viewer)
Here’s a short, replayable sequence that shows Basem’s penchant for steady pressure and timely breaks. Watch the maneuvering and the pawn‑structure decisions in the middle game.
Why Fans Like Basem
Fans root for Basem because his games rarely end quietly. He’s the kind of player who will grind in worse positions, pull off a cheeky tactic or simply outlast an opponent in a long endgame. Add a dash of self‑deprecating humor and you have a favorite sparring partner and a thorn in many an opponent’s side.
- Humor: known to send a joking "sorry not sorry" after a lucky escape.
- Learning curve: constantly experimenting with new openings and postgame notes.
- Community: often plays long sessions, happy to analyze and share insights afterward.
Want More?
For a full timeline of Basem’s blitz journey, check the rating chart above and enjoy rewatching those roller‑coaster games. If you're hunting for an entertaining opponent, search Basem1985 and challenge a stylist who always plays to the last move.
Quick summary
Nice work — you converted a clean win recently and you have clear strengths in openings you play often. The big 1‑month rating drop (-464) looks like short‑term volatility (likely time trouble / tilt). The 3‑ and 6‑month trends are positive, so focus on fixing immediate causes (time management + session control) while keeping your long‑term habits that produced growth.
What you did well
- Conversion: you turned a middlegame edge into a winning rook endgame in your recent win — good technical sense under pressure.
- Opening strength: you get consistently good results with systems like the Nimzo‑Larsen / flank lines — keep using those reliable setups. (Nimzo-Larsen Attack)
- Tactics & initiative: you create and exploit tactical chances; you often force favourable simplifications.
- Practical instincts: you choose plans that lead to clear targets rather than vague maneuvers — that helps in blitz.
Highest‑impact fixes
- Time management in Blitz: several games ended on the clock (both wins and losses). Make a hard rule to simplify when below a threshold (e.g., 10s) to avoid flagging in winning positions. (Blitz)
- Session tilt control: the big short‑term drop suggests tilt runs. Stop after 2 losses or 6 games and take a short break.
- Avoid risky novelty in blitz: stick to practiced lines in your repertoire rather than experimenting mid‑session.
- Late‑game simplifications: when ahead, trade into clearer winning endgames earlier if the clock is low.
Illustrative moments (from recent games)
- Win vs nawaf_hs — you converted steadily and finished a rook endgame accurately. Replay that game to spot the move where you simplified and removed counterplay.
- Loss vs Narutzki — ended on time in a complex middlegame. Practice the habit: if the position is complicated and the clock is low, trade pieces or choose safe prophylactic moves.
- Games vs liviu78rom — some results were decided by time/disconnect/abandonment. Check pre‑session setup (connection, distractions) to prevent avoidable losses.
Concrete next steps (this week)
- Time‑management drill: 3 sessions of 10 blitz games with the rule — if you fall below 10 seconds, simplify on your next move. Focus on keeping decisions simple and safe under pressure.
- Tactics: 20 minutes daily of fast puzzles (prioritise forks, pins, discovered attacks) and review mistakes.
- Endgames: 3 short drills on rook endgames (basic Lucena/Philidor ideas) — 15–20 minutes total.
- Opening consolidation: pick 2 systems you play most (keep Nimzo‑Larsen as primary) and study typical plans and one safe sideline for each.
- Post‑session review: annotate the last 3 losses and write one root cause for each (time, tactic, opening, tilt). Fix one cause next session.
Practical blitz rules to apply immediately
- Play the opening fast and principled: develop, secure king safety, fight for the centre — don’t invent on move 2–6.
- Clock advantage = complexity; material/positional advantage = simplification.
- When low on time: remove queens or major pieces if it reduces complication and keeps your advantage.
- Use premoves only on forced recaptures or when you’re certain — avoid speculative premoves in tactical positions.
- Stop the session after 2 straight losses or 6 games — a 5‑minute reset prevents tilt cascades.
7‑day micro plan
- Days 1–2: Time drill + 20m tactics each day + review last 3 losses.
- Days 3–4: Opening study (2 systems) + 2 blitz sessions applying the "simplify under 10s" rule.
- Days 5–7: Rook endgame practice + annotate one full win and one full loss to extract repeatable lessons.
Final note
Your long history shows you can climb back and produce high peaks. The immediate goal is stabilisation: eliminate clock losses and manage tilt. Do the short drills for a week, and you should see your blitz consistency and rating recover.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| liviu78rom | 1W / 6L / 0D | View |
| narutzki | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| nawaf_hs | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| anstasres | 7W / 15L / 1D | View |
| murmamur | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| evizscerate | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| soontobecandidatemaster | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| johnandersoniv | 5W / 30L / 2D | View |
| ssuperqa | 10W / 10L / 2D | View |
| juliano86 | 11W / 6L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dlevine32180 | 74W / 106L / 3D | View Games |
| gunsberg | 43W / 121L / 10D | View Games |
| meshter | 25W / 105L / 5D | View Games |
| redhawkbull | 63W / 53L / 4D | View Games |
| estriver | 45W / 67L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1753 | 2037 | ||
| 2024 | 1685 | 1660 | 2037 | |
| 2023 | 1807 | 2204 | 2030 | |
| 2022 | 1723 | 2121 | 2085 | |
| 2021 | 2050 | 1363 | ||
| 2020 | 2016 | |||
| 2019 | 1953 | |||
| 2018 | 2006 | |||
| 2017 | 1959 | |||
| 2016 | 1476 | 1814 | ||
| 2015 | 1635 | |||
| 2014 | 1747 | |||
| 2013 | 1467 | 1702 | ||
| 2012 | 1696 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1340W / 1359L / 150D | 1266W / 1434L / 141D | 79.6 |
| 2024 | 1199W / 1396L / 212D | 1169W / 1493L / 144D | 86.0 |
| 2023 | 1011W / 1264L / 199D | 974W / 1358L / 173D | 90.4 |
| 2022 | 1294W / 1268L / 226D | 1184W / 1441L / 202D | 89.9 |
| 2021 | 1443W / 1217L / 245D | 1275W / 1387L / 254D | 89.1 |
| 2020 | 1042W / 1002L / 167D | 1010W / 1064L / 156D | 87.2 |
| 2019 | 1322W / 1221L / 164D | 1213W / 1317L / 150D | 85.5 |
| 2018 | 1434W / 1436L / 185D | 1311W / 1612L / 160D | 86.1 |
| 2017 | 1447W / 1494L / 165D | 1365W / 1614L / 163D | 83.8 |
| 2016 | 1333W / 1262L / 129D | 1250W / 1365L / 99D | 82.9 |
| 2015 | 772W / 720L / 73D | 729W / 781L / 55D | 80.8 |
| 2014 | 867W / 855L / 72D | 806W / 915L / 65D | 80.2 |
| 2013 | 1111W / 765L / 91D | 1049W / 802L / 94D | 80.7 |
| 2012 | 425W / 234L / 30D | 387W / 267L / 35D | 81.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 12656 | 5978 | 5870 | 808 | 47.2% |
| Australian Defense | 10668 | 5019 | 5025 | 624 | 47.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 8878 | 4023 | 4483 | 372 | 45.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6878 | 3228 | 3213 | 437 | 46.9% |
| Modern | 5837 | 2567 | 2894 | 376 | 44.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3866 | 1731 | 1920 | 215 | 44.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2276 | 1072 | 1064 | 140 | 47.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1331 | 646 | 628 | 57 | 48.5% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1284 | 532 | 662 | 90 | 41.4% |
| Modern Defense | 1251 | 572 | 600 | 79 | 45.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 155 | 75 | 68 | 12 | 48.4% |
| Barnes Defense | 136 | 61 | 60 | 15 | 44.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 93 | 29 | 54 | 10 | 31.2% |
| Australian Defense | 35 | 17 | 14 | 4 | 48.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 25 | 14 | 11 | 0 | 56.0% |
| Slav Defense | 21 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 52.4% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 19 | 8 | 9 | 2 | 42.1% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 17 | 6 | 9 | 2 | 35.3% |
| French Defense | 16 | 7 | 8 | 1 | 43.8% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 16 | 3 | 11 | 2 | 18.8% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 26 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 14 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 11 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 54.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Modern Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 5 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 40.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 0 |
| Losing | 22 | 2 |