Zachary Tanenbaum (BeanScreen)
FIDE Master & Chess Dynamo
Known in the chess world as BeanScreen, Zachary Tanenbaum is a formidable FIDE Master who dances across the 64 squares with both brilliance and a pinch of playful mischief. If chess were a video game, Zachary would be the hidden boss you don’t want to mess with – undefeated, unpredictable, and armed with a cache of secret openings labelled, quite mysteriously, as "Top Secret."
Rating Peaks and Playing Style
Zachary’s peak ratings are nothing short of spectacular, hitting a blistering 2823 in blitz, 2738 in rapid, and an astonishing 2883 in bullet – essentially speed chess on steroids. Their blitzing prowess is legendary, boasting over 15,000 games with a win rate that hovers above 55%, and an even more impressive 70% win rate in bullet games.
Playing with the tenacity of a chess ninja, Zachary averages 74 moves to a win and isn’t shy about gritting through longer battles, with losses averaging 90 moves. They embrace the endgames (over 80% of their games go deep) showing tremendous tactical awareness and a comeback rate close to 84%. In other words: don’t count them out, even when things look grim!
Opening Moves & Strategy
With a mysterious "Top Secret" opening strategy dominating much of their play, Zachary has accumulated wins faster than a speeding knight. Among the less classified openings, they’ve shown mastery of the Scotch Game Classical Variation and a bullet-perfect record in the Saragossa Opening – because who doesn’t love a surprise from the sidelines?
Memorable Matches
At the dawn of 2025, Zachary secured a notable victory against facu14101998 in a tense Scotch Game battle, clinching the win by resignation after a well-executed tactical squeeze – a win reflecting both patience and brutal precision. On another occasion, Zachary triumphed with a swift checkmate against Isengard1 using the Van ’t Kruijs Opening, proving that sometimes the old-novelty can be the sharpest blade.
The Psychological Edge
With a tilt factor of just 11, Zachary keeps composure even when the chess gods are playing pranks. Their best time of day to play? 11 AM sharp, as if the brain’s chess engine fires up alongside the morning coffee. The psychological resilience ensures that losses—rare and brief—never linger, as Zachary swiftly returns to the battlefield prepared for vengeance.
Fun Facts
- Has a longest winning streak of 84 games. That’s basically a chess marathon champion.
- Average moves per win: 74, proving Zachary enjoys savoring victories rather than snatching quick checkmates.
- Uses openings so secretive we’re half convinced there’s a government agency involved.
- Favorite playing days? Thursdays bring a 62% win rate, midweek magic!
Whether sprinting at bullet speed or grinding in marathon endgames, Zachary Tanenbaum’s chess journey is a testament to dedication, skill, and a little bit of mystery. So next time you see the username BeanScreen pop up in your pairing, brace yourself—you're in for a chess battle that’s as thrilling as it is unpredictable.
Recent blitz play: what stood out
You’ve shown a willingness to enter sharp, tactical middlegames and pressure the opponent’s king when the position opens up. In your win and some of your dynamic lines, you use piece activity and pawn storms to create practical chances quickly. There are also a few games where quiet, solid play or cleaner endgame technique would have been enough to convert advantages—these are the kinds of positions where blitz mistakes often slip in when time is tight.
Strengths to lean into
- Willingness to enter aggressive, tactical mazes and seek concrete targets. This can lead to decisive attacks when you sense initiative.
- Good instinct for piece activity and coordination in middlegames, which helps you create practical chances in sharp openings (for example, in lines related to your strongest openings).
- Resilience in defense when the position remains dynamic; you often find counterplay or resourceful ideas even after the opponent starts a direct attack.
Areas to improve
- Time management under blitz pressure. You sometimes commit to aggressive lines without fully verifying sequences, which can lead to missed resources or back-rank issues. Build a simple plan for the next few moves in critical positions and budget a few seconds for a quick check of tactics before committing.
- Candidate move generation. In complex middlegames you can benefit from explicitly considering 2–3 plausible plans before deciding on a line, rather than jumping to the first sharp idea that pops up.
- Endgame conversion. A few wins in which you convert advantages to a clean finish would strengthen your overall score in blitz. Regular endgame practice (rook endings, king and pawn endings) will pay off when the clock is tight.
- Opening consistency and repertoire curation. You perform very well in several aggressive lines, but some openings show higher risk in blitz. Narrow your repertoire to 2–3 reliable lines per color and study typical middlegame plans rather than chasing only tactical tricks.
Opening insights and practical recommendations
Your openings data shows strong results in the following lines, which you can leverage to keep blitz pace high while reducing risk:
- Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation – high win rate around 60% across many games. Great for solid but active play; study the typical middlegame plans and common ideas in this line.
- Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation – around 60% win rate; very dynamic, but requires deep knowledge. Use in blitz when you’re comfortable with the typical tactical motifs and know when to step back to safer plans.
- Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation – around 58% win rate; reliable and solid, a good complement for lower-risk blitz days.
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense – solid results; another practical option for faster games where you want quick development and pressure on the center.
- London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation and similar solid lines – mid-50s win rate; useful for days you prefer a stable structure with straightforward plans.
- QGA and some sharp lines with 3.e3 c5 show mixed results; consider using them selectively when you’re confident in the resulting plans and tactics.
Practical takeaway: build a compact blitz repertoire focused on 2–3 strong lines per color (favoring solid, yet active setups) and reserve the sharper lines for days when you’re feeling confident in your preparation.
Performance trends and what they imply
Your strength-adjusted win rate sits around the 50% mark, suggesting your blitz results are close to even when accounting for opponent strength. The rating changes show a strong short-term gain in the last month, with more modest gains over 3–6 months and a slight dip over 12 months. The slopes indicate fluctuation rather than steady climb, which is common in blitz. The goal is to translate those bursts of success into consistent, repeatable results.
Two-week plan to raise your blitz results
- Week 1: Repertoire consolidation. Pick 2 lines you feel comfortable with for white and 2 for black (one solid, one dynamic each color). Study 2–3 typical middlegame plans for each line and practice 10–15 minute drills focused on those positions.
- Week 2: Tactics and candidate moves. Do daily 15–20 minute tactic sets, emphasizing spotting a second viable plan in common structures and checking for tactical traps in blitz positions.
- Week 3: Endgames. Practice rook endings and king-and-pawn endings with a timer, focusing on simple, practical conversion techniques.
- Week 4: Time management discipline. Play blitz with a fixed pace (for example 3+0 or 3+2) and implement a 2-second independent check on each critical move, ensuring you don’t overcommit before confirming the tactical and structural implications.
Next steps
Implement the two-week plan to solidify your repertoire and improve time management. After completing it, review a few recent blitz games to identify patterns in mistakes (for example, recurring overextension or missed resources) and adjust your plan accordingly. If you’d like, I can tailor a week-by-week drill schedule around your current favorite openings and common blitz motifs.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Alexei Gubajdullin | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Aksel Bu Kvaloy | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| gunner214 | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Максим Щекачихин | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Haik Martirosyan | 4W / 32L / 3D | View |
| gryffindorac8 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Michał Kopczyński | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Azat Sharafiev | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Erik Rönkä | 8W / 4L / 1D | View |
| Anastasiia Hnatyshyn | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Bordi | 46W / 52L / 14D | View Games |
| 1b31-o | 80W / 20L / 7D | View Games |
| Daniel Lowinger | 64W / 27L / 13D | View Games |
| Krikor Sevag Mekhitarian | 25W / 66L / 9D | View Games |
| joshukid | 49W / 38L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2737 | 2836 | 2415 | |
| 2024 | 2670 | 2421 | ||
| 2023 | 2745 | 2708 | 2486 | |
| 2022 | 2837 | 2753 | 2414 | |
| 2021 | 2727 | 2701 | 2390 | |
| 2020 | 2755 | 2668 | 2710 | |
| 2019 | 2334 | 2409 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 87W / 62L / 7D | 85W / 58L / 11D | 82.8 |
| 2024 | 61W / 32L / 5D | 47W / 46L / 7D | 88.7 |
| 2023 | 654W / 269L / 52D | 565W / 336L / 64D | 80.3 |
| 2022 | 2615W / 903L / 222D | 2556W / 954L / 228D | 78.6 |
| 2021 | 1459W / 994L / 184D | 1320W / 1109L / 189D | 84.8 |
| 2020 | 1735W / 1159L / 223D | 1487W / 1373L / 253D | 85.9 |
| 2019 | 29W / 6L / 0D | 31W / 5L / 2D | 78.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 934 | 523 | 344 | 67 | 56.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 806 | 467 | 274 | 65 | 57.9% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 787 | 476 | 250 | 61 | 60.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 703 | 425 | 228 | 50 | 60.5% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 536 | 277 | 210 | 49 | 51.7% |
| QGA: Classical, 6...a6 7.a3 | 475 | 189 | 224 | 62 | 39.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 406 | 220 | 148 | 38 | 54.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 383 | 207 | 145 | 31 | 54.0% |
| Modern | 347 | 185 | 141 | 21 | 53.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 346 | 197 | 125 | 24 | 56.9% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 66 | 40 | 21 | 5 | 60.6% |
| Giuoco Piano: Tarrasch Variation | 43 | 24 | 10 | 9 | 55.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 38 | 29 | 6 | 3 | 76.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 33 | 20 | 11 | 2 | 60.6% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 24 | 16 | 4 | 4 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Modern Steinitz Defense | 19 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 47.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 19 | 13 | 5 | 1 | 68.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 17 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 58.8% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed, Averbakh Variation | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 28.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 13 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 46.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 305 | 209 | 79 | 17 | 68.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 292 | 222 | 61 | 9 | 76.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 266 | 185 | 66 | 15 | 69.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 265 | 194 | 54 | 17 | 73.2% |
| Modern | 224 | 152 | 63 | 9 | 67.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 207 | 158 | 41 | 8 | 76.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 175 | 109 | 63 | 3 | 62.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 169 | 139 | 26 | 4 | 82.2% |
| Four Knights Game | 142 | 94 | 37 | 11 | 66.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 141 | 104 | 30 | 7 | 73.8% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 84 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |