Profile Summary: belica1974
Meet belica1974, a rapid-fire strategist whose chess journey is a fascinating tale of ups, downs, and clever maneuvers that could rival the intricacies of DNA replication! With a rapid rating that has sprinted from a modest 783 in 2023 to an impressive 1064 by 2025, belica1974 proves that persistence and clever tactics are in their biological make-up.
Known for a playful affinity toward the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack and a knack for rolling out defenses like the Owens Defense and King’s Fianchetto Opening, belica1974 approaches the chessboard much like a masterful cell division—careful, calculated, and ultimately successful. Their most victorious opening is the Nimzowitsch Larsen Attack Classical Variation, boasting a win rate soaring above 54%, a true genetic marker of their preferred style.
With a win-loss record nearly balanced in rapid games (1512 wins to 1529 losses), belica1974 demonstrates resilience worthy of a prize-winning mitochondrion—constantly generating the energy to come back, as evidenced by an 82% comeback rate! Their win rate after losing a piece is a flawless 100%, showing they can regenerate like a starfish after a tactical setback.
This player engages deeply in the endgame—with an endgame frequency of over 67%—treading the final stages like a scientist carefully observing the cellular mitosis phase. A fun fact: belica1974 averages over 70 moves per victory, meaning no game is ever too short on complex, evolving scenarios, proving their patience is truly in their chromosomes.
In psychological dynamics, belica1974 exhibits a mild tilt factor, a gentle reminder that even the best of us can occasionally feel those genetic mutations of frustration. Yet, their tactical awareness keeps the losses lopsided rate low at just 8.43%, showing a natural ability to stay steady under pressure and adapt swiftly.
Whether playing white or black, belica1974’s win rates (50% with white and 45.7% with black) confirm a balanced playstyle that could inspire even the most seasoned biologist to admire the elegant complexity of life—and chess.
In summary, belica1974’s chess career is a biological masterpiece—sometimes a mutation, often evolution, always fascinating in the great ecosystem of chess. Keep an eye on them; this player's game is truly alive and evolving!
Quick summary
Nice run of rapid games — you’re playing actively, grabbing material and creating passed pawns. A lot of your recent wins finished because the opponent flagged or you turned pressure into concrete material gains. Your main weaknesses to target: time management, a few tactical oversights in sharp middlegames, and some endgame technique vs passed pawns and promotions.
Games I looked at
- Win vs erkanagrali — strong queenside/king-side pressure; final win on time (good activity and passed pawn play).
- Win vs dk3108 — excellent pawn advance and piece coordination into a winning rook/pawn ending (opponent timed out).
- Win vs beli1962 — created tactical chances, used piece activity well to convert (opponent timed out).
- Loss vs yessirrskiiiiiiii — opponent created a dangerous passed pawn and promotion. You reached a complicated endgame where defense was difficult.
- Loss vs fraserjm21 — sharp middlegame tactics turned against you; there were tactical exchanges that left your king exposed and material down.
For a quick interactive review, load the early attacking phase of your recent win:
[[Pgn|g3|e5|Bg2|Nf6|b3|Bc5|Bb2|Ng4|e3|Nc6|Qxg4|d5|Qxg7|Rf8|Bxe5|Nb4|Bc3|d4|exd4|Bxd4|Qxh7|Bxc3|dxc3|Nxc2+|Qxc2|Qe7+|Ne2|Be6|Bxb7|Rb8|Ba6|Qd6|Bd3|Bg4|O-O|Qd5|Be4|Qh5|Qd3|Bxe2|Qe3|Kd8|Re1|f5|Qd4+|Kc8|Bg2|Bf3|Nd2|Bxg2|Kxg2|Rd8|Qe3|Rh8|Nf3|Qh3+|Kg1|f4|Qd4]What you're doing well
- Active piece play: you prioritize piece activity (rook lifts, queen infiltrations) and create threats rather than purely passive moves.
- Tactical opportunism: you spot and win material (queen hunts and captures like Qxg4/Qxg7 in one game).
- Generating passed pawns and using them as a practical weapon — you know how to push advantages into endgames.
- Resilience under pressure: even in worse positions you keep fighting and create practical problems for the opponent.
Main areas to improve
- Time management — many games ended on time (opponents or you). Try to avoid very low increments in critical endgames. Use the first 10 moves to build a comfortable clock cushion.
- Tactical hygiene — a few losses came from missed tactics or exchanges that left your king and pawns vulnerable. Regular puzzle training will help.
- Endgame technique — defend/promote passed pawns, rook endgames, and basic queen vs rook ideas. Work on Lucena/Philidor basics and opposition themes.
- Opening clarity — you play many irregular or offbeat openings (your Openings Performance shows lots of Amar Gambit, Barnes, Nimzo-Larsen). Narrowing to 1–2 reliable systems will reduce early bad positions.
Concrete drills (do these 3–5× a week)
- 10–15 tactics per day on a puzzle site, focus on forks, pins and discovered attacks (20–30 minutes total).
- 15–20 minutes of rook endgame practice: Lucena and Philidor, basic king+rook vs king and king+pawn races.
- One short game (10|5 or 15|10) where you deliberately spend more time early (first 10 moves) to practice avoiding time trouble.
- Review 5 of your losses each week: find the turning move and write a single sentence why it went wrong (calculation error, missed tactic, passive plan).
Opening suggestions
- If you like the kingside fianchetto (your recent wins show it works): study the typical plans and pawn breaks for that setup. Use King's Fianchetto Opening as a study tag for key ideas: where to put knights, when to play e4/d4, and common tactical motifs.
- Your stats show a low winrate with English Opening — either narrow the lines you play there to 1–2 move orders or switch to a similar but simpler setup to reduce early blunders.
- Build a short repertoire of 2–3 reliable responses for Black (solid pawn structure, easy plans) so you enter middlegames you understand.
Practical tips for your next 10 rapid games
- Spend extra time on move 10 and 20 — these are pivot moments where plans get set. If you’re ahead on the clock, keep it; if you’re low, simplify.
- When you have a material edge, trade into a clear endgame you know (passed pawn + rook is ideal). If unsure, avoid speculative complications.
- Before each game, pick one theme to watch for (e.g., back-rank weakness, knight forks, passed pawn push) — train your eyes to catch those patterns during the game.
- Use the “review” feature after each game: tag the critical blunder and the winning idea. Small notes build faster improvement than replaying dozens of games without focus.
4‑week improvement plan (prioritized)
- Week 1: Tactics daily + 3 rook endgame drills. Focus: reduce tactical oversights and convert simple endgames.
- Week 2: Repertoire pruning — choose 1 White setup and 1 Black setup and learn typical pawn breaks and a couple of model games.
- Week 3: Play 20 rapid games (mix 10|5 and 15|10). Practice time management: aim to finish move 15 with ≥5 minutes left.
- Week 4: Review losses and annotate 10 games — write 1–2 lines why you lost/won and what to change. Keep daily puzzles and 2 rook endgames per week.
Small checklist to use after every game
- What was the turning point? (1 move)
- Did I get low on time? (yes/no) — if yes, why?
- One improvement for next game (tactics, opening, clock).
Closing — short encouragement
Your profile shows steady activity and lots of practice. Keep the tactical training and simplify your opening choices a little — that combination gives the biggest rating gains quickly. If you want, I can:
- Make a 7-day tactics routine tailored to your weaknesses.
- Pick 2 clean opening lines (one White, one Black) and give a 5‑game study plan to learn them.
- Annotate one of the losses in detail step‑by‑step — upload the game you want reviewed.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| erkanagrali | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| yessirrskiiiiiiii | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| dk3108 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| beli1962 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fraserjm21 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| barnabino24 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| albert21222 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| lucacristiano | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| saichand01 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| varun_adhithya | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| watermelonheadnb | 12W / 9L / 2D | View Games |
| alexis amaya | 9W / 4L / 0D | View Games |
| Azet Ri | 6W / 5L / 0D | View Games |
| kaos1977 | 8W / 1L / 2D | View Games |
| amit_varsat_007 | 6W / 2L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1096 | |||
| 2024 | 793 | |||
| 2023 | 783 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 896W / 859L / 73D | 865W / 879L / 80D | 71.8 |
| 2024 | 84W / 78L / 9D | 80W / 89L / 3D | 60.6 |
| 2023 | 446W / 422L / 31D | 405W / 470L / 36D | 69.7 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 1992 | 980 | 931 | 81 | 49.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 1155 | 571 | 536 | 48 | 49.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1110 | 543 | 522 | 45 | 48.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 635 | 307 | 303 | 25 | 48.4% |
| Modern | 475 | 201 | 255 | 19 | 42.3% |
| Australian Defense | 343 | 137 | 192 | 14 | 39.9% |
| English Opening | 63 | 23 | 40 | 0 | 36.5% |
| Bird Opening | 15 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| King's Indian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 9 | 1 |
| Losing | 17 | 0 |