Profile: Bengal_tiger07
FIDE Master Extraordinaire & Blitz Beast
Meet Bengal_tiger07, a ferocious chess player who prowls the 64 squares like the majestic predator their username suggests. Officially crowned a FIDE Master, this player’s journey through the chess jungle is marked by relentless tactical prowess and a flair for the fast-paced variants of the game.
Starting from humble beginnings in 2015 with blitz ratings barely tougher than kitten chess (max 1870), Bengal_tiger07 quickly ascended the ranks with an explosive improvement that saw bullet ratings soar into the high 2800s. Much like a tiger mastering its territory, this player dominates bullet chess with a peak rating of 2907 and a win rate that could scare the pawns off even the bravest opponents. Blitz is their kingdom too, reaching up to 2949 at peak—and trust us, they multitask at lightning speed.
Though they battle fiercely in bullet and blitz, Bengal_tiger07 is no stranger to rapid chess, achieving win rates close to 80% in thousands of games—a true versatile predator equally comfortable stalking longer time controls.
What sets this tiger apart? Their psychological resilience is the stuff of legend: an 85% comeback rate after setbacks, a near-perfect 99% win rate even after losing a piece, and an aversion to early resignations (only about 2% rate) highlight a relentless fighting spirit. Despite a tilt factor of 19, our tiger’s claws remain sharp, as evidenced by an epic longest winning streak of 62 games.
Known for out-hustling opponents especially in the mornings (8 AM boasts an intimidating 74.75% win rate) and early evenings, Bengal_tiger07’s style blends patience and endurance with swift, precise strikes—the average win spans over 70 moves, proving they savor each tactical meal.
Off the board, Bengal_tiger07 is likely the kind of player who jokes, "I don’t always attack, but when I do, it’s a tiger’s bite." Friendly with opponents ranging from “adorable07” (100% win rate, by the way) to the daunting “rud_makarian” (33.33% win rate, showing not every prey escapes unscathed).
Whether you’re a casual player or a grandmaster, beware the Bengal_tiger07: agile, strategic, and always hungry for victory. In the kingdom of chess, this master doesn’t just play the game—they own the jungle.
Quick summary
Nice string of games. You’re clearly comfortable in sharp kings‑Indian / French structures and you convert practical advantages well — often by piling on pressure, simplifying into winning endgames, or flagging opponents when the clock is on. At the same time a recurring theme is time trouble / risky play when low on time, plus a few tactical oversights that let opponents generate decisive passed pawns.
What you did well
- Opening familiarity: you consistently reach familiar, playable structures (e.g. Kings‑Indian types). That gives you a big practical edge in bullet — you know plans and pawn breaks without thinking much.
- Conversion & endgames: in several wins you simplified into rook / pawn endgames and finished accurately — good technique under pressure.
- Tactical spotting: you punished opponent inaccuracies (capturing loose pieces and tactical hits), for example quick captures on open files and decisive queen incursions.
- Practical clock play: you use the clock as a weapon — multiple wins were on time, which is a valid skill in bullet when used cleanly.
Where you can improve
- Time management: winning on time is good, but losing on time shows risky time usage. Try to avoid entering complex long tactical lines when you’re below ~10 seconds. Flagging is effective, but not if you throw away material first.
- Watch pawn races and passed pawns: in your recent loss the opponent’s a‑pawn promoted (…a1=Q) after you allowed the pawn march to become unstoppable. Stop underestimating enemy pawn breaks and advance‑to‑queens threats in the endgame.
- Loose pieces and tactical shots: there were a few moments where a piece could be grabbed or a tactic punished (forks, discovered checks). Be especially careful of leaving pieces unprotected in sharp middlegames — Loose Piece applies here.
- Premoves & simplification discipline: in bullet it’s tempting to premove a lot. Premoves are great in quiet positions but dangerous in tactics‑heavy positions — reduce premoves when the position is unclarified.
Concrete next steps (practice plan)
- Time-sliced practice: play short blocks with a goal. Example: 25 games 1|0 focusing on not dropping below 5 seconds before a simplification. After each loss, note whether it was "flag loss" or "positional blunder."
- Tactics under clock: 10 minutes of 1‑2 move tactics drills daily to build instant pattern recognition for forks, skewers, and discovered checks.
- Endgame drills: 10 rapid drills on rook vs. pawns and king + pawn races. Practice stopping outside passed pawns and converting a rook + king vs king/pawn setups.
- Opening simplification: choose one or two bullet‑friendly lines (solid, low‑theory) to play when low on time — e.g., systems that trade pieces early to simplify into clear, technical plans. Your openings performance shows strong results when the positions are familiar; exploit that.
- Review flagged games: pick 5 games you won or lost on time and do a quick postmortem — could the win/loss have been avoided by a safe simplification? If yes, train that decision pattern.
Mini checklist for each bullet game
- Before move 15: are there hanging pieces or obvious tactics? If yes, slow down and check twice.
- If below 10 seconds: trade queens or major pieces if that preserves a clear plan or winning pawn structure.
- When opponent pushes a flank pawn (a/b/h), evaluate the passed pawn race immediately — mark “stop the pawn” or “race to queen” and act quickly.
- Only premove when the move is forced or captures are safe — otherwise premove less.
Short drills to try this week
- 5 × 1|0 bullet matches where your aim is to never drop under 4 seconds with >1 minute remaining on the session clock.
- 10 minutes tactics where every correct puzzle increases your “safe‑premove” allowance by +1 for the next session.
- 10 rook‑endgame positions (10 min calm analysis each) — focus on stopping outside passed pawns and cutting off the king.
Game references & examples
- Opponent you played multiple times: Anatoly Bykhovsky. Reviewing your games vs them is high value — you both reach similar structures often.
- An instructive recent win (opening → tactical simplification):
- Loss to study: look at the game where the opponent’s a‑pawn promoted (…a1=Q). That sequence shows how a small pawn‑push can become decisive if not checked early — slow down when an opponent creates an outside passer.
Final note
Your long‑term data shows you’re improving (positive slopes and recent +28 in one month). Focus on time control discipline and a few endgame templates and you’ll convert more wins cleanly instead of depending on flags. Keep the openings you trust, but add a “safe line” to switch to when the clock is under 10 seconds.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| BSWPaulsen | 6W / 3L / 0D | View |
| Abdulla Gadimbayli | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Eline Roebers | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| jacksterthepro | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| JamyTheSaint | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| tango_argentino | 69W / 68L / 2D | View Games |
| Leo Bispo | 69W / 27L / 8D | View Games |
| purry1979 | 51W / 49L / 2D | View Games |
| canwedoit | 34W / 63L / 4D | View Games |
| x-2872584143 | 57W / 24L / 7D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2829 | |||
| 2024 | 2850 | |||
| 2023 | 2903 | 2813 | ||
| 2022 | 2855 | 2777 | 2268 | |
| 2021 | 2806 | 2852 | ||
| 2020 | 2841 | 2773 | ||
| 2019 | 2651 | 2639 | 1200 | |
| 2018 | 2568 | 2712 | ||
| 2017 | 2516 | 2519 | ||
| 2016 | 2710 | 2463 | ||
| 2015 | 2500 | 1870 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2W / 3L / 0D | 1W / 2L / 0D | 100.0 |
| 2024 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 3W / 1L / 0D | 106.2 |
| 2023 | 53W / 48L / 8D | 53W / 47L / 6D | 83.0 |
| 2022 | 2527W / 665L / 267D | 2335W / 760L / 322D | 72.5 |
| 2021 | 950W / 676L / 86D | 897W / 729L / 91D | 83.8 |
| 2020 | 136W / 127L / 16D | 136W / 125L / 16D | 85.1 |
| 2019 | 403W / 286L / 39D | 372W / 299L / 52D | 81.7 |
| 2018 | 501W / 445L / 46D | 401W / 499L / 79D | 75.8 |
| 2017 | 251W / 225L / 38D | 191W / 251L / 46D | 84.7 |
| 2016 | 430W / 354L / 36D | 363W / 395L / 44D | 83.2 |
| 2015 | 84W / 23L / 2D | 76W / 25L / 6D | 82.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 921 | 531 | 342 | 48 | 57.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 736 | 432 | 265 | 39 | 58.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 546 | 319 | 205 | 22 | 58.4% |
| Czech Defense | 454 | 276 | 159 | 19 | 60.8% |
| Modern | 399 | 241 | 141 | 17 | 60.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 377 | 220 | 141 | 16 | 58.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 326 | 167 | 140 | 19 | 51.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 297 | 148 | 131 | 18 | 49.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 273 | 132 | 123 | 18 | 48.4% |
| East Indian Defense | 261 | 136 | 108 | 17 | 52.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 375 | 214 | 129 | 32 | 57.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 229 | 130 | 85 | 14 | 56.8% |
| Philidor Defense | 205 | 92 | 98 | 15 | 44.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 197 | 108 | 77 | 12 | 54.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 194 | 114 | 65 | 15 | 58.8% |
| East Indian Defense | 163 | 84 | 63 | 16 | 51.5% |
| Czech Defense | 143 | 70 | 55 | 18 | 49.0% |
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 139 | 96 | 36 | 7 | 69.1% |
| Unknown | 117 | 62 | 55 | 0 | 53.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 113 | 65 | 45 | 3 | 57.5% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center Game: Berger Variation | 189 | 170 | 4 | 15 | 90.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 184 | 134 | 15 | 35 | 72.8% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 99 | 86 | 7 | 6 | 86.9% |
| Center Game | 59 | 57 | 0 | 2 | 96.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 55 | 53 | 1 | 1 | 96.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Chekhover Variation | 51 | 37 | 7 | 7 | 72.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 50 | 45 | 1 | 4 | 90.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 45 | 36 | 3 | 6 | 80.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 45 | 31 | 8 | 6 | 68.9% |
| East Indian Defense | 42 | 34 | 1 | 7 | 81.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 62 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 5 |