Ben Marmont - National Master Extraordinaire
Known in chess circles as "bennybear," Ben Marmont proudly holds the prestigious title of National Master. With a flair for quick strikes and tactical wizardry, Ben has made a name for themselves primarily in the fast-paced world of bullet and blitz chess.
Rating Highlights & Style
Ben's bullet rating peaked at a respectable 2129 in 2021, showcasing lightning-fast instincts, while blitzing reached an impressive 2212 in the same year — not too shabby for someone who probably sacrifices pawns like snacks. Rapid play hasn't been neglected either, with a peak of 1919, proving Ben is no stranger to thinking on their feet.
When winning, Ben tends to orchestrate his masterpieces over about 69 moves, savoring both the journey and the endgame. Speaking of which, Ben enjoys the endgame nearly 77% of the time, confirming they don’t just sprint to victory, but like to cross the finish line in style.
Tactical Genius with a Heart
Ben's comeback rate is a staggering 87.32%, and remarkably, they boast a 100% win rate after losing a piece. Talk about turning lemons into checkmate-worthy lemonade! Though occasionally tempted to resign early (14% early resignation rate), Ben's resilience and tactical acumen keep the games thrilling until the very end.
Winning Against the Odds
Whether playing white or black, Ben maintains a solid winning edge, with a win rate slightly favoring white at 56.99% and black at 55.63%. Ben’s favorite opening strategy remains a closely guarded secret—so secret, in fact, that all their top games are tagged simply as "Top Secret". Maybe the mystery adds to the magic?
Personality & Quirks
Games with Ben are a rollercoaster of emotion, as his tilt factor sits at 10—enough to keep opponents guessing if the next move is brilliance or a blunder. Despite this, his playing style exhibits a calm, collected warrior ready to claw back from any dire situation.
Ben favors playing on weekends and evenings, boasting win rates approaching 60% on Sundays and between 58-60% on certain evenings. Clearly, when the mood strikes, bennybear is at their fastest and most ferocious!
Remembering Ben Marmont
With thousands of games under his belt and hundreds of victories, Ben Marmont continues to prove that chess is not just a game, but a battle of wills, wit, and occasionally, a well-timed surprise. Whether you encounter bennybear in bullet or blitz, expect fierce competition, a dash of mystery, and maybe a cheeky grin when you least expect it.
Hi Ben (bennybear) – Performance Review & Action Plan
What you’re doing well
- Active, principled openings. Whether playing the Najdorf, Accelerated Dragon or your Ruy-Lopez lines, you usually fight for the centre and create dynamic imbalances early.
- Tactical vision. Several of your recent wins feature crisp combinations such as 10.Nd5! in the Ruy (vs SPkrain) and the exchange-sac 26…Rb8! in the Alapin game. Your calculation speed is above average for the 2 k+ Blitz bracket.
- Pressure on the clock. In many Sicilians you steer the game into sharp positions that make opponents burn time – visible in two recent time-outs you forced.
Key improvement areas
-
End-game conversion & technique.
All three most recent losses reached endings where the material was equal or only slightly worse (e.g. vs kunyav: opposite-coloured bishops + rooks). Your decision making there slipped, often from:
a) pushing pawns without king activation;
b) trading into unfavourable king-and-pawn endings.
➜ Action: spend one week on Lucena, Philidor and basic rook-pawn endings (e.g. Averbakh’s manual). Then play five 15 | 10 games focusing solely on reaching favourable end-games, even if it means quieter middlegames. -
Time management.
Four of the last seven decisive results were time losses (even from winning positions). Your average remaining time when losing was 7 seconds; when winning, 45 seconds. ➜ Action: insert two mini “speed bumps” into your thinking routine:- Opening phase (move 8–12): commit to playing immediately if you recognise a book position.
- End-game phase: use the opponent’s move to pre-calculate two candidate moves; you’ll rarely need more than 5 seconds on reply.
-
Over-pressing in equal positions.
In the Closed Sicilian loss you rejected the simple 18…O-O-O + Rhe8 plan and instead played the speculative 18…Bd5?!, burning 70 seconds and loosening your king. The pattern recurs: you often choose the most forcing line even when the position calls for patience. ➜ Action: after every forcing candidate, ask “What is my opponent’s worst counterplay?” If it’s unpleasant, switch to a slower improving move.
Opening map (last 25 games)
Sicilian (68 %), Ruy-Lopez (20 %), Scandinavian (12 %). Consider adding one solid back-up line (e.g. Carlsbad structures with 1.d4) to avoid preparation fatigue.
Quick tactical warm-up
Try solving this position from your win vs Ashok105 – Black to move:
Strength-building schedule (2-week block)
| Day | Focus | Goal |
|---|---|---|
| Mon / Thu | Tactics trainer | 30 puzzles > 80 % accuracy |
| Tue / Fri | End-game drills | Rook vs pawn, 4-pawn races |
| Wed | 15 | 10 games | Mandatory post-game analysis |
| Weekend | Review master Najdorf games | Annotate 3 games with comments |
Motivation snapshot
Your current Blitz peak: 2212 (2021-02-25). A 20-point gain is realistic once the two biggest leaks (end-games & clock) are patched.
Keep the energy and fighting spirit high, Ben! Small, targeted improvements will push you to the next bracket.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| inv1ctus83 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| yoyoyjuarez | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| karaburmabluz | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ahmedjrebe | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| hjs60 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| arul008 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| roni1803 | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| milkwithfish | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| uncrownedking7 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ordobekos | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| klaranovak | 8W / 2L / 0D | |
| Juraj Janosik | 5W / 1L / 0D | |
| Adalbert G | 2W / 3L / 0D | |
| Najd Mbarek | 1W / 2L / 2D | |
| thegonz | 3W / 2L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2112 | 2220 | 2089 | |
| 2024 | 1771 | |||
| 2023 | 1942 | |||
| 2022 | 1989 | 2196 | 1862 | |
| 2021 | 1961 | 2086 | 399 | |
| 2020 | 1690 | 2125 | 1718 | 400 |
| 2019 | 1742 | 2055 | ||
| 2017 | 1945 | |||
| 2016 | 1941 | |||
| 2015 | 1816 | |||
| 2014 | 1793 | |||
| 2013 | 1902 | 1769 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 186W / 125L / 32D | 168W / 147L / 22D | 76.2 |
| 2024 | 1W / 2L / 0D | 0W / 3L / 0D | 67.7 |
| 2023 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 104.0 |
| 2022 | 29W / 22L / 3D | 30W / 21L / 3D | 73.9 |
| 2021 | 187W / 137L / 19D | 178W / 132L / 24D | 75.5 |
| 2020 | 144W / 81L / 22D | 126W / 90L / 19D | 75.9 |
| 2019 | 81W / 57L / 8D | 85W / 51L / 9D | 72.0 |
| 2017 | 3W / 3L / 1D | 3W / 2L / 2D | 91.4 |
| 2016 | 7W / 3L / 0D | 6W / 5L / 1D | 67.9 |
| 2015 | 6W / 5L / 0D | 6W / 4L / 1D | 67.6 |
| 2014 | 20W / 10L / 1D | 18W / 10L / 2D | 71.1 |
| 2013 | 68W / 29L / 6D | 67W / 29L / 4D | 69.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 39 | 21 | 13 | 5 | 53.9% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 26 | 20 | 6 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 22 | 10 | 12 | 0 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 16 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 12 | 3 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 15 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack | 15 | 7 | 6 | 2 | 46.7% |
| Slav Defense | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.1% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 124 | 59 | 56 | 9 | 47.6% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 84 | 52 | 25 | 7 | 61.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 80 | 49 | 21 | 10 | 61.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 64 | 25 | 36 | 3 | 39.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 58 | 36 | 19 | 3 | 62.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 37 | 24 | 9 | 4 | 64.9% |
| Slav Defense | 37 | 30 | 6 | 1 | 81.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 34 | 20 | 10 | 4 | 58.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 33 | 17 | 14 | 2 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 32 | 18 | 11 | 3 | 56.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Bird Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 1 |
| Losing | 10 | 0 |