William Coe - National Master Extraordinaire
Known in the chess world by the username BillCoe, William Coe is a National Master whose journey on the 64 squares is nothing short of an epic saga seasoned with thrilling victories, occasional missteps, and relentless resilience.
Chess Style & Strategy
BillCoe’s style is a captivating blend of enduring patience and tactical ingenuity. With an average of nearly 78 moves per game, whether in victory or defeat, he enjoys marathoning through complex middle and endgames rather than quick strike blitzes—though don’t be fooled; his blitz rating peaks impressively above 2200! He exhibits a remarkable comeback rate of 87.64%, proving he’s the ultimate chess phoenix rising from the ashes whenever he loses a piece.
Psychologically, he is modestly prone to tilt (a 10 out of 100 on the tilt scale), which means after a trick gone wrong, he sometimes wishes he could just flip the board. Luckily, with a dedication to early resignations half the time, he spares himself unnecessary suffering.
Performance Highlights
- Peak Blitz Rating: 2296 in May 2025 – he’s nearly entered Grandmaster territory, but don’t ask him about his losing streaks (he’s had a painful 10 in a row).
- Bullet Brilliance: With a bullet peak rating of 2134, BillCoe can blitz lightning-fast when the situation demands.
- Daily Chess Pro: Achieved a peak daily rating of 2228 back in 2016, showcasing his solid classical foundation.
Opening Curiosities
While the specifics of his favorite openings remain under tight wraps (classified as "Top Secret"), some daring ventures into the Caro Kann Tartakower Variation and the Sicilian Defense French Variation keep opponents on their toes – though results there are as mixed as a complicated positional struggle.
He is not the sort to shy away from unconventional battlegrounds, dabbling occasionally in Chess960 to keep both himself and the crowd guessing.
Memorable Matches
In one of his latest showdowns in early June 2025, BillCoe triumphed on time against the formidable MaestroG after a tactical tussle centered around the Richter-Veresov Attack. Though he’s also tasted bitter defeats, such as losses against Vincefm and Mourinho_Jose, his persistence and passion never wane.
Win-Loss-Draw Chronicles
Across over 11,000 blitz games, BillCoe has racked up 4,716 wins and learned from 5,817 losses, with 1,019 draws in between. In the bullet arena, his win rate tips just over 50%, and daily games show a respectable 56% success rate.
Off the Board
Legend has it that BillCoe occasionally communes with the chess spirits, whispering to the pawns and rooks before each game. While no gory knight sacrifices or queen blunders go unnoticed around him, he maintains a good-natured banter about his own “early resignations” – half the time, he claims it’s just “strategic patience.”
Whether it’s taking down foes with a sly pin or embarking on a grueling endgame marathon, William Coe is a cherished figure who proves that chess is not just a game – it’s a life adventure, complete with glorious checkmates and those pesky times you totally blunder your queen.
General Performance Overview
William, your strength adjusted win rate of approximately 55.5% is a solid indicator that you perform well relative to the strength of your opponents. Over the last month, you have shown notable progress with a positive rating change of 14 points and a positive rating trend slope of about 23, showing recent momentum and improvement.
However, your 3, 6, and 12 month rating changes and trends suggest some challenges over a longer time frame, including a 6-month rating drop of 70 points and negative slopes, indicating some inconsistency or difficulty maintaining peak performance.
Recent Games Analysis
Your recent wins demonstrate strong play especially in aggressively positioned openings like the Sicilian Defense where you showcased both tactical awareness and endgame technique. For example, in the game against ncmike2011, you effectively managed the complex Najdorf variation, building pressure on your opponent and converting an advantage decisively.
- You are comfortable with sharp and dynamic openings, using moves that maintain active piece play and initiate plans on both wings.
- Your endgame technique in these victories indicates good calculation and positional understanding, especially with controlling passed pawns and king activity.
- Successful exploitation of your opponent's weaknesses, such as pinned pieces or loose pawns, is a strength in your games.
However, in some losses, particularly those played against strong opponents such as NimzoKnight and Sherpadlor, you faced challenges:
- Early middlegame strategic decisions sometimes led to less favorable positions, especially in pawn structure or piece activity.
- Handling of complex positional themes like closed center tension (as in the French Defense) could be further improved.
- Some of the losses reflect difficulty in adapting mid-game plans when the position shifts from tactical to strategic complexity.
Opening Play Insights
Your frequent use of sharp openings like the Sicilian Defense (including the Najdorf and Kan variations) demonstrates confidence in entering complex tactical battles. It benefits your style when you can leverage initiative early on.
Key suggestions for your opening repertoire:
- Continue to deepen your knowledge of your chosen openings to improve move order precision and sharpen your understanding of typical tactical motifs.
- Study some alternative lines or sidelines for opponents who might be well-prepared against your main lines, to keep them off balance.
- Work on recognizing strategic ideas in quieter openings to balance your dynamic edge with solid positional foundations.
Areas for Improvement
- Strategic Planning: Focus on improving your strategic understanding during the middlegame to reduce positional weaknesses and strengthen long-term plans.
- Endgame Techniques: Although your endgame is strong in many wins, reinforcing knowledge of key theoretical endings will boost conversion rates in close games.
- Mental Resilience and Consistency: Maintaining positive rating trends over longer periods will require steady focus and possibly increasing practice or study routine.
- Adaptability: Work on handling transitions from tactical to positional play more smoothly to avoid pitfalls when the position becomes less concrete.
Next Steps
- Analyze your losses thoroughly to understand key moments where the game swung against you, focusing on the transition from the opening to the middlegame.
- Work with targeted puzzles focusing on middle game positional themes and endgame scenarios.
- Regularly review your opening repertoire with updated engine assistance and possible new theoretical developments.
- Consider playing more training games or working with a coach to harness your recent positive momentum and build consistency.
Resources and References
Here are a few recent notable games to review deeply:
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phuong Hanh Luong | 1W / 0L / 1D | |
| Melika Mohammadi | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Akash G | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| gora2812 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| hugo-berthier | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| loruf | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Meri Arabidze | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| nexoknight11 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| rachidhuilda | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| jimnator | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| dragondefierro | 18W / 5L / 1D | |
| sairamcp | 10W / 8L / 1D | |
| malimukes | 4W / 12L / 3D | |
| ch3 | 10W / 6L / 0D | |
| robc2012 | 4W / 9L / 2D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1927 | |||
| 2024 | 1744 | 2149 | ||
| 2023 | 1763 | 2134 | ||
| 2022 | 2045 | 2193 | ||
| 2021 | 2095 | 2103 | ||
| 2020 | 2077 | |||
| 2019 | 2017 | |||
| 2018 | 1841 | 2000 | ||
| 2017 | 1929 | |||
| 2016 | 1869 | 2158 | ||
| 2015 | 1890 | 2209 | ||
| 2014 | 1877 | 2097 | ||
| 2010 | 1200 | |||
| 2009 | 1665 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 160W / 261L / 48D | 148W / 281L / 43D | 81.4 |
| 2024 | 520W / 555L / 86D | 451W / 625L / 96D | 82.6 |
| 2023 | 492W / 571L / 106D | 438W / 622L / 110D | 81.9 |
| 2022 | 330W / 400L / 69D | 299W / 413L / 78D | 79.0 |
| 2021 | 271W / 288L / 62D | 235W / 333L / 44D | 78.4 |
| 2020 | 236W / 291L / 66D | 238W / 326L / 44D | 79.9 |
| 2019 | 70W / 82L / 15D | 73W / 86L / 8D | 77.8 |
| 2018 | 217W / 189L / 32D | 192W / 220L / 29D | 80.5 |
| 2017 | 190W / 198L / 41D | 179W / 201L / 42D | 79.5 |
| 2016 | 16W / 14L / 3D | 14W / 14L / 4D | 80.1 |
| 2015 | 20W / 10L / 4D | 18W / 12L / 5D | 75.7 |
| 2014 | 64W / 30L / 11D | 64W / 39L / 5D | 78.8 |
| 2010 | 0W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 3.0 |
| 2009 | 2W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 76.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 608 | 232 | 324 | 52 | 38.2% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 590 | 276 | 265 | 49 | 46.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 505 | 224 | 240 | 41 | 44.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 452 | 174 | 234 | 44 | 38.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 398 | 158 | 212 | 28 | 39.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 382 | 137 | 214 | 31 | 35.9% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 366 | 151 | 186 | 29 | 41.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 292 | 126 | 132 | 34 | 43.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Nyezhmetdinov-Rossolimo Attack, Fianchetto Variation | 268 | 128 | 122 | 18 | 47.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 262 | 103 | 138 | 21 | 39.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 31 | 15 | 16 | 0 | 48.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 25 | 10 | 12 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 22 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 45.5% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 22 | 9 | 12 | 1 | 40.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 18 | 10 | 8 | 0 | 55.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 47.1% |
| French Defense | 15 | 8 | 7 | 0 | 53.3% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Australian Defense | 13 | 5 | 7 | 1 | 38.5% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Gipslis Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Maróczy Bind | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Closed | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Benoni Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 10 | 2 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |