bingbong: The Chess Warrior of the Boards
From humble beginnings in 2012 with a modest daily rating hovering around 1054, bingbong has embarked on a truly epic chess journey. Known for their persistence—even when early records were more “learning curve” than “victory lap”—this player’s story is one of grit, growth, and an obsession with the queen’s gambit.
Rating Rises and Dashes
After a rollercoaster ride through the thousands—daily highs peaking near 1600, bullet ratings blasting past the 2400 mark, blitz attacks smashing ceilings beyond 2100, and rapid games cruising comfortably over 2100—bingbong’s chess evolution is both impressive and relentless.
Signature Style
Bingbong’s style is a curious blend of patience and explosive tacticals. With an average of 64 moves per victory, they refuse to rush, savouring the strategic dance from opening to endgame. Tactical awareness is their secret weapon, boasting a staggering 80% comeback rate—the kind of player who makes you believe a lost knight is just a temporary setback before the real spectacle begins.
Opening Repertoire
Familiar foes beware: openings like the Trompowsky Attack and French Defense Schlechter Variation are often bingbong’s playgrounds, where they excel with win rates topping 60%. Equally comfortable opening with kings and queens, they surprise opponents with the unpredictable “Top Secret” openings—presumably involving secret chess ninja moves.
Victories, Setbacks, and a Touch of Humor
It’s not all checkmates and celebrations; bingbong has faced trials too, including a legendary 41-game losing streak. But don't worry—by now they've shaken off the dust and ran off with three current winning streak games under their belt. In short: this chess battler knows resilience better than any grandmaster motivational quote.
Daily Grind and Peak Moments
Whether it’s the tactical bullet arenas or the thoughtful rapid battles, bingbong’s dedication is clear. They hit their peak bullet rating of 2471 in March 2025, just in time to remind everyone that chess isn’t about quick wins, but about strategy and heart (and maybe a little luck on those time scrambles).
Notable Moments
In their most recent clutches of greatness, bingbong secured memorable victories over opponents such as futuretitlesabah and serchess3434, showcasing precision in openings like the Queen's Gambit Accepted and the French Defense. Even when bowing out, the games were lessons in elegance, with losses often coming against tough opponents in nail-biting endgames.
Off the Board
Who is bingbong away from the 64 squares? A relentless enthusiast with a tilt factor of 41—meaning they sometimes channel their inner drama queen after a blunder but bounce back with equal zeal. Their best time to pounce on opponents? When the clock strikes midnight, proving perhaps that the nightlife fuels their chess wizardry.
Final Thoughts
Known for clever opening traps, stubborn endgame endurance, and the kind of comeback stories that make lesser mortals surrender, bingbong is a chess player you don't want to miss. Whether you face them on bullet, blitz, rapid, or daily, be prepared for a battle of wits, cunning, and unexpected twists. Because when bingbong steps into the arena, it’s never just a game—it’s a chess saga in the making.
What went well in your recent bullet games
You showed willingness to play actively and initiate sharp tactics in your bullet games. Your aggression can create concrete chances when your opponent missteps, and you often find good attacking ideas and piece activity in the early middlegame.
- You handle dynamic positions with energy, often pressuring your opponent’s king and creating forcing sequences.
- When your plans align with quick development, you convert pressure into material or positional gains more reliably.
Areas to improve for more consistency
- Time management in bullet can make or break a game. Aim to reach the critical middlegame while keeping at least a small buffer of time for when you need precise decisions.
- Avoid overextending in the opening when you’re uncertain. Choose 2–3 openings you’re very comfortable with and stick to clear development plans rather than chasing long forcing lines under time pressure.
- Tighten the transition to the endgame. In several games, exchanges led to unclear endings; practice common endgame patterns so you can convert advantages or hold difficult positions more calmly.
- Watch for recurring blunders in sharp lines. If you sense fatigue or time pressure, switch to simpler, solid plans rather than risky tactical skirmishes.
Opening performance insights
Your opening choices show a mix of results. Some openings tend to yield more reliable, simpler development and quicker, clearer middlegame plans, while others lead to longer, more complex battles. Focus on 2–3 openings you understand deeply, with clear middlegame ideas and standard pawn structures, so you can play fast and confidently in bullet.
- Prioritize openings whose typical plans you can execute quickly—develop pieces, control the center, and keep king safety intact.
- For each chosen opening, learn the key deviations your opponents commonly employ and your straightforward responses, so you can keep the clock on your side.
Understanding rating trends and how to approach them
Your recent trend shows fluctuations across different time windows. In bullet, momentum can swing a lot from game to game. The goal is to build consistency by sharpening your decision-making under time pressure, sticking to your prepared plans, and reducing risky detours in sharp positions.
- Create a focused training plan that reinforces your openings, tactical pattern recognition, and essential endgames.
- Incorporate regular tactical puzzles and quick opening reviews to keep your patterns sharp for fast games.
Recommended two-week practice plan
- Week 1: lock in 2 openings you enjoy and study their main, straightforward lines. Practice 5–10 tactical puzzles daily and do 1 short endgame drill a few times this week.
- Week 2: play a mix of short training games focused on your prepared openings, then review each game to identify time spent on decision-making and any recurring mistakes. Add 1 additional tactical session and reinforce a simple endgame pattern you can execute under pressure.
Quick tactical and planning reminders for bullet
- Prioritize rapid development: knights before heavy pieces, then connect rooks with early castling and central control.
- Look for forced moves only when they clearly improve your position; otherwise keep the board simple and rely on quick piece activity.
- When you’re ahead, aim to simplify to a clear endgame or a straightforward conversion pattern.
- When you’re behind, seek forcing lines that regain activity or create a practical winning chances, but avoid long, uncertain calculations.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| gmarkov1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| drxeneinstein | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| zeenhunn | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| s-ama | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| enkushi | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| slkintanar0211 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| destroyer199211 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| euklides1971 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| infiniteocean | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| drricksanchez21 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jesse Zafirakos | 84W / 1168L / 27D | |
| flipsjde | 283W / 397L / 29D | |
| Hannah Sayce | 67W / 129L / 7D | |
| Malishious | 56W / 64L / 9D | |
| frederichprasetyono | 89W / 18L / 3D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2290 | 2122 | 2107 | 961 |
| 2024 | 2301 | 2099 | 2053 | 1460 |
| 2023 | 2115 | 1964 | 1598 | 1397 |
| 2022 | 1972 | 1816 | 1459 | |
| 2021 | 1759 | 1640 | 1601 | 1384 |
| 2020 | 1622 | 1448 | 1638 | 1229 |
| 2019 | 1229 | |||
| 2018 | 1204 | 1104 | ||
| 2017 | 1369 | 1278 | 1044 | 893 |
| 2016 | 1067 | |||
| 2015 | 1100 | 1070 | 674 | |
| 2014 | 1159 | 1376 | ||
| 2013 | 980 | 1163 | ||
| 2012 | 1105 | 1199 | 914 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 681W / 657L / 56D | 635W / 678L / 67D | 74.8 |
| 2024 | 1340W / 1488L / 110D | 1271W / 1544L / 110D | 67.9 |
| 2023 | 428W / 320L / 19D | 402W / 336L / 30D | 66.7 |
| 2022 | 89W / 64L / 6D | 92W / 55L / 6D | 66.7 |
| 2021 | 283W / 181L / 30D | 292W / 188L / 21D | 70.1 |
| 2020 | 428W / 318L / 46D | 410W / 342L / 38D | 63.6 |
| 2019 | 12W / 6L / 0D | 6W / 6L / 3D | 55.5 |
| 2018 | 18W / 22L / 1D | 20W / 20L / 2D | 63.0 |
| 2017 | 97W / 86L / 11D | 109W / 81L / 10D | 58.3 |
| 2016 | 18W / 16L / 2D | 18W / 22L / 1D | 53.6 |
| 2015 | 11W / 19L / 1D | 8W / 24L / 0D | 30.2 |
| 2014 | 59W / 44L / 4D | 55W / 46L / 8D | 63.4 |
| 2013 | 39W / 32L / 0D | 32W / 38L / 2D | 54.8 |
| 2012 | 108W / 70L / 5D | 81W / 95L / 5D | 61.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 736 | 373 | 335 | 28 | 50.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 595 | 223 | 357 | 15 | 37.5% |
| Modern | 444 | 218 | 206 | 20 | 49.1% |
| Alekhine Defense | 416 | 182 | 218 | 16 | 43.8% |
| French Defense | 400 | 220 | 160 | 20 | 55.0% |
| Australian Defense | 398 | 178 | 199 | 21 | 44.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 239 | 111 | 119 | 9 | 46.4% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 238 | 103 | 119 | 16 | 43.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 224 | 83 | 127 | 14 | 37.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 222 | 66 | 154 | 2 | 29.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 296 | 167 | 116 | 13 | 56.4% |
| Modern | 198 | 108 | 82 | 8 | 54.5% |
| French Defense | 160 | 79 | 76 | 5 | 49.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 146 | 74 | 61 | 11 | 50.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 142 | 76 | 59 | 7 | 53.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 131 | 61 | 64 | 6 | 46.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 128 | 73 | 48 | 7 | 57.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 91 | 51 | 39 | 1 | 56.0% |
| Australian Defense | 90 | 47 | 41 | 2 | 52.2% |
| Czech Defense | 81 | 50 | 27 | 4 | 61.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% |
| French Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Czech Defense | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Barnes Defense | 111 | 62 | 42 | 7 | 55.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 104 | 53 | 42 | 9 | 51.0% |
| French Defense | 82 | 46 | 36 | 0 | 56.1% |
| Scotch Game | 81 | 37 | 39 | 5 | 45.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 67 | 30 | 34 | 3 | 44.8% |
| Modern | 66 | 34 | 26 | 6 | 51.5% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 60 | 23 | 33 | 4 | 38.3% |
| Czech Defense | 52 | 28 | 24 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 50 | 19 | 28 | 3 | 38.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 48 | 23 | 24 | 1 | 47.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 1 |
| Losing | 65 | 0 |