Profile
Srihari L R is a FIDE Grandmaster from India, celebrated for his prowess in fast time controls and his steady, strategic approach to the game. A forward-thinking competitor, he thrives on the pressure of Blitz and brings a calm demeanor to sharp, time-scrambled battles.
His preferred time control is Blitz, where his quick calculation and tenacious endgame technique have earned him respect on the online and over-the-board scenes. For a quick snapshot of his competitive journey, see the rating chart:
. His peak Blitz rating to date stands at 2930 (2024-12-17). You can view a succinct profile here: sriharilr.Career Highlights
As a titled player, Srihari L R earned the Grandmaster title from FIDE, marking him among the elite in the chess world. A standout milestone was reaching a Blitz peak of 2930 in December 2024, a testament to consistency and growth across years of competition. His career spans a rich tapestry of tournaments and online events, with a notable track record in Blitz and Bullet play.
- Longest Winning Streak: 14 games
- Longest Losing Streak: 15 games
- Current Winning Streak: 1 game
Openings and Repertoire
Srihari has cultivated a diverse Blitz repertoire, balancing solid foundations with dynamic choices. In Blitz, several openings have yielded strong results across thousands of games, reflecting his versatile preparation and adaptability.
- Czech Defense — 291 games, 165W-86L-40D (WinRate 56.7%)
- Modern Defense — 187 games, 102W-67L-18D (WinRate 54.55%)
- Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation — 317 games, 149W-132L-36D (WinRate 47%)
- Nimzo-Larsen Attack — 194 games, 85W-83L-26D (WinRate ~44%)
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense — 194 games, 90W-81L-23D (WinRate 46.39%)
Playing Style and Approach
Known for pragmatic, resourceful play, Srihari often steers into sharp middlegames with a steady hand. His endgame frequency is high, and he embraces the grind with a cool mind. His comeback instinct is evident in his tactical moments, where precision and resilience turn difficult positions into fightable games.
- Endgame Frequency: 84.28%
- Comeback Rate After Losing a Piece: 43.74%
- White Win Rate: 47.59% | Black Win Rate: 44.11%
Notable Moments
Off the clock, Srihari is known for his insightful commentary and good-natured humor, often sharing candid takes on openings, plans, and the occasional blunder with fans. His career is a blend of deep preparation, fearless blitz battles, and the quiet satisfaction of a well-timed endgame grind.
Data Notes
Placeholder data and viewer-enhancements you might see in supported apps include:
, 2930 (2024-12-17), and sriharilr. These help illustrate his career arc and peak moments in a compact, mobile-friendly format.
Overview of your recent blitz play
You’ve shown willingness to fight for dynamic chances and to press when opportunities arise. In your wins, you tended to keep your pieces active and create concrete problems for your opponent to solve. In your losses and draws, a few common patterns appear: missed chances to simplify into favorable endgames, and moments where you allowed the position to become unclear or tactical, making it harder to convert your initiative. The goal now is to turn those active moments into concrete, repeatable outcomes and to tighten the transitions from middlegame to endgame.
Key strengths to build on
- Active piece play: you frequently place pieces on aggressive squares, creating practical problems for your opponents.
- Confidence in tactical initiative: you look for forcing lines and are willing to complicate when your opponent is unsettled.
- Opening versatility: you explore multiple openings, which can keep opponents uncomfortable and off-balance.
Areas to improve
- Endgame technique: work on converting advantages in rook and minor-piece endings to avoid drawing or losing delicate positions.
- Decision discipline in the middlegame: ask yourself if a sharp tactic is worth the risk or if a simpler plan preserves your edge.
- Time management in blitz: aim to establish a clear plan within the first few moves and avoid over-investing time on speculative lines.
- Opening consolidation: select a compact, trusted set of lines to reduce early confusion and to know typical middlegame ideas for those lines.
Opening performance considerations
Your opening choices show solid results in several defensively solid setups. To capitalize on this, consider narrowing your opening repertoire to a small, dependable group of lines for White and Black. This reduces early guesswork and frees mental bandwidth for the critical middlegame decisions. Focus on lines where you already feel comfortable and study the typical middlegame plans that arise from those positions.
Practical plan for the next 4 weeks
- Week 1 — Tactics and pattern recognition: commit to 15–20 minutes of daily puzzles focusing on forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks, and typical mating nets.
- Week 2 — Endgames basics: study common rook endings and simple queen endings. Practice 5–10 practical rook- vs rook-and-pawn endings to build conversion confidence.
- Week 3 — Repertoire tightening: choose 2 White openings and 2 Black defenses you enjoy (for example, a solid Queen's Pawn line and a reliable defensive setup). Learn a short plan for each, including typical piece placements and key ideas.
- Week 4 — Game review process: after each blitz game, write a 2–3 sentence note on the critical decision point, what you could have done differently, and a concrete improvement to try in your next game.
- Throughout: time-box your decisions in the first 6–8 moves to establish a clear plan. If you’re uncertain, step back to a simpler continuation that maintains your piece activity.
Additional resources and next steps
If you’d like, I can annotate a specific recent game to highlight turning points and better alternative choices. I can also tailor a small printable checklist for blitz decisions (opening, plan, tactics, endgame).
Want personalized annotations? sriharilr can be a good starting point to request a focused game review.
Practice starter
To immediately start applying these ideas, you can load a short practice PGN focusing on a single opening plan and a simple endgame conversion. Use this as a template for quick reviews after your next blitz session.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Aryan Tari | 1W / 4L / 3D | |
| elfangm2 | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| Ruslan Gadzhiev | 1W / 6L / 0D | |
| Isik Can | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Maksym Dubnevych | 4W / 3L / 0D | |
| Grigoriy Oparin | 7W / 10L / 2D | |
| Gabriel Gähwiler | 4W / 5L / 2D | |
| noxiousfrog | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| poohineedyou | 8W / 5L / 3D | |
| nikita_romanovskij03 | 2W / 0L / 2D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Manu David | 67W / 107L / 16D | |
| PracticeMakesOK | 42W / 29L / 5D | |
| Pranav Anand | 27W / 23L / 3D | |
| Arctic_Fox3000 | 21W / 28L / 3D | |
| charudharshini | 17W / 25L / 9D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2939 | 2901 | 2438 | |
| 2024 | 2827 | 2889 | ||
| 2023 | 2620 | 2625 | 2467 | |
| 2022 | 2554 | 2673 | 2379 | |
| 2021 | 2577 | 2772 | 2239 | |
| 2020 | 2597 | 2594 | 2145 | |
| 2019 | 2311 | 2582 | 1759 | |
| 2018 | 2227 | 2376 | 1944 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 596W / 431L / 118D | 566W / 482L / 94D | 85.2 |
| 2024 | 574W / 441L / 85D | 499W / 512L / 91D | 85.6 |
| 2023 | 305W / 302L / 78D | 293W / 343L / 65D | 86.6 |
| 2022 | 421W / 358L / 102D | 379W / 409L / 97D | 88.9 |
| 2021 | 294W / 289L / 84D | 292W / 303L / 79D | 89.0 |
| 2020 | 373W / 286L / 85D | 349W / 309L / 92D | 86.2 |
| 2019 | 428W / 483L / 99D | 407W / 516L / 74D | 82.0 |
| 2018 | 164W / 180L / 40D | 145W / 207L / 24D | 82.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 388 | 182 | 178 | 28 | 46.9% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 318 | 150 | 132 | 36 | 47.2% |
| Czech Defense | 293 | 167 | 86 | 40 | 57.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 275 | 96 | 149 | 30 | 34.9% |
| Sicilian Defense | 234 | 106 | 111 | 17 | 45.3% |
| Philidor Defense | 204 | 102 | 91 | 11 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 200 | 92 | 85 | 23 | 46.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 198 | 87 | 83 | 28 | 43.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 192 | 83 | 86 | 23 | 43.2% |
| Modern Defense | 190 | 105 | 67 | 18 | 55.3% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 406 | 184 | 192 | 30 | 45.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 255 | 122 | 122 | 11 | 47.8% |
| Czech Defense | 178 | 83 | 77 | 18 | 46.6% |
| King's Indian Attack | 163 | 78 | 75 | 10 | 47.9% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 152 | 69 | 63 | 20 | 45.4% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 138 | 54 | 78 | 6 | 39.1% |
| Philidor Defense | 88 | 48 | 39 | 1 | 54.5% |
| Alekhine Defense | 83 | 34 | 42 | 7 | 41.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 81 | 39 | 34 | 8 | 48.1% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 75 | 35 | 35 | 5 | 46.7% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 12 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 58.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 25.0% |
| Czech Defense | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 20.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| English Opening: King's English Variation | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Tartakower Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 0 |
| Losing | 15 | 5 |