Bloodpack: The Bullet Beast and Opening Specialist
Once a mere mortal with a rating of around 1300 back in 2012, Bloodpack has surged through the ranks like a knight on a midnight spree. Best known for their hectic Bullet battles, where lightning-fast decisions separate the chess mortals from the legends, Bloodpack boasts a peak Bullet rating of 2527 as of October 2024 — a testament to countless battles fought and won in fractions of seconds!
But Bloodpack isn’t just a speed demon; their Blitz games are no joke either, soaring to a peak rating of 2348, while their Daily and Rapid playtime reveals a thoughtful player capable of deep strategy, scoring peaks of 2164 and 1922 respectively. Leisurely Sunday evenings or early mornings — whenever the mood strikes blood to pack a winning streak — Bloodpack often rocks the board with an impressive 88.64% comeback rate and a tendency to squeeze out victories even after losing a piece.
Opening up, Bloodpack has a love-hate relationship with the Scandinavian Defense Mieses Kotrc Main Line having played it over 2,700 times! With a win rate flirting around 41%, it’s often a fierce battlefield where Bloodpack tests their wits against time and tactics. Their secret weapon? The Pirc Defense Main Line Byrne Variation that yields a healthy 60%+ win rate, proving that even in bullet chaos, strategy reigns supreme.
Bloodpack’s style? Expect long, nerve-wracking endgames with a whopping 77.47% endgame frequency. Despite the chaos, their average winning games stretch nearly 75 moves, showing patience beneath the rapid clicks. On the flip side, losses come faster on average, hinting at those moments when fate just doesn’t smile.
When to catch Bloodpack at their best? If your chess clock shows odd hours like 5 AM (yes, really), you might witness their magic unfold, with a tilt factor that’s mercifully low — only 16 — so don’t expect a rage quit but rather a determined fight.
Recent games reveal Bloodpack’s prowess: a victorious escapade against Treasurechess777 with a timely win on time, and a relentless grind that overcame Financieru in the Richter Veresov Attack. Even the occasional hard-fought battle lost to opponents like Chess3169 showcase Bloodpack’s relentless spirit.
In short, Bloodpack is a dynamic chess force: fierce in bullet, strategic in blitz, and always a thrilling contender in every format. A player who might just make you question your mouse-click speed and your opening choices - all while grinning at the thrill of the battle.
Executive snapshot for your bullet games
You’re playing a mix of fast, tactical battles. Your overall win rate sits around 50%, with a long history of games showing ups and downs rather than a smooth upward climb. Shorter time controls tend to reward quick, clear plans and reliable pattern recognition, so sharpening those areas can push your results higher in bullet formats.
- Strengths to lean into: you often initiate sharp tactical chances and seem comfortable taking dynamic, piece-forces-in-the-middle kinds of trades.
- Common improvement areas: short-term momentum can swing on a few careless trades or imprecise endgames. Many games end in heavy material swings or unclear plans after the middlegame.
- Time management reminder: with bullet, decide on a small set of universal plans and try to stick to them for the first 8–12 moves to reduce clock pressure.
Openings performance snapshot
Here’s how your listed openings perform overall. Use these as a guide to choose reliable paths in fast games and as targets for focused improvement.
- Scandinavian Defense: 6532 games, wins 2825, losses 3505, draws 202. Win rate about 43%. Consider reinforcing a simple, repeatable plan in this line to avoid getting tangled in the middlegame chaos typical of fast play.
- Amazon Attack: 4463 games, wins 2118, losses 2207, draws 138. Win rate around 47.5%. Good for sharp, tactical play; ensure you have quick, forcing ideas after 1 or 2 moves.
- Australian Defense: 4165 games, wins 2015, losses 2028, draws 122. Win rate about 48%. Solid choice for bullet with solid structure.
- Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack: 3368 games, wins 1606, losses 1668, draws 94. Win rate about 47.7%. Similar notes as above—maintain clear middlegame plans.
- Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted: 2826 games, wins 1252, losses 1490, draws 84. Win rate about 44%. Be ready for dynamic positions and avoid getting overloaded with side threats.
- Czech Defense: 1927 games, wins 1043, losses 819, draws 65. Win rate about 54%. This is your best-performing listed opening; consider using it as a stable, frequent option in bullets and study its typical pawn structures and typical piece placements.
- Alekhine/Colle variations: mixed results, look for small improvements in the common plans and endgames that arise from these lines.
- Practical note: if you notice a trend where a certain line yields quick losses in the first 10 moves, it may be worth swapping to a simpler alternative in time trouble or pre-select a short, safe line for the first 8–10 moves.
Suggested quick action: focus on the Czech Defense as Black in bullet to leverage its higher win rate, and pair it with a compact plan you can remember in your memory bank. Czech Defense
Momentum and rating trend interpretation
- 1 month rating change: -11. Short-term, minor dip. Consider tightening the opening choices and simplifying the middlegame plans to recover quickly.
- 3 month rating change: -104. A larger mid-term drawdown; focus on avoiding big tactical swings and practice recognizing forced lines that lead to favorable trades.
- 6 month rating change: +62. Indicates some longer-term recovery; a few steady improvements are showing up. Keep reinforcing solid fundamentals while maintaining aggression in the right moments.
- 1 month rating trend slope: +6.10. Short-term momentum is positive; use this window to lock in a few reliable patterns and avoid risky sacrifices when you’re ahead on time.
- 3 month rating trend slope: -31. A downturn in the medium term; review the games from these months to identify recurring mistakes or overextensions.
- 6 month rating trend slope: -13.4. Slight downward drift over a half-year; combined with the 3-month trend, focus on balanced decision-making under time pressure and clearer endgame transitions.
- 12 month rating trend slope: +8.07. Long-term improvement is present; keep a consistent review loop and build a stable repertoire that supports steady growth.
Bottom line: your short-term momentum is sometimes positive, but there have been stretches of decline. To convert momentum into steady gains, target consistent middlegame plans and a reliable endgame routine you can rely on under a tight clock. Consider a monthly review of at least 5 games to identify patterns and adjust your practice accordingly.
Recommended focus for the next 4 weeks
- Solidify a compact, repeatable opening plan for bullet. Pick 2 openings for White and 2 for Black with clear middlegame ideas and endgame transitions. Use them consistently to reduce decision fatigue.
- Endgame fluency drills: practice rook endings with a couple of pawns, and practice two-minutes-to-mate situations so you can convert advantages quickly when time is short.
- Tactics bursts: 15–20 minutes of daily tactical puzzles to improve pattern recognition, focusing on common bullet motifs like forcing lines, direct threats, and quick captures that gain material without losing tempo.
- Time management discipline: set a mental timer for the first 10 moves and aim to keep the pace steady. Pre-calculate a simple plan for the first 8 moves and commit to not deviating unless the opponent forces a clear win.
- Post-game review habit: after each bullet session, review 3 games in your head or with a quick, basic notes summary. Note one decision that felt forced and one better alternative that could have been chosen instead.
- Opening-specific study: deepen understanding of the Czech Defense and similar solid setups. Learn typical pawn structures and piece placement patterns so you recognize the typical middlegame ideas without deep calculation each game. Czech Defense
Quick starter drills you can try
- Daily 20-minute bullet session focused on one opening line with a simple, repeatable plan and a target middlegame idea.
- Three-minute warm-ups: solve 5 tactical puzzles that feature immediate tactical themes (forks, pins, discovered attacks) before you play.
- One-page post-game notes: write a short recap after each session: what went well, what caused the biggest clock pressure, and one improvement for the next game.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Luis Fernando Corredor | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| nathmar1 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| lazarus2010 | 89W / 11L / 2D | |
| m1ppi34 | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| schaakmika | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| johnandersoniv | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| mikemorton9 | 4W / 3L / 0D | |
| toozeerhard | 9W / 13L / 0D | |
| mfilou | 11W / 8L / 0D | |
| tartakover100 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| timeless limitless | 79W / 99L / 3D | |
| KF3WIN | 69W / 76L / 1D | |
| jastreb | 54W / 63L / 5D | |
| agatonk | 53W / 64L / 2D | |
| simeodona | 50W / 60L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2328 | 2164 | ||
| 2024 | 2318 | 2165 | ||
| 2023 | 2340 | 2157 | 1922 | |
| 2022 | 2422 | 2198 | 1834 | 1572 |
| 2021 | 2276 | 2268 | 1686 | |
| 2020 | 2347 | 2146 | ||
| 2019 | 2098 | 1918 | ||
| 2018 | 1961 | 1781 | ||
| 2017 | 2128 | 1989 | 1977 | |
| 2016 | 2167 | 2016 | 1858 | |
| 2015 | 2005 | 1895 | 2062 | |
| 2014 | 1791 | 1771 | 2052 | |
| 2013 | 1722 | 1792 | 2060 | |
| 2012 | 1490 | 1690 | 1678 | 2123 |
| 2010 | 1117 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 508W / 462L / 43D | 382W / 588L / 39D | 72.1 |
| 2024 | 243W / 247L / 14D | 212W / 276L / 22D | 72.0 |
| 2023 | 196W / 156L / 13D | 155W / 195L / 18D | 71.8 |
| 2022 | 959W / 930L / 89D | 764W / 1103L / 77D | 74.1 |
| 2021 | 732W / 721L / 40D | 601W / 842L / 48D | 71.6 |
| 2020 | 1488W / 1595L / 96D | 1388W / 1665L / 111D | 70.7 |
| 2019 | 1589W / 1652L / 91D | 1383W / 1851L / 87D | 69.4 |
| 2018 | 1058W / 1159L / 69D | 874W / 1315L / 76D | 71.3 |
| 2017 | 1151W / 1281L / 89D | 1017W / 1425L / 77D | 72.9 |
| 2016 | 2476W / 2596L / 157D | 2167W / 2919L / 146D | 74.2 |
| 2015 | 1753W / 1569L / 103D | 1508W / 1837L / 94D | 72.6 |
| 2014 | 856W / 751L / 38D | 751W / 872L / 40D | 71.4 |
| 2013 | 852W / 751L / 60D | 818W / 808L / 45D | 72.2 |
| 2012 | 659W / 413L / 31D | 593W / 462L / 34D | 72.7 |
| 2010 | 1W / 0L / 0D | 0W / 1L / 0D | 51.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 6542 | 2828 | 3512 | 202 | 43.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 4467 | 2120 | 2209 | 138 | 47.5% |
| Australian Defense | 4168 | 2016 | 2030 | 122 | 48.4% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3373 | 1609 | 1670 | 94 | 47.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 2827 | 1253 | 1490 | 84 | 44.3% |
| Amar Gambit | 2624 | 1138 | 1408 | 78 | 43.4% |
| Czech Defense | 1928 | 1044 | 819 | 65 | 54.1% |
| Barnes Defense | 1400 | 580 | 786 | 34 | 41.4% |
| Alekhine Defense | 1149 | 475 | 641 | 33 | 41.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 1111 | 448 | 628 | 35 | 40.3% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 1174 | 559 | 568 | 47 | 47.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 775 | 388 | 354 | 33 | 50.1% |
| Australian Defense | 468 | 238 | 219 | 11 | 50.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 452 | 248 | 190 | 14 | 54.9% |
| Czech Defense | 313 | 177 | 123 | 13 | 56.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 261 | 123 | 131 | 7 | 47.1% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 245 | 119 | 119 | 7 | 48.6% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 208 | 103 | 97 | 8 | 49.5% |
| Rapport-Jobava System | 200 | 102 | 93 | 5 | 51.0% |
| Slav Defense | 180 | 94 | 81 | 5 | 52.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 23 | 11 | 9 | 3 | 47.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 21 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 61.9% |
| Australian Defense | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| East Indian Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Slav Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 28.6% |
| Slav Defense | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Benoni Defense: Benoni Gambit Accepted | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 19 | 1 |
| Losing | 16 | 0 |