Profile Summary: bobsolid
Known in the chess world as bobsolid, this player is a force to be reckoned with on the blitz and bullet boards. Starting from modest beginnings in 2019 with a blitz rating hovering around 1939, bobsolid quickly skyrocketed to a peak blitz rating close to the superhuman 2769 by 2024—yes, that's practically GM territory in bullet and blitz combined!
A master of the fast game, bobsolid boasts over 2200 wins in blitz and nearly 100 bullet victories, showing a brutal combination of speed, nerves, and tactical brilliance. Whether it's the classical battlegrounds of the Indian Game or the fiery chaos of the Sicilian Defense, bobsolid navigates the opening theory like a seasoned wizard, with nearly 60% win rates on favorite lines like the Indian Game in blitz and a flawless 100% win rate in several bullet openings like the Modern Defense With 1.d4.
Known for an astounding comeback rate of 92.75% and practically a perfect record after losing a piece (100% win rate! – talk about optimism!), bobsolid embodies resilience and optimism. Though the tilt factor is a humble 7 (chess heartbreaks happen to the best), the win rate difference between rated and casual games shows this player takes the competitive edge seriously.
In terms of style, bobsolid doesn’t shy away from long battles, with an average of 88 moves per win in blitz—patience and precision in blitz? That's practically a paradox, but bobsolid pulls it off. Endgames are frequent companions, appearing in more than 84% of games, showing their prowess in the late stages of struggle.
Recent accomplishments include swift victories by resignation, like the notable win over Bob_2004 in a Krause Variation of the Queen’s Pawn Opening. Early tactics and solid positional understanding shine through, leaving opponents nodding in respect—or resignation.
Outside the numbers, bobsolid's records reveal a funny little trait: a knack for demolishing “radioactivewalrus65” with a perfect win record, yet mysteriously zero wins against “miserableplayer4” — evidence that even the best have their kryptonite.
With an ever-growing rating, a vast number of games, and a playstyle blending resilience, tactical brilliance, and a little humor, bobsolid is a blazing star of blitz and bullet chess, proving that speed chess doesn’t have to be just about quick moves—it can be a marathon of mind games and laughs, too.
Quick recap of the session
Nice run — you converted several messy positions into wins and showed strong tactical awareness. Your most recent clean technical win was against Danil Kuzuev; I added a quick replay below so you can jump straight to the critical sequence.
- Good tactical finish vs Danil Kuzuev — the knight invasion and the forcing sequence around move 26–35 decided the game.
- Solid handling as Black in shorter wins — you used active piece play and tactical shots to finish quickly (see the games vs zombie596 and Bobancio).
- The loss (with White) to Bartosz Probola came from a queenless middlegame that turned into a complex knight-and-pawn endgame where opponent’s knights dominated key squares.
Replay:
Win vs KuzuevDanil:
What you did well (recurring positives)
- Fast, accurate tactics: You find forcing knight checks and forks (Nf6+, Nxe6 type motifs) reliably in bullet — that wins material quickly and finishes games.
- Active piece play: You push pieces to aggressive squares rather than passively defending. That creates practical problems for opponents in bullet time controls.
- Opening selection: Your repertoire is well-targeted — high win rates in aggressive/less-common lines (Nimzo-Larsen, Colle variants, Dőry, Modern). You’re getting tangible rewards from surprise/ambitious systems.
- Conversion: When you gain an edge you tend to keep increasing pressure instead of giving easy counterplay — good discipline in the middlegame-to-endgame transition.
Placeholders to check later: Nimzo-Larsen Attack and Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation if you want to turn opening wins into repeatable preparation.
Key weaknesses to fix (high-impact, short drills)
- Queenless middlegame / knight endgame technique — the loss vs Bartosz Probola shows you can be outmaneuvered when queens are off and knights find outposts (watch c4/d4/c2 squares). Drill: 10–15 minutes of knight vs knight+pawn endgame practice and tablebase checks for typical motifs.
- Pawn structure care — in several games you advanced pawns (b4 / h-pawn / kingside pushes) that later became targets. In bullet, avoid unnecessary pawn weaknesses unless they gain concrete play.
- Prophylaxis against enemy knight outposts — you let enemy knights occupy influential central squares. Habit: when exchanging queens or simplifying, ask “where will my opponent’s knights go?” and stop a key outpost with a pawn or a minor piece trade if necessary.
- Time management in long bullet scrambles — you played strong moves but sometimes under severe time pressure. If you know an endgame is coming, take a second extra move to plan a route (pre-move safely only when forced trades are certain).
Concrete action plan (this week)
- Daily 10–15 min: tactics trainer emphasizing knight forks and short forcing combos. Prioritize puzzles that end with a knight fork, discovered attack, or decisive check sequence.
- 3× 20 min sessions: endgame fundamentals (queenless middlegame, knight vs pawn patterns, passed-pawn defense). Use quick endgame drills or a short TB session.
- Review one loss per session: run your loss vs Bartosz Probola at low engine depth and tag the move where evaluation swung. Focus on the first inaccuracy that allowed the opponent to trade into a favorable knight endgame.
- Opening refinement: keep the surprise lines you have, but prepare simple plans for the common queenless middlegame structures that arise after queen exchanges in those lines (safe king route, one pawn break to create counterplay).
- Bullet routine tweak: when the game simplifies, switch to a “slow down two moves” mindset — in critical queenless positions spend a little extra time to avoid tactical blind spots.
Short tactical checklist to use in game
- Before simplifying: check opponent knight squares (c4/d4/e4) — can they land there after trades?
- When queens are off: ask whether your king is safer or exposed; prioritize king safety and active minor pieces over extra pawns.
- Look for immediate forks and deflection tactics when the opponent’s king or queen is slightly displaced — you already do this well, make it a reflex.
- Don’t weaken light/dark pawns around your king unless it creates a forced attack — passive weaknesses are what opponents exploited in your loss.
Small encouragement + where to focus next
Your rating trend and strength-adjusted win rate show you’re performing at a very high level — incremental gains from endgame technique and prophylactic thinking will yield more wins than switching openings. Keep the attacking instincts, but add a little endgame polish and prophylaxis vs knights.
- Immediate next step: review the last loss vs Bartosz Probola with an engine at low depth and mark the one move to improve.
- Midterm: 4–6 targeted endgame sessions over two weeks; you’ll see fewer cleanouts by enemy knights.
- Long term: maintain your tactical training and keep using aggressive systems where you already have a great win rate.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sacrifices333 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| secretsanta1234 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| druperbau | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| portugalskaya-raketa | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| skapo_1190 | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| zaza khoperia | 2W / 0L / 1D | View |
| Simon Ansell | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Moises Ford | 0W / 0L / 1D | View |
| abellanaa_pcap | 1W / 0L / 1D | View |
| haragas | 1W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| morozevichbobr | 21W / 12L / 3D | View Games |
| Nebojsa Djordjevic | 6W / 6L / 6D | View Games |
| BSWPaulsen | 6W / 6L / 3D | View Games |
| Marco Dobrikov | 5W / 9L / 1D | View Games |
| Paul Szuper | 9W / 6L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2700 | 2740 | ||
| 2024 | 2527 | 2664 | ||
| 2023 | 2672 | |||
| 2022 | 2607 | |||
| 2021 | 2510 | 2560 | ||
| 2020 | 2528 | |||
| 2019 | 2118 | 2580 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 369W / 230L / 74D | 325W / 257L / 88D | 90.9 |
| 2024 | 457W / 302L / 99D | 431W / 319L / 111D | 92.7 |
| 2023 | 216W / 143L / 39D | 180W / 182L / 35D | 88.5 |
| 2022 | 117W / 94L / 22D | 122W / 91L / 26D | 87.8 |
| 2021 | 93W / 55L / 18D | 87W / 75L / 10D | 88.9 |
| 2020 | 71W / 39L / 11D | 53W / 61L / 9D | 85.2 |
| 2019 | 107W / 61L / 19D | 119W / 56L / 11D | 83.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 159 | 91 | 51 | 17 | 57.2% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 147 | 77 | 51 | 19 | 52.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon | 123 | 67 | 43 | 13 | 54.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 118 | 52 | 55 | 11 | 44.1% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 112 | 56 | 42 | 14 | 50.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 97 | 57 | 31 | 9 | 58.8% |
| Döry Defense | 95 | 45 | 41 | 9 | 47.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 89 | 41 | 41 | 7 | 46.1% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 85 | 44 | 29 | 12 | 51.8% |
| Gruenfeld: Exchange Variation | 83 | 42 | 31 | 10 | 50.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 80.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Döry Defense | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Modern | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Australian Defense | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 11 | 0 |
| Losing | 7 | 1 |