Profile Summary: Tiago Cunha Navarro (Boliviar)
Meet Tiago Cunha Navarro, famously known on the 64 squares as Boliviar — a National Master whose chess pieces dance to a tune of strategy and occasional cheeky surprises. This maestro of the board has earned their National Master title with undeniable grit and a penchant for quite the comeback, boasting an impressive 86% comeback rate when the chips are down. Yes, Tiago isn’t just a player; they’re that stubborn chess mule who just won’t quit until the king falls.
Tiago’s preferred battleground? Blitz chess, where their peak rating of 2453 (achieved in March 2021) attests to lightning-fast calculations and nerves of steel, even if sometimes a tad too impatient—after all, the early resignation rate of 1.51% reminds us that every grandmaster probably lost a nail-biter or two to time pressure. When it comes to bullet, Tiago’s rockets reach a staggering 2446 peak rating as of May 2023—a speed demon with a Queen’s Gambit up their sleeve and a knight ready to hop into battle.
Their most recent games display a flair for precise and tactical play — finishing with checkmates that could have been choreographed. One memorable victory saw Boliviar deliver a clean checkmate after carefully navigating a complex middlegame during a queen’s pawn opening. Tiago's playing style embraces long strategic battles, averaging around 80 moves per win—because why rush victory when you can savor every brilliant move?
Off the board, Tiago might chuckle at their notorious tilt factor of 11, which shows the fiery passion hidden behind that calm chessface. Yet, don’t be fooled – their best time to play is a surprising 6 AM, likely fueled by black coffee, a montage of chess puzzles, and that special talent to turn early mornings into glorious wins.
With over 4,000 blitz wins and a win rate stepping just shy of 50%, Boliviar mixes classical technique with lightning-fast intuition, battling opponents from all over and maintaining a vast arsenal of opening knowledge—though the exact repertoire remains a top-secret mystery. Tiago Cunha Navarro’s journey continues, one check, one mate, and one brilliantly executed blunder (because who doesn’t love a good story?) at a time.
Keep your eyes on the clock when faced with Boliviar—they might just outwit and outpace you before you can say "check!"
Coach Feedback for Tiago Cunha Navarro (Boliviar)
Strengths
- Opening Knowledge: Your adoption of solid and classical openings such as the Queen's Gambit Declined and the Slav Defense shows good opening preparation. Your comfort in these structures gives you a stable foundation to build from.
- Positional Understanding: You demonstrate strong positional play, particularly in maneuvering pieces effectively and controlling key squares. In your wins, notice how you improved your piece activity steadily and created pressure over time.
- Endgame Technique: You converted advantageous positions well in several games, showcasing good technique in simplified positions, which is crucial for scoring wins.
- Calculated Attacking Moves: Your tactical awareness allowed you to deliver sharp checkmates and capitalize on opponent's mistakes, such as the elegant mate with Qxf7# in the Benko Gambit game.
Areas for Improvement
- Handling Pressure in Defense: Some losses indicate challenges in maintaining balance against aggressive openings or when the opponent creates dynamic imbalances. Work on improving your defensive technique by practicing defensive puzzles and studying key defensive motifs.
- Time Management: In certain games, such as the loss against TC58, you used significantly less time than your opponent initially, which is positive, but later in the game time pressure may have influenced your decisions negatively. Practice pacing your clock to maintain consistent thinking time throughout the game.
- Opening Adaptability: While your main openings are solid, occasionally being caught off guard by less common moves or variations can create early discomfort. Expanding your opening repertoire slightly and studying sidelines could add useful weaponry and prevent surprises.
- Endgame Precision in Critical Positions: Some endgames showed opportunities missed or unclear technique under pressure (for example, losses in slightly worse endgames). Targeting endgame study, particularly rook and minor piece endings, can help increase your conversion rate.
Recommendations
- Regularly analyze your losses to understand concrete reasons for the mistakes — was it tactical oversight, strategic misunderstanding, or time trouble? This reflective practice is key to improvement.
- Incorporate focused training on defense and calculation, using tactical trainers or puzzle rush to sharpen your skills under time pressure.
- Study key endgames systematically—knowing fundamental endgame positions will boost your confidence and practical results in longer games.
- Try to experiment occasionally with a new opening system or variation to gain broader experience and surprise opponents.
Summary
Tiago, your play demonstrates a solid classical foundation with good positional and technical skills. With focused work on defense, time management, and endgame precision, you can further increase your win percentage and rating. Keep analyzing your games deeply and embrace diverse training methods.
Keep up the great work, and feel free to share some specific games or positions you want to improve in!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Slave Trajkoski | 26W / 31L / 3D | View Games |
| emiliofelix | 19W / 26L / 1D | View Games |
| tikvata | 21W / 23L / 2D | View Games |
| 2011KING | 13W / 24L / 4D | View Games |
| amer01 | 19W / 15L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2288 | 2470 | ||
| 2024 | 2353 | |||
| 2023 | 2353 | 2384 | ||
| 2022 | 2330 | |||
| 2021 | 2331 | 1856 | ||
| 2020 | 2383 | 1710 | ||
| 2019 | 2334 | 1710 | ||
| 2018 | 2105 | 2402 | 1785 | |
| 2017 | 2059 | 2208 | ||
| 2016 | 2168 | 2156 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 46W / 51L / 10D | 43W / 56L / 7D | 79.7 |
| 2024 | 42W / 49L / 3D | 38W / 51L / 4D | 79.7 |
| 2023 | 99W / 124L / 20D | 108W / 112L / 21D | 84.3 |
| 2022 | 13W / 14L / 1D | 10W / 16L / 0D | 85.8 |
| 2021 | 155W / 188L / 17D | 153W / 195L / 20D | 81.6 |
| 2020 | 201W / 191L / 30D | 170W / 223L / 31D | 82.0 |
| 2019 | 33W / 18L / 4D | 30W / 22L / 5D | 61.5 |
| 2018 | 708W / 619L / 68D | 652W / 658L / 74D | 81.2 |
| 2017 | 934W / 823L / 108D | 808W / 952L / 88D | 85.2 |
| 2016 | 667W / 522L / 53D | 570W / 623L / 57D | 83.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 478 | 221 | 232 | 25 | 46.2% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 332 | 165 | 144 | 23 | 49.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 232 | 119 | 105 | 8 | 51.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 209 | 92 | 110 | 7 | 44.0% |
| Döry Defense | 206 | 91 | 105 | 10 | 44.2% |
| Amazon Attack | 178 | 75 | 91 | 12 | 42.1% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 176 | 70 | 95 | 11 | 39.8% |
| Scotch Game | 169 | 63 | 96 | 10 | 37.3% |
| Australian Defense | 168 | 89 | 70 | 9 | 53.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 143 | 81 | 52 | 10 | 56.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 35 | 7 | 28 | 0 | 20.0% |
| QGD: Albin, 3.dxe5 | 27 | 20 | 5 | 2 | 74.1% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 14 | 8 | 6 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Amar Gambit | 13 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 76.9% |
| Australian Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| Modern Defense: Pterodactyl Variation | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 16.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 219 | 105 | 105 | 9 | 48.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 171 | 78 | 83 | 10 | 45.6% |
| Australian Defense | 107 | 55 | 49 | 3 | 51.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 104 | 51 | 49 | 4 | 49.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 67 | 31 | 34 | 2 | 46.3% |
| Amazon Attack | 67 | 37 | 27 | 3 | 55.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 62 | 28 | 32 | 2 | 45.2% |
| Slav Defense | 57 | 22 | 31 | 4 | 38.6% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 52 | 22 | 26 | 4 | 42.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 48 | 23 | 23 | 2 | 47.9% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 14 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |