Bonn Rainauld Tibod (brainy_jar)
Meet Bonn Rainauld Tibod, a chess virtuoso who dances deftly across the 64 squares like a caffeinated knight on a quest for checkmate. With a peak blitz rating soaring to 2381 as of October 2021, Bonn has demonstrated a relentless pursuit of excellence, displaying lightning-fast tactics and strategic prowess. If chess were a jungle, Bonn would undoubtedly be the cunning predator – striking unexpectedly and gracefully.
Playing Style & Strengths
Known for an impressive 75% win rate against lower-rated opponents and a remarkable comeback rate of 75%, Bonn's games often read like thrilling novel chapters where the underdog triumphs against all odds. His average game length suggests patience and endurance, with victories spanning over 70 moves, showing a fondness for enduring battles rather than quick skirmishes. Bonn's psychological resilience boasts a modest tilt factor of 17, which in chess speak means he stays calm under fire — mostly.
Favorite Openings
- Blitz: Italian Game Two Knights Modern Bishops Opening (81.75% win rate)
- Rapid: King's Indian Defense Normal Variation (80% win rate)
- Bullet: Pirc Defense Main Line (65.91% win rate)
Bonn’s opening repertoire is as colorful as a chessboard itself, with a flair for dynamic, aggressive lines like the Sicilian Defense Taimanov and the Italian Game. Whether launching an early attack or expertly maneuvering through endgames, he’s got a plan, and that plan usually involves winning.
Statistical Highlights
- Total blitz wins: 8,381 with only 3,085 losses — that’s a lot of happy dances!
- Rapid and bullet formats also show solid performance, with hundreds of wins to his name.
- Longest winning streak: 37 games. Yes, you read that right — 37!
- Current winning streak: Holding strong at 5 games.
Psychology & Timing
If you’re wondering when Bonn is at his peak, it’s around 1 AM — when the world sleeps, he’s scheming. His best days to challenge him? Thursday and Tuesday, when his win rates crest above 67%. But, fair warning: his early resignation rate is a humble 4.23%, reflecting the occasional “Oops, my bad!” moment (hey, even grandmasters have those).
Recent Adventures on the Board
Just recently, Bonn clinched a victory against Pajuca on May 26, 2025, with a bold London System that ended in a neat resignation – classic brainy_jar efficiency! Conversely, even legends face setbacks, like his narrow loss to gena2019 on the same day, proving that in chess, the thrill lies as much in the battle as in the triumph.
Final Word
Bonn Rainauld Tibod isn’t just a chess player; he’s a relentless strategist with a sprinkle of humor and a love for slow, grinding deep positional fights. Whether you call him Bonn or brainy_jar, stepping into the arena with him means engaging in a contest filled with calculated risks, bold sacrifices, and occasionally just pure, unadulterated chess magic. Watch out, opponents – his king’s on the hunt, and the castle is never safe!
Strengths to Build On
You demonstrate sharp tactical awareness and good piece activity in blitz. In several games you press with active rooks and queen, creating practical problems for your opponents even when the position is unpolished. You also show resilience in complex middlegame fights and a solid approach to converting advantages into material or positional gains when your opponent missteps.
- You manage to generate concrete threats from open lines and open files, especially when the kings are exposed or files are semi-open.
- Your willingness to complicate the position can push less precise opponents into mistakes, which is a useful blitz trait.
- You handle time pressure in many games with steady, purposeful moves rather than rushed, guessy plays.
Key Improvement Areas for Blitz
- Time management: In fast games, aim to decide on a plan within the first few critical moves and then execute it. If you’re unsure after 8-10 seconds, consider a safe developing move that maintains your plan instead of exploring too many branches.
- Endgame technique: When you reach simplified endgames, focus on clear pawn structure plans (passed pawns, outside passer, Kirkman-style rook activity) and aim to reduce tactical noise that can flip a win into a draw or loss.
- Consistency in openings: You have strong results in several lines, but avoid over-reliance on a few heavily studied ideas. Introduce 1-2 flexible branches in your main openings to adapt to different opponents in blitz.
- Spotting threats and blunders: In dynamic, tactical positions, double-check for opponent threats and look for forcing moves (checks, captures with tempo, or threats that force concessions) to minimize blunders under time pressure.
Opening Strategy Recommendations
Your data shows solid results with several aggressive and dynamic defenses and defenses-to-counterlines. A practical approach in blitz is to:
- Keep expanding the repertoire around your strongest openings (for example, lines from the Sicilian Defense and the Caro-Kann) but add a flexible anti-branch to handle offbeat replies.
- Prepare key middlegame themes from each opening (typical pawn breaks, typical piece maneuvers, and common tactical motifs) so you can transition quickly from opening to middlegame with a clear plan.
- When you face unusual lines, avoid too deep novelty scouting in blitz; aim for solid, principled development and a clear plan rather than speculative improvisation.
Tip: after your next few games, write down a single plan for the middlegame in each opening you play (e.g., “activate rooks on the e-file, press on the kingside if the center opens”).
Endgame and Tactical Practice Plan
To sharpen your conversion and reduce blunders, try the following over the next two weeks:
- Endgame drills: practice rook endings with a pawn majority, focusing on creating a passed pawn and using the opposition to win.
- Tactical training: 15 minutes of puzzles daily, emphasizing back-rank ideas, tactical motifs like overloads and deflections, and recognizing forced sequences in sharp lines.
- Game review routine: after each blitz game, write 2-3 critical moments where a different, simpler plan would have been stronger, and what move would have accomplished it.
Practical Practice Schedule (next 14 days)
- Daily: 15 minutes of tactics, plus 1 short blitz game (3+2 or 5+0) to apply the day’s learning.
- Alternate days: 30-minute openings review focusing on 1-2 lines in your primary choices and 1 flexible anti-variation.
- End of week: review 3 of your recent blitz games with a focus on where a different plan in the middlegame would have saved time or gained a clear advantage.
Optional Example to Visualize Plan
To help you apply these insights quickly, you can load a sample game plan visualization. If you’d like, plug in a recent opening into a move-list viewer to practice planning the middlegame from the first strong developing move. Placeholder example below can be replaced with a real game when you’re ready:
Next Steps
Continue leveraging your strengths in initiative and dynamic play, while tightening time usage and endgame technique. The data suggests your trend is positive; keep a steady practice routine and add targeted endgame drills to stabilize decision-making under time pressure.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| richarddagreat | 7W / 42L / 2D | View Games |
| kreevuls | 33W / 0L / 0D | View Games |
| hangie | 24W / 4L / 1D | View Games |
| otaviano12 | 8W / 15L / 2D | View Games |
| cebu_prince | 8W / 13L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1968 | 2428 | 2014 | |
| 2024 | 1968 | 2248 | 2009 | |
| 2023 | 1882 | 2228 | 2001 | |
| 2022 | 1849 | 2283 | 1913 | |
| 2021 | 1798 | 2276 | 1882 | |
| 2020 | 1916 | 2180 | 1678 | 1053 |
| 2019 | 1750 | 2102 | 1541 | |
| 2018 | 1734 | 2065 | ||
| 2017 | 1745 | 1903 | 1053 | |
| 2016 | 1649 | 1845 | ||
| 2015 | 1708 | 1920 | ||
| 2014 | 1852 | 1905 | 1132 | 1161 |
| 2013 | 1875 | |||
| 2012 | 1650 | 1622 | ||
| 2011 | 1797 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 158W / 113L / 17D | 163W / 110L / 18D | 80.1 |
| 2024 | 194W / 106L / 23D | 180W / 121L / 22D | 77.5 |
| 2023 | 172W / 122L / 16D | 158W / 148L / 19D | 83.0 |
| 2022 | 90W / 69L / 15D | 88W / 77L / 11D | 91.7 |
| 2021 | 140W / 86L / 22D | 126W / 105L / 28D | 84.1 |
| 2020 | 499W / 310L / 43D | 472W / 320L / 45D | 77.8 |
| 2019 | 2276W / 781L / 92D | 2271W / 784L / 102D | 72.0 |
| 2018 | 1435W / 488L / 43D | 1412W / 524L / 59D | 70.6 |
| 2017 | 781W / 471L / 44D | 775W / 448L / 34D | 70.8 |
| 2016 | 240W / 165L / 13D | 197W / 196L / 11D | 66.5 |
| 2015 | 85W / 52L / 0D | 79W / 51L / 5D | 74.9 |
| 2014 | 58W / 21L / 3D | 52W / 20L / 3D | 77.6 |
| 2013 | 15W / 10L / 1D | 17W / 8L / 0D | 84.5 |
| 2012 | 13W / 10L / 0D | 15W / 9L / 0D | 67.4 |
| 2011 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 3W / 1L / 1D | 68.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 405 | 304 | 88 | 13 | 75.1% |
| Czech Defense | 298 | 212 | 76 | 10 | 71.1% |
| Sicilian Defense | 291 | 225 | 54 | 12 | 77.3% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 261 | 194 | 55 | 12 | 74.3% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 235 | 167 | 62 | 6 | 71.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 233 | 146 | 69 | 18 | 62.7% |
| Barnes Defense | 228 | 167 | 58 | 3 | 73.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 219 | 151 | 53 | 15 | 69.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 196 | 145 | 44 | 7 | 74.0% |
| French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Botvinnik Variation | 190 | 136 | 52 | 2 | 71.6% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 11 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 18.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 11 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 36.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| East Indian Defense | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.e3 | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Botvinnik System | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| King's Indian Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Czech Defense | 258 | 164 | 88 | 6 | 63.6% |
| Amar Gambit | 247 | 136 | 105 | 6 | 55.1% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 213 | 116 | 91 | 6 | 54.5% |
| Australian Defense | 187 | 117 | 69 | 1 | 62.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 172 | 95 | 69 | 8 | 55.2% |
| Barnes Defense | 169 | 105 | 57 | 7 | 62.1% |
| Amazon Attack | 155 | 85 | 69 | 1 | 54.8% |
| Sicilian Defense | 137 | 87 | 46 | 4 | 63.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 130 | 82 | 44 | 4 | 63.1% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 120 | 69 | 45 | 6 | 57.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: Ragozin | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 37 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 1 |