FIDE Master Havard Haug: The Endgame Entomologist
Meet Havard Haug, a FIDE Master whose chess career is nothing short of a biological phenomenon. Much like a skilled entomologist studying the intricate dance of ants, Havard meticulously dissects the chessboard with microscopic precision, crafting moves with the patience of a spider weaving its web.
Bursting out of the 2017 cocoon with a blitz rating of 1272, Havard’s rating metamorphosed impressively over the years, reaching a peak blitz rating of 2937 by 2025—a true king of the hive! The bullet swarm has been no less impressive, with a soaring rating touching 2951. Known for a venomous comeback rate of 84.45% and a staggering 98.75% win rate after losing a piece, this master proves that even when a pawn falls, the game is far from over. Talk about regenerative powers!
Playing style? Havard prefers the long haul, with an average of nearly 80 moves per win, snaring opponents with slow, deliberate endgames that could make even the most patient dung beetle envious. An endgame frequenter with a 78.94% occurrence, Havard knows how to squirm out of tight spots and spin intricate traps.
When it comes to openings, Havard's favorite shells are the Alapin Sicilian and the Old Benoni Defense—solid, resilient, and full of surprises. On blitz boards, these apertures yield win rates upward of 60%, proving that Havard's opening repertoire is as robust as a beetle’s exoskeleton.
Not all is smooth sailing in the hive, however. A tilt factor of 36 indicates Havard sometimes gets rattled, yet their come-back-from-the-brink resilience more than compensates. And while the average daily games are fewer compared to bullet and blitz, Havard commands respect with strong performances across all formats.
Havard Haug is a fascinating study in the ecosystem of chess—a masterful strategist who knows how to adapt, defend, and strike with precision. Like an ant colony working tirelessly and cooperatively, Havard dismantles foes one move at a time, always ready to scuttle forward to the next victory.
Recent performance: quick takeaways from your latest bullet games
You asked for constructive feedback on your recent bullet results. Here are practical, actionable observations based on the latest loss and draw samples:
- Time management in tight games: In the loss game, the clock pressure became a deciding factor. When bullets pile up, it’s easy to drift into long, uncertain calculations. A simple fix is to allocate a basic thinking budget per move and stick to it, using the increment to adjust only on critical decisions.
- Keeping activity after exchanges: After several trades, the position often becomes cleaner but also more time-consuming to evaluate. Aim to keep your pieces active and avoid unnecessary exchanges that reduce your practical chances to create threats or counterplay.
- Endgame awareness in short time controls: In bullet, many wins or losses hinge on ending positions being understood quickly. Strengthen a few “easy-to-spot” endgame ideas (rook endings with pawns, opposite-colored pawns, king activity) so you can convert or hold positions under time pressure.
- Opening familiarity vs. surprise lines: Your recent games show you’re comfortable with some standard lines, but bullets reward you for quick, confident plans. Build a small, reliable repertoire with 2–3 lines you know deeply, so you can move with purpose even when you’re pressed for time.
Study cue: you can review the loss game by checking the opponent’s approach and timing. As a quick study aid, you can load a placeholder PGN snippet here:
Openings performance: how to shape your repertoire
Your openings data shows solid results in several aggressive and solid lines. The key takeaway is to consolidate a compact, repeatable repertoire so you can play quickly and confidently in bullet. Focus on a couple of White lines you enjoy and a couple of Black defenses you know well.
- White choices to lean on: Amar Gambit and other sharp lines appear to perform well. If you’re comfortable with dynamic play, keep refining key middlegame ideas that come from these lines, so you don’t get stuck in unclear positions after the initial attacks.
- Black choices to rely on: French Defense and Scandinavian options show strong results. Build familiar plans for these defenses (central structure, typical piece placements, common break ideas) so you can respond quickly to White’s setup.
- General principle: create a small cheat sheet of 2–3 middlegame plans for each main line you play. In bullet, having a reliable plan beats spending time deciding on the spot.
Rating trends and a practical improvement plan
Your recent trends suggest mixed short-term results with some longer-term gains. A practical path to steady progress is to couple targeted openings study with focused endgame practice and time-management drills tailored to bullet length.
- Time management drill: practice with a fixed per-move time budget and a short set of bailout moves for common tactical motifs. Use the increment to confirm safe choices rather than to search for the one perfect line.
- Endgame focus: dedicate two short sessions per week to rook endings and simple king-and-pawn endings. Learn a few reliable conversion ideas and common defensive techniques so you can push or hold with confidence.
- Opening consolidation: pick 2 White lines and 2 Black defenses as your core repertoire, and write down your plan for the first 15 moves. Revisit and update your notes after every few games to keep ideas fresh under time pressure.
- Post-game review habit: after each bullet session, write a brief 3-point recap of what you misjudged and what you should do differently next time. This reinforces learning and speeds up recall in future games.
Two-week practical practice plan
Use this plan to build consistency and reduce time-related mistakes in bullet games:
- Daily warm-up: complete 5–10 minutes of quick tactical puzzles to keep pattern recognition sharp.
- Three short bullet sessions per week: focus on your two main White lines and two Black defenses, aiming for quick, purposeful moves rather than long speculation.
- Weekly deep-dive: review two recent games (one loss, one draw) and annotate three critical moments. Write down the better plan and why you missed it.
- Endgame mini-cocus: two 15-minute sessions on rook endings and one session on minor-piece endings; practice converting small advantages and defending difficult endings.
- Time-management drill: simulate real bullet timing in practice games and set strict clocks for yourself to avoid flagging in tight moments.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Artavazd Hayrapetyan | 1W / 3L / 1D | |
| Bibek Thing | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Oleg Vastrukhin | 2W / 0L / 1D | |
| Shelev Oberoi | 7W / 3L / 1D | |
| kingcyber19 | 0W / 2L / 0D | |
| Peter Michalik | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| Bella Khotenashvili | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Ihor Samunenkov | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Vojtěch Plát | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| fontaine2025 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sean Senft | 571W / 218L / 80D | |
| VilluWonka | 251W / 213L / 25D | |
| x-2872584143 | 199W / 163L / 34D | |
| LordGigantics | 249W / 105L / 14D | |
| Chill Well | 171W / 97L / 21D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2838 | 2960 | 2397 | 1598 |
| 2024 | 2740 | 2792 | 2400 | |
| 2023 | 2884 | 2781 | 2400 | 1560 |
| 2022 | 2711 | 2592 | 2070 | 1554 |
| 2021 | 2593 | 2445 | 2039 | |
| 2020 | 2229 | 2354 | 1755 | 1689 |
| 2019 | 1690 | 1915 | 1426 | 1645 |
| 2018 | 1672 | 1746 | 1426 | 1437 |
| 2017 | 1272 | 1272 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 305W / 164L / 52D | 260W / 199L / 48D | 101.2 |
| 2024 | 857W / 485L / 140D | 820W / 521L / 140D | 99.6 |
| 2023 | 897W / 588L / 140D | 834W / 636L / 140D | 97.5 |
| 2022 | 2635W / 1322L / 304D | 2427W / 1447L / 361D | 87.7 |
| 2021 | 1635W / 715L / 185D | 1563W / 798L / 166D | 82.8 |
| 2020 | 2473W / 935L / 245D | 2398W / 1018L / 226D | 79.6 |
| 2019 | 908W / 380L / 55D | 872W / 442L / 56D | 73.3 |
| 2018 | 352W / 212L / 31D | 340W / 226L / 33D | 79.7 |
| 2017 | 6W / 2L / 1D | 4W / 6L / 0D | 64.3 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1338 | 841 | 360 | 137 | 62.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 632 | 336 | 230 | 66 | 53.2% |
| Unknown | 466 | 267 | 198 | 1 | 57.3% |
| Modern | 397 | 220 | 140 | 37 | 55.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 352 | 221 | 107 | 24 | 62.8% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 352 | 204 | 103 | 45 | 58.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 297 | 163 | 102 | 32 | 54.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 285 | 189 | 69 | 27 | 66.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 281 | 182 | 82 | 17 | 64.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 277 | 202 | 56 | 19 | 72.9% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 2775 | 1797 | 842 | 136 | 64.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 1560 | 900 | 546 | 114 | 57.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 940 | 588 | 279 | 73 | 62.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 917 | 560 | 291 | 66 | 61.1% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 844 | 510 | 279 | 55 | 60.4% |
| Modern | 827 | 521 | 266 | 40 | 63.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 694 | 453 | 196 | 45 | 65.3% |
| King's Indian Attack | 563 | 335 | 191 | 37 | 59.5% |
| French Defense | 558 | 385 | 146 | 27 | 69.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 528 | 297 | 194 | 37 | 56.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 77.8% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Philidor Defense | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Alekhine Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 25 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 48.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 8 | 4 | 5 | 47.1% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Unknown Opening* | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 40.0% |
| Scotch Game | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| French Defense | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 54 | 0 |
| Losing | 36 | 3 |