Player Profile: builders_tea
Meet builders_tea, a chess aficionado who’s brewed up quite a storm on the digital 64 squares since 2016. Starting modestly with a daily rating of 1345, builders_tea rapidly steeped their skills to reach a peak daily rating of 2076 in 2021—a true sign of a player who likes their chess strong and bold!
Known for an aggressive opening style cloaked in mystery (they keep their favorite openings Top Secret), builders_tea has logged over 2,000 daily games with an impressive 51% win rate. These stats say they rarely resign early (early resignation rate: 3.35%), proving a stubborn resistance—if there’s a will, there’s a way (and usually a tactic or two up their sleeve).
Speaking of tactics, their comeback rate is an astonishing 74.1%, and get this: a 100% win rate after losing a piece! Clearly, losing pieces only means the beginning of the battle, not the end. They’re a resilient wizard who thrives in the endgame, playing nearly 70% of their games to the bitter—or glorious—finish.
Style & Stats Highlights
- Daily Play: Peak 2076, with over 1,400 games played in the “Top Secret” daily opening arsenal.
- Rapid Chess: A strong performer with ratings edging near 2,000, showcasing adaptability across time controls.
- Bullet and Blitz: Though less active, bullet performance shines with a max rating over 1650 and blitz boasts a striking 88% win rate in limited games.
- Psychological Grit: Handles tilt with a factor of 31 (because who doesn’t sometimes want to toss the board?), and prefers rated battles over casual—a true strategist at heart.
- Peak Performance Times: Highest win rates occur early mornings (2-4 AM) where chess magic apparently brews best, and late mornings around noon. For the rest of us mere mortals awake at reasonable hours, their win rate hovers around a solid 50%.
Recent Adventures
In November 2024, builders_tea triumphantly defeated carong165 with a classic Giuoco Piano, securing victory by resignation after a sharp 37-move duel. Although a recent battle against Slobo321 resulted in a loss, the quick comeback potential surely means this defeat is just a plot twist in the epic saga.
Signature Moves
Expect cool-headed maneuvering, a calm but lethal endgame, and a knack for wriggling out of tight spots. If you see builders_tea sacrificing a piece, don’t panic—there’s mastery behind the madness!
Whether sipping tea or brewing brilliant strategies, builders_tea proves chess is not just a game, it’s an art—best served with a splash of wit and a solid defense.
Quick takeaways
Nice mix of sharp attacking wins and some painful losses to heavy-piece tactics. You’re comfortable creating tactical complications and winning material, but opponent rooks/queens are finding your king. Focus: king safety, simple prophylaxis, and a compact study routine to stop repeat patterns.
- Win highlight: strong tactical awareness and willingness to grab material (excellent calculation spotting).
- Recurring loss pattern: opposing heavy pieces (rooks/queen) invading on the 3rd/2nd rank or delivering back‑rank mates.
- Practical next step: 5–15 minute daily routine — tactics, one short opening check, one endgame/back‑rank drill.
Win — what you did well
Game vs pro33x — aggressive piece play and concrete calculation paid off. You created tactical motifs (knight forking and a queen strike) and ended with a clean checkmate pattern.
- Good use of the knight to win material early — you looked for forcing lines and didn’t shy from the complication.
- You kept the initiative after winning material instead of drifting; that made Qc8# possible. That’s textbook: win material, simplify threats, finish quickly.
- Opening choice worked: Nimzowitsch-Larsen-Attack produced active pieces and targets — keep it in your repertoire.
Replay the sequence to internalize the tactical pattern:
Losses — recurring issues & fixes
Multiple recent losses ended with heavy pieces mating or forcing decisive material wins. Two consistent themes: king exposure and allowing rook/queen infiltration. Examples include games vs zakariahammas and eviemae7912.
- Back-rank and 3rd-rank infiltrations: Your king often ends up with too little luft or on the same rank as enemy rooks. Simple fixes — make a luft pawn move (h3/g3) earlier when safe, or exchange a rook if you can’t create luft.
- Passive piece placement: When opponent brings rooks to the 3rd rank (Rh3/Rh5 patterns), your pieces sometimes aren’t coordinated to repel them. Aim to keep one piece (rook, bishop or queen) able to challenge enemy rooks on 3rd/2nd ranks.
- Trade decisions: In several losses you allowed counterplay by not trading at the right moment (or traded into a position that opened lines to your king). Before forcing trades, scan for enemy checks and back‑rank tactics.
- Time & temperament: You have good time reserves in these games; the issues are strategic rather than purely clock-related. Use the increment to stop and verify forcing checks before moving.
Study this loss to see the infiltration pattern and improve defensive technique:
Concrete drills — 2 week plan
Short daily sessions you can realistically keep to build quick, practical gains.
- Daily (15 minutes): 8–10 tactical puzzles (focus forks, pins, skewers and back-rank motifs).
- Every other day (5 minutes): review one recent loss — identify the decisive moment and write one sentence: “If I had played X instead of Y, I would have…”
- 3× per week (5–10 minutes): endgame/back-rank practice — simple rook and pawn endgames and defending against rook penetrations (practice making luft, rook trades, and blocking files).
- Weekly opening check (5–10 minutes): one short line for your main systems (keep Nimzowitsch-Larsen-Attack and your Reti notes tidy; write 2 typical plans and 1 trap to avoid).
Behavioral tips for faster improvement
- Before each move, ask two quick questions: “Is my king safe?” and “Does opponent have immediate checks?” — this prevents most tactical losses.
- When ahead in material, trade queens and rooks to reduce counterplay and make the win simpler.
- Use the increment: spend an extra second to verify there isn’t a tactical shot before you grab a pawn or enter a forcing line.
- Keep a short post‑game habit: mark one “lesson” per game (win or loss) and save it — you’ll start noticing patterns.
Next small goals (one month)
- Reduce losses from back‑rank/3rd‑rank infiltrations by 50% — focus on one defensive idea (create luft or trade rooks when attacked).
- Increase strength‑adjusted win rate by continuing the tactical training (your current number is a solid base).
- Keep using the openings where you score well (your stats show good results with lines like the Nimzowitsch-Larsen-Attack and similar systems).
If you want, I can:
- Annotate 2–3 of these games move‑by‑move and highlight the critical moments.
- Build a 7‑day training plan tailored to how much time you actually have each day.
- Create 20 targeted puzzles that mimic mistakes from your losses (back‑rank, rook invasions, queen forks).
Which option would you like first?
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Jan van Mechelen | 19W / 14L / 11D | View Games |
| aansmar | 14W / 2L / 9D | View Games |
| disgustingsasquatch | 1W / 6L / 3D | View Games |
| leandrolean | 2W / 1L / 7D | View Games |
| ruiazevedo | 5W / 2L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1514 | 1712 | 2019 | |
| 2024 | 1654 | 1958 | 1832 | |
| 2023 | 1959 | 1851 | ||
| 2022 | 1937 | 2019 | ||
| 2021 | 1855 | 1980 | ||
| 2020 | 1400 | 1864 | 2059 | |
| 2019 | 1317 | 1955 | ||
| 2018 | 2000 | |||
| 2017 | 1817 | 1977 | ||
| 2016 | 1636 | 1673 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 30W / 27L / 4D | 25W / 28L / 5D | 68.8 |
| 2024 | 3W / 8L / 0D | 1W / 10L / 0D | 19.6 |
| 2023 | 22W / 24L / 5D | 21W / 23L / 9D | 59.9 |
| 2022 | 55W / 19L / 13D | 40W / 31L / 11D | 70.6 |
| 2021 | 58W / 30L / 17D | 53W / 43L / 18D | 59.4 |
| 2020 | 72W / 28L / 28D | 75W / 35L / 26D | 59.3 |
| 2019 | 81W / 40L / 25D | 70W / 55L / 15D | 59.9 |
| 2018 | 82W / 50L / 33D | 67W / 56L / 42D | 59.2 |
| 2017 | 112W / 44L / 29D | 112W / 52L / 23D | 60.4 |
| 2016 | 11W / 2L / 0D | 10W / 0L / 0D | 56.8 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 13 | 4 | 8 | 1 | 30.8% |
| Amazon Attack | 7 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 58 | 35 | 18 | 5 | 60.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 19 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 52.6% |
| Australian Defense | 16 | 10 | 3 | 3 | 62.5% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 60.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: 3.d3 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 7 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 14.3% |
| KGA: Scandinavian, 4.exd5 Bd6 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 57.1% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 28.6% |
| Four Knights Game | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Döry Defense | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 71.4% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 28.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 57.1% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Ruy Lopez: Morphy Defense, Anderssen Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 68 | 35 | 15 | 18 | 51.5% |
| Unknown | 57 | 49 | 8 | 0 | 86.0% |
| Döry Defense | 51 | 19 | 21 | 11 | 37.2% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 50 | 19 | 20 | 11 | 38.0% |
| Australian Defense | 49 | 38 | 10 | 1 | 77.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 48 | 27 | 16 | 5 | 56.2% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation | 32 | 21 | 9 | 2 | 65.6% |
| Amazon Attack | 30 | 17 | 9 | 4 | 56.7% |
| Scotch Game | 25 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 36.0% |
| Diemer-Duhm Gambit (DDG): 4...f5 | 24 | 14 | 2 | 8 | 58.3% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 31 | 0 |