Caballino: A Chess Journey of Growth and Grit
Emerging on the online chess scene in 2013 with a respectable blitz rating of 1879, Caballino’s career has been defined by steady improvement, diverse time controls, and an ever‐evolving understanding of both tactics and psychological warfare. Over the years, his rating and style have evolved significantly – from a strong blitz performance to demonstrated expertise in rapid and even bullet formats.
Throughout the years, Caballino’s blitz rating steadily climbed, reflecting his commitment to constant improvement. By 2025, his blitz rating reached an impressive 2303, evidence of his enduring dedication to the game and deep study of opening repertoires and endgame technique. His journey – with ratings tracked each year – is a testament to his persistence and adaptability. Whether it was a measured approach in rapid games or the intense pace of blitz and bullet, he has consistently earned respect from both his peers and online opponents.
Known for a style that emphasizes endgame prowess (with over 83% of his games reaching that phase) and a measured average moves count in victories and losses, Caballino plays with an analytical calm. His tactical awareness shines through in his remarkable comeback rate of over 88%, and his ability to extract wins even when at a material disadvantage speaks to his deep understanding of chess dynamics.
Beyond raw calculation, psychological factors also influence his play. With a tilt factor kept to a modest level and only a slight divergence between his rated and casual win percentages, Caballino has proven himself not only a technically strong player but also one with admirable mental resilience. According to his time‐performance data, his win rates are consistently balanced across the days of the week – from the steady focus of Monday through Friday to the reflective ambiance of the weekends – and he shows strong performance during key hours of the day.
In addition to his rating progress, his opening repertoire reveals a wide-ranging familiarity with many complex lines, from the Sicilian Defense’s dynamic variations to intricate approaches in the Indian Game. His solid grasp of strategy and tactics allows him to navigate multiple systems, adapting to both classical and modern ideas.
Caballino’s journey in chess is one of determination and continuous growth. His story is not just reflected in his ratings but also in his ability to recover from setbacks, his strong endgame technique, and his disciplined time‐management – all of which combine to make him a formidable competitor on any board.
As the years advance, Caballino continues to refine his game – a true modern chess warrior whose evolution reflects the timeless blend of experience, psychological strength, and tactical brilliance.
What you’re doing well
You show a willingness to fight for dynamic, contested positions in blitz. When you get initiative, your pieces coordinate to generate pressure on the king, and you’re good at opening lines for rooks and minor pieces to become active. You also seem comfortable trading when it helps simplify into favorable endgames, which is a solid habit in fast time controls.
Key improvement areas
- Time management in sharp moments: in blitz, spend a moment to decide whether a tactical line is worth the risk. If the line is unclear, shift to safer, plan-based moves that keep the position balanced.
- Calculation discipline: cultivate a quick, reliable method to verify forcing lines. After identifying a candidate, confirm the consequences a few moves ahead rather than chasing long sequences that may collapse under time pressure.
- Plan-oriented play: after generating a strategic idea (for example, pressuring a particular file or targeting a weak pawn), have a concrete follow-up plan. If the plan isn’t clear, steer the game toward a simpler, easier-to-sustain plan rather than overcomplicating.
- Endgame conversion: blitz often hinges on converting tiny advantages. Practice a few standard endgames (rook endgames, bishop vs knight endings, and basic king activity) to improve conversion when the position simplifies.
- Opening repertoire for blitz: build a small, reliable set of openings for both sides. Knowing the typical middlegame plans for a couple of structures helps you reach favorable positions faster and reduces overthinking in the early moves.
Insights from your recent games
Recent blitz outcomes show a mix of aggressive middle-games and some tough tactical challenges. Here are practical, non-notation takeaways you can apply next time:
- Recent win: your aggression paid off when you could keep pieces active and pressure the opponent’s king. Focus on maintaining that initiative, but ensure you have a concrete plan after the initial attack so you don’t get tangled in a long, uncertain sequence.
- Recent loss: a complex sequence shifted the momentum against you. In similar situations, prioritize king safety and keep rooks and major pieces connected. If a line looks murky, simplify earlier rather than calc-heavy sacrifices that can backfire under time pressure.
- Recent draw: you held a solid position through calm exchanges, but there were moments where a more precise push could have converted the slight edge. When you spot a small advantage, consider a targeted plan to apply pressure rather than waiting for repetition or perpetual checks.
Training plan (short-term)
- Daily tactical practice: 15–20 minutes focusing on common motifs (forks, pins, skewers, back-rank weaknesses, and rook activity).
- Blitz-focused sessions: two 15–20 minute sessions per week at 3+2 or 2+1 to build speed with a pre-set plan for your favorite openings.
- Endgame drills: 10 minutes, 2–3 times per week, practicing rook endgames and king activity to improve conversion in late middlegame/early endgame phases.
- Opening discipline: pick 1–2 setups you’re comfortable with for both colors. Write a one-page quick reference with typical plans and a few safe replies to common replies.
- Post-game reflection: after each blitz game, write 2 bullet points—one thing you did well, and one concrete improvement for the next game.
Quick action items for the next week
- Identify one recurring pattern in your blitz games (for example, a pawn structure or a typical middle-game plan) and study a short guide or video about it.
- Set a mental time-check: if you’re at move 15 and have under 2 minutes left, switch to a safer, simpler plan and avoid speculative doubles or long tactical lines.
- During your next blitz game, aim to finish the opening phase with a clear plan (e.g., develop and contest key files) rather than chasing immediate tactics.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| hdzleon | 3W / 1L / 1D | View |
| cekuttt | 3W / 2L / 0D | View |
| szachista4444 | 1W / 4L / 1D | View |
| andres290963 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| en_croissant96 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| boroczchess | 2W / 1L / 0D | View |
| santito1973 | 13W / 10L / 0D | View |
| ata101 | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| testerhaze | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Felix Izeta Txabarri | 0W / 2L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| chocolate dark | 58W / 53L / 4D | View Games |
| Bara Kuda | 65W / 40L / 3D | View Games |
| sairamcp | 59W / 44L / 5D | View Games |
| Dirceu Viana | 45W / 45L / 10D | View Games |
| u9671682 | 42W / 46L / 6D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2373 | 813 | 1095 | |
| 2024 | 2252 | 993 | ||
| 2023 | 1056 | 2213 | 1030 | 1030 |
| 2022 | 2272 | 1241 | ||
| 2021 | 2331 | 1117 | ||
| 2020 | 943 | 2228 | ||
| 2019 | 2167 | |||
| 2018 | 2231 | 985 | ||
| 2017 | 1994 | |||
| 2016 | 1200 | 2088 | ||
| 2015 | 2015 | |||
| 2014 | 2010 | |||
| 2013 | 1879 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 994W / 910L / 100D | 960W / 931L / 89D | 76.9 |
| 2024 | 1269W / 1131L / 139D | 1181W / 1215L / 138D | 78.9 |
| 2023 | 1376W / 1012L / 105D | 1306W / 1072L / 118D | 75.2 |
| 2022 | 648W / 434L / 58D | 593W / 485L / 64D | 77.6 |
| 2021 | 1278W / 879L / 153D | 1248W / 978L / 112D | 79.1 |
| 2020 | 1193W / 814L / 91D | 1154W / 905L / 71D | 73.5 |
| 2019 | 1388W / 878L / 127D | 1292W / 972L / 130D | 75.2 |
| 2018 | 1836W / 1209L / 119D | 1653W / 1427L / 89D | 72.3 |
| 2017 | 1360W / 968L / 90D | 1327W / 1032L / 95D | 72.5 |
| 2016 | 1318W / 984L / 80D | 1246W / 1031L / 80D | 74.2 |
| 2015 | 1090W / 867L / 55D | 1046W / 906L / 61D | 74.8 |
| 2014 | 988W / 824L / 47D | 926W / 859L / 71D | 74.7 |
| 2013 | 361W / 237L / 18D | 315W / 289L / 9D | 70.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 3770 | 2065 | 1512 | 193 | 54.8% |
| Döry Defense | 2850 | 1468 | 1259 | 123 | 51.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Knight Variation | 2017 | 1166 | 785 | 66 | 57.8% |
| King's Indian Defense: Accelerated Averbakh Variation | 2004 | 1198 | 722 | 84 | 59.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1978 | 1039 | 862 | 77 | 52.5% |
| Benoni Defense | 1817 | 1007 | 753 | 57 | 55.4% |
| Slav Defense | 1535 | 913 | 561 | 61 | 59.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation | 1504 | 838 | 596 | 70 | 55.7% |
| East Indian Defense | 1490 | 740 | 653 | 97 | 49.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1465 | 750 | 650 | 65 | 51.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Czech Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Elephant Gambit | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Bishop's Opening: Horwitz Gambit | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Four Knights Game | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Petrov's Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Classical Variation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 25 | 0 |
| Losing | 14 | 0 |