Profile Summary of calemcc
Meet calemcc, a chess warrior who proudly holds the prestigious title of National Master, a badge earned from the renowned National chess federation. This player’s journey through the ranks has been nothing short of a rollercoaster ride, filled with intense blitz battles, rapid-fire bullet games, and strategic daily matches.
Starting modestly back in 2011, calemcc’s blitz rating soared impressively from around 1080 to a staggering peak beyond 2600 by 2025. If that doesn’t scream “Chess beast,” then what does? Their bullet game is equally fearsome, flirting with the 2500 rating mark! Rapid and daily games also showcase finesse and deep strategic play, emphasizing a well-rounded chess talent.
But don’t mistake this for a robotic calculator – calemcc’s style includes a heroic 85.88% comeback rate and an almost mythical 98% win rate after losing a piece. Adversity clearly fuels their fire. On the flipside, they have a “Tilt Factor” of 21, meaning a few tough losses might get under their skin – hey, nobody’s perfect!
With a knack for gruelling endgames (over 74% of their games reach those nerve-wracking final moves), and an average of 71 moves per game, calemcc doesn’t exactly rush – they savor every pawn push and knight fork. Early resignations? Only 2.11% of the time – clearly, perseverance is their mantra.
Off the board, calemcc’s list of opponents reads like a who’s who of chess challengers, with some rivalries yielding 100% win rates and others providing humbling lessons. Their current winning streak stands strong at 5, with a legendary longest streak of 17 wins – a true testament to their chess grit and determination.
In the digital realm, calemcc’s favorite opening remains a well-guarded secret, having played it in over 42,000 blitz games alone – talk about commitment, or maybe a little mystery!
So if you ever queue up to face calemcc online, prepare for a formidable opponent who mixes strategic depth, tactical resilience, and a sprinkle of human imperfection. Just don’t ask them to reveal their secret openings – that’s their ace up the sleeve!
Quick summary of the session
Nice run — you won several cleanly and converted concrete chances, especially with active piece play and mating ideas. A loss in a Semi‑Slav game showed a recurring tactical theme you can tighten up. Overall your play is trending strongly; keep the focus on the same practical strengths while fixing a few recurring leaks.
What you did well (patterns to keep)
- Active rooks and queen routing to the enemy king — you converted a back‑rank/king‑side finishing pattern very cleanly (example: Qf8 mate in the Bogo‑Indian game vs hiwa2110).
- Good use of open files and doubling/seizing the 7th — you pressure files quickly after simplifications and force weaknesses.
- Practical tactics and forcing sequences — you punish loose coordination (examples: wins where opponents resigned after a decisive tactic or were mated).
- Opening results are strong in certain systems (your stats show excellent results in several French and English lines). That opening comfort is paying off in the middlegame.
Main issues to fix (quick wins)
- Time management: a few games reached single‑digit seconds on the clock. Slow down in the first 10 minutes to avoid rushed tactical oversights later.
- Tactical awareness around pawn storms and sacrifices: in the Semi‑Slav loss your opponent opened lines with a pawn sac (hxg3 / gxf2+ sequence) and you didn’t have a clean defence. Watch for sacrificial motifs that open files to your king.
- King safety / prophylaxis: when your opponent has attacking resources, spend a moment looking for a flight square or piece interposition (back‑rank checks and g‑file/ h‑file threats appeared several times).
- Conversion technique after gaining the initiative: when you get an advantage, aim for straightforward plans (exchange into a winning king+pawn endgame or force mate) rather than complicated permutations that can give the opponent tactical chances.
Concrete improvements with examples
- Practice defending against pawn sac attacks — drill positions where the opponent plays hxg3 or g5/g4 lines aimed at breaking open your king (play both sides to learn the motifs).
- Work on back‑rank awareness. Before every move in a sharp middlegame, check: does my king have luft? Any back‑rank mates or skewers possible after exchanges?
- Improve opening move timing: in familiar lines (your strong openings like the French variations and Bogo-Indian Defense) play faster in the opening so you have time to calculate tactical sequences later.
- Review the Semi‑Slav typical sacrifices and the right defensive replies — this will directly address the tactical issue in your recent loss. Study games in Semi-Slav Defense Main Line.
Short tactical & training plan (next 2 weeks)
- Daily 15–20 minutes tactics focused on sacrifices that open lines (filters: sacrifices, back‑rank, mating nets).
- 3 × 15‑minute sessions this week reviewing the game vs hiwa2110 (loss) and replaying the critical sequence with the aim: “how could I have prevented the gxf2+ motif?”
- 2 endgame drills (Lucena/Rook + pawn and basic king + pawn) to sharpen conversion technique — short sessions are very effective.
- One slow training game per week (longer time control) where you practice spending a little more time in the opening to avoid late time trouble.
Concrete move‑level example you can replay
Here’s the finishing sequence from your Bogo‑Indian win (good model of switching to mating threats). Replay it and ask: “If I were the defender, where could I have created counterplay?”
Checklist to use during games
- After each of your moves: “Is my king safe? Any direct tactical shots for my opponent?”
- Before committing to an aggressive pawn break (g5/h5/hxg3), calculate at least one forcing reply that opens a file to a king.
- If you’re ahead in development and the opponent’s king is in the center — simplify and swap into a winning endgame or win material with forced tactics.
- When you hit time trouble, prefer safe, simplifying moves over speculative tactics unless you’ve calculated them thoroughly.
Next steps & targets
- Short term (1–2 weeks): Reduce games that end with under 30s on your clock by spending 1–2 extra seconds per opening move. Do 10 tactical puzzles daily.
- Medium term (1–2 months): Sharpen defence versus sacrificial attacking ideas in Semi‑Slav / QGD structures; aim to convert more of your +/≈ positions into wins.
- Long term: Keep building on your opening strengths (French/English lines) while expanding repertoire vs the Semi‑Slav to avoid repeated tactical motifs.
Parting note
Your recent form and rating trend are excellent — the fixes here are relatively small and targeted. Apply them, and you should see fewer tactical losses and better time management in your next block of games. If you want, paste one full game you felt unsure about and I’ll do a short move‑by‑move post‑mortem.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| williamjohnb | 5W / 4L / 0D | View |
| tigreton16 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| niksmbidkar | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| stuffystuffy | 14W / 5L / 1D | View |
| res128 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| leo3691 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| abhishek_ganiger | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| adrianpascal | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| pink-ostrich | 2W / 0L / 0D | View |
| king_of_premoves | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| penguininja | 57W / 92L / 10D | View Games |
| Slave Trajkoski | 75W / 62L / 5D | View Games |
| Glenn Bidari | 42W / 82L / 13D | View Games |
| WarlordX | 42W / 73L / 8D | View Games |
| Rogelio Jr Antonio | 27W / 89L / 5D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2513 | 2529 | 2531 | |
| 2024 | 2508 | 1896 | ||
| 2023 | 2437 | 2395 | ||
| 2022 | 2502 | |||
| 2021 | 2355 | 2563 | ||
| 2020 | 2222 | 2249 | ||
| 2019 | 2249 | 2482 | 1896 | 2083 |
| 2018 | 2255 | 2292 | 1896 | |
| 2017 | 2203 | 2228 | 1930 | 2083 |
| 2016 | 2100 | 2223 | 1953 | 1521 |
| 2015 | 2066 | 2129 | 1904 | 1620 |
| 2014 | 1882 | 1946 | 1862 | 1812 |
| 2013 | 1740 | 1920 | 1676 | |
| 2012 | 1658 | 1777 | 1391 | 1681 |
| 2011 | 1134 | 1337 | 1227 | 1302 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 320W / 248L / 35D | 257W / 315L / 36D | 77.0 |
| 2024 | 680W / 708L / 103D | 652W / 752L / 93D | 74.7 |
| 2023 | 492W / 547L / 77D | 453W / 611L / 59D | 74.8 |
| 2022 | 5W / 7L / 1D | 4W / 7L / 1D | 83.1 |
| 2021 | 541W / 605L / 83D | 530W / 626L / 72D | 75.7 |
| 2020 | 767W / 800L / 118D | 708W / 880L / 95D | 76.9 |
| 2019 | 791W / 806L / 121D | 715W / 878L / 100D | 71.9 |
| 2018 | 691W / 731L / 90D | 656W / 765L / 94D | 75.1 |
| 2017 | 1099W / 1113L / 151D | 992W / 1238L / 131D | 75.2 |
| 2016 | 1100W / 1060L / 135D | 1055W / 1119L / 121D | 67.5 |
| 2015 | 574W / 624L / 102D | 495W / 723L / 59D | 74.2 |
| 2014 | 653W / 1299L / 84D | 659W / 1279L / 103D | 72.1 |
| 2013 | 904W / 1744L / 121D | 841W / 1821L / 113D | 69.7 |
| 2012 | 621W / 968L / 72D | 607W / 1003L / 64D | 68.7 |
| 2011 | 167W / 168L / 6D | 159W / 174L / 10D | 54.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense | 207 | 95 | 105 | 7 | 45.9% |
| Australian Defense | 177 | 68 | 101 | 8 | 38.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 125 | 49 | 69 | 7 | 39.2% |
| Amar Gambit | 115 | 44 | 62 | 9 | 38.3% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 101 | 37 | 57 | 7 | 36.6% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 93 | 44 | 46 | 3 | 47.3% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 83 | 37 | 42 | 4 | 44.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 80 | 26 | 49 | 5 | 32.5% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 65 | 28 | 34 | 3 | 43.1% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 63 | 30 | 32 | 1 | 47.6% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 2428 | 961 | 1323 | 144 | 39.6% |
| French Defense | 2292 | 883 | 1296 | 113 | 38.5% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 2072 | 920 | 1047 | 105 | 44.4% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 1431 | 546 | 792 | 93 | 38.2% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 1413 | 557 | 790 | 66 | 39.4% |
| Queen's Gambit Declined: Hastings Variation | 1330 | 564 | 695 | 71 | 42.4% |
| Australian Defense | 1194 | 486 | 645 | 63 | 40.7% |
| Slav Defense | 1161 | 496 | 610 | 55 | 42.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 1048 | 481 | 497 | 70 | 45.9% |
| Amazon Attack | 954 | 387 | 517 | 50 | 40.6% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD Tarrasch: 4.cxd5 | 31 | 24 | 6 | 1 | 77.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 29 | 17 | 12 | 0 | 58.6% |
| Barnes Defense | 22 | 11 | 10 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 21 | 10 | 11 | 0 | 47.6% |
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 20 | 15 | 4 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Australian Defense | 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 77.8% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 16 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 62.5% |
| French Defense | 14 | 6 | 8 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Amar Gambit | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 11 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 81.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QGD: 3.Nc3 Bb4 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 12 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 50.0% |
| French Defense: Burn Variation | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Australian Defense | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% |
| King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Bobotsov-Korchnoi-Petrosian Variation | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 62.5% |
| French Defense: Guimard Variation, Thunderbunny Variation | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% |
| French Defense | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 50.0% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 7 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 85.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 0 |
| Losing | 19 | 1 |