Artem Tuzhik: The FIDE Master with a Tactical Twist
Meet Artem Tuzhik, a FIDE Master whose chess prowess shines brighter than a queen on an open file. Known in the online realm as Castleqweenside7447, Artem doesn't just play the game; they dance with it.
Rating and Style
With a peak blitz rating climbing above 2600 and bullet performances hitting the 2500 mark, Artem demonstrates a fiery mix of speed and precision. Whether it's rapid or blitz, Artem's win rates hover around the 48% to 60% mark—proof that consistency is key, but occasional fireworks are inevitable.
Playing Style
Artem is the embodiment of patience and endurance, with an average win game spanning nearly 80 moves, and rarely throwing in the towel early (a humble 0.94% early resignation rate). Their endgame skills are legendary, featuring in over 81% of games—because when it comes to chess, Artem knows the finish line is just as important as the flashy opening.
Tactical Prowess
When the going gets tough, Artem gets going. An astonishing 89.83% comeback rate and a perfect 100% win rate after losing a piece show a fighter who never quits. Opponents beware: losing material early against Artem might just be the beginning of your downfall.
Psychological Edge
While even the best can tilt, Artem keeps it cool with a tilt factor of 11 (low enough to avoid tantrums, high enough to keep the adrenaline flowing). They also have a knack for performing better in rated games compared to casual play—perhaps proving that Artem thrives when the stakes are high.
Memorable Moments
Artem’s longest winning streak of 24 games goes to show that whether it's a weekend blitz marathon or a quick bullet sprint at 1 AM, they can turn the tide for long stretches. With opponents ranging from azpatzer1981 to ccdk, Artem's chess battlefield is vast and victorious.
In Summary
Artem Tuzhik is more than just a chess player—they are a strategic storm wrapped in calm calculation, a relentless tactician, and an endgame whisperer. Watch out for the castle on the queenside, because when Artem’s around, it's always a checkmate waiting to happen.
Quick summary
Good energy in these recent 3‑minute games: you’re finding tactical shots, converting active positions into wins, and you have clear opening preferences you can leverage. The recurring negatives are time management and a few recurring strategic blind spots (pawn play / passed‑pawn handling and some endgame technique). Below are concrete suggestions you can use right away.
What you did well
- You create and exploit tactical chances quickly — your decisive game included a sharp exchange sac and a rook sacrifice that led to a winning position. See the finish of a recent win below:
- Your opening choices are mostly purposeful — you’re comfortable in many Sicilian structures and in dynamic pawn breaks. Use that familiarity as a practical advantage in blitz. -
- Strong pattern recognition in tactical middlegames — you spot forks, pins and back‑rank ideas faster than average blitz opponents.
Recurring weaknesses to fix
- Time management: you often let the clock get low in complex positions. When the clock is under 20 seconds you start making errors. Practice leaving a 10–15 second “buffer” for critical moves.
- Passed‑pawn handling: in losses you allowed opponent pawns to advance and queen (example: games where the opponent’s connected pawns eventually decided the game). When you are capturing material, check whether you open a file or diagonal for a dangerous passer.
- Endgame technique under time pressure: converting or defending rook + pawn endgames and dealing with outside passed pawns can be shaky when the clock is low. Focus on a few practical endgames (rook vs rook + pawn, king+pawn endings and Lucena/Philidor ideas).
- Occasional over‑optimistic sacrifices: your willingness to sac is a strength, but in blitz you sometimes play speculative sacrifices without fully calculating follow‑up. If you choose to sac, have a one‑ or two‑move concrete follow‑up in mind.
- Defensive coordination: against accurate counterplay your pieces sometimes become uncoordinated (e.g., a bishop tucked away while rooks are inactive). Before committing to an attack, ask: are my pieces defending key squares?
Concrete training plan (4 weeks)
- Daily (15–25 minutes): 20–30 tactical puzzles focusing on forks, pins, discovered attacks and clean mating nets. Keep a short log of recurring motifs you miss.
- Every other day (20 minutes): one practical endgame theme — Week 1: basic king & pawn (outside passed pawn), Week 2: rook endgames (Lucena/Philidor basics), Week 3: minor‑piece vs rook/major piece conversions, Week 4: review weak spots.
- Twice weekly (30–45 minutes): play 5–10 blitz games but stop at critical losses and immediately review the last 5 decisive moves. Ask: did I have a simpler winning plan? Did I blunder in time trouble?
- Opening work (2× week, 15 minutes): drill 2 lines that give you reliable practical positions — keep one solid main line (for example Sicilian Defense setups you like) and one surprise line from your high‑win openings like the Scandinavian or Caro‑Kann Exchange.
- Weekly goal: annotate one won and one lost game with a short explanation (3–5 sentences) of the turning point — this builds pattern memory faster than pure tactics.
Blitz‑specific practical tips
- Reserve time for critical moments: in 3|0 aim to keep 10–15 seconds reserve. If you find your clock under 10s frequently, make a rule: no move under 3 seconds unless it is a simple recapture or mate.
- Practical simplification: when you’re clearly ahead, exchange into an endgame you know. When equal, avoid speculative complications unless you see a forcing win. -
- Use pre‑moves carefully: pre‑move only when a capture or forced recapture is safe. Don’t pre‑move in messy positions—it’s where mouse slips and cheapo losses happen.
- One‑question test before every move: “Is my king safe?” — this prevents blunders from attacking shots and quiet traps.
- When ahead on material: force trades and centralize your king if an endgame is near. In many of your wins you converted by bringing pieces to active squares — make that a habit earlier.
How to leverage your opening strengths
- You have strong results in Scandinavian and the Caro‑Kann Exchange — double down on these as “go‑to” lines for blitz. Keep a one‑page cheat sheet of common tactical themes and a few typical plans (pawn breaks, piece setups).
- For the Sicilian lines you play often, tidy up 2 move orders that avoid quiet transpositions where you were uncomfortable. Practice those move orders 5 times in a row as part of your opening drill.
- Study typical endgames arising from the lines you like — if your openings often leave you with opposite‑color bishops or isolated pawns, practice the relevant endgame motifs.
Short checklist to use immediately during games
-
- Count opponent threats before you move (checks, captures, mates).
- If you plan a sacrifice: can you see 2 forced follow‑ups? If not, wait.
- With ≤20s on clock: simplify or play safe; save time for complex positions.
- When ahead: swap off into an endgame you know or centralize the king.
Next steps & micro‑goals (2 weeks)
- Improve blitz conversion: +20 tactics/day, focus on endgame 15 minutes/week. Aim to reduce losses from time trouble by 30%.
- Play 50 blitz games with immediate 30–60 second self‑review of each decisive game. Track how many losses are “time” vs “strategy”.
- At the end of two weeks, send me one annotated win and one annotated loss and I’ll give targeted feedback on the turning points.
Examples & study links (placeholders)
- Study the decisive tactical game here (review the finish and the exchange sac): the embedded mini‑viewer above shows the final line and position.
- Revisit games vs these opponents for patterns: chesspunctum, fearsamuel.
- Reinforce the opening themes in Sicilian Defense and the Scandinavian — these are where you score well and can get quick practical wins.
Closing — encouragement
Your profile shows sustained high performance and a strong tactical eye. Tweaking clock management and targeted endgame study will convert more of your good positions into wins. Pick one small change (for example: keep 12 seconds as a minimum reserve) and commit to it for 2 weeks — you’ll notice an immediate improvement.
If you want, send one annotated loss and one annotated win (just 3–5 moves around the turning point) and I’ll give a micro‑analysis and a short checklist tailored to those positions.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| matwe2 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| justinuuan | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| kingwalker2 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| secretchessplayer2014 | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| fearsamuel | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| chesspunctum | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Jacob Chudnovsky | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| wannabescientist | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Bruce Monson | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| Enrico Ghersinich | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| ljucifer | 21W / 45L / 3D | View Games |
| isaiahdaniel | 3W / 26L / 0D | View Games |
| caraguru | 5W / 15L / 5D | View Games |
| Mark Kotliar | 10W / 7L / 5D | View Games |
| matej_titan | 10W / 5L / 3D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2588 | |||
| 2024 | 2512 | 2503 | ||
| 2023 | 2506 | 2509 | ||
| 2022 | 2489 | |||
| 2021 | 1923 | 2525 | 2281 | |
| 2020 | 2122 | 2525 | 2224 | |
| 2019 | 2224 | 2482 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 51W / 25L / 3D | 45W / 38L / 2D | 65.7 |
| 2024 | 2W / 1L / 0D | 1W / 1L / 0D | 68.0 |
| 2023 | 56W / 10L / 1D | 42W / 22L / 7D | 78.3 |
| 2022 | 0W / 1L / 0D | 0W / 0L / 0D | 44.0 |
| 2021 | 545W / 328L / 95D | 508W / 378L / 85D | 80.3 |
| 2020 | 185W / 152L / 59D | 159W / 178L / 55D | 81.6 |
| 2019 | 313W / 304L / 74D | 294W / 327L / 58D | 80.9 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 220 | 98 | 102 | 20 | 44.5% |
| Amar Gambit | 122 | 47 | 65 | 10 | 38.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 103 | 48 | 47 | 8 | 46.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 99 | 57 | 37 | 5 | 57.6% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 99 | 47 | 45 | 7 | 47.5% |
| Modern | 91 | 45 | 40 | 6 | 49.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 75 | 36 | 30 | 9 | 48.0% |
| Czech Defense | 75 | 45 | 22 | 8 | 60.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 72 | 34 | 28 | 10 | 47.2% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 61 | 37 | 18 | 6 | 60.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 32 | 22 | 8 | 2 | 68.8% |
| French Defense: Advance Variation | 22 | 14 | 8 | 0 | 63.6% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 16 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 43.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Alekhine Defense | 15 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 40.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 13 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 76.9% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
| French Defense | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Accelerated Dragon, Modern Bc4 Variation | 12 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 41.7% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 11 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 18.2% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 27 | 13 | 11 | 3 | 48.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Scotch Game | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 7 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 71.4% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed, Anti-Sveshnikov Variation, Kharlov-Kramnik Line | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 24 | 1 |
| Losing | 11 | 0 |