Cedrik Haskovec (aka CedrHask)
National Master – The Chessboard Conqueror
Cedrik Haskovec is not your everyday chess player – oh no! Since first setting foot on the 64 squares back in 2009, Cedrik has been steadily climbing the ranks with a dedication rivaled only by caffeine-fueled late-night strategists. Earning the prestigious National Master title, Cedrik has showcased a deep passion for chess, accompanied by a knack for turning even the gloomiest positions into dazzling victories.
Starting with a modest rating of 1200, Cedrik quickly shattered early barriers and soared past the 2200 mark by 2013 – a testament to countless hours of practice and probably a fair share of creative openings. His peak daily rating of 2363, achieved in August 2019, marks him as a formidable opponent who’s just as comfortable plotting a sneaky trap as grinding out a solid endgame.
Cedrik's playing style is a curious blend of patience and tactical wizardry, boasting an impressive comeback rate of over 76%. Whether down a piece or navigating a tricky position, this player often turns the tables with flair and grit. His average game length reveals a love for rich, strategic battles—on average, wins last about 59 moves, while losses linger around 65 moves, suggesting he fights till the very end.
A master of the Unknown Opening (because why play it safe?), Cedrik experiments often but also enjoys trusted systems like the Nimzo-Indian and Sicilian Defenses. His rapid rating peaked at 2001 and blitz at 1852, proving versatility across multiple time controls – though daily chess remains his main battlefield.
When it comes to psychological fortitude, Cedrik keeps a tilt factor around 4, which means even if frustration creeps in, it’s far from his defining trait. In fact, he’s recorded a stellar 68% win rate on Mondays, suggesting that fresh brains early in the week are the secret sauce. Oddly enough, 2 AM is his best time to play – maybe the chess gods whisper their secrets only in the early morning quiet.
Opponents beware: Cedrik has taken down frequent rivals like trapperjohn92 with a win rate exceeding 76%, and boasts perfect or near-perfect scores against many others. His recent games show sharp tactical awareness and a penchant for resignations—not only giving up when necessary but also forcing the enemy to admit defeat!
Memorable Victory Highlight
In a captivating game from January 2025, Cedrik patiently handled the classic Nimzo-Indian Defense against Nafe_CZ. After a tense exchange and subtle maneuvers, he coaxed his opponent into resignation on move 44. This game is a great example of his patience, strategic vision, and ability to quietly bulldoze toward victory.
Whether known as Cedrik, CedrHask, or the National Master with a chessboard in his grip, this player is a shining example of dedication, skill, and a touch of humor in the game we all love.
Performance Overview
Cedrik, your recent rapid games show a solid performance with a strength-adjusted win rate of approximately 59%. This is a strong indicator of consistent competitive play against opponents of varying strengths. Over the last 6 months, you've achieved an impressive rating increase of 141 points, reflecting steady progress, especially notable given your positive trends over 1, 3, 6, and 12 months.
Game Insights
- Your wins display effective handling of the Sicilian Defense McDonnell Attack and Queen's Gambit Declined, showing clear understanding of key middle-game ideas and transitions.
- You successfully leveraged open lines for your major pieces and maintained pressure decisively, often leading opponents to resign well before time control, as seen in the final positions of your wins.
- In your losses, opponents capitalized on tactical opportunities and positional weaknesses, such as doubled pawns or weak squares. For example, some games illustrated challenges in pawn structure management and timely piece coordination.
- Endgame technique was often strong, particularly in converting material advantages and exploiting king activity, though occasionally you faced difficulties when your opponent reached active counterplay.
Opening and Tactical Play
Your choice of openings such as the Sicilian variations and Queen's Gambit Declined lines are well-suited to your playing style, favoring dynamic piece play and control of the center.
- Consider deepening your familiarity with the transitions and typical plans of these openings to avoid early pitfalls.
- Review some of the losses where early exchanges led to compromised pawn structures—improving opening accuracy and understanding will lessen these risks.
- Use the Gottfried94 games as study material, focusing on how you handled attacks and defense, both successfully and where you lost control.
Areas for Improvement
- Opening precision: Strengthen your knowledge of critical lines and typical strategic goals in your preferred openings.
- Positional awareness: Work on identifying and correcting pawn structure weaknesses early to prevent opponent initiative.
- Tactical vigilance: Continue practicing calculation and spotting tactical motifs to reduce errors under time pressure.
- Endgame technique: Reinforce practical endgame skills to convert advantages confidently and play resiliently in tougher positions.
Next Steps for Development
To continue your upward rating trend:
- Analyze your winning and losing games in detail—try to pinpoint key moments where the game's momentum shifted.
- Study common tactical themes from your recent games to build sharper calculation skills.
- Use structured opening repertoires tailored to your strengths and experiment cautiously with others to broaden your experience.
- Regularly practice endgames to build confidence in critical final phases of the game.
- Maintain a balance of playing, reviewing, and learning to optimize improvement over the coming months.
Keep leveraging your strengths and tackling challenges head-on; your positive rating slope is a testament to your hard work and potential. Well done!
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| georgeturcan | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| vipercz3 | 0W / 1L / 3D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| TrapperJohn92 | 122W / 30L / 8D | |
| Gottfried94 | 20W / 11L / 6D | |
| ggggggggggggggggggggg49 | 13W / 1L / 0D | |
| hshsvssv | 9W / 1L / 0D | |
| holdemrulzok | 0W / 0L / 6D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1432 | 1932 | 2173 | |
| 2024 | 1819 | 2128 | ||
| 2023 | 1712 | 2165 | ||
| 2022 | 2026 | |||
| 2021 | 1652 | 1542 | 2301 | |
| 2020 | 1672 | 2330 | ||
| 2019 | 1795 | 1493 | 1976 | |
| 2018 | 1783 | 1943 | ||
| 2017 | 1844 | 2280 | ||
| 2016 | 2014 | |||
| 2015 | 2228 | |||
| 2014 | 2223 | |||
| 2013 | 2235 | |||
| 2012 | 1983 | |||
| 2011 | 1725 | |||
| 2010 | 1725 | |||
| 2009 | 1200 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 29W / 11L / 11D | 26W / 13L / 11D | 60.8 |
| 2024 | 111W / 38L / 9D | 115W / 33L / 15D | 61.7 |
| 2023 | 6W / 5L / 7D | 7W / 4L / 6D | 54.8 |
| 2022 | 5W / 2L / 7D | 4W / 2L / 8D | 52.9 |
| 2021 | 4W / 6L / 8D | 9W / 8L / 4D | 65.8 |
| 2020 | 8W / 1L / 8D | 5W / 1L / 8D | 63.6 |
| 2019 | 12W / 2L / 4D | 4W / 6L / 8D | 53.8 |
| 2018 | 4W / 5L / 5D | 5W / 5L / 5D | 65.7 |
| 2017 | 7W / 3L / 5D | 6W / 3L / 6D | 53.4 |
| 2016 | 5W / 1L / 8D | 4W / 3L / 5D | 45.9 |
| 2015 | 4W / 2L / 5D | 3W / 1L / 5D | 60.1 |
| 2014 | 3W / 1L / 5D | 2W / 0L / 10D | 62.3 |
| 2013 | 9W / 0L / 2D | 9W / 1L / 1D | 53.7 |
| 2012 | 4W / 0L / 1D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 56.9 |
| 2011 | 1W / 1L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 0D | 75.2 |
| 2010 | 3W / 0L / 5D | 4W / 1L / 3D | 41.1 |
| 2009 | 4W / 0L / 0D | 2W / 0L / 1D | 42.0 |
Openings: Most Played
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 28 | 11 | 10 | 7 | 39.3% |
| Sicilian Defense | 13 | 8 | 1 | 4 | 61.5% |
| Queen's Indian Defense: Buerger Variation | 12 | 2 | 0 | 10 | 16.7% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 18.2% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 40.0% |
| Australian Defense | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 9 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 66.7% |
| Amar Gambit | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 8 | 3 | 0 | 5 | 37.5% |
| King's Indian Defense: Makogonov Variation | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 71.4% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 41 | 30 | 9 | 2 | 73.2% |
| Sicilian Defense | 40 | 30 | 9 | 1 | 75.0% |
| QGA: 3.Nf3 Bg4 | 27 | 22 | 5 | 0 | 81.5% |
| QGA: 4.e3 a6 | 19 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 63.2% |
| QGA: 3.e3 c5 | 18 | 14 | 4 | 0 | 77.8% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 68.8% |
| QGD: 2...Bf5 3.cxd5 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 12 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 66.7% |
| Australian Defense | 12 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 25.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 12 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 75.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Defense: Larsen Variation | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Döry Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bogo-Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bird Opening: Dutch Variation, Batavo Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Defense: Blumenfeld-Hiva Gambit | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| King's Indian Defense | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.0% |
| Nimzo-Indian Defense: Three Knights Variation, Duchamp Variation | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Dutch Defense: Leningrad Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Australian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
| English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Hedgehog System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 1 |
| Losing | 4 | 0 |