Profile Summary: Evan Ai (CFalcons8)
Evan Ai is no ordinary chess enthusiast; they’ve earned the prestigious title of National Master from National, placing them among the elite thinkers of the chessboard. Evan’s journey is a rollercoaster of ratings, furious blunders, impressive comebacks, and moments of genius that make watching their games an absolute spectacle.
A Career in Ratings
Starting out with modest ratings back in 2013 (a blitz peak of 1469), Evan quickly climbed the ranks over the years. By the mid-2020s, their blitz rating skyrocketed beyond 2600, hitting a blistering peak of 2627 in August 2024! Bullet chess seems to be Evan’s playground too, with a staggering peak rating of 2699 in January 2025, making them nearly unstoppable when the clock is ticking.
Playing Style
Patience is Evan's game, with an average of around 75 moves per win or loss indicating long, strategic battles rather than quick skirmishes. They favor outwitting opponents slowly rather than a quick knockout, and their endgame frequency of nearly 79% proves that they’re comfortable in the trenches where pawns become queens and every move counts.
Despite their serious approach, Evan doesn’t shy away from early resignations when the tides turn, but only about 3.3% of the time—sometimes it’s just smarter to save energy for the next encounter.
Tactical Prowess & Mental Fortitude
With an impressive 82.7% comeback rate, Evan is the embodiment of persistence, often turning bad positions into victories. Their winning rate after losing a piece is almost half, a sign that no material loss is too grievous when combined with sharp tactical awareness.
One might say Evan lives by the motto, "Never say die on the chessboard." However, a tilt factor of 22 means even masters have their human moments — but who's counting?
Openings & Favorite Moves
Evan keeps the enemy guessing with a repertoire almost classified as "Top Secret". Some known facets include deft handling of the Sicilian Defense and the Queens Pawn openings. The Pirc Defense seems to have a personalized touch, with a perfect win rate in the rare games played.
Memorable Battles
In a recent clash against littlefireball03, Evan showcased surgical precision with the Reti Opening Queenside Fianchetto Variation, finishing with a delightful checkmate in just 30 moves — timing and technique perfectly aligned.
But as with any great warrior, Evan tastes defeat as well. Notably, a swift loss to farhadtahirov on time showed that even the best can be caught off guard by the relentless clock.
Psychological & Temporal Trends
When to challenge Evan? Probably not on Sundays or around 7-8 AM, when their win rates peak near 55-56%! A curious tidbit: their best time of day to play is 1 PM — clearly an early afternoon genius.
Their psychological battle is strong, but rated games show a tiny disadvantage compared to casual ones, reminding us all that chess doesn’t always follow the script.
Final Word
With thousands of games and hundreds of opponents faced, many times victorious, Evan remains a dynamic and resilient competitor, forever sharpening their skills and enjoying the beautiful chaos of chess. Whether blitz, bullet, rapid, or daily, Evan Ai commands respect on the 64 squares. A National Master who’s equal parts strategist, tactician, and maybe a dash of mischief!
Overall Performance Insights
Evan, your current alertness to detail and consistent play is clear from your positive recent rating trends, especially with a strong gain of 191 points over the last month and a good overall six-month trend. Your strength-adjusted win rate is about 51%, which indicates a solid performance against similarly rated opponents. Keep focusing on maintaining this consistency to continue your upward trajectory.
Strengths in Your Recent Games
- Opening Preparation: Your wins with lines such as the Dutch Defense: Classical Variation, and solid play in the Slav Defense and Scotch Game show good familiarity with diverse openings.
- Tactical Awareness: In your recent wins, you demonstrated an ability to capitalize on opponent inaccuracies quickly, especially through good piece activity and sharp play in the middlegame.
- Endgame Technique: Some wins indicate confident handling of complex endgames, such as when securing material advantage and converting it efficiently.
- Adaption Under Time Pressure: Your responses show balanced time management, avoiding severe time scrambles, which is important in blitz.
Areas to Improve for Even Better Results
- Positional Consistency: Some losses suggest room for improvement in recognizing when to trade pieces or improve pawn structure to avoid weaknesses—particularly in the Queen's Indian and Goring Gambit encounters.
- Defensive Play: Work on increasing resilience in difficult positions, especially in the handling of attacks following early material imbalances.
- Opening Variety and Depth: While you have several openings with good success, deepening your understanding and expanding your repertoire can prevent opponents from preparing easily against your preferred lines.
- Handling Tactical Complications: Occasionally, quick tactical sequences in opponents' favor have led to losses; focusing on calculation drills could help reduce these errors.
- Midgame Planning: Strengthen strategic plans to connect opening to endgame smoothly; for example, choosing better pawn breaks or piece maneuvers to maintain advantage.
Opportunities to Capitalize On
Your performance is currently strong in openings like the Czech Defense and Colle System where your win rates are over 56%. Consider reinforcing your repertoire around these areas to leverage your strengths and gain more confident wins.
Conversely, the Sicilian Najdorf has a nearly balanced win/loss record with a slight disadvantage; revisiting theory and traps here could help you shift the scale in your favor.
Recommendations for Training Focus
- Study typical pawn structures and plans in your frequently played openings to improve strategic decision making.
- Practice tactical pattern recognition with puzzles to increase your speed and accuracy during blitz.
- Review your recent losses to identify recurring mistakes and areas where alternative moves could have improved your position.
- Incorporate endgame studies focusing on converting small advantages and defending tricky positions.
- Analyze critical moments in your games where you could transition better between opening and endgame.
Next Steps
Continue your excellent momentum by playing regularly with focused goals. Apply these insights incrementally to sharpen your skills and watch your rating climb steadily. Your capacity to improve is evident from recent trends, so steady effort will yield great rewards.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| jgroffct | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| ostrykaktus | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| petrova_elizaveta | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| swarmios | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| narekdavid | 0W / 1L / 1D | |
| liamclery2020 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| virtuosoops | 1W / 1L / 0D | |
| shekibsozan | 3W / 0L / 0D | |
| ov_n_03 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| senhor-do-tempo | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| wang5ter | 48W / 103L / 15D | |
| anticlassical | 34W / 29L / 6D | |
| regitche | 22W / 21L / 2D | |
| Stefchezz | 26W / 10L / 1D | |
| windowsenthusiast | 19W / 17L / 1D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2410 | 2499 | 2205 | |
| 2024 | 2457 | 2486 | 1434 | |
| 2023 | 2366 | 2320 | 2205 | 1518 |
| 2022 | 2310 | 2357 | 2204 | 1551 |
| 2021 | 2286 | 2170 | 2080 | |
| 2020 | 2031 | 2076 | 2123 | 1534 |
| 2019 | 1862 | 1840 | 1830 | 1273 |
| 2018 | 1634 | 1366 | 1804 | 1454 |
| 2017 | 1714 | 1911 | 1866 | 1479 |
| 2016 | 1626 | 1814 | ||
| 2015 | 1558 | 1784 | ||
| 2014 | 1827 | |||
| 2013 | 1469 | 1619 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 500W / 319L / 62D | 383W / 426L / 72D | 80.5 |
| 2024 | 371W / 280L / 46D | 338W / 311L / 58D | 80.6 |
| 2023 | 704W / 529L / 68D | 662W / 561L / 79D | 76.7 |
| 2022 | 345W / 251L / 40D | 319W / 294L / 34D | 77.9 |
| 2021 | 171W / 115L / 18D | 178W / 110L / 18D | 74.6 |
| 2020 | 280W / 186L / 41D | 267W / 209L / 34D | 75.1 |
| 2019 | 82W / 62L / 4D | 86W / 54L / 3D | 25.6 |
| 2018 | 61W / 70L / 3D | 54W / 69L / 7D | 40.3 |
| 2017 | 131W / 119L / 18D | 114W / 129L / 10D | 60.8 |
| 2016 | 26W / 16L / 2D | 15W / 25L / 2D | 67.5 |
| 2015 | 44W / 39L / 3D | 32W / 46L / 6D | 63.7 |
| 2014 | 10W / 4L / 0D | 5W / 10L / 1D | 70.8 |
| 2013 | 70W / 58L / 8D | 58W / 72L / 5D | 71.4 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 352 | 204 | 145 | 3 | 58.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 185 | 85 | 90 | 10 | 46.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 124 | 66 | 48 | 10 | 53.2% |
| Czech Defense | 110 | 67 | 35 | 8 | 60.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 108 | 52 | 44 | 12 | 48.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 100 | 53 | 37 | 10 | 53.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 97 | 58 | 30 | 9 | 59.8% |
| Modern | 93 | 52 | 38 | 3 | 55.9% |
| English Opening: Agincourt Defense | 86 | 45 | 34 | 7 | 52.3% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 78 | 41 | 28 | 9 | 52.6% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 265 | 133 | 126 | 6 | 50.2% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 177 | 105 | 62 | 10 | 59.3% |
| French Defense | 153 | 88 | 58 | 7 | 57.5% |
| Australian Defense | 144 | 83 | 52 | 9 | 57.6% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 135 | 72 | 57 | 6 | 53.3% |
| Czech Defense | 108 | 63 | 39 | 6 | 58.3% |
| Modern | 105 | 61 | 39 | 5 | 58.1% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 102 | 54 | 48 | 0 | 52.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 99 | 51 | 42 | 6 | 51.5% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 87 | 50 | 33 | 4 | 57.5% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amar Gambit | 17 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 64.7% |
| Unknown Opening* | 16 | 6 | 9 | 1 | 37.5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 9 | 5 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 11 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 27.3% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 42.9% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense | 5 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 60.0% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation | 74 | 33 | 36 | 5 | 44.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 37 | 22 | 13 | 2 | 59.5% |
| Ruy Lopez: Brix Variation | 36 | 23 | 13 | 0 | 63.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 28 | 21 | 5 | 2 | 75.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 22 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 59.1% |
| Sicilian Defense: Four Knights Variation, Cobra Variation | 22 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 45.5% |
| Sicilian Defense: Najdorf Variation, Opocensky Variation | 20 | 12 | 6 | 2 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 19 | 14 | 4 | 1 | 73.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 18 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 5.6% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 50.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 33 | 0 |
| Losing | 22 | 0 |