Kendrick Knowles (aka Chessmatic242)
Candidate Master, FIDE
Meet Kendrick Knowles, a titled Candidate Master who has navigated the treacherous chessboard battlefield with courage, wits, and a splash of humor. Known in the digital realm as Chessmatic242, Kendrick has been showing the world what it means to flex both brains and resilience since their early days in 2011.
Rating Journey
From a humble start with daily ratings near 1000, Kendrick's rapid play rating has soared to a peak of 2166 by 2025. Blitz battles have seen them reach a sizzling 2031, with bullet chess performances topping at 1997. Despite being tempted by quick games, Kendrick clearly knows the value of a slow, thoughtful move—seriously, their average moves per win in rapid games are around 69.
Playing Style
Known for a love of deep endgames (65.3% frequency), Kendrick doesn't surrender easily—boasting a 85.6% comeback rate. They’ve mastered the art of bouncing back after losing a piece, with a notable 41% win rate in such situations. Their patience is legendary, as only 3.17% of their games end with early resignations—that's not just stubbornness, that's strategic moxie.
Tactical Awareness & Psychological Fortitude
Kendrick's tactical awareness shines bright. An infamous tilt factor of 25 means they sometimes get a little salty—but who doesn’t? Interestingly, their best time to play is 5:00 AM, a secret hour when the mind is sharp and opponents are still dreaming about their last blunder. Their win rate doesn’t drop much between casual and rated games, proving they’re serious about every pawn push and king hunt.
Opening Repertoire & Preferences
Kendrick seems to have a "Top Secret" weapon—possibly their favorite line, with over 37,000 rapid games played in it. However, the trusty Caro-Kann Defense also gets a lot of love, along with its Exchange and Botvinnik variations. They even have an impressive 63% win rate with the King's Indian Attack Yugoslav Variation, perfect for tricky, strategic battles that boggle the average opponent.
Battle Scars & Notable Games
Kendrick's battlefield records include over 16,400 wins and 20,600 losses in rapid games alone—because sometimes even the wisest knight gets forked. Arrays of recent games show victories by resignation and seamless time wins, especially using solid setups like the Caro-Kann Defense and King’s Indian Attack.
Not Just A Player, But A Performer
With an average of 69 moves per win and tactical resilience set to stun, Kendrick is more than just a chess player—they’re an experience. Their love for long, strategic duels beats the quick blast bullet games, but don’t discount their speed either: their bullet peak rating near 2000 is nothing to sneeze at.
In the world of sixty-four squares, Kendrick Knowles plays like a sly fox wrapped in a scholar’s robes—ready to charm, challenge, and checkmate you before your morning coffee.
Overview of your recent rapid performance
You’ve experienced a short-term dip in rating over the last 1 to 6 months, as shown by the negative rating changes. Over the full year, the trend slope suggests a slow upward drift, which means you are building a foundation for improvement even if a recent stretch feels tougher. Your Strength Adjusted Win Rate sits just under 50%, which is a signal to sharpen convert-to-win chances in tighter positions. Overall, you have a solid base, with room to tighten decision making in the middlegame and improve endgame conversion under time pressure.
What you do well
- You have a broad opening repertoire and have shown comfort with both solid and sharper lines. In particular, the Hungarian Opening (Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit) shows one of your stronger win rates among your listed openings, indicating you handle aggressive, tactical setups well.
- You’re capable of creating practical chances in the middlegame and keeping pressure on opponents who misstep in dynamic lines.
- Longer-term trend analysis hints at a positive development trajectory. With focused work on the last few months, you can translate that into more consistent results in rapid games.
Areas to improve
- Time management in rapid games. Allocate your clock to ensure you’re not scrambling in the middlegame or endgame; practice budgeting 1–2 minutes per key decision and sticking to a simple plan when under time pressure.
- Endgame conversion. Work on common rook and minor piece endgames so small advantages convert into wins more often.
- Midgame decision quality. When you win or lose a pawn, have a clear plan rather than trading into an unclear structure—aim to keep or create a small, concrete plan (active king, open files, targeted weaknesses).
- Pattern recognition and tactical discipline. Increase exposure to tactical motifs (pins, forks, double attacks) through focused puzzles to reduce blunders in tight positions.
- Opening choice alignment with style. Some lines show better results for you than others. Consider leaning into the sharper, more forcing lines you’re comfortable with (like the Hungarian or certain Goblin setups) while filling gaps in quieter, positional lines you struggle with.
Concrete plan for the next two weeks
- Daily tactics practice (15–20 minutes). Focus on motifs such as forks, pins, discovered attacks, back-rank issues, and endings that frequently appear in rapid games.
- Opening study (2 sessions per week, ~30 minutes each) on your two preferred sharp lines: Hungarian Opening and Dresden Opening: The Goblin. Annotate typical middlegame plans and common pitfalls, so you have ready-made ideas to apply in games.
- Endgame focus (2 sessions per week, ~25 minutes). Practice rook endgames and king activity typical in rapid games; learn a simple plan for converting rook endings when you’re ahead or simplifying when behind.
- Post-game reflection. After every rapid game, write 1–2 lessons you learned and one concrete adjustment you will try in the next game.
Quick tips you can apply in your next game
- Before the 15th move, establish a clear plan for the middlegame based on the opening you chose. Do not rush into trades that simplify into less favorable endgames.
- If you’re running low on time, switch to a simpler plan: target opponent weaknesses, control key files, and avoid speculative tactical sequences unless you’re sure of the tactic.
- Keep a small notebook or mental checklist for common endgame patterns you encounter in rapid games, so you can convert advantages more reliably.
Profile and opening notes (optional)
For quick reference, you can review your recent opening choices and performance. If you’d like, I can tailor a quick opening plan based on your preferences and recent results. kendrickknowles
Potential opening focus areas to explore: Caro-Kann Defense, Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit, and Dresden Opening: The Goblin.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nurymkhan | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| dbaltazar1 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| zomdsroyale | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| the_dugler | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| pedaradovanovic | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| bisken | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| benjy1518 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| kylextream | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| mushtaque786 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| chesspunks-fan17 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| nick5446 | 5W / 18L / 1D | |
| caindoy | 6W / 15L / 1D | |
| astorani40 | 4W / 17L / 0D | |
| korner | 5W / 15L / 0D | |
| mostlylose | 12W / 7L / 0D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 1687 | |||
| 2024 | 1865 | |||
| 2023 | 1728 | 1563 | ||
| 2022 | 1831 | 1860 | ||
| 2021 | 1821 | 1805 | ||
| 2020 | 1662 | 1926 | ||
| 2019 | 1878 | 1494 | ||
| 2018 | 1446 | 1615 | ||
| 2017 | 1465 | 1726 | ||
| 2016 | 1419 | 1714 | ||
| 2015 | 1829 | 1564 | 1634 | |
| 2014 | 1795 | 1776 | ||
| 2013 | 1240 | 1487 | 1514 | |
| 2012 | 1180 | 1459 | 1420 | |
| 2011 | 1092 | 1459 | 1484 | 990 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 497W / 527L / 46D | 480W / 543L / 55D | 66.1 |
| 2024 | 37W / 31L / 4D | 30W / 38L / 4D | 69.2 |
| 2023 | 139W / 159L / 13D | 126W / 180L / 7D | 61.8 |
| 2022 | 127W / 128L / 11D | 114W / 161L / 4D | 65.4 |
| 2021 | 46W / 74L / 13D | 47W / 83L / 7D | 65.3 |
| 2020 | 141W / 157L / 13D | 131W / 168L / 14D | 65.7 |
| 2019 | 221W / 281L / 25D | 218W / 306L / 16D | 61.7 |
| 2018 | 168W / 251L / 18D | 174W / 236L / 10D | 60.8 |
| 2017 | 144W / 175L / 7D | 130W / 181L / 10D | 61.2 |
| 2016 | 183W / 223L / 21D | 169W / 246L / 18D | 64.3 |
| 2015 | 82W / 134L / 6D | 82W / 133L / 9D | 63.4 |
| 2014 | 196W / 254L / 22D | 177W / 261L / 25D | 64.0 |
| 2013 | 166W / 174L / 11D | 119W / 208L / 11D | 64.7 |
| 2012 | 574W / 769L / 44D | 532W / 809L / 43D | 67.0 |
| 2011 | 435W / 469L / 30D | 362W / 515L / 31D | 65.6 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 967 | 412 | 521 | 34 | 42.6% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 678 | 284 | 361 | 33 | 41.9% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 527 | 228 | 280 | 19 | 43.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 472 | 231 | 227 | 14 | 48.9% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 381 | 173 | 195 | 13 | 45.4% |
| Modern | 375 | 160 | 205 | 10 | 42.7% |
| Döry Defense | 353 | 158 | 180 | 15 | 44.8% |
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 344 | 156 | 172 | 16 | 45.4% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 269 | 102 | 158 | 9 | 37.9% |
| Australian Defense | 239 | 114 | 115 | 10 | 47.7% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dresden Opening: The Goblin | 300 | 133 | 158 | 9 | 44.3% |
| Barnes Defense | 239 | 97 | 134 | 8 | 40.6% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 203 | 76 | 121 | 6 | 37.4% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 198 | 73 | 117 | 8 | 36.9% |
| Modern | 191 | 70 | 117 | 4 | 36.6% |
| Sicilian Defense | 160 | 75 | 82 | 3 | 46.9% |
| Philidor Defense | 155 | 58 | 93 | 4 | 37.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 89 | 39 | 47 | 3 | 43.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 84 | 26 | 53 | 5 | 30.9% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 80 | 25 | 53 | 2 | 31.2% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scandinavian Defense | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Ruy Lopez: Old Steinitz Defense, Semi-Duras Variation | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| French Defense | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Barnes Opening: Walkerling | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Sozin Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| QGD: 4.Nf3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Fegatello Attack, Leonhardt Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| English Opening: Carls-Bremen System | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 15 | 0 |
| Losing | 17 | 1 |