Intro
Arsal Gardezi is a rising chess talent celebrated for a blistering Blitz style and a quick wit at the board. A titled player who earned the National Master title from National, Arsal blends sharp calculation with a calm, almost classroom-like patience in the heat of a speed game. Off the board he enjoys puzzles, memes, and the odd coffee that somehow survives a tense rapid duel. arsalgardezi
Titles and Recognition
- National Master, awarded by National
- Peak Blitz rating: 2427 (2025-08-26)
- Peak Bullet rating: 2534 (2022-07-16)
- Longest winning streak: 17 games
- Longest losing streak: 15 games
- Current Winning Streak: 1
- Current Losing Streak: 0
- Preferred time control: Blitz
- 2427 (2025-08-26)
For a quick visual of his rating journey, see the
.Playing Style
Arsal is known for resilient endgames and a fearless approach to complications. He boasts an endgame frequency around 67.8% and a relatively low EarlyResignation rate at 9.18%, preferring to grind out wins rather than settle for premature draws. His tactical awareness shines in comeback scenarios, with a Comeback Rate of 77.92% when behind in material. He enjoys Blitz and Bullet for dynamic, time-pressure battles that test both nerves and creativity.
Time of day and rhythm matter: his data points toward productive play around the early hours, with a notable trend around 06:00. Blitz
Persona and Milestones
Humor, focus, and a never-say-die attitude define Arsal’s presence at the board. He treats each game as a short story with an unexpected plot twist, often turning tight situations into learning moments. His profile is a testament to steady growth across time controls, with particular strength in Blitz and Bullet formats. To explore more about his journey, see his profile above. arsalgardezi
What you’re doing well
You show solid early development and king safety in many blitz games. In several hands you focus on quick piece activity, develop your minor pieces smoothly, and keep your king tucked in safely with quick castling. When tactical chances arise, you’re able to spot forcing lines and convert them to decisive outcomes on the clock.
- You often reach a playable middlegame with a clear plan rather than wandering aimlessly, which helps in blitz where time is tight.
- You handle typical blitz rhythms well, keeping pressure on when you find a good pawn break or a tactical shot.
- You have demonstrated strong performance in several opening frameworks, especially in familiar positional setups where you know the typical middlegame ideas.
Key improvements to focus on
- Endgame technique: In longer blitz sequences, you can tighten the transition to rook and pawn endgames. Practice common rook endings and king activity with a small set of known plans to convert extra pawns or simplify safely.
- Tactical accuracy and blunder avoidance: In some games, a missed tactic or an unclear recapture cost you material. Allocate a few seconds to verify whether a move creates a direct threat, recapture, or tactical trap for your opponent before committing.
- Time management and pacing: Develop a steady opening tempo. Try to finish the opening phase with at least a couple of minutes on the clock for the middle game. Use a simple rule like “spend no more than a fixed amount of time per 10 moves” to avoid ending up in time trouble.
- Consistent plan after the 15th move: In blitz, it’s easy to drift. After the 15th move, articulate a concrete plan (piece improvements, target weaknesses, or a pawn break) and align your next few moves with that plan.
Opening performance insights
Your data shows stronger results in certain White openings and solid performance in a few Black defenses. Based on the numbers provided, consider these practical directions:
- White: Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation has a healthy win rate. Lean into a simple, reliable Colle-style repertoire as a go-to, especially in fast games where you prefer clear plans and solid structure.
- White: Amar Gambit and London System variants show competitive results. Use these as supplementary options to keep your opponents guessing, but be ready with typical middlegame ideas so you don’t get stuck in unfamiliar positions.
- Black: French Defense (especially the Exchange Variation) and French-related lines show decent results. If you like solid, structured games, keep a prepared plan for the exchanges and typical pawn structures, so you can navigate to favorable endgames.
- Avoid overreliance on the truly unknown set: The Unknown category has a lower-confidence signal. When facing less familiar lines, rely on sound generic principles (develop, control the center, keep king safe, look for a clear plan) rather than trying speculative tactics.
Rating and trend context
Your trend data shows a positive mid-term trajectory with gains across the 3- and 6-month windows, while the 12-month view dips slightly. This pattern suggests you’re making meaningful improvements in recent play, but long-term consistency could be strengthened. A focused, repeatable training routine will help stabilize gains and reduce variance in blitz results.
Practical two-week training plan
- Daily tactical puzzles: 15–20 minutes solving puzzles focused on spotting threats, forcing sequences, and simple calculations (3–4 move horizons).
- Endgame practice: 2 short sessions per week on rook endings and basic king-pawn endings. Use 10–15 minutes per session with a few randomly chosen endgame positions.
- Opening focus: Pick 2 White openings to specialize (Colle System variants you’re comfortable with) and 2 Black defences (French Exchange and a solid Kings Indian Attack setup). Spend 20–30 minutes reviewing typical middlegame plans, common pawn breaks, and typical piece maneuvers for each.
- Post-game review: For every blitz session, write down 2–3 concrete takeaways from the game (both mistakes to avoid and ideas to repeat). If possible, annotate one recent game with the aim of highlighting a better plan 3–4 moves ahead.
- Time-check routine: In every game, make a quick keepsake of time at move 10 and move 25. If you’re under time pressure, switch to “safe moves” that maintain position rather than chasing win lines.
Optional notes and placeholders
If you’d like, we can attach specific game records or PGN snippets to your plan to analyze key moments. Placeholder previews can be inserted for targeted study, such as annotated lines from the two openings you choose to prioritize, or a short post-game summary for your next practice session.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| brassatt | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| salem7523 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| nullisium | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| dragonxchess | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ghouldep | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| trumpid | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| ttb0855 | 0W / 1L / 0D | |
| sicilian_player123 | 1W / 0L / 0D | |
| temetriusjamalmorant | 212W / 184L / 52D | |
| yatomimochi | 2W / 0L / 0D | |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| temetriusjamalmorant | 212W / 184L / 52D | |
| Logan Clark Shafer | 123W / 99L / 36D | |
| dragonwizard02 | 37W / 111L / 9D | |
| Sharvesh Deviprasath | 68W / 62L / 5D | |
| roman_navarro | 79W / 33L / 8D | |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2318 | 2327 | 2025 | |
| 2024 | 2250 | 2344 | 1847 | |
| 2023 | 2229 | 2110 | 1847 | 1600 |
| 2022 | 2146 | 2344 | 1905 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 196W / 217L / 32D | 198W / 236L / 32D | 72.0 |
| 2024 | 138W / 139L / 22D | 136W / 151L / 24D | 75.1 |
| 2023 | 614W / 602L / 46D | 565W / 660L / 61D | 61.0 |
| 2022 | 429W / 318L / 31D | 381W / 380L / 40D | 71.5 |
Openings: Most Played
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 387 | 177 | 206 | 4 | 45.7% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 148 | 80 | 61 | 7 | 54.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 87 | 43 | 39 | 5 | 49.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 84 | 42 | 40 | 2 | 50.0% |
| King's Indian Attack | 67 | 33 | 30 | 4 | 49.2% |
| French Defense: Exchange Variation | 61 | 33 | 24 | 4 | 54.1% |
| French Defense | 58 | 26 | 30 | 2 | 44.8% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 56 | 20 | 29 | 7 | 35.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 54 | 27 | 27 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 54 | 26 | 22 | 6 | 48.1% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 229 | 120 | 97 | 12 | 52.4% |
| Amar Gambit | 206 | 102 | 94 | 10 | 49.5% |
| King's Indian Attack | 117 | 50 | 61 | 6 | 42.7% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 117 | 56 | 55 | 6 | 47.9% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 115 | 45 | 66 | 4 | 39.1% |
| Modern | 104 | 60 | 42 | 2 | 57.7% |
| Australian Defense | 86 | 39 | 43 | 4 | 45.4% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 79 | 47 | 30 | 2 | 59.5% |
| Barnes Defense | 49 | 26 | 20 | 3 | 53.1% |
| Döry Defense | 44 | 14 | 29 | 1 | 31.8% |
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 55.6% |
| Italian Game: Two Knights Defense | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Blackburne Shilling Gambit | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| French Defense: Classical Variation, Svenonius Variation | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 40.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Amazon Attack | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Italian Game: Classical Variation, Ghulam-Kassim Variation | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Bishop's Opening: Vienna Hybrid, Hromádka Variation | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Döry Defense | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
| Sicilian Defense: Alapin Variation, Sherzer Variation | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0% |
| Scandinavian Defense | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 17 | 1 |
| Losing | 15 | 0 |