Avatar of Alejandro González Vega

Alejandro González Vega FM

ChessVegaAcademy Chicago Since 2014 (Active) Chess.com ♟♟♟♟♟
47.3%- 48.3%- 4.5%
Bullet 2105
3531W 3698L 240D
Blitz 2341
1157W 1093L 202D
Rapid 2056
2W 0L 0D
Daily 981
1W 0L 0D
Coach Chesswick's Profile Photo
Coach Chesswick

Quick summary for Alejandro González Vega

Nice session — you converted two wins by creating active attacks and sometimes benefited from opponents flagging in time trouble. You showed sharp tactical vision in several games (winning material and delivering mates). At the same time a few clear tactical oversights and a couple of back‑rank/queen infiltration patterns cost you immediate losses. Below are specific positives, concrete mistakes to fix, and a short practice plan you can follow over the next two weeks.

Highlights — what you did well

  • Consistent attacking intent: you pushed kingside play and used your queen and rooks actively to open lines and create mating threats.
  • Good piece coordination: bishops and queen often combined to create tactical pressure and win decisive material.
  • Practical time management in bullet: you convert flags and apply clock pressure — an important skill in 1|0 games.
  • Repertoire familiarity: regular play in Scandinavian and Sicilian lines gives you practical edge from move knowledge.

Key weaknesses to fix

  • Single-move tactical oversights: a recurring theme is missing an opponent's forcing sequence (checks, forks, back‑rank mates) that immediately flips the evaluation.
  • Calculation under severe time pressure: the clock sometimes causes you to play candidate moves without checking the opponent’s only forcing reply.
  • Back-rank and loose-piece awareness: several losses come from leaving the back rank unsecured or allowing a queen/rook infiltration—build a quick pre-move safety check.
  • Over-reliance on flagging: winning on time is useful but masks recurring tactical or conversion weaknesses; aim to convert advantages earlier.

Concrete drills and practice plan (2 weeks)

  • Daily tactics (12–18 minutes): focus on back‑rank mates, mating nets, pins and forks. Short, high-volume practice works best for bullet improvement.
  • Blunder-check routine: before each move ask — "Any checks? Any captures? Any hanging pieces?" Make this a 2‑second habit.
  • Play structure: 4 blitz games (3|0 or 5|0) and 8 bullet games (1|0) per session, but always review the losses — find the single move that changed the evaluation.
  • Opening tidy-up (15 minutes): reinforce key lines in the Scandinavian Defense and Sicilian Defense: O'Kelly Variation — learn typical tactical motifs that appear from those openings.
  • Weekly game review: pick the worst loss of the week and do a 10–15 minute post‑mortem, writing down what you missed and how to avoid it next time.

Short checklist to use during games

  • Quick scan before playing a move: checks, captures, hanging pieces, back-rank weaknesses (1–2 seconds).
  • If you see an attack, ask "Can I force a simplification or tactic in 1–3 moves?" If not, improve piece placement first.
  • When ahead on the clock: avoid speculative sacrifices; use extra time to verify tactics thoroughly.
  • Endgame in bullet: prioritize safe conversion (trade down when ahead) rather than hunting flashy mates with little time.

Small targeted exercises (this week)

  • Back‑rank drill: solve 20 puzzles in a row that end in back‑rank mate or require back‑rank defense.
  • Speed tactical sprints: 10 two‑minute puzzle runs — aim to improve accuracy and speed each day.
  • One deep review: play one 5|0 game and spend 20 minutes annotating the critical middle game and any blunders.

Mindset & longer-term steps

  • Accept the recent rating dip as feedback — the numbers show you're close to your expected level. Tightening up tactical checks will give a large rating impact.
  • Strength-adjusted win rate near 50% means your play is fundamentally sound; remove the one-move blunders and you'll climb back quickly.
  • Add a weekly 10–20 minute endgame basics session (king+pawn vs king, basic rook endgames) to convert material advantages more reliably.

Opponents and quick pointers

  • Win vs soumen1234 — advantage came from energetic kingside play and forcing lines; review when you have time to see where simplification could have finished sooner.
  • Win vs grandgator — strong queen activity; good conversion after winning material.
  • Loss vs juggrnaut — classic queen infiltration/back-rank finishing pattern; add back‑rank drills to avoid repeats.

Next 3 actionable steps (today)

  • 15-minute tactics session focused on back‑rank and mating-net puzzles.
  • Play three 3|0 games and after each loss, identify the single move you missed that changed the evaluation.
  • Spend 10 minutes refreshing ideas in your Scandinavian and O'Kelly Sicilian lines (common tactical traps and typical endgames).

How I can help next

  • Annotate one of your recent games move‑by‑move and highlight recurring mistakes.
  • Create a 2‑week training plan tailored to your openings and tactical weaknesses.
  • Generate 30 custom puzzles focused on mating nets and back‑rank defenses drawn from your games.

Tell me which option you prefer and I’ll prepare it.


Report a Problem