Narquingden Reyes
FIDE Master – Chess Virtuoso & Tactical Magician
Meet Narquingden Reyes, the chess player who probably dreams in openings and thinks in endgames. Awarded the prestigious title of FIDE Master, Narquingden is no stranger to intense battles on 64 squares, dazzling opponents with a tactical awareness so sharp it could slice through a queen’s defenses.
Known for an incredible comeback rate of over 93% and a flawless 100% win rate after losing a piece, Narquingden turns setbacks into setups like a true chess alchemist. Their longest winning streak? A jaw-dropping 18 consecutive wins, proving resilience isn’t just a skill; it’s an art form.
Narquingden thrives in rapid and blitz formats with earnings and ratings that climb steadily year after year: from a Blitz max rating of 2712 in 2023 to an impressive Rapid peak of 2329 in 2025. Whether it’s bullet (max 2735) or daily chess, this player’s consistency and commitment manifest in over 2,700 blitz games and a blitz winning percentage nudging 57%—not for the faint-hearted!
Their style is a delightful blend of patience and aggression. With an average game length pushing into the 80+ moves, and an endgame frequency exceeding 85%, Narquingden clearly enjoys the long chess marathon just as much as quick tactical strikes. White pieces? They boast a solid 58% win rate, and with Black, they’re no slouches either at 54%.
Besides a razor-sharp mind, this player modestly admits to a “tilt factor” of 8—because even chess maestros have their off days (don’t we all?). Yet they consistently keep calm under pressure, seldom resigning early (under 1% early resignation rate) and showing psychological fortitude that many can only aspire to.
Fun fact: Narquingden’s most feared opponents range from “jake_pcap” to “scarlet_fate,” boasting win rates that make chess adversaries sweat. Plus, Narquingden has a knack for evening the score against the same foes multiple times, suggesting they never back down from a rematch.
In short, Narquingden Reyes isn’t just playing chess—they’re remodeling it with every game. So next time you see their name on the board, brace yourself: a strategic storm is about to hit, crowned by the calm assuredness of a true FIDE Master.
Overview and approach for improvement
You play blitz with sharp energy and good practical resourcefulness. You often fight back in dynamic positions and keep your pieces active, even when the position becomes chaotic. To keep trending upward in blitz, focus on three pillars: time management, a concise opening repertoire, and solid endgame technique.
What you are doing well
- Your tactical alertness helps you generate counterplay in complicated middlegames. You spot forcing moves and create practical chances even when the board is messy.
- You stay resilient in defense and often find solid defensive resources when under pressure, which keeps games drifting into practical endgames rather than quick losses.
- You show ambition to convert even small advantages into wins, especially in positions with open lines and active rooks.
Key areas to improve
- Time management in blitz: develop a simple clock discipline. Try to finish the opening phase with a healthy but controlled amount of time left and reserve the critical moments for the middlegame where you decide the plan.
- Opening consistency: pick 2–3 openings you enjoy and study their typical middlegame plans and pawn structures. A tighter repertoire helps you avoid spending time on unfamiliar lines in the heat of a game.
- Endgame technique: in long blitz sequences, practice common rook endgames and king activity patterns. Learn how to activate rooks on open files and how to maximize king safety while pushing for a convertable edge.
- Tactical pattern recognition: commit to short daily puzzle work (15–20 minutes) focusing on forks, pins, skewers, and discovered attacks. This trains your eye for blitz opportunities and reduces overthinking.
Observations from your recent games
- Recent wins and draws show you can press in open, tactical settings; use that energy to drive clearer plans after the opening instead of trading into uncertain endings.
- Times when accuracy dropped often came from pushing tactical lines without a solid plan or enough time to verify the idea. When ahead in material or activity, simplify to reduce error risk and convert advantage steadily.
- In drawn or closely contested endgames, a small improvement in king activity and control of key files can be the difference between a draw and a win. Aim to activate the rooks first and keep the strongest piece centralized.
Suggested practice plan for the coming week
- Daily: 15 minutes of tactical puzzles focused on common blitz themes (forks, pins, skewers, discovered attacks) and 15 minutes of endgame drills (rook endings, central king activity).
- Blitz routine: play 5–7 blitz games, then review two critical moments from each game to identify one improvement point per game.
- Opening focus: choose two openings you enjoy (for example, a solid system for White and a dynamic reply for Black) and prepare a one-page cheat sheet with typical plans, key square ideas, and common traps.
Momentum and rating trends in plain terms
Your recent numbers show positive movement, with a one-month rating change of +32, a three-month change of +11, and a six-month change of +5. The trend slopes indicate you are generally moving upward, though the rate of improvement has varied. Aim to translate that momentum into consistent daily practice so the gains become steadier over time. For reference, the one-month slope is about 2.35 points per day, the three-month slope is around 8, and the twelve-month trend is gradually positive as well.
Opening performance snapshots
You have some openings with strong results in your dataset, and others where you’re still building comfort. Consider leaning more on the higher-performing options and completing your understanding of their typical middlegame plans. Examples to explore deeply include moves and structures associated with:
East Indian Defense, Modern, and Australian Defense patterns, which have shown favorable results in your history. You can study these through practical games and focused drills, and then test them in blitz to build familiarity.
To keep the plan actionable, you could label two openings you’ll rely on in blitz and keep a short, practical note on plans for each.
Placeholder references for quick review:
East Indian Defense, Modern, Australian Defense.
Concrete next steps
- Pick two openings to standardize your blitz repertoire and write a one-page plan for each, including typical piece placements and endgame ideas.
- Dedicate a fixed 30-minute daily window to blitz review: 10 minutes tactical puzzles, 10 minutes endgame drills, 10 minutes game review focusing on a single improvement point per game.
- When you sense time pressure rising, shift toward simpler, forcing moves and straightforward plans rather than complex tactical ideas that require deep calculation.
🆚 Opponent Insights
| Recent Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| penetrators666 | 15W / 2L / 4D | View |
| 🪳🪲Just a glamorous cockroach | 4W / 3L / 0D | View |
| gmfyhr1 | 1W / 4L / 1D | View |
| thechessprodigy_2014 | 0W / 1L / 0D | View |
| puracat | 0W / 1L / 1D | View |
| Thomas Morais | 0W / 2L / 1D | View |
| theunderwatertroll | 1W / 0L / 0D | View |
| honorthehawk | 3W / 0L / 0D | View |
| slepstari | 2W / 1L / 1D | View |
| eyeofthetiger1204 | 0W / 2L / 1D | View |
| Most Played Opponents | ||
|---|---|---|
| Marc Paraguya | 50W / 12L / 5D | View Games |
| chesterreyes | 25W / 28L / 11D | View Games |
| Cherry Ann Mejia | 50W / 3L / 9D | View Games |
| gm_butanding | 33W / 20L / 7D | View Games |
| scarlet_fate | 29W / 10L / 0D | View Games |
Rating
| Year | Bullet | Blitz | Rapid | Daily |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2751 | 2751 | 2283 | |
| 2024 | 2706 | 2700 | 2318 | 2008 |
| 2023 | 2712 | 2702 | 2228 | 2008 |
| 2022 | 2652 | 2650 | 2169 | |
| 2021 | 2625 | 2557 | 2079 | |
| 2020 | 2504 | 2659 | 1986 | |
| 2019 | 2612 | |||
| 2018 | 2614 | 2591 | 2014 | |
| 2017 | 2607 | 2519 | 2052 |
Stats by Year
| Year | White | Black | Moves |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 203W / 125L / 27D | 194W / 153L / 47D | 85.1 |
| 2024 | 105W / 58L / 16D | 129W / 81L / 25D | 87.1 |
| 2023 | 70W / 46L / 13D | 136W / 60L / 45D | 85.5 |
| 2022 | 111W / 48L / 52D | 136W / 72L / 48D | 89.1 |
| 2021 | 90W / 45L / 61D | 94W / 58L / 36D | 90.6 |
| 2020 | 110W / 45L / 24D | 94W / 47L / 28D | 86.1 |
| 2019 | 5W / 0L / 0D | 7W / 0L / 0D | 52.6 |
| 2018 | 49W / 26L / 18D | 48W / 25L / 17D | 78.1 |
| 2017 | 214W / 65L / 28D | 178W / 91L / 39D | 83.2 |
Openings: Most Played
| Rapid Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 52 | 27 | 8 | 17 | 51.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 21 | 10 | 4 | 7 | 47.6% |
| English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System | 16 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 43.8% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 14 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 71.4% |
| Amazon Attack | 14 | 7 | 2 | 5 | 50.0% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 13 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 46.1% |
| Modern | 11 | 7 | 0 | 4 | 63.6% |
| East Indian Defense | 11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 27.3% |
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 11 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 36.4% |
| Slav Defense | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 60.0% |
| Blitz Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense | 144 | 79 | 41 | 24 | 54.9% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 132 | 74 | 39 | 19 | 56.1% |
| East Indian Defense | 77 | 48 | 19 | 10 | 62.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 75 | 40 | 29 | 6 | 53.3% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 73 | 46 | 21 | 6 | 63.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 49 | 32 | 16 | 1 | 65.3% |
| Modern | 44 | 32 | 9 | 3 | 72.7% |
| Australian Defense | 44 | 31 | 7 | 6 | 70.5% |
| Slav Defense: Quiet Variation, Amsterdam Variation | 43 | 23 | 16 | 4 | 53.5% |
| Amazon Attack | 39 | 26 | 6 | 7 | 66.7% |
| Bullet Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colle System: Rhamphorhynchus Variation | 70 | 41 | 26 | 3 | 58.6% |
| Modern | 66 | 35 | 30 | 1 | 53.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 58 | 29 | 22 | 7 | 50.0% |
| Nimzo-Larsen Attack | 57 | 31 | 22 | 4 | 54.4% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 56 | 31 | 19 | 6 | 55.4% |
| Hungarian Opening: Wiedenhagen-Beta Gambit | 55 | 34 | 18 | 3 | 61.8% |
| Alekhine Defense | 53 | 20 | 27 | 6 | 37.7% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 48 | 30 | 15 | 3 | 62.5% |
| Australian Defense | 39 | 24 | 11 | 4 | 61.5% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 37 | 23 | 11 | 3 | 62.2% |
| Daily Opening | Games | Wins | Losses | Draws | Win Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Caro-Kann Defense: Classical Variation | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 12.5% |
| Slav Defense: Bonet Gambit | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
| Amazon Attack: Siberian Attack | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 33.3% |
| Caro-Kann Defense | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 83.3% |
| Modern | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 66.7% |
| Sicilian Defense: Closed | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| London System: Poisoned Pawn Variation | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 60.0% |
| Caro-Kann Defense: Exchange Variation | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 25.0% |
| East Indian Defense | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 25.0% |
| Amar Gambit | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 66.7% |
🔥 Streaks
| Streak | Longest | Current |
|---|---|---|
| Winning | 18 | 1 |
| Losing | 9 | 0 |